Serveur d'exploration Hippolyte Bernheim

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

A life cycle analysis of social security

Identifieur interne : 000C76 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000C75; suivant : 000C77

A life cycle analysis of social security

Auteurs : Ay E Mrohoroglu ; Selahattin Mrohoroglu ; Douglas H. Joines

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:F04678920FE67BAB4AE7ABAD5E7CC5A5B2FE754E

English descriptors

Abstract

Summary: We develop an applied general equilibrium model to examine the optimal social security replacement rate and the welfare benefits associated with it. Our setup consists of overlapping generations of 65-period lived individuals facing mortality risk and individual income risk. Private credit markets, including markets for private annuities, are closed by assumption. Unlike previous analyses, we find that an unfunded social security system may well enhance economic welfare. In our benchmark economy, the optimal social security replacement rate is 30%, and an empirically more plausible replacement rate of 60% raises welfare compared with an economy with no social security system.

Url:
DOI: 10.1007/BF01213942

Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:F04678920FE67BAB4AE7ABAD5E7CC5A5B2FE754E

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">A life cycle analysis of social security</title>
<author>
<name sortKey=" Mrohoroglu, Ay E" sort=" Mrohoroglu, Ay E" uniqKey=" Mrohoroglu A" first="Ay E" last=" Mrohoroglu">Ay E Mrohoroglu</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Department of Finance and Business Economics, USC, 90089, Los Angeles, CA, USA</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey=" Mrohoroglu, Selahattin" sort=" Mrohoroglu, Selahattin" uniqKey=" Mrohoroglu S" first="Selahattin" last=" Mrohoroglu">Selahattin Mrohoroglu</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Department of Finance and Business Economics, USC, 90089, Los Angeles, CA, USA</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Joines, Douglas H" sort="Joines, Douglas H" uniqKey="Joines D" first="Douglas H." last="Joines">Douglas H. Joines</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Department of Finance and Business Economics, USC, 90089, Los Angeles, CA, USA</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:F04678920FE67BAB4AE7ABAD5E7CC5A5B2FE754E</idno>
<date when="1995" year="1995">1995</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1007/BF01213942</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/F04678920FE67BAB4AE7ABAD5E7CC5A5B2FE754E/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000C76</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000C76</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">A life cycle analysis of social security</title>
<author>
<name sortKey=" Mrohoroglu, Ay E" sort=" Mrohoroglu, Ay E" uniqKey=" Mrohoroglu A" first="Ay E" last=" Mrohoroglu">Ay E Mrohoroglu</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Department of Finance and Business Economics, USC, 90089, Los Angeles, CA, USA</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey=" Mrohoroglu, Selahattin" sort=" Mrohoroglu, Selahattin" uniqKey=" Mrohoroglu S" first="Selahattin" last=" Mrohoroglu">Selahattin Mrohoroglu</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Department of Finance and Business Economics, USC, 90089, Los Angeles, CA, USA</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Joines, Douglas H" sort="Joines, Douglas H" uniqKey="Joines D" first="Douglas H." last="Joines">Douglas H. Joines</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Department of Finance and Business Economics, USC, 90089, Los Angeles, CA, USA</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">Economic Theory</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">Econ Theory</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0938-2259</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1432-0479</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>Springer-Verlag</publisher>
<pubPlace>Berlin/Heidelberg</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="1995-02-01">1995-02-01</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">6</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="83">83</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="114">114</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0938-2259</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0938-2259</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Accidental bequests</term>
<term>Additional benefit</term>
<term>Adverse selection</term>
<term>Agent types</term>
<term>Aggregate capital stock</term>
<term>Aggregate consumption</term>
<term>Aggregate fluctuations</term>
<term>Aggregate labor input</term>
<term>Alternative redistribution schemes</term>
<term>Alternative schemes</term>
<term>Alternative values</term>
<term>Annuity</term>
<term>Annuity markets</term>
<term>Asset</term>
<term>Asset holdings</term>
<term>Auerbach</term>
<term>Average consumption</term>
<term>Average utility</term>
<term>Benchmark</term>
<term>Benchmark economy</term>
<term>Benchmark model economy</term>
<term>Beneficial role</term>
<term>Benefit level</term>
<term>Bequest</term>
<term>Bequest motive</term>
<term>Bequest motives</term>
<term>Budget constraint</term>
<term>Business cycles</term>
<term>Business sector</term>
<term>Capital income</term>
<term>Capital stock</term>
<term>Catastrophic illness</term>
<term>Certain lifetimes</term>
<term>Cohort</term>
<term>Computational burden</term>
<term>Computational details</term>
<term>Constant returns</term>
<term>Constraint</term>
<term>Consumption profile</term>
<term>Consumption supplement</term>
<term>Current model</term>
<term>Decision rule</term>
<term>Decision rules</term>
<term>Descriptive statistics</term>
<term>Discount factor</term>
<term>Disposable income</term>
<term>Dynamic efficiency</term>
<term>Dynamic inefficiency</term>
<term>Dynamic program</term>
<term>Econ</term>
<term>Economic theory</term>
<term>Economic welfare</term>
<term>Efficiency index</term>
<term>Elderly face</term>
<term>Empirical profile</term>
<term>Empirical support</term>
<term>Employment opportunities state</term>
<term>Employment status</term>
<term>Exogenous</term>
<term>Face liquidity constraints</term>
<term>Financial loss</term>
<term>Financial resources</term>
<term>Financial risk</term>
<term>Future consumption</term>
<term>Future income fluctuations</term>
<term>Future research</term>
<term>General equilibrium model</term>
<term>Golden rule capital stock</term>
<term>Golden rule level</term>
<term>Gross income</term>
<term>Growth rate</term>
<term>Harvard university press</term>
<term>Health care</term>
<term>Health care costs</term>
<term>Idiosyncratic employment risk</term>
<term>Illness cost</term>
<term>Incomplete markets</term>
<term>Indirect business taxes</term>
<term>Individual income risk</term>
<term>Indivisible labor</term>
<term>Inefficiency</term>
<term>Initial wealth distribution</term>
<term>Interest rate</term>
<term>Intertemporal</term>
<term>Intertemporal allocation</term>
<term>Intertemporal elasticity</term>
<term>Kotlikoff</term>
<term>Labor inelastically</term>
<term>Labor supply</term>
<term>Large number</term>
<term>Last period</term>
<term>Life cycle</term>
<term>Life cycle model</term>
<term>Lifetime</term>
<term>Lifetime risks</term>
<term>Lifetime uncertainty</term>
<term>Lifetime utility</term>
<term>Liquidity</term>
<term>Liquidity constraints</term>
<term>Lower capital stock</term>
<term>Mandatory annuity contracts</term>
<term>Mandatory retirement</term>
<term>Market interest rate</term>
<term>Matrix</term>
<term>Medicare</term>
<term>Model economies</term>
<term>Model economy</term>
<term>Model period</term>
<term>Model specification</term>
<term>Mortality risk</term>
<term>Next step</term>
<term>Nursing home</term>
<term>Nursing home expenditures</term>
<term>Nursing homes</term>
<term>Objective function</term>
<term>Optimal level</term>
<term>Optimal replacement rate</term>
<term>Optimization problem</term>
<term>Other words</term>
<term>Percent replacement rate</term>
<term>Perfect annuity markets</term>
<term>Physical capital</term>
<term>Planner</term>
<term>Policy arrangement</term>
<term>Polit</term>
<term>Population growth</term>
<term>Population growth rate</term>
<term>Prescott</term>
<term>Previous analyses</term>
<term>Private annuities</term>
<term>Private annuity contracts</term>
<term>Private asset holdings</term>
<term>Private care insurance</term>
<term>Private credit markets</term>
<term>Private savings</term>
<term>Production function</term>
<term>Production technology</term>
<term>Productivity growth</term>
<term>Profit maximization problem</term>
<term>Reasonable ratios</term>
<term>Redistribution</term>
<term>Reference economy</term>
<term>Relative prices</term>
<term>Relative risk aversion</term>
<term>Relative wage</term>
<term>Replacement rate</term>
<term>Replacement rates</term>
<term>Representative agent</term>
<term>Reproducible capital</term>
<term>Risk aversion</term>
<term>Scale technology</term>
<term>Security arrangement</term>
<term>Security arrangements</term>
<term>Security replacement rate</term>
<term>Security replacement rates</term>
<term>Security system</term>
<term>Sensitivity analysis</term>
<term>Sharp decrease</term>
<term>Social planner</term>
<term>Social security</term>
<term>Social security arrangement</term>
<term>Social security benefit level</term>
<term>Social security benefits</term>
<term>Social security replacement rate</term>
<term>Social security replacement rates</term>
<term>Social security system</term>
<term>State space</term>
<term>Stationary equilibrium</term>
<term>Steady state</term>
<term>Steady states</term>
<term>Subjective discount factor</term>
<term>Subjective time discount factor</term>
<term>Substitution</term>
<term>Time preference</term>
<term>Uncertain lifetime</term>
<term>Uncertain lifetimes</term>
<term>Unconditional probability</term>
<term>Unemployment insurance</term>
<term>Unemployment insurance benefits</term>
<term>Unemployment insurance replacement ratio</term>
<term>Unintended bequests</term>
<term>Utility function</term>
<term>Value function</term>
<term>Value functions</term>
<term>Wealthincome ratio</term>
<term>Welfare benefit</term>
<term>Welfare benefits</term>
<term>Welfare effects</term>
<term>Young workers</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Summary: We develop an applied general equilibrium model to examine the optimal social security replacement rate and the welfare benefits associated with it. Our setup consists of overlapping generations of 65-period lived individuals facing mortality risk and individual income risk. Private credit markets, including markets for private annuities, are closed by assumption. Unlike previous analyses, we find that an unfunded social security system may well enhance economic welfare. In our benchmark economy, the optimal social security replacement rate is 30%, and an empirically more plausible replacement rate of 60% raises welfare compared with an economy with no social security system.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<istex>
<corpusName>springer-journals</corpusName>
<keywords>
<teeft>
<json:string>social security</json:string>
<json:string>econ</json:string>
<json:string>annuity</json:string>
<json:string>replacement rate</json:string>
<json:string>benchmark</json:string>
<json:string>prescott</json:string>
<json:string>asset holdings</json:string>
<json:string>liquidity constraints</json:string>
<json:string>dynamic inefficiency</json:string>
<json:string>intertemporal</json:string>
<json:string>security replacement rate</json:string>
<json:string>welfare benefits</json:string>
<json:string>bequest motive</json:string>
<json:string>kotlikoff</json:string>
<json:string>population growth</json:string>
<json:string>social security system</json:string>
<json:string>capital stock</json:string>
<json:string>decision rules</json:string>
<json:string>accidental bequests</json:string>
<json:string>decision rule</json:string>
<json:string>polit</json:string>
<json:string>liquidity</json:string>
<json:string>social security replacement rate</json:string>
<json:string>discount factor</json:string>
<json:string>social security benefits</json:string>
<json:string>aggregate consumption</json:string>
<json:string>mortality risk</json:string>
<json:string>medicare</json:string>
<json:string>young workers</json:string>
<json:string>value function</json:string>
<json:string>cohort</json:string>
<json:string>productivity growth</json:string>
<json:string>exogenous</json:string>
<json:string>benefit level</json:string>
<json:string>catastrophic illness</json:string>
<json:string>security arrangements</json:string>
<json:string>redistribution</json:string>
<json:string>benchmark model economy</json:string>
<json:string>intertemporal elasticity</json:string>
<json:string>benchmark economy</json:string>
<json:string>model economy</json:string>
<json:string>physical capital</json:string>
<json:string>constraint</json:string>
<json:string>inefficiency</json:string>
<json:string>dynamic program</json:string>
<json:string>welfare benefit</json:string>
<json:string>disposable income</json:string>
<json:string>initial wealth distribution</json:string>
<json:string>lifetime uncertainty</json:string>
<json:string>life cycle</json:string>
<json:string>security system</json:string>
<json:string>security arrangement</json:string>
<json:string>private savings</json:string>
<json:string>mandatory retirement</json:string>
<json:string>average consumption</json:string>
<json:string>consumption profile</json:string>
<json:string>matrix</json:string>
<json:string>subjective discount factor</json:string>
<json:string>unemployment insurance</json:string>
<json:string>objective function</json:string>
<json:string>state space</json:string>
<json:string>previous analyses</json:string>
<json:string>employment status</json:string>
<json:string>utility function</json:string>
<json:string>private annuities</json:string>
<json:string>average utility</json:string>
<json:string>population growth rate</json:string>
<json:string>aggregate capital stock</json:string>
<json:string>social planner</json:string>
<json:string>life cycle model</json:string>
<json:string>relative risk aversion</json:string>
<json:string>uncertain lifetimes</json:string>
<json:string>planner</json:string>
<json:string>auerbach</json:string>
<json:string>bequest</json:string>
<json:string>asset</json:string>
<json:string>lifetime utility</json:string>
<json:string>annuity markets</json:string>
<json:string>bequest motives</json:string>
<json:string>market interest rate</json:string>
<json:string>efficiency index</json:string>
<json:string>budget constraint</json:string>
<json:string>beneficial role</json:string>
<json:string>other words</json:string>
<json:string>future consumption</json:string>
<json:string>representative agent</json:string>
<json:string>policy arrangement</json:string>
<json:string>social security arrangement</json:string>
<json:string>optimal level</json:string>
<json:string>private credit markets</json:string>
<json:string>relative prices</json:string>
<json:string>labor supply</json:string>
<json:string>steady state</json:string>
<json:string>sensitivity analysis</json:string>
<json:string>golden rule capital stock</json:string>
<json:string>aggregate labor input</json:string>
<json:string>constant returns</json:string>
<json:string>replacement rates</json:string>
<json:string>optimal replacement rate</json:string>
<json:string>reproducible capital</json:string>
<json:string>social security replacement rates</json:string>
<json:string>empirical profile</json:string>
<json:string>gross income</json:string>
<json:string>financial risk</json:string>
<json:string>adverse selection</json:string>
<json:string>elderly face</json:string>
<json:string>certain lifetimes</json:string>
<json:string>nursing home expenditures</json:string>
<json:string>stationary equilibrium</json:string>
<json:string>substitution</json:string>
<json:string>subjective time discount factor</json:string>
<json:string>scale technology</json:string>
<json:string>optimization problem</json:string>
<json:string>labor inelastically</json:string>
<json:string>risk aversion</json:string>
<json:string>alternative values</json:string>
<json:string>unemployment insurance benefits</json:string>
<json:string>empirical support</json:string>
<json:string>reasonable ratios</json:string>
<json:string>computational details</json:string>
<json:string>time preference</json:string>
<json:string>large number</json:string>
<json:string>golden rule level</json:string>
<json:string>face liquidity constraints</json:string>
<json:string>harvard university press</json:string>
<json:string>last period</json:string>
<json:string>employment opportunities state</json:string>
<json:string>next step</json:string>
<json:string>private asset holdings</json:string>
<json:string>idiosyncratic employment risk</json:string>
<json:string>intertemporal allocation</json:string>
<json:string>future income fluctuations</json:string>
<json:string>uncertain lifetime</json:string>
<json:string>reference economy</json:string>
<json:string>perfect annuity markets</json:string>
<json:string>alternative schemes</json:string>
<json:string>unintended bequests</json:string>
<json:string>unemployment insurance replacement ratio</json:string>
<json:string>steady states</json:string>
<json:string>production technology</json:string>
<json:string>indivisible labor</json:string>
<json:string>economic welfare</json:string>
<json:string>economic theory</json:string>
<json:string>agent types</json:string>
<json:string>social security benefit level</json:string>
<json:string>business sector</json:string>
<json:string>indirect business taxes</json:string>
<json:string>capital income</json:string>
<json:string>security replacement rates</json:string>
<json:string>private annuity contracts</json:string>
<json:string>future research</json:string>
<json:string>percent replacement rate</json:string>
<json:string>interest rate</json:string>
<json:string>dynamic efficiency</json:string>
<json:string>lower capital stock</json:string>
<json:string>profit maximization problem</json:string>
<json:string>model economies</json:string>
<json:string>additional benefit</json:string>
<json:string>descriptive statistics</json:string>
<json:string>individual income risk</json:string>
<json:string>model period</json:string>
<json:string>growth rate</json:string>
<json:string>sharp decrease</json:string>
<json:string>consumption supplement</json:string>
<json:string>alternative redistribution schemes</json:string>
<json:string>mandatory annuity contracts</json:string>
<json:string>general equilibrium model</json:string>
<json:string>relative wage</json:string>
<json:string>welfare effects</json:string>
<json:string>production function</json:string>
<json:string>financial loss</json:string>
<json:string>lifetime risks</json:string>
<json:string>wealthincome ratio</json:string>
<json:string>incomplete markets</json:string>
<json:string>private care insurance</json:string>
<json:string>financial resources</json:string>
<json:string>health care</json:string>
<json:string>nursing home</json:string>
<json:string>nursing homes</json:string>
<json:string>computational burden</json:string>
<json:string>health care costs</json:string>
<json:string>unconditional probability</json:string>
<json:string>illness cost</json:string>
<json:string>current model</json:string>
<json:string>model specification</json:string>
<json:string>business cycles</json:string>
<json:string>aggregate fluctuations</json:string>
<json:string>value functions</json:string>
<json:string>lifetime</json:string>
<json:string>consumption</json:string>
</teeft>
</keywords>
<author>
<json:item>
<name>Ayşe İmrohoroglu</name>
<affiliations>
<json:string>Department of Finance and Business Economics, USC, 90089, Los Angeles, CA, USA</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<name>Selahattin İmrohoroglu</name>
<affiliations>
<json:string>Department of Finance and Business Economics, USC, 90089, Los Angeles, CA, USA</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<name>Douglas H. Joines</name>
<affiliations>
<json:string>Department of Finance and Business Economics, USC, 90089, Los Angeles, CA, USA</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
</author>
<articleId>
<json:string>BF01213942</json:string>
<json:string>Art5</json:string>
</articleId>
<arkIstex>ark:/67375/1BB-RDMRL7CH-K</arkIstex>
<language>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</language>
<originalGenre>
<json:string>OriginalPaper</json:string>
</originalGenre>
<abstract>Summary: We develop an applied general equilibrium model to examine the optimal social security replacement rate and the welfare benefits associated with it. Our setup consists of overlapping generations of 65-period lived individuals facing mortality risk and individual income risk. Private credit markets, including markets for private annuities, are closed by assumption. Unlike previous analyses, we find that an unfunded social security system may well enhance economic welfare. In our benchmark economy, the optimal social security replacement rate is 30%, and an empirically more plausible replacement rate of 60% raises welfare compared with an economy with no social security system.</abstract>
<qualityIndicators>
<score>8.2</score>
<pdfWordCount>14923</pdfWordCount>
<pdfCharCount>74691</pdfCharCount>
<pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion>
<pdfPageCount>32</pdfPageCount>
<pdfPageSize>439.28 x 662.28 pts</pdfPageSize>
<refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative>
<abstractWordCount>100</abstractWordCount>
<abstractCharCount>693</abstractCharCount>
<keywordCount>0</keywordCount>
</qualityIndicators>
<title>A life cycle analysis of social security</title>
<genre>
<json:string>research-article</json:string>
</genre>
<host>
<title>Economic Theory</title>
<language>
<json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<publicationDate>1995</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>1995</copyrightDate>
<issn>
<json:string>0938-2259</json:string>
</issn>
<eissn>
<json:string>1432-0479</json:string>
</eissn>
<journalId>
<json:string>199</json:string>
</journalId>
<volume>6</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<pages>
<first>83</first>
<last>114</last>
</pages>
<genre>
<json:string>journal</json:string>
</genre>
<subject>
<json:item>
<value>Analysis</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<value>Economics general</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<value>Economic Theory</value>
</json:item>
</subject>
</host>
<namedEntities>
<unitex>
<date></date>
<geogName></geogName>
<orgName></orgName>
<orgName_funder></orgName_funder>
<orgName_provider></orgName_provider>
<persName></persName>
<placeName></placeName>
<ref_url></ref_url>
<ref_bibl></ref_bibl>
<bibl></bibl>
</unitex>
</namedEntities>
<ark>
<json:string>ark:/67375/1BB-RDMRL7CH-K</json:string>
</ark>
<categories>
<wos>
<json:string>1 - social science</json:string>
<json:string>2 - economics</json:string>
</wos>
<scienceMetrix>
<json:string>1 - economic & social sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - economics & business </json:string>
<json:string>3 - economic theory</json:string>
</scienceMetrix>
<scopus>
<json:string>1 - Social Sciences</json:string>
<json:string>2 - Economics, Econometrics and Finance</json:string>
<json:string>3 - Economics and Econometrics</json:string>
</scopus>
<inist>
<json:string>1 - sciences humaines et sociales</json:string>
</inist>
</categories>
<publicationDate>1995</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>1995</copyrightDate>
<doi>
<json:string>10.1007/BF01213942</json:string>
</doi>
<id>F04678920FE67BAB4AE7ABAD5E7CC5A5B2FE754E</id>
<score>1</score>
<fulltext>
<json:item>
<extension>pdf</extension>
<original>true</original>
<mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F04678920FE67BAB4AE7ABAD5E7CC5A5B2FE754E/fulltext/pdf</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<extension>zip</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/zip</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F04678920FE67BAB4AE7ABAD5E7CC5A5B2FE754E/fulltext/zip</uri>
</json:item>
<istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/F04678920FE67BAB4AE7ABAD5E7CC5A5B2FE754E/fulltext/tei">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">A life cycle analysis of social security</title>
<respStmt>
<resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp>
<name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>ISTEX</authority>
<publisher scheme="https://publisher-list.data.istex.fr">Springer-Verlag</publisher>
<pubPlace>Berlin/Heidelberg</pubPlace>
<availability>
<licence>
<p>Springer-Verlag, 1995</p>
</licence>
<p scheme="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-3XSW68JL-F">springer</p>
</availability>
<date>1993-09-12</date>
</publicationStmt>
<notesStmt>
<note type="research-article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</note>
<note type="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note>
<note>Symposium</note>
</notesStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct type="inbook">
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">A life cycle analysis of social security</title>
<author xml:id="author-0000">
<persName>
<forename type="first">Ayşe</forename>
<surname>İmrohoroglu</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Department of Finance and Business Economics, USC, 90089, Los Angeles, CA, USA</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0001">
<persName>
<forename type="first">Selahattin</forename>
<surname>İmrohoroglu</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Department of Finance and Business Economics, USC, 90089, Los Angeles, CA, USA</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0002">
<persName>
<forename type="first">Douglas</forename>
<surname>Joines</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Department of Finance and Business Economics, USC, 90089, Los Angeles, CA, USA</affiliation>
</author>
<idno type="istex">F04678920FE67BAB4AE7ABAD5E7CC5A5B2FE754E</idno>
<idno type="ark">ark:/67375/1BB-RDMRL7CH-K</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1007/BF01213942</idno>
<idno type="article-id">BF01213942</idno>
<idno type="article-id">Art5</idno>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<title level="j">Economic Theory</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">Econ Theory</title>
<idno type="pISSN">0938-2259</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1432-0479</idno>
<idno type="journal-ID">true</idno>
<idno type="issue-article-count">10</idno>
<idno type="volume-issue-count">3</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>Springer-Verlag</publisher>
<pubPlace>Berlin/Heidelberg</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="1995-02-01"></date>
<biblScope unit="volume">6</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="83">83</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="114">114</biblScope>
</imprint>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<creation>
<date>1993-09-12</date>
</creation>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
<abstract xml:lang="en">
<p>Summary: We develop an applied general equilibrium model to examine the optimal social security replacement rate and the welfare benefits associated with it. Our setup consists of overlapping generations of 65-period lived individuals facing mortality risk and individual income risk. Private credit markets, including markets for private annuities, are closed by assumption. Unlike previous analyses, we find that an unfunded social security system may well enhance economic welfare. In our benchmark economy, the optimal social security replacement rate is 30%, and an empirically more plausible replacement rate of 60% raises welfare compared with an economy with no social security system.</p>
</abstract>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="Journal Subject">
<list>
<head>Economics / Management Science</head>
<item>
<term>Analysis</term>
</item>
<item>
<term>Economics general</term>
</item>
<item>
<term>Economic Theory</term>
</item>
</list>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
<revisionDesc>
<change when="1993-09-12">Created</change>
<change when="1995-02-01">Published</change>
<change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2017-11-30">References added</change>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:fulltextTEI>
<json:item>
<extension>txt</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>text/plain</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F04678920FE67BAB4AE7ABAD5E7CC5A5B2FE754E/fulltext/txt</uri>
</json:item>
</fulltext>
<metadata>
<istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="corpus springer-journals not found" wicri:toSee="no header">
<istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration>
<istex:docType PUBLIC="-//Springer-Verlag//DTD A++ V2.4//EN" URI="http://devel.springer.de/A++/V2.4/DTD/A++V2.4.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType>
<istex:document>
<Publisher>
<PublisherInfo>
<PublisherName>Springer-Verlag</PublisherName>
<PublisherLocation>Berlin/Heidelberg</PublisherLocation>
</PublisherInfo>
<Journal>
<JournalInfo JournalProductType="ArchiveJournal" NumberingStyle="Unnumbered">
<JournalID>199</JournalID>
<JournalPrintISSN>0938-2259</JournalPrintISSN>
<JournalElectronicISSN>1432-0479</JournalElectronicISSN>
<JournalTitle>Economic Theory</JournalTitle>
<JournalAbbreviatedTitle>Econ Theory</JournalAbbreviatedTitle>
<JournalSubjectGroup>
<JournalSubject Type="Primary">Economics / Management Science</JournalSubject>
<JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Analysis</JournalSubject>
<JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Economics general</JournalSubject>
<JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Economic Theory</JournalSubject>
</JournalSubjectGroup>
</JournalInfo>
<Volume>
<VolumeInfo VolumeType="Regular" TocLevels="0">
<VolumeIDStart>6</VolumeIDStart>
<VolumeIDEnd>6</VolumeIDEnd>
<VolumeIssueCount>3</VolumeIssueCount>
</VolumeInfo>
<Issue IssueType="Regular">
<IssueInfo TocLevels="0">
<IssueIDStart>1</IssueIDStart>
<IssueIDEnd>1</IssueIDEnd>
<IssueArticleCount>10</IssueArticleCount>
<IssueHistory>
<CoverDate>
<DateString>1995</DateString>
<Year>1995</Year>
<Month>2</Month>
</CoverDate>
</IssueHistory>
<IssueCopyright>
<CopyrightHolderName>Springer-Verlag</CopyrightHolderName>
<CopyrightYear>1995</CopyrightYear>
</IssueCopyright>
</IssueInfo>
<Article ID="Art5">
<ArticleInfo Language="En" ArticleType="OriginalPaper" NumberingStyle="Unnumbered" TocLevels="0" ContainsESM="No">
<ArticleID>BF01213942</ArticleID>
<ArticleDOI>10.1007/BF01213942</ArticleDOI>
<ArticleSequenceNumber>5</ArticleSequenceNumber>
<ArticleTitle Language="En">A life cycle analysis of social security</ArticleTitle>
<ArticleCategory>Symposium</ArticleCategory>
<ArticleFirstPage>83</ArticleFirstPage>
<ArticleLastPage>114</ArticleLastPage>
<ArticleHistory>
<RegistrationDate>
<Year>2005</Year>
<Month>2</Month>
<Day>8</Day>
</RegistrationDate>
<Received>
<Year>1993</Year>
<Month>9</Month>
<Day>12</Day>
</Received>
<Revised>
<Year>1994</Year>
<Month>9</Month>
<Day>20</Day>
</Revised>
</ArticleHistory>
<ArticleCopyright>
<CopyrightHolderName>Springer-Verlag</CopyrightHolderName>
<CopyrightYear>1995</CopyrightYear>
</ArticleCopyright>
<ArticleGrants Type="Regular">
<MetadataGrant Grant="OpenAccess"></MetadataGrant>
<AbstractGrant Grant="OpenAccess"></AbstractGrant>
<BodyPDFGrant Grant="Restricted"></BodyPDFGrant>
<BodyHTMLGrant Grant="Restricted"></BodyHTMLGrant>
<BibliographyGrant Grant="Restricted"></BibliographyGrant>
<ESMGrant Grant="Restricted"></ESMGrant>
</ArticleGrants>
<ArticleContext>
<JournalID>199</JournalID>
<VolumeIDStart>6</VolumeIDStart>
<VolumeIDEnd>6</VolumeIDEnd>
<IssueIDStart>1</IssueIDStart>
<IssueIDEnd>1</IssueIDEnd>
</ArticleContext>
</ArticleInfo>
<ArticleHeader>
<AuthorGroup>
<Author AffiliationIDS="Aff1">
<AuthorName DisplayOrder="Western">
<GivenName>Ayşe</GivenName>
<FamilyName>İmrohoroglu</FamilyName>
</AuthorName>
</Author>
<Author AffiliationIDS="Aff1">
<AuthorName DisplayOrder="Western">
<GivenName>Selahattin</GivenName>
<FamilyName>İmrohoroglu</FamilyName>
</AuthorName>
</Author>
<Author AffiliationIDS="Aff1">
<AuthorName DisplayOrder="Western">
<GivenName>Douglas</GivenName>
<GivenName>H.</GivenName>
<FamilyName>Joines</FamilyName>
</AuthorName>
</Author>
<Affiliation ID="Aff1">
<OrgDivision>Department of Finance and Business Economics</OrgDivision>
<OrgName>USC</OrgName>
<OrgAddress>
<Postcode>90089</Postcode>
<City>Los Angeles</City>
<State>CA</State>
<Country>USA</Country>
</OrgAddress>
</Affiliation>
</AuthorGroup>
<Abstract ID="Abs1" Language="En">
<Heading>Summary</Heading>
<Para>We develop an applied general equilibrium model to examine the optimal social security replacement rate and the welfare benefits associated with it. Our setup consists of overlapping generations of 65-period lived individuals facing mortality risk and individual income risk. Private credit markets, including markets for private annuities, are closed by assumption. Unlike previous analyses, we find that an unfunded social security system may well enhance economic welfare. In our benchmark economy, the optimal social security replacement rate is 30%, and an empirically more plausible replacement rate of 60% raises welfare compared with an economy with no social security system.</Para>
</Abstract>
<ArticleNote Type="Misc">
<SimplePara>We would like to thank Andy Atkeson, V. V. Chari, Steve Davis, Paul Evans, Lars Hansen, Tim Kehoe, Nobu Kiyotaki, Ed Prescott, José-Victor Ríos-Rull, Richard Rogerson, Tom Sargent, Nancy Stokey, Dick Sweeney, Robert Townsend, and the participants of the NBER Economic Fluctuations Small Group Workshop on Micro and Macro Perspectives on the Aggregate Labor Market in Palo Alto, the NBER General Equilibrium Theory Conference in Minneapolis, the Money and Banking Workshop at the University of Chicago, and the NBER Summer Institute. An earlier version of this paper was titled “A Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Analysis of Social Security.” This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. SES-9210291. We also thank the Minnesota and San Diego Supercomputer Centers for their support.</SimplePara>
</ArticleNote>
</ArticleHeader>
<NoBody></NoBody>
</Article>
</Issue>
</Volume>
</Journal>
</Publisher>
</istex:document>
</istex:metadataXml>
<mods version="3.6">
<titleInfo lang="en">
<title>A life cycle analysis of social security</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en">
<title>A life cycle analysis of social security</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Ayşe</namePart>
<namePart type="family">İmrohoroglu</namePart>
<affiliation>Department of Finance and Business Economics, USC, 90089, Los Angeles, CA, USA</affiliation>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Selahattin</namePart>
<namePart type="family">İmrohoroglu</namePart>
<affiliation>Department of Finance and Business Economics, USC, 90089, Los Angeles, CA, USA</affiliation>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Douglas</namePart>
<namePart type="given">H.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Joines</namePart>
<affiliation>Department of Finance and Business Economics, USC, 90089, Los Angeles, CA, USA</affiliation>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre type="research-article" displayLabel="OriginalPaper" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</genre>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Springer-Verlag</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Berlin/Heidelberg</placeTerm>
</place>
<dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">1993-09-12</dateCreated>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1995-02-01</dateIssued>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1995</dateIssued>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1995</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<abstract lang="en">Summary: We develop an applied general equilibrium model to examine the optimal social security replacement rate and the welfare benefits associated with it. Our setup consists of overlapping generations of 65-period lived individuals facing mortality risk and individual income risk. Private credit markets, including markets for private annuities, are closed by assumption. Unlike previous analyses, we find that an unfunded social security system may well enhance economic welfare. In our benchmark economy, the optimal social security replacement rate is 30%, and an empirically more plausible replacement rate of 60% raises welfare compared with an economy with no social security system.</abstract>
<note>Symposium</note>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Economic Theory</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="abbreviated">
<title>Econ Theory</title>
</titleInfo>
<genre type="journal" displayLabel="Archive Journal" authority="ISTEX" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Springer</publisher>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1995-02-01</dateIssued>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1995</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<subject>
<genre>Economics / Management Science</genre>
<topic>Analysis</topic>
<topic>Economics general</topic>
<topic>Economic Theory</topic>
</subject>
<identifier type="ISSN">0938-2259</identifier>
<identifier type="eISSN">1432-0479</identifier>
<identifier type="JournalID">199</identifier>
<identifier type="IssueArticleCount">10</identifier>
<identifier type="VolumeIssueCount">3</identifier>
<part>
<date>1995</date>
<detail type="volume">
<number>6</number>
<caption>vol.</caption>
</detail>
<detail type="issue">
<number>1</number>
<caption>no.</caption>
</detail>
<extent unit="pages">
<start>83</start>
<end>114</end>
</extent>
</part>
<recordInfo>
<recordOrigin>Springer-Verlag, 1995</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="istex">F04678920FE67BAB4AE7ABAD5E7CC5A5B2FE754E</identifier>
<identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/1BB-RDMRL7CH-K</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1007/BF01213942</identifier>
<identifier type="ArticleID">BF01213942</identifier>
<identifier type="ArticleID">Art5</identifier>
<accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Springer-Verlag, 1995</accessCondition>
<recordInfo>
<recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-3XSW68JL-F">springer</recordContentSource>
<recordOrigin>Springer-Verlag, 1995</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
<json:item>
<extension>json</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/json</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F04678920FE67BAB4AE7ABAD5E7CC5A5B2FE754E/metadata/json</uri>
</json:item>
</metadata>
<serie></serie>
</istex>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Psychologie/explor/BernheimV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000C76 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000C76 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Psychologie
   |area=    BernheimV1
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:F04678920FE67BAB4AE7ABAD5E7CC5A5B2FE754E
   |texte=   A life cycle analysis of social security
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Mon Mar 5 17:33:33 2018. Site generation: Thu Apr 29 15:49:51 2021