Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis Complications: What to Use When First-Line Treatment Fails-A Consensus of Systemic Sclerosis Experts
Identifieur interne : 000006 ( PascalFrancis/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000005; suivant : 000007Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis Complications: What to Use When First-Line Treatment Fails-A Consensus of Systemic Sclerosis Experts
Auteurs : Kyle M. Walker [Irlande (pays)] ; Janet Pope [Canada]Source :
- Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism [ 0049-0172 ] ; 2012.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Objectives: There is a need for standardization in systemic sclerosis (SSc) management. Methods: SSc experts (n = 117) were sent 3 surveys to gain consensus for SSc management. Results: First-line therapy for scleroderma renal crisis (SRC) was an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi). For SRC there were not many differences between treating mild or severe SRC. In general, Second-line was to add either a calcium channel blocker (CCB) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) and then an alpha-blocker (66% agreed). Endothelin receptor agonists (ERAs) were the first treatment in mild pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) (72%), followed by adding a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE5i) (77%) and then a prostanoid (73%). For severe PAH, initial treatment was 1 of the following: a prostanoid (49%), combination of a ERA and a PDE5i (18%), or combination of a ERA and a prostanoid (16%) (71% agreed). For mild Raynaud's phenomenon (RF), after a CCB and adding a PDE5i (35%), trying an ARB (32%) and finally a prostanoid (23%) was suggested. For more severe RF, 54% agreed on adding a PDE5i (45%) or prostanoid (32%) to a CCB. In the prevention of digital ulcers (DU), initial treatment was a CCB (73%), then adding a PDE5i, then use of a ERA, and then a prostanoid (44% agreed). In interstitial lung disease/pulmonary fibrosis, for induction, usually intravenous cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or azathioprine were chosen. For maintenance, MMF was chosen by three-fourths (56% agreed). For gastroesophageal reflux disease, >50% would exceed the maximum recommended proton pump inhibitor dose if required (72% agreed). For skin involvement after methotrexate, MMF was usually chosen (37% agreement). For SSC-related inflammatory arthritis, methotrexate therapy (60%) was followed by adding corticosteroids (37%) or hydroxychloroquine (31%) (62% agreed). Conclusions: Discrepancies in drug choices occurred in treatment after first line in SSc. Not all algorithms had good agreement. This study provides some guidance for SSc management.
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:12-0332401Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis Complications: What to Use When First-Line Treatment Fails-A Consensus of Systemic Sclerosis Experts</title>
<author><name sortKey="Walker, Kyle M" sort="Walker, Kyle M" uniqKey="Walker K" first="Kyle M." last="Walker">Kyle M. Walker</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Trinity College, Dublin</s1>
<s2>Dublin</s2>
<s3>IRL</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Irlande (pays)</country>
<wicri:noRegion>Dublin</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Pope, Janet" sort="Pope, Janet" uniqKey="Pope J" first="Janet" last="Pope">Janet Pope</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>University of Western Ontario</s1>
<s2>London, ON</s2>
<s3>CAN</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Canada</country>
<wicri:noRegion>University of Western Ontario</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">12-0332401</idno>
<date when="2012">2012</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 12-0332401 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:12-0332401</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000008</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Curation">000058</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Checkpoint">000006</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PascalFrancis" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000006</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis Complications: What to Use When First-Line Treatment Fails-A Consensus of Systemic Sclerosis Experts</title>
<author><name sortKey="Walker, Kyle M" sort="Walker, Kyle M" uniqKey="Walker K" first="Kyle M." last="Walker">Kyle M. Walker</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Trinity College, Dublin</s1>
<s2>Dublin</s2>
<s3>IRL</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Irlande (pays)</country>
<wicri:noRegion>Dublin</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Pope, Janet" sort="Pope, Janet" uniqKey="Pope J" first="Janet" last="Pope">Janet Pope</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>University of Western Ontario</s1>
<s2>London, ON</s2>
<s3>CAN</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Canada</country>
<wicri:noRegion>University of Western Ontario</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Semin. arthritis rheum.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0049-0172</idno>
<imprint><date when="2012">2012</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Semin. arthritis rheum.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0049-0172</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Algorithm</term>
<term>Complication</term>
<term>Rheumatology</term>
<term>Scleroderma</term>
<term>Treatment</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Traitement</term>
<term>Sclérodermie</term>
<term>Complication</term>
<term>Algorithme</term>
<term>Rhumatologie</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Objectives: There is a need for standardization in systemic sclerosis (SSc) management. Methods: SSc experts (n = 117) were sent 3 surveys to gain consensus for SSc management. Results: First-line therapy for scleroderma renal crisis (SRC) was an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi). For SRC there were not many differences between treating mild or severe SRC. In general, Second-line was to add either a calcium channel blocker (CCB) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) and then an alpha-blocker (66% agreed). Endothelin receptor agonists (ERAs) were the first treatment in mild pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) (72%), followed by adding a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE5i) (77%) and then a prostanoid (73%). For severe PAH, initial treatment was 1 of the following: a prostanoid (49%), combination of a ERA and a PDE5i (18%), or combination of a ERA and a prostanoid (16%) (71% agreed). For mild Raynaud's phenomenon (RF), after a CCB and adding a PDE5i (35%), trying an ARB (32%) and finally a prostanoid (23%) was suggested. For more severe RF, 54% agreed on adding a PDE5i (45%) or prostanoid (32%) to a CCB. In the prevention of digital ulcers (DU), initial treatment was a CCB (73%), then adding a PDE5i, then use of a ERA, and then a prostanoid (44% agreed). In interstitial lung disease/pulmonary fibrosis, for induction, usually intravenous cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or azathioprine were chosen. For maintenance, MMF was chosen by three-fourths (56% agreed). For gastroesophageal reflux disease, >50% would exceed the maximum recommended proton pump inhibitor dose if required (72% agreed). For skin involvement after methotrexate, MMF was usually chosen (37% agreement). For SSC-related inflammatory arthritis, methotrexate therapy (60%) was followed by adding corticosteroids (37%) or hydroxychloroquine (31%) (62% agreed). Conclusions: Discrepancies in drug choices occurred in treatment after first line in SSc. Not all algorithms had good agreement. This study provides some guidance for SSc management.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0049-0172</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>SAHRBF</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Semin. arthritis rheum.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>42</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>1</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis Complications: What to Use When First-Line Treatment Fails-A Consensus of Systemic Sclerosis Experts</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>WALKER (Kyle M.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>POPE (Janet)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Trinity College, Dublin</s1>
<s2>Dublin</s2>
<s3>IRL</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>University of Western Ontario</s1>
<s2>London, ON</s2>
<s3>CAN</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA17 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium (SCTC) <sup>1</sup>
and Canadian Scleroderma Research Group (CS<sub>RG</sub>
)<sub>2</sub>
</s1>
<s3>INC</s3>
</fA17>
<fA20><s1>42-55</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2012</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>15333</s2>
<s5>354000504409580060</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2012 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>28 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>12-0332401</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Objectives: There is a need for standardization in systemic sclerosis (SSc) management. Methods: SSc experts (n = 117) were sent 3 surveys to gain consensus for SSc management. Results: First-line therapy for scleroderma renal crisis (SRC) was an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi). For SRC there were not many differences between treating mild or severe SRC. In general, Second-line was to add either a calcium channel blocker (CCB) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) and then an alpha-blocker (66% agreed). Endothelin receptor agonists (ERAs) were the first treatment in mild pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) (72%), followed by adding a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE5i) (77%) and then a prostanoid (73%). For severe PAH, initial treatment was 1 of the following: a prostanoid (49%), combination of a ERA and a PDE5i (18%), or combination of a ERA and a prostanoid (16%) (71% agreed). For mild Raynaud's phenomenon (RF), after a CCB and adding a PDE5i (35%), trying an ARB (32%) and finally a prostanoid (23%) was suggested. For more severe RF, 54% agreed on adding a PDE5i (45%) or prostanoid (32%) to a CCB. In the prevention of digital ulcers (DU), initial treatment was a CCB (73%), then adding a PDE5i, then use of a ERA, and then a prostanoid (44% agreed). In interstitial lung disease/pulmonary fibrosis, for induction, usually intravenous cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or azathioprine were chosen. For maintenance, MMF was chosen by three-fourths (56% agreed). For gastroesophageal reflux disease, >50% would exceed the maximum recommended proton pump inhibitor dose if required (72% agreed). For skin involvement after methotrexate, MMF was usually chosen (37% agreement). For SSC-related inflammatory arthritis, methotrexate therapy (60%) was followed by adding corticosteroids (37%) or hydroxychloroquine (31%) (62% agreed). Conclusions: Discrepancies in drug choices occurred in treatment after first line in SSc. Not all algorithms had good agreement. This study provides some guidance for SSc management.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B15</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X"><s0>002B07</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Traitement</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Treatment</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Tratamiento</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Sclérodermie</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Scleroderma</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Esclerodermia</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Complication</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Complication</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Complicación</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Algorithme</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Algorithm</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Algoritmo</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Rhumatologie</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Rheumatology</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Reumatología</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Maladie autoimmune</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Autoimmune disease</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Enfermedad autoinmune</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Maladie de système</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Systemic disease</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Enfermedad sistémica</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Pathologie de la peau</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Skin disease</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Piel patología</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Pathologie du tissu conjonctif</s0>
<s5>40</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Connective tissue disease</s0>
<s5>40</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Tejido conjuntivo patología</s0>
<s5>40</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Immunopathologie</s0>
<s5>41</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Immunopathology</s0>
<s5>41</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Inmunopatología</s0>
<s5>41</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>254</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
</inist>
<affiliations><list><country><li>Canada</li>
<li>Irlande (pays)</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree><country name="Irlande (pays)"><noRegion><name sortKey="Walker, Kyle M" sort="Walker, Kyle M" uniqKey="Walker K" first="Kyle M." last="Walker">Kyle M. Walker</name>
</noRegion>
</country>
<country name="Canada"><noRegion><name sortKey="Pope, Janet" sort="Pope, Janet" uniqKey="Pope J" first="Janet" last="Pope">Janet Pope</name>
</noRegion>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/ChloroquineV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000006 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000006 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Sante |area= ChloroquineV1 |flux= PascalFrancis |étape= Checkpoint |type= RBID |clé= Pascal:12-0332401 |texte= Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis Complications: What to Use When First-Line Treatment Fails-A Consensus of Systemic Sclerosis Experts }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |