BernheimV1, PascalFrancis, Checkpoint, bibRecord, 000021

Fact, truth, and text: The quest for a firm basis for historical knowledge around 1900

Identifieur interne : 000021 ( PascalFrancis/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000020; suivant : 000022

Fact, truth, and text: The quest for a firm basis for historical knowledge around 1900

Auteurs : Rolf Torstendahl [Suède]

Source :

History and theory : (Print) [ 0018-2656 ] ; 2003.

RBID : Francis:519-04-10978

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Histoire, Connaissance, Fait, Vérité, Opinion, Kantisme, Taxinomie, Philosophie morale, Crédibilité, Réalité, Texte, Droysen (J. G.), Bernheim (E.), Langlois (C. V.), Seignobos (C.).
Wicri :
- topic : Histoire.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Credibility, Fact, History, Kantianism, Knowledge, Moral philosophy, Opinion, Reality, Taxinomy, Text, Truth.

Abstract

The object of this essay is to discuss two problems and to present solutions to them, which do not quite agree with what is generally said of them. The first problem concerns the history of methods for reaching firm historical knowledge. In three methodological manuals for historians, written by J. G. Droysen, E. Bernheim, and C.-V. Langlois and C. Seignobos and first published in the late nineteenth century, the task of the historian was said to be how to obtain firm knowledge about history. The question is how this message should be understood. The second problem concerns the differences between the three manuals. If their common goal is firm historical knowledge, are there any major differences of opinion? The answer given in this article is yes, and the ground is sought in their theories of truth.

Affiliations:

Suède

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

to stream PascalFrancis, to step Corpus: 000023
to stream PascalFrancis, to step Curation: 000025

Links to Exploration step

Francis:519-04-10978

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Fact, truth, and text: The quest for a firm basis for historical knowledge around 1900</title>
<author><name sortKey="Torstendahl, Rolf" sort="Torstendahl, Rolf" uniqKey="Torstendahl R" first="Rolf" last="Torstendahl">Rolf Torstendahl</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Mälardalens Högskola</s1>
<s2>Västerås</s2>
<s3>SWE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Suède</country>
<wicri:noRegion>Mälardalens Högskola</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">519-04-10978</idno>
<date when="2003">2003</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">FRANCIS 519-04-10978 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Francis:519-04-10978</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000023</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Curation">000025</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Checkpoint">000021</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PascalFrancis" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000021</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Fact, truth, and text: The quest for a firm basis for historical knowledge around 1900</title>
<author><name sortKey="Torstendahl, Rolf" sort="Torstendahl, Rolf" uniqKey="Torstendahl R" first="Rolf" last="Torstendahl">Rolf Torstendahl</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Mälardalens Högskola</s1>
<s2>Västerås</s2>
<s3>SWE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Suède</country>
<wicri:noRegion>Mälardalens Högskola</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">History and theory : (Print)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Hist. theory : (Print)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0018-2656</idno>
<imprint><date when="2003">2003</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">History and theory : (Print)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Hist. theory : (Print)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0018-2656</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Credibility</term>
<term>Fact</term>
<term>History</term>
<term>Kantianism</term>
<term>Knowledge</term>
<term>Moral philosophy</term>
<term>Opinion</term>
<term>Reality</term>
<term>Taxinomy</term>
<term>Text</term>
<term>Truth</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Histoire</term>
<term>Connaissance</term>
<term>Fait</term>
<term>Vérité</term>
<term>Opinion</term>
<term>Kantisme</term>
<term>Taxinomie</term>
<term>Philosophie morale</term>
<term>Crédibilité</term>
<term>Réalité</term>
<term>Texte</term>
<term>Droysen (J. G.)</term>
<term>Bernheim (E.)</term>
<term>Langlois (C. V.)</term>
<term>Seignobos (C.)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Histoire</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The object of this essay is to discuss two problems and to present solutions to them, which do not quite agree with what is generally said of them. The first problem concerns the history of methods for reaching firm historical knowledge. In three methodological manuals for historians, written by J. G. Droysen, E. Bernheim, and C.-V. Langlois and C. Seignobos and first published in the late nineteenth century, the task of the historian was said to be how to obtain firm knowledge about history. The question is how this message should be understood. The second problem concerns the differences between the three manuals. If their common goal is firm historical knowledge, are there any major differences of opinion? The answer given in this article is yes, and the ground is sought in their theories of truth.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0018-2656</s0>
</fA01>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Hist. theory : (Print)</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>42</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>3</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Fact, truth, and text: The quest for a firm basis for historical knowledge around 1900</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>TORSTENDAHL (Rolf)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Mälardalens Högskola</s1>
<s2>Västerås</s2>
<s3>SWE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>305-331</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2003</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>24534</s2>
<s5>354000113154970020</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2004 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>519-04-10978</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>History and theory : (Print)</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fA68 i1="01" i2="1" l="FRE"><s1>Les faits, la vérité et le texte : la recherche d'un fondement ferme de la connaissance historique vers 1900</s1>
</fA68>
<fA99><s0>ref. et notes dissem.</s0>
</fA99>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>The object of this essay is to discuss two problems and to present solutions to them, which do not quite agree with what is generally said of them. The first problem concerns the history of methods for reaching firm historical knowledge. In three methodological manuals for historians, written by J. G. Droysen, E. Bernheim, and C.-V. Langlois and C. Seignobos and first published in the late nineteenth century, the task of the historian was said to be how to obtain firm knowledge about history. The question is how this message should be understood. The second problem concerns the differences between the three manuals. If their common goal is firm historical knowledge, are there any major differences of opinion? The answer given in this article is yes, and the ground is sought in their theories of truth.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="P"><s0>5194A</s0>
<s1>IV</s1>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="P"><s0>519</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="P" l="FRE"><s0>Histoire</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="P" l="ENG"><s0>History</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="P" l="FRE"><s0>Connaissance</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="P" l="ENG"><s0>Knowledge</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="P" l="FRE"><s0>Fait</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="P" l="ENG"><s0>Fact</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="P" l="FRE"><s0>Vérité</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="P" l="ENG"><s0>Truth</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="P" l="FRE"><s0>Opinion</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="P" l="ENG"><s0>Opinion</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="P" l="FRE"><s0>Kantisme</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="P" l="ENG"><s0>Kantianism</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="P" l="FRE"><s0>Taxinomie</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="P" l="ENG"><s0>Taxinomy</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="P" l="FRE"><s0>Philosophie morale</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="P" l="ENG"><s0>Moral philosophy</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="P" l="FRE"><s0>Crédibilité</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="P" l="ENG"><s0>Credibility</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="P" l="FRE"><s0>Réalité</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="P" l="ENG"><s0>Reality</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="P" l="FRE"><s0>Texte</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="P" l="ENG"><s0>Text</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="P" l="FRE"><s0>Droysen (J. G.)</s0>
<s2>NF</s2>
<s2>FA</s2>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>31</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="P" l="FRE"><s0>Bernheim (E.)</s0>
<s2>NF</s2>
<s2>FA</s2>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>32</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="14" i2="P" l="FRE"><s0>Langlois (C. V.)</s0>
<s2>NF</s2>
<s2>FA</s2>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>33</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="15" i2="P" l="FRE"><s0>Seignobos (C.)</s0>
<s2>NF</s2>
<s2>FA</s2>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>34</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21><s1>201</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>PSI</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>PSI</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
</inist>
<affiliations><list><country><li>Suède</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree><country name="Suède"><noRegion><name sortKey="Torstendahl, Rolf" sort="Torstendahl, Rolf" uniqKey="Torstendahl R" first="Rolf" last="Torstendahl">Rolf Torstendahl</name>
</noRegion>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Psychologie/explor/BernheimV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Checkpoint

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000021 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000021 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Psychologie
   |area=    BernheimV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Checkpoint
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Francis:519-04-10978
   |texte=   Fact, truth, and text: The quest for a firm basis for historical knowledge around 1900
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Mon Mar 5 17:33:33 2018. Site generation: Thu Apr 29 15:49:51 2021

	Serveur d'exploration Hippolyte Bernheim
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration Hippolyte Bernheim

Fact, truth, and text: The quest for a firm basis for historical knowledge around 1900

Fact, truth, and text: The quest for a firm basis for historical knowledge around 1900

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri