From General Laws To Singularities
Identifieur interne : 000952 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000951; suivant : 000953From General Laws To Singularities
Auteurs : Mony ElkaïmSource :
- Family Process [ 0014-7370 ] ; 1985-06.
Abstract
This article comprises several sections. The first is devoted to an explanation of a number of notions stemming from work by Ilya Prigogine and others on open systems far from equilibrium. As a result of this work, I have been able to stand back from the traditional approach employed in family therapy, that of open systems at equilibrium (the theory of Ludwig Bertalanffy). The second section describes a clinical example based on elements close to Prigogine's theories. In the third part I develop an approach that—although continuing to draw on Prigogine's work—is much more closely linked to the research I have carried out with Félix Guattari over recent years. In this part I attempt to study a level that, in my view, has too often been left outside the field of inquiry: that of couplings between “singularities” of members of the family system and the therapist. A clinical case is presented in which this “semiotic” level, as Guattari terms it, is used together with that of the “intrinsic rules” of the system. Finally, I propose a few avenues of inquiry and research on the basis of the concepts presented.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1985.00151.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:CFB013EBA1AFEBDC3638D4B1DE546DE8D5904D7BLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">From General Laws To Singularities</title><author><name sortKey="Elkaim, Mony" sort="Elkaim, Mony" uniqKey="Elkaim M" first="Mony" last="Elkaïm">Mony Elkaïm</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>President of the Institute for Family and Human Systems Studies, Square des Nations 5, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:CFB013EBA1AFEBDC3638D4B1DE546DE8D5904D7B</idno><date when="1985" year="1985">1985</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1545-5300.1985.00151.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/CFB013EBA1AFEBDC3638D4B1DE546DE8D5904D7B/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000952</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000952</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">From General Laws To Singularities</title><author><name sortKey="Elkaim, Mony" sort="Elkaim, Mony" uniqKey="Elkaim M" first="Mony" last="Elkaïm">Mony Elkaïm</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>President of the Institute for Family and Human Systems Studies, Square des Nations 5, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Family Process</title><idno type="ISSN">0014-7370</idno><idno type="eISSN">1545-5300</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1985-06">1985-06</date><biblScope unit="volume">24</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="151">151</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="164">164</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0014-7370</idno></series><idno type="istex">CFB013EBA1AFEBDC3638D4B1DE546DE8D5904D7B</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1545-5300.1985.00151.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">FAMP151</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0014-7370</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This article comprises several sections. The first is devoted to an explanation of a number of notions stemming from work by Ilya Prigogine and others on open systems far from equilibrium. As a result of this work, I have been able to stand back from the traditional approach employed in family therapy, that of open systems at equilibrium (the theory of Ludwig Bertalanffy). The second section describes a clinical example based on elements close to Prigogine's theories. In the third part I develop an approach that—although continuing to draw on Prigogine's work—is much more closely linked to the research I have carried out with Félix Guattari over recent years. In this part I attempt to study a level that, in my view, has too often been left outside the field of inquiry: that of couplings between “singularities” of members of the family system and the therapist. A clinical case is presented in which this “semiotic” level, as Guattari terms it, is used together with that of the “intrinsic rules” of the system. Finally, I propose a few avenues of inquiry and research on the basis of the concepts presented.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>MONY ELKAÏM M.D.</name><affiliations><json:string>President of the Institute for Family and Human Systems Studies, Square des Nations 5, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>FAMP151</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>This article comprises several sections. The first is devoted to an explanation of a number of notions stemming from work by Ilya Prigogine and others on open systems far from equilibrium. As a result of this work, I have been able to stand back from the traditional approach employed in family therapy, that of open systems at equilibrium (the theory of Ludwig Bertalanffy). The second section describes a clinical example based on elements close to Prigogine's theories. In the third part I develop an approach that—although continuing to draw on Prigogine's work—is much more closely linked to the research I have carried out with Félix Guattari over recent years. In this part I attempt to study a level that, in my view, has too often been left outside the field of inquiry: that of couplings between “singularities” of members of the family system and the therapist. A clinical case is presented in which this “semiotic” level, as Guattari terms it, is used together with that of the “intrinsic rules” of the system. Finally, I propose a few avenues of inquiry and research on the basis of the concepts presented.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.268</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>595 x 842 pts (A4)</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>1119</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>7131</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>38133</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>11</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>189</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>From General Laws To Singularities</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>24</volume><publisherId><json:string>FAMP</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>14</total><last>164</last><first>151</first></pages><issn><json:string>0014-7370</json:string></issn><issue>2</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1545-5300</json:string></eissn><title>Family Process</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1545-5300</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>social science</json:string><json:string>psychology, clinical</json:string><json:string>family studies</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>economic & social sciences</json:string><json:string>social sciences</json:string><json:string>family studies</json:string></scienceMetrix><inist><json:string>sciences humaines et sociales</json:string><json:string>philosophie</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>1985</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1985</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1545-5300.1985.00151.x</json:string></doi><id>CFB013EBA1AFEBDC3638D4B1DE546DE8D5904D7B</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/CFB013EBA1AFEBDC3638D4B1DE546DE8D5904D7B/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/CFB013EBA1AFEBDC3638D4B1DE546DE8D5904D7B/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/CFB013EBA1AFEBDC3638D4B1DE546DE8D5904D7B/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">From General Laws To Singularities</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>WILEY</p></availability><date>1985</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">From General Laws To Singularities</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">MONY</forename><surname>ELKAÏM</surname></persName><roleName type="degree">M.D.</roleName><affiliation>President of the Institute for Family and Human Systems Studies, Square des Nations 5, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Family Process</title><idno type="pISSN">0014-7370</idno><idno type="eISSN">1545-5300</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1545-5300</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1985-06"></date><biblScope unit="volume">24</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="151">151</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="164">164</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">CFB013EBA1AFEBDC3638D4B1DE546DE8D5904D7B</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1545-5300.1985.00151.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">FAMP151</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1985</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This article comprises several sections. The first is devoted to an explanation of a number of notions stemming from work by Ilya Prigogine and others on open systems far from equilibrium. As a result of this work, I have been able to stand back from the traditional approach employed in family therapy, that of open systems at equilibrium (the theory of Ludwig Bertalanffy). The second section describes a clinical example based on elements close to Prigogine's theories. In the third part I develop an approach that—although continuing to draw on Prigogine's work—is much more closely linked to the research I have carried out with Félix Guattari over recent years. In this part I attempt to study a level that, in my view, has too often been left outside the field of inquiry: that of couplings between “singularities” of members of the family system and the therapist. A clinical case is presented in which this “semiotic” level, as Guattari terms it, is used together with that of the “intrinsic rules” of the system. Finally, I propose a few avenues of inquiry and research on the basis of the concepts presented.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1985-06">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/CFB013EBA1AFEBDC3638D4B1DE546DE8D5904D7B/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1545-5300</doi><issn type="print">0014-7370</issn><issn type="electronic">1545-5300</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="FAMP"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="FAMILY PROCESS">Family Process</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="06002"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/famp.1985.24.issue-2</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="24">24</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="2">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="1985-06">June 1985</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="2" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1545-5300.1985.00151.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="FAMP151"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="14"></count></countGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2004-08-03"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2004-08-03"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.5 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-04-06"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-25"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="151">151</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="164">164</numbering></numberingGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:FAMP.FAMP151.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Manuscript received October 21, 1983; Revisions submitted June 5, 1984; Accepted August 3, 1984</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="referenceTotal" number="9"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="19"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="figureTotal" number="2"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">From General Laws To Singularities</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>MONY</givenNames><familyName>ELKAÏM</familyName><degrees>M.D.</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="BE"><unparsedAffiliation>President of the Institute for Family and Human Systems Studies, Square des Nations 5, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>This article comprises several sections. The first is devoted to an explanation of a number of notions stemming from work by Ilya Prigogine and others on open systems far from equilibrium. As a result of this work, I have been able to stand back from the traditional approach employed in family therapy, that of open systems at equilibrium (the theory of Ludwig Bertalanffy). The second section describes a clinical example based on elements close to Prigogine's theories. In the third part I develop an approach that—although continuing to draw on Prigogine's work—is much more closely linked to the research I have carried out with Félix Guattari over recent years. In this part I attempt to study a level that, in my view, has too often been left outside the field of inquiry: that of couplings between “singularities” of members of the family system and the therapist. A clinical case is presented in which this “semiotic” level, as Guattari terms it, is used together with that of the “intrinsic rules” of the system. Finally, I propose a few avenues of inquiry and research on the basis of the concepts presented.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>From General Laws To Singularities</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>From General Laws To Singularities</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">MONY</namePart><namePart type="family">ELKAÏM</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">M.D.</namePart><affiliation>President of the Institute for Family and Human Systems Studies, Square des Nations 5, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1985-06</dateIssued><edition>Manuscript received October 21, 1983; Revisions submitted June 5, 1984; Accepted August 3, 1984</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1985</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="figures">2</extent><extent unit="references">9</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">This article comprises several sections. The first is devoted to an explanation of a number of notions stemming from work by Ilya Prigogine and others on open systems far from equilibrium. As a result of this work, I have been able to stand back from the traditional approach employed in family therapy, that of open systems at equilibrium (the theory of Ludwig Bertalanffy). The second section describes a clinical example based on elements close to Prigogine's theories. In the third part I develop an approach that—although continuing to draw on Prigogine's work—is much more closely linked to the research I have carried out with Félix Guattari over recent years. In this part I attempt to study a level that, in my view, has too often been left outside the field of inquiry: that of couplings between “singularities” of members of the family system and the therapist. A clinical case is presented in which this “semiotic” level, as Guattari terms it, is used together with that of the “intrinsic rules” of the system. Finally, I propose a few avenues of inquiry and research on the basis of the concepts presented.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Family Process</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0014-7370</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1545-5300</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1545-5300</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">FAMP</identifier><part><date>1985</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>24</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>151</start><end>164</end><total>14</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">CFB013EBA1AFEBDC3638D4B1DE546DE8D5904D7B</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1545-5300.1985.00151.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">FAMP151</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Psychologie/explor/TherFamFrancoV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000952 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000952 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Psychologie
|area= TherFamFrancoV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:CFB013EBA1AFEBDC3638D4B1DE546DE8D5904D7B
|texte= From General Laws To Singularities
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.29. |  |