Lessons from the origins of eyewitness testimony research in Europe
Identifieur interne : 000356 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000355; suivant : 000357Lessons from the origins of eyewitness testimony research in Europe
Auteurs : Siegfried Ludwig Sporer [Allemagne]Source :
- Applied Cognitive Psychology [ 0888-4080 ] ; 2008-09.
English descriptors
- Teeft :
- Actual height, Alfred binet, Angewandte psychologie, Appl, Archival studies, Association method, Aussage, Autobiographical memory, Behavioral sciences, Beitrage, Binet, Brewer weber, Broad conception, Cambridge university press, Central europe, Child witness, Clever hans, Cognit, Cognitive, Cognitive psychology, Common sense, Content analysis, Content criteria, Copyright, Correct value, Credibility, Credibility assessment, Criminal politics, Criminal psychology, Deception, Different methods, Different times, Different types, Early childhood, Early period, Early writings, Effect size measures, Effect sizes, Event experiments, Experimental psychology, Experimental studies, Eyewitness, Eyewitness issues, Eyewitness reports, Eyewitness research, Eyewitness statements, Eyewitness testimony, Eyewitness testimony research, Farm kitchen, Forensic psychology, Forensischen psychologie, German states, German supreme court, Hermann ebbinghaus, Hugo munsterberg, Individual cases, Individual differences, Integrative model, Intentional distortions, Interest today, Interrogation, Introspective reports, John wiley sons, Judicial proof, Jugendliche zeugen, Juvenile witnesses, Legal practice, Legal profession, Legal scholar, Legal scholars, Lipmann, Many errors, Memory processes, Mental achievement, Metamemorial processes, Mittermaier, Munsterberg, Nders, Original writings, Other details, Other hand, Otto lipmann, Person descriptions, Phenomenological aspects, Policy makers need, Psychol, Psychological bulletin, Psychological research, Psychologie, Psychologische rundschau, Psychology, Real cases, Researcher, Response latencies, Retention phase, School teachers, Sexual abuse, Social psychology, Sole focus, Spontaneous testimony, Sporer, Statement validity analysis, Subjective certainty, Such cases, Suggestibility, Teuschner lubensky, Transl, Truth criteria, Undeutsch, Wigmore, Wiley, Wilhelm wundt, Witness statements, Witness testimony, Yellow psychology.
Abstract
After 100 years of research I look back at the beginnings of the psychology of eyewitness testimony to assess the ‘progress’ researchers have made. Specifically, I review the origins of (experimental) psychological research at the first three decades of the 20th century in Central Europe which quickly expanded around the world. Both eyewitness errors (e.g. due to suggestive questioning) as well as intentional distortions of the truth (lies) were thoroughly studied at that time. An eyewitness statement was considered a joint product of cognitive factors and of interrogation. It is argued that many of the central issues that are at the focus of study today had already been addressed in this early period, perhaps even with a broader scope than much contemporary writing. At the end, I propose an integrative model of the psychology of testimony that may help to organise past and future research. Ten theses that address unresolved issues and suggestions for solutions after 100 years of research are outlined. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Url:
DOI: 10.1002/acp.1479
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 000424
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 000423
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 000138
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 000360
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 000356
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Lessons from the origins of eyewitness testimony research in Europe</title><author><name sortKey="Sporer, Siegfried Ludwig" sort="Sporer, Siegfried Ludwig" uniqKey="Sporer S" first="Siegfried Ludwig" last="Sporer">Siegfried Ludwig Sporer</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:A5BDD0B11D012EEC38C54B496C6C8DD7A001AE70</idno><date when="2008" year="2008">2008</date><idno type="doi">10.1002/acp.1479</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/A5BDD0B11D012EEC38C54B496C6C8DD7A001AE70/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000424</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000424</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000423</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000138</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000138</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0888-4080:2008:Sporer S:lessons:from:the</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000360</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000356</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000356</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Lessons from the origins of eyewitness testimony research in Europe</title><author><name sortKey="Sporer, Siegfried Ludwig" sort="Sporer, Siegfried Ludwig" uniqKey="Sporer S" first="Siegfried Ludwig" last="Sporer">Siegfried Ludwig Sporer</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country><wicri:regionArea>University of Giessen</wicri:regionArea></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country wicri:rule="url">Allemagne</country></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country><wicri:regionArea>Correspondence address: Department of Psychology and Sports Sciences, University of Giessen, Otto‐Behaghel‐Strasse 10F, 35394 Giessen</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>35394 Giessen</wicri:noRegion><wicri:noRegion>35394 Giessen</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Applied Cognitive Psychology</title><title level="j" type="sub">Basic and Applied Issues in Eyewitness Research: A Münsterberg Centennial Retrospective</title><title level="j" type="alt">APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY</title><idno type="ISSN">0888-4080</idno><idno type="eISSN">1099-0720</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">22</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="737">737</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="757">757</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">21</biblScope><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2008-09">2008-09</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0888-4080</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0888-4080</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Actual height</term><term>Alfred binet</term><term>Angewandte psychologie</term><term>Appl</term><term>Archival studies</term><term>Association method</term><term>Aussage</term><term>Autobiographical memory</term><term>Behavioral sciences</term><term>Beitrage</term><term>Binet</term><term>Brewer weber</term><term>Broad conception</term><term>Cambridge university press</term><term>Central europe</term><term>Child witness</term><term>Clever hans</term><term>Cognit</term><term>Cognitive</term><term>Cognitive psychology</term><term>Common sense</term><term>Content analysis</term><term>Content criteria</term><term>Copyright</term><term>Correct value</term><term>Credibility</term><term>Credibility assessment</term><term>Criminal politics</term><term>Criminal psychology</term><term>Deception</term><term>Different methods</term><term>Different times</term><term>Different types</term><term>Early childhood</term><term>Early period</term><term>Early writings</term><term>Effect size measures</term><term>Effect sizes</term><term>Event experiments</term><term>Experimental psychology</term><term>Experimental studies</term><term>Eyewitness</term><term>Eyewitness issues</term><term>Eyewitness reports</term><term>Eyewitness research</term><term>Eyewitness statements</term><term>Eyewitness testimony</term><term>Eyewitness testimony research</term><term>Farm kitchen</term><term>Forensic psychology</term><term>Forensischen psychologie</term><term>German states</term><term>German supreme court</term><term>Hermann ebbinghaus</term><term>Hugo munsterberg</term><term>Individual cases</term><term>Individual differences</term><term>Integrative model</term><term>Intentional distortions</term><term>Interest today</term><term>Interrogation</term><term>Introspective reports</term><term>John wiley sons</term><term>Judicial proof</term><term>Jugendliche zeugen</term><term>Juvenile witnesses</term><term>Legal practice</term><term>Legal profession</term><term>Legal scholar</term><term>Legal scholars</term><term>Lipmann</term><term>Many errors</term><term>Memory processes</term><term>Mental achievement</term><term>Metamemorial processes</term><term>Mittermaier</term><term>Munsterberg</term><term>Nders</term><term>Original writings</term><term>Other details</term><term>Other hand</term><term>Otto lipmann</term><term>Person descriptions</term><term>Phenomenological aspects</term><term>Policy makers need</term><term>Psychol</term><term>Psychological bulletin</term><term>Psychological research</term><term>Psychologie</term><term>Psychologische rundschau</term><term>Psychology</term><term>Real cases</term><term>Researcher</term><term>Response latencies</term><term>Retention phase</term><term>School teachers</term><term>Sexual abuse</term><term>Social psychology</term><term>Sole focus</term><term>Spontaneous testimony</term><term>Sporer</term><term>Statement validity analysis</term><term>Subjective certainty</term><term>Such cases</term><term>Suggestibility</term><term>Teuschner lubensky</term><term>Transl</term><term>Truth criteria</term><term>Undeutsch</term><term>Wigmore</term><term>Wiley</term><term>Wilhelm wundt</term><term>Witness statements</term><term>Witness testimony</term><term>Yellow psychology</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">After 100 years of research I look back at the beginnings of the psychology of eyewitness testimony to assess the ‘progress’ researchers have made. Specifically, I review the origins of (experimental) psychological research at the first three decades of the 20th century in Central Europe which quickly expanded around the world. Both eyewitness errors (e.g. due to suggestive questioning) as well as intentional distortions of the truth (lies) were thoroughly studied at that time. An eyewitness statement was considered a joint product of cognitive factors and of interrogation. It is argued that many of the central issues that are at the focus of study today had already been addressed in this early period, perhaps even with a broader scope than much contemporary writing. At the end, I propose an integrative model of the psychology of testimony that may help to organise past and future research. Ten theses that address unresolved issues and suggestions for solutions after 100 years of research are outlined. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>Allemagne</li></country></list><tree><country name="Allemagne"><noRegion><name sortKey="Sporer, Siegfried Ludwig" sort="Sporer, Siegfried Ludwig" uniqKey="Sporer S" first="Siegfried Ludwig" last="Sporer">Siegfried Ludwig Sporer</name></noRegion><name sortKey="Sporer, Siegfried Ludwig" sort="Sporer, Siegfried Ludwig" uniqKey="Sporer S" first="Siegfried Ludwig" last="Sporer">Siegfried Ludwig Sporer</name><name sortKey="Sporer, Siegfried Ludwig" sort="Sporer, Siegfried Ludwig" uniqKey="Sporer S" first="Siegfried Ludwig" last="Sporer">Siegfried Ludwig Sporer</name></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Psychologie/explor/BernheimV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000356 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000356 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Psychologie
|area= BernheimV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:A5BDD0B11D012EEC38C54B496C6C8DD7A001AE70
|texte= Lessons from the origins of eyewitness testimony research in Europe
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |