Response to “The imaginary ‘Asian Super Consumer’: A critique of demand reduction campaigns for the illegal wildlife trade”
Identifieur interne : 000301 ( Pmc/Corpus ); précédent : 000300; suivant : 000302Response to “The imaginary ‘Asian Super Consumer’: A critique of demand reduction campaigns for the illegal wildlife trade”
Auteurs : Daniel Bergin ; Derek Wu ; Wander MeijerSource :
- Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences [ 0016-7185 ] ; 2020.
Abstract
In a recent paper in Geoforum, Margulies et al. (2019) outline what they perceive as a bias toward an “Asian super consumer”. They argue that wildlife trade demand reduction campaigns are unfocused, untargeted, and therefore have a tendency to place blame on people of colour and communities in the Global South as key actors in driving illegal wildlife trade. As researchers and practitioners, we have been studying the demand for wildlife and wildlife products for many years. While we agree that it is vitally important to consider the cultural nuances of illegal and unsustainable wildlife trade and to operate in a manner that is respectful toward different cultures, we believe that the authors have overlooked the fact that modern wildlife trade demand reduction campaigns are already conducting this research and using it to target their campaigns to specific groups.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.04.009
PubMed: 32327764
PubMed Central: 7177093
Links to Exploration step
PMC:7177093Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Response to “The imaginary ‘Asian Super Consumer’: A critique of demand reduction campaigns for the illegal wildlife trade”</title>
<author><name sortKey="Bergin, Daniel" sort="Bergin, Daniel" uniqKey="Bergin D" first="Daniel" last="Bergin">Daniel Bergin</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="af005">GlobeScan, 33-35 Hillier Street, Sheung Wan, Hong Kong, SAR China</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="af010">Oxford Wildlife Trade Research Group, Department of Anthropology and Geography, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Wu, Derek" sort="Wu, Derek" uniqKey="Wu D" first="Derek" last="Wu">Derek Wu</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="af005">GlobeScan, 33-35 Hillier Street, Sheung Wan, Hong Kong, SAR China</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Meijer, Wander" sort="Meijer, Wander" uniqKey="Meijer W" first="Wander" last="Meijer">Wander Meijer</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="af005">GlobeScan, 33-35 Hillier Street, Sheung Wan, Hong Kong, SAR China</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno>
<idno type="pmid">32327764</idno>
<idno type="pmc">7177093</idno>
<idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7177093</idno>
<idno type="RBID">PMC:7177093</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.04.009</idno>
<date when="2020">2020</date>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000301</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">000301</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Response to “The imaginary ‘Asian Super Consumer’: A critique of demand reduction campaigns for the illegal wildlife trade”</title>
<author><name sortKey="Bergin, Daniel" sort="Bergin, Daniel" uniqKey="Bergin D" first="Daniel" last="Bergin">Daniel Bergin</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="af005">GlobeScan, 33-35 Hillier Street, Sheung Wan, Hong Kong, SAR China</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="af010">Oxford Wildlife Trade Research Group, Department of Anthropology and Geography, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Wu, Derek" sort="Wu, Derek" uniqKey="Wu D" first="Derek" last="Wu">Derek Wu</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="af005">GlobeScan, 33-35 Hillier Street, Sheung Wan, Hong Kong, SAR China</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Meijer, Wander" sort="Meijer, Wander" uniqKey="Meijer W" first="Wander" last="Meijer">Wander Meijer</name>
<affiliation><nlm:aff id="af005">GlobeScan, 33-35 Hillier Street, Sheung Wan, Hong Kong, SAR China</nlm:aff>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0016-7185</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1872-9398</idno>
<imprint><date when="2020">2020</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p>In a recent paper in Geoforum, Margulies et al. (2019) outline what they perceive as a bias toward an “Asian super consumer”. They argue that wildlife trade demand reduction campaigns are unfocused, untargeted, and therefore have a tendency to place blame on people of colour and communities in the Global South as key actors in driving illegal wildlife trade. As researchers and practitioners, we have been studying the demand for wildlife and wildlife products for many years. While we agree that it is vitally important to consider the cultural nuances of illegal and unsustainable wildlife trade and to operate in a manner that is respectful toward different cultures, we believe that the authors have overlooked the fact that modern wildlife trade demand reduction campaigns are already conducting this research and using it to target their campaigns to specific groups.</p>
</div>
</front>
<back><div1 type="bibliography"><listBibl><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Jacobson, S K" uniqKey="Jacobson S">S.K. Jacobson</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Mcduff, M D" uniqKey="Mcduff M">M.D. McDuff</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Monroe, M C" uniqKey="Monroe M">M.C. Monroe</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Meijer, W" uniqKey="Meijer W">W. Meijer</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Bergin, D" uniqKey="Bergin D">D. Bergin</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Wu, D" uniqKey="Wu D">D. Wu</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Yang, C" uniqKey="Yang C">C. Yang</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Kritski, E" uniqKey="Kritski E">E. Kritski</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
</listBibl>
</div1>
</back>
</TEI>
<pmc article-type="discussion"><pmc-dir>properties open_access</pmc-dir>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Geoforum</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">Geoforum</journal-id>
<journal-title-group><journal-title>Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">0016-7185</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">1872-9398</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Elsevier Ltd.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">32327764</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="pmc">7177093</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">S0016-7185(20)30098-1</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.04.009</article-id>
<article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group><article-title>Response to “The imaginary ‘Asian Super Consumer’: A critique of demand reduction campaigns for the illegal wildlife trade”</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" id="au005"><name><surname>Bergin</surname>
<given-names>Daniel</given-names>
</name>
<email>danielbergin1@gmail.com</email>
<xref rid="af005" ref-type="aff">a</xref>
<xref rid="af010" ref-type="aff">b</xref>
<xref rid="cor1" ref-type="corresp">⁎</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" id="au010"><name><surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>Derek</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="af005" ref-type="aff">a</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" id="au015"><name><surname>Meijer</surname>
<given-names>Wander</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="af005" ref-type="aff">a</xref>
</contrib>
<aff id="af005"><label>a</label>
GlobeScan, 33-35 Hillier Street, Sheung Wan, Hong Kong, SAR China</aff>
<aff id="af010"><label>b</label>
Oxford Wildlife Trade Research Group, Department of Anthropology and Geography, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom</aff>
</contrib-group>
<author-notes><corresp id="cor1"><label>⁎</label>
Corresponding author. <email>danielbergin1@gmail.com</email>
</corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="pmc-release"><day>23</day>
<month>4</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<pmc-comment> PMC Release delay is 0 months and 0 days and was based on .</pmc-comment>
<pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>23</day>
<month>4</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<history><date date-type="received"><day>16</day>
<month>4</month>
<year>2020</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted"><day>19</day>
<month>4</month>
<year>2020</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions><copyright-statement>© 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder></copyright-holder>
<license><license-p>Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract id="ab005"><p>In a recent paper in Geoforum, Margulies et al. (2019) outline what they perceive as a bias toward an “Asian super consumer”. They argue that wildlife trade demand reduction campaigns are unfocused, untargeted, and therefore have a tendency to place blame on people of colour and communities in the Global South as key actors in driving illegal wildlife trade. As researchers and practitioners, we have been studying the demand for wildlife and wildlife products for many years. While we agree that it is vitally important to consider the cultural nuances of illegal and unsustainable wildlife trade and to operate in a manner that is respectful toward different cultures, we believe that the authors have overlooked the fact that modern wildlife trade demand reduction campaigns are already conducting this research and using it to target their campaigns to specific groups.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group id="kg005"><title>Keywords</title>
<kwd>IWT</kwd>
<kwd>Ivory trade</kwd>
<kwd>Wildlife trafficking</kwd>
<kwd>Wildlife products</kwd>
<kwd>Critical race theory</kwd>
<kwd>China</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body><sec id="s0005"><label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p id="p0005">In a recent paper in <italic>Geoforum</italic>
, Margulies et al. (2019) outline what they perceive as a bias toward an “Asian super consumer” and argue that wildlife trade demand reduction campaigns have a tendency to place blame on people of colour and communities in the Global South as key actors in driving illegal wildlife trade. They stress that although these demand reduction strategies are not intentionally furthering racist stereotypes, a lack of attention to the detail of consumer profiles reproduces and reinforces problematic historical stereotypes. To illustrate this lack of attention to detail, the authors refer to fieldwork conducted by one of the authors in China that highlights the differences in wildlife products consumed by men and women, the importance of understanding the purpose and motivations for purchasing wildlife products, and the need to consider the perceived value of wildlife products in designing wildlife demand reduction campaigns. They also analyse two campaigns that they believe fail to recognise cultural, gendered, and classed differences in the people who use illegal wildlife products and why they use them, though they acknowledge that a thorough review of demand reduction campaigns is beyond the scope of their short intervention.</p>
<p id="p0010">As researchers and practitioners, we have been studying the demand for wildlife and wildlife products for many years. We have been involved in the design of campaigns aimed at reducing consumer demand for wildlife products for various NGOs and we have reviewed dozens of campaign research reports. We fully agree with the authors that it is vitally important to consider the cultural nuances of illegal and unsustainable wildlife trade and to operate in manner that is respectful toward different cultures. The importance of this has been particularly highlighted in the cultural insensitivity surrounding the recent outbreak of COVID-19 (coronavirus), which was first reported in Wuhan, China. Cultural insensitivity and problematic stereotyping of Chinese and Asian people has been evident among the public and in media outlets since the outbreak (<xref rid="b0015" ref-type="bibr">Peel and Mallet, 2020</xref>
, <xref rid="b0045" ref-type="bibr">Yeung, 2020</xref>
). Within these fora, wildlife trade has assumed a central point of discussion because of fears that the virus was transferred from bats, pangolins, snakes, or other wild animals.</p>
<p id="p0015">Although these stereotypes undoubtedly exist and must be acknowledged and carefully monitored in wildlife trade demand reduction strategies, we believe that the authors miss a key point in their paper. In our experience, we have observed that many organisations are already using advanced techniques to target specific groups with their demand reduction campaigns and that targeting a generic “Asian super consumer” is an outdated and little-used technique for campaigns that are conducted on a large scale. Margulies et al. (2019) provide evidence from an unspecified number of respondents for the differences between genders in the purchase of dried fish maw. They also cite studies on eating endangered fish, gifting tiger products and buying ivory that highlight “purpose and motivation” as factors that must be carefully distinguished. Finally, the authors note that the perceived value of wildlife products is crucial for designing successful campaigns. We believe that these insights, while likely correct for the specific situations on which the authors are reporting, are overly-simplistic themselves and that modern demand reduction campaigns take into account a far broader range of inputs when determining the specific audience for campaigns as well as understanding the drivers and deterrents for wildlife purchase among this audience.</p>
<p id="p0020">When conducting education and conservation campaigns, targeted messages are more effective than general messages (<xref rid="b0005" ref-type="bibr">Jacobson et al., 2015</xref>
). For large-scale campaigns conducted with limited resources, this increased effectiveness is vital in the efforts to induce behaviour change among wildlife consumers. The authors correctly identify this importance but overlook the fact that campaigns that target, for example, wealth, status or people who are uninformed may be basing this on research conducted on thousands of nationally representative respondents (e.g., <xref rid="b0035" ref-type="bibr">WildAid, 2014a</xref>
, <xref rid="b0040" ref-type="bibr">WildAid, 2014b</xref>
, <xref rid="b0025" ref-type="bibr">USAID, 2018a</xref>
, <xref rid="b0030" ref-type="bibr">USAID, 2018</xref>
; USAID, 2018b; <xref rid="b0010" ref-type="bibr">Meijer et al., 2019</xref>
, <xref rid="b0020" ref-type="bibr">TRAFFIC, 2019</xref>
). These non-exhaustive examples combined represent interviews with over 7,700 respondents from three countries about the trade in four species. They identify, among other attributes, gender, purpose, motivation, and perceived value as factors that influence wildlife purchase and use these to segment the population into consumer types for targeted messaging. Some of these examples are reports prepared by GlobeScan, with which the authors are affiliated, but others are conducted by different organisations. Many NGOs put this research into the public domain but they are not required to publish the information, and other campaigns are based on consumer research studies that are unpublished.</p>
<p id="p0025">We had no involvement in research that may have fed into the particular campaigns mentioned by Margulies et al. (2019) and do not comment directly on the concerns raised in their critique of these particular campaigns. However, we feel that by omitting the wealth of research that has been, and continues to be, conducted on this topic, the authors provide a picture of demand reduction campaigns as unfocused, untargeted, and are therefore perpetuating racist narratives. We believe that this perspective does not account for campaigns that do use scientific methods to develop culturally nuanced approaches to wildlife trade demand reduction, as is called for by Margulies et al. (2019).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s0010"><title>Declaration of Competing Interest</title>
<p id="p0030">The authors work for GlobeScan, an independent research consultancy. We have conducted a substantial number of projects to provide inputs for wildlife trade reduction campaigns. Some of the examples we draw upon are publicly-available reports prepared by GlobeScan relating to demand reduction for wildlife trade. While we acknowledge that these close links may influence our perceptions, we also believe that they make us well-placed to provide insights that may not be apparent to researchers who have not worked as practitioners in this field.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back><ref-list id="bi005"><title>References</title>
<ref id="b0005"><element-citation publication-type="book" id="h0005"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jacobson</surname>
<given-names>S.K.</given-names>
</name>
<name><surname>McDuff</surname>
<given-names>M.D.</given-names>
</name>
<name><surname>Monroe</surname>
<given-names>M.C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<chapter-title>Conservation education and outreach techniques</chapter-title>
<year>2015</year>
<publisher-name>Oxford University Press</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Oxford, UK</publisher-loc>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b0010"><element-citation publication-type="book" id="h0010"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Meijer</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name><surname>Bergin</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name><surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name><surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name><surname>Kritski</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<chapter-title>Demand under the Ban – China Ivory Consumption Research 2019</chapter-title>
<year>2019</year>
<publisher-name>WWF</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Beijing, China</publisher-loc>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b0015"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" id="h0015">Peel, M. and Mallet, V. (2020) ‘Why don’t you stay home?’ — coronavirus sparks racism fears. Financial Times. 1st February 2020. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/eeda65ea-4424-11ea-a43a-c4b328d9061c</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b0020"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" id="h0020">TRAFFIC (2019) Tiger product consumers suggested demand reduction messaging. Hanoi, Vietnam</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b0025"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" id="h0025">USAID (2018a) Research study on consumer demand for elephant, rhino and pangolin parts and products in Vietnam. Bangkok, Thailand. Available at: https://www.usaidwildlifeasia.org/resources/reports/ussv-quant-report-saving-elephants-pangolins-and-rhinos-20181105.pdf/view</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b0030"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" id="h0030">USAID (2018b) Quantitative and qualitative study of consumer demand for wildlife products in Thailand. Bangkok, Thailand. Available at: https://www.usaidwildlifeasia.org/resources/reports/final_20180605_thailandformativeresearchivorytiger_eng.pdf/view</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b0035"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" id="h0035">WildAid (2014a) Ivory demand in China 2012 – 2014. San Francisco, CA</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b0040"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" id="h0040">WildAid (2014b) Rhino horn demand 2012 – 2014. San Francisco, CA</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="b0045"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" id="h0045">Yeung, J. (2020) As the coronavirus spreads, fear is fueling racism and xenophobia. CNN. 31st January 2020. Available at: https://edition.cnn.com/2020/01/31/asia/wuhan-coronavirus-racism-fear-intl-hnk/index.html</mixed-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</pmc>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/StressCovidV1/Data/Pmc/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000301 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000301 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Sante |area= StressCovidV1 |flux= Pmc |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= PMC:7177093 |texte= Response to “The imaginary ‘Asian Super Consumer’: A critique of demand reduction campaigns for the illegal wildlife trade” }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:32327764" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a StressCovidV1
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. | ![]() |