Euthanasia and end-of-life practices in France and Germany. A comparative study
Identifieur interne : 000B10 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000B09; suivant : 000B11Euthanasia and end-of-life practices in France and Germany. A comparative study
Auteurs : Ruth HornSource :
- Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy [ 1386-7423 ] ; 2013-05-01.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Abstract: The objective of this paper is to understand from a sociological perspective how the moral question of euthanasia, framed as the “right to die”, emerges and is dealt with in society. It takes France and Germany as case studies, two countries in which euthanasia is prohibited and which have similar legislation on the issue. I presuppose that, and explore how, each society has its own specificities in terms of practical, social and political norms that affect the ways in which they deal with these issues. The paper thus seeks to understand how requests for the “right to die” emerge in each society, through both the debate (analysis of daily newspapers, medical and philosophical literature, legal texts) and the practices (ethnographic work in three French and two German hospitals) that elucidate the phenomenon. It does so, however, without attempting to solve the moral question of euthanasia. In spite of the differences observed between these two countries, the central issue at stake in their respective debates is the question of the individual’s autonomy to choose the conditions in which he or she wishes to die; these conditions depend, amongst others, on the doctor-patient relationship, the organisation of end-of-life care in hospital settings, and more generally, on the way autonomy is defined and handled in the public debate.
Url:
DOI: 10.1007/s11019-011-9357-5
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:B8AEB84F1763329897A6C59358C96714BA343CACLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Euthanasia and end-of-life practices in France and Germany. A comparative study</title><author><name sortKey="Horn, Ruth" sort="Horn, Ruth" uniqKey="Horn R" first="Ruth" last="Horn">Ruth Horn</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Centre for Ethics in Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, BS8 2PS, Bristol, UK</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: ruth.horn@bristol.ac.uk</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:B8AEB84F1763329897A6C59358C96714BA343CAC</idno><date when="2011" year="2011">2011</date><idno type="doi">10.1007/s11019-011-9357-5</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/B8AEB84F1763329897A6C59358C96714BA343CAC/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000B10</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000B10</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Euthanasia and end-of-life practices in France and Germany. A comparative study</title><author><name sortKey="Horn, Ruth" sort="Horn, Ruth" uniqKey="Horn R" first="Ruth" last="Horn">Ruth Horn</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Centre for Ethics in Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, BS8 2PS, Bristol, UK</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: ruth.horn@bristol.ac.uk</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy</title><title level="j" type="sub">A European Journal</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Med Health Care and Philos</title><idno type="ISSN">1386-7423</idno><idno type="eISSN">1572-8633</idno><imprint><publisher>Springer Netherlands</publisher><pubPlace>Dordrecht</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2013-05-01">2013-05-01</date><biblScope unit="volume">16</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="197">197</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="209">209</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1386-7423</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1386-7423</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Autonomy</term><term>Debate</term><term>End-of-life practices</term><term>Euthanasia</term><term>France</term><term>Germany</term><term>Limitation of medical intervention</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: The objective of this paper is to understand from a sociological perspective how the moral question of euthanasia, framed as the “right to die”, emerges and is dealt with in society. It takes France and Germany as case studies, two countries in which euthanasia is prohibited and which have similar legislation on the issue. I presuppose that, and explore how, each society has its own specificities in terms of practical, social and political norms that affect the ways in which they deal with these issues. The paper thus seeks to understand how requests for the “right to die” emerge in each society, through both the debate (analysis of daily newspapers, medical and philosophical literature, legal texts) and the practices (ethnographic work in three French and two German hospitals) that elucidate the phenomenon. It does so, however, without attempting to solve the moral question of euthanasia. In spite of the differences observed between these two countries, the central issue at stake in their respective debates is the question of the individual’s autonomy to choose the conditions in which he or she wishes to die; these conditions depend, amongst others, on the doctor-patient relationship, the organisation of end-of-life care in hospital settings, and more generally, on the way autonomy is defined and handled in the public debate.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>springer-journals</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Ruth Horn</name><affiliations><json:string>Centre for Ethics in Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, BS8 2PS, Bristol, UK</json:string><json:string>E-mail: ruth.horn@bristol.ac.uk</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Autonomy</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Debate</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>End-of-life practices</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Euthanasia</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>France</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Germany</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Limitation of medical intervention</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>9357</json:string><json:string>s11019-011-9357-5</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/VQC-M6ZKLK8W-8</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>OriginalPaper</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Abstract: The objective of this paper is to understand from a sociological perspective how the moral question of euthanasia, framed as the “right to die”, emerges and is dealt with in society. It takes France and Germany as case studies, two countries in which euthanasia is prohibited and which have similar legislation on the issue. I presuppose that, and explore how, each society has its own specificities in terms of practical, social and political norms that affect the ways in which they deal with these issues. The paper thus seeks to understand how requests for the “right to die” emerge in each society, through both the debate (analysis of daily newspapers, medical and philosophical literature, legal texts) and the practices (ethnographic work in three French and two German hospitals) that elucidate the phenomenon. It does so, however, without attempting to solve the moral question of euthanasia. In spite of the differences observed between these two countries, the central issue at stake in their respective debates is the question of the individual’s autonomy to choose the conditions in which he or she wishes to die; these conditions depend, amongst others, on the doctor-patient relationship, the organisation of end-of-life care in hospital settings, and more generally, on the way autonomy is defined and handled in the public debate.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>9.592</score><pdfWordCount>10238</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>62257</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>13</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 790.866 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>216</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1358</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>7</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Euthanasia and end-of-life practices in France and Germany. A comparative study</title><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><title>Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><publicationDate>2013</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2013</copyrightDate><issn><json:string>1386-7423</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1572-8633</json:string></eissn><journalId><json:string>11019</json:string></journalId><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><pages><first>197</first><last>209</last></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Medicine</value></json:item><json:item><value>Medicine & Public Health</value></json:item><json:item><value>Theory of Medicine/Bioethics</value></json:item><json:item><value>Medical Law</value></json:item><json:item><value>Ethics</value></json:item><json:item><value>History of Medicine</value></json:item></subject></host><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/VQC-M6ZKLK8W-8</json:string></ark><publicationDate>2013</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2011</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1007/s11019-011-9357-5</json:string></doi><id>B8AEB84F1763329897A6C59358C96714BA343CAC</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B8AEB84F1763329897A6C59358C96714BA343CAC/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B8AEB84F1763329897A6C59358C96714BA343CAC/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B8AEB84F1763329897A6C59358C96714BA343CAC/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/B8AEB84F1763329897A6C59358C96714BA343CAC/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Euthanasia and end-of-life practices in France and Germany. A comparative study</title><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher scheme="https://publisher-list.data.istex.fr">Springer Netherlands</publisher><pubPlace>Dordrecht</pubPlace><availability><licence><p>Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 2011</p></licence><p scheme="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-3XSW68JL-F">springer</p></availability><date>2011</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="research-article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</note><note type="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note><note>Scientific Contribution</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Euthanasia and end-of-life practices in France and Germany. A comparative study</title><author xml:id="author-0000" corresp="yes"><persName><forename type="first">Ruth</forename><surname>Horn</surname></persName><email>ruth.horn@bristol.ac.uk</email><affiliation>Centre for Ethics in Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, BS8 2PS, Bristol, UK</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">B8AEB84F1763329897A6C59358C96714BA343CAC</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/VQC-M6ZKLK8W-8</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1007/s11019-011-9357-5</idno><idno type="article-id">9357</idno><idno type="article-id">s11019-011-9357-5</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy</title><title level="j" type="sub">A European Journal</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Med Health Care and Philos</title><idno type="pISSN">1386-7423</idno><idno type="eISSN">1572-8633</idno><idno type="journal-ID">true</idno><idno type="issue-article-count">21</idno><idno type="volume-issue-count">4</idno><imprint><publisher>Springer Netherlands</publisher><pubPlace>Dordrecht</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2013-05-01"></date><biblScope unit="volume">16</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="197">197</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="209">209</biblScope></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2011</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Abstract: The objective of this paper is to understand from a sociological perspective how the moral question of euthanasia, framed as the “right to die”, emerges and is dealt with in society. It takes France and Germany as case studies, two countries in which euthanasia is prohibited and which have similar legislation on the issue. I presuppose that, and explore how, each society has its own specificities in terms of practical, social and political norms that affect the ways in which they deal with these issues. The paper thus seeks to understand how requests for the “right to die” emerge in each society, through both the debate (analysis of daily newspapers, medical and philosophical literature, legal texts) and the practices (ethnographic work in three French and two German hospitals) that elucidate the phenomenon. It does so, however, without attempting to solve the moral question of euthanasia. In spite of the differences observed between these two countries, the central issue at stake in their respective debates is the question of the individual’s autonomy to choose the conditions in which he or she wishes to die; these conditions depend, amongst others, on the doctor-patient relationship, the organisation of end-of-life care in hospital settings, and more generally, on the way autonomy is defined and handled in the public debate.</p></abstract><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>Keywords</head><item><term>Autonomy</term></item><item><term>Debate</term></item><item><term>End-of-life practices</term></item><item><term>Euthanasia</term></item><item><term>France</term></item><item><term>Germany</term></item><item><term>Limitation of medical intervention</term></item></list></keywords></textClass><textClass><keywords scheme="Journal-Subject-Collection"><list><label>SC11</label><item><term>Medicine</term></item></list></keywords></textClass><textClass><keywords scheme="Journal-Subject-Group"><list><label>SCH</label><label>SCH66000</label><label>SCR16005</label><label>SCE14000</label><label>SCH64000</label><item><term>Medicine & Public Health</term></item><item><term>Theory of Medicine/Bioethics</term></item><item><term>Medical Law</term></item><item><term>Ethics</term></item><item><term>History of Medicine</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2013-05-01">Published</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2017-12-2">References added</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="corpus springer-journals not found" wicri:toSee="no header"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//Springer-Verlag//DTD A++ V2.4//EN" URI="http://devel.springer.de/A++/V2.4/DTD/A++V2.4.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><Publisher><PublisherInfo><PublisherName>Springer Netherlands</PublisherName><PublisherLocation>Dordrecht</PublisherLocation><PublisherImprintName>Springer</PublisherImprintName></PublisherInfo><Journal OutputMedium="All"><JournalInfo JournalProductType="NonStandardArchiveJournal" NumberingStyle="Unnumbered"><JournalID>11019</JournalID><JournalPrintISSN>1386-7423</JournalPrintISSN><JournalElectronicISSN>1572-8633</JournalElectronicISSN><JournalTitle>Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy</JournalTitle><JournalSubTitle>A European Journal</JournalSubTitle><JournalAbbreviatedTitle>Med Health Care and Philos</JournalAbbreviatedTitle><JournalSubjectGroup><JournalSubject Code="SCH" Type="Primary">Medicine & Public Health</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Code="SCH66000" Priority="1" Type="Secondary">Theory of Medicine/Bioethics</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Code="SCR16005" Priority="2" Type="Secondary">Medical Law</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Code="SCE14000" Priority="3" Type="Secondary">Ethics</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Code="SCH64000" Priority="4" Type="Secondary">History of Medicine</JournalSubject><SubjectCollection Code="SC11">Medicine</SubjectCollection></JournalSubjectGroup></JournalInfo><Volume OutputMedium="All"><VolumeInfo TocLevels="0" VolumeType="Regular"><VolumeIDStart>16</VolumeIDStart><VolumeIDEnd>16</VolumeIDEnd><VolumeIssueCount>4</VolumeIssueCount></VolumeInfo><Issue IssueType="Regular" OutputMedium="All"><IssueInfo IssueType="Regular" TocLevels="0"><IssueIDStart>2</IssueIDStart><IssueIDEnd>2</IssueIDEnd><IssueArticleCount>21</IssueArticleCount><IssueHistory><OnlineDate><Year>2013</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>5</Day></OnlineDate><PrintDate><Year>2013</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>4</Day></PrintDate><CoverDate><Year>2013</Year><Month>5</Month></CoverDate><PricelistYear>2013</PricelistYear></IssueHistory><IssueCopyright><CopyrightHolderName>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht</CopyrightHolderName><CopyrightYear>2013</CopyrightYear></IssueCopyright></IssueInfo><Article ID="s11019-011-9357-5" OutputMedium="All"><ArticleInfo ArticleType="OriginalPaper" ContainsESM="No" Language="En" NumberingStyle="Unnumbered" TocLevels="0"><ArticleID>9357</ArticleID><ArticleDOI>10.1007/s11019-011-9357-5</ArticleDOI><ArticleSequenceNumber>8</ArticleSequenceNumber><ArticleTitle Language="En" OutputMedium="All">Euthanasia and end-of-life practices in France and Germany. A comparative study</ArticleTitle><ArticleCategory>Scientific Contribution</ArticleCategory><ArticleFirstPage>197</ArticleFirstPage><ArticleLastPage>209</ArticleLastPage><ArticleHistory><RegistrationDate><Year>2011</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>10</Day></RegistrationDate><OnlineDate><Year>2011</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>23</Day></OnlineDate></ArticleHistory><ArticleCopyright><CopyrightHolderName>Springer Science+Business Media B.V.</CopyrightHolderName><CopyrightYear>2011</CopyrightYear></ArticleCopyright><ArticleGrants Type="Regular"><MetadataGrant Grant="OpenAccess"></MetadataGrant><AbstractGrant Grant="OpenAccess"></AbstractGrant><BodyPDFGrant Grant="Restricted"></BodyPDFGrant><BodyHTMLGrant Grant="Restricted"></BodyHTMLGrant><BibliographyGrant Grant="Restricted"></BibliographyGrant><ESMGrant Grant="Restricted"></ESMGrant></ArticleGrants></ArticleInfo><ArticleHeader><AuthorGroup><Author AffiliationIDS="Aff1" CorrespondingAffiliationID="Aff1"><AuthorName DisplayOrder="Western"><GivenName>Ruth</GivenName><FamilyName>Horn</FamilyName></AuthorName><Contact><Phone>+44-117-9287308</Phone><Fax>+44-11792-87326</Fax><Email>ruth.horn@bristol.ac.uk</Email></Contact></Author><Affiliation ID="Aff1"><OrgDivision>Centre for Ethics in Medicine</OrgDivision><OrgName>University of Bristol</OrgName><OrgAddress><Street>Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road</Street><City>Bristol</City><Postcode>BS8 2PS</Postcode><Country Code="GB">UK</Country></OrgAddress></Affiliation></AuthorGroup><Abstract ID="Abs1" Language="En" OutputMedium="All"><Heading>Abstract</Heading><Para>The objective of this paper is to understand from a sociological perspective how the moral question of euthanasia, framed as the “right to die”, emerges and is dealt with in society. It takes France and Germany as case studies, two countries in which euthanasia is prohibited and which have similar legislation on the issue. I presuppose that, and explore how, each society has its own specificities in terms of practical, social and political norms that affect the ways in which they deal with these issues. The paper thus seeks to understand how requests for the “right to die” emerge in each society, through both the debate (analysis of daily newspapers, medical and philosophical literature, legal texts) and the practices (ethnographic work in three French and two German hospitals) that elucidate the phenomenon. It does so, however, without attempting to solve the moral question of euthanasia. In spite of the differences observed between these two countries, the central issue at stake in their respective debates is the question of the individual’s autonomy to choose the conditions in which he or she wishes to die; these conditions depend, amongst others, on the doctor-patient relationship, the organisation of end-of-life care in hospital settings, and more generally, on the way autonomy is defined and handled in the public debate.</Para></Abstract><KeywordGroup Language="En"><Heading>Keywords</Heading><Keyword>Autonomy</Keyword><Keyword>Debate</Keyword><Keyword>End-of-life practices</Keyword><Keyword>Euthanasia</Keyword><Keyword>France</Keyword><Keyword>Germany</Keyword><Keyword>Limitation of medical intervention</Keyword></KeywordGroup><ArticleNote Type="Misc"><SimplePara>This paper presents the results of my PhD: R. Horn. 2009. <Emphasis Type="Italic">Le debat sur l’euthanasie et les pratiques en fin de vie en France et en Allemagne. Une étude comparative.</Emphasis> Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales. Paris.</SimplePara></ArticleNote></ArticleHeader><NoBody></NoBody></Article></Issue></Volume></Journal></Publisher></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Euthanasia and end-of-life practices in France and Germany. A comparative study</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Euthanasia and end-of-life practices in France and Germany. A comparative study</title></titleInfo><name type="personal" displayLabel="corresp"><namePart type="given">Ruth</namePart><namePart type="family">Horn</namePart><affiliation>Centre for Ethics in Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, BS8 2PS, Bristol, UK</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: ruth.horn@bristol.ac.uk</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="OriginalPaper" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Springer Netherlands</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Dordrecht</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2013-05-01</dateIssued><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2011</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><abstract lang="en">Abstract: The objective of this paper is to understand from a sociological perspective how the moral question of euthanasia, framed as the “right to die”, emerges and is dealt with in society. It takes France and Germany as case studies, two countries in which euthanasia is prohibited and which have similar legislation on the issue. I presuppose that, and explore how, each society has its own specificities in terms of practical, social and political norms that affect the ways in which they deal with these issues. The paper thus seeks to understand how requests for the “right to die” emerge in each society, through both the debate (analysis of daily newspapers, medical and philosophical literature, legal texts) and the practices (ethnographic work in three French and two German hospitals) that elucidate the phenomenon. It does so, however, without attempting to solve the moral question of euthanasia. In spite of the differences observed between these two countries, the central issue at stake in their respective debates is the question of the individual’s autonomy to choose the conditions in which he or she wishes to die; these conditions depend, amongst others, on the doctor-patient relationship, the organisation of end-of-life care in hospital settings, and more generally, on the way autonomy is defined and handled in the public debate.</abstract><note>Scientific Contribution</note><subject lang="en"><genre>Keywords</genre><topic>Autonomy</topic><topic>Debate</topic><topic>End-of-life practices</topic><topic>Euthanasia</topic><topic>France</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Limitation of medical intervention</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy</title><subTitle>A European Journal</subTitle></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Med Health Care and Philos</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" displayLabel="Non Standard Archive Journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><originInfo><publisher>Springer</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2013-04-05</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2013</copyrightDate></originInfo><subject><genre>Journal-Subject-Collection</genre><topic authority="SpringerSubjectCodes" authorityURI="SC11">Medicine</topic></subject><subject><genre>Journal-Subject-Group</genre><topic authority="SpringerSubjectCodes" authorityURI="SCH">Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic authority="SpringerSubjectCodes" authorityURI="SCH66000">Theory of Medicine/Bioethics</topic><topic authority="SpringerSubjectCodes" authorityURI="SCR16005">Medical Law</topic><topic authority="SpringerSubjectCodes" authorityURI="SCE14000">Ethics</topic><topic authority="SpringerSubjectCodes" authorityURI="SCH64000">History of Medicine</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">1386-7423</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1572-8633</identifier><identifier type="JournalID">11019</identifier><identifier type="IssueArticleCount">21</identifier><identifier type="VolumeIssueCount">4</identifier><part><date>2013</date><detail type="volume"><number>16</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="issue"><number>2</number><caption>no.</caption></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>197</start><end>209</end></extent></part><recordInfo><recordOrigin>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, 2013</recordOrigin></recordInfo></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">B8AEB84F1763329897A6C59358C96714BA343CAC</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/VQC-M6ZKLK8W-8</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1007/s11019-011-9357-5</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">9357</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">s11019-011-9357-5</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 2011</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-3XSW68JL-F">springer</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 2011</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B8AEB84F1763329897A6C59358C96714BA343CAC/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Psychologie/explor/BernheimV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000B10 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000B10 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Psychologie
|area= BernheimV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:B8AEB84F1763329897A6C59358C96714BA343CAC
|texte= Euthanasia and end-of-life practices in France and Germany. A comparative study
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |