Must most psychotherapists remain as incompetent as they now are?
Identifieur interne : 000820 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000819; suivant : 000821Must most psychotherapists remain as incompetent as they now are?
Auteurs : Albert EllisSource :
- Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy [ 0022-0116 ] ; 1982-03-01.
English descriptors
- Teeft :
- Albert ellis, Basic personality change, Behavior therapy, Behavioral change, Behavioral methods, Cognitive, Cognitive distraction, Discomfort anxiety, Efficient therapy, Elli, Ellis abrahms, Ellis grieger, Ellis whiteley, Emotional disturbance, Gradual desensitization, Marcus aurelius, Modeling, Operant conditioning, Palo alto, Past experiences, People change, Potential harm, Present disturbances, Psychotherapy, Reciprocal inhibition, Relaxation response, Several reasons, Show clients, Social reinforcement, Symptom removal, Therapy, Unselective eclecticism.
Abstract
Abstract: Although psychotherapy often is effective or helpful for groups of people, it is frequently inefficient and therefore is wasteful for many clients and actually contributes to harming a sizable minority of them. Some of the main aspects of therapeutic inefficiency are discussed in this paper, including: overemphasis on past experience; encouraging dependency and the dire need for love; overemphasis on modeling; the stressing of insight; the use of catharsis and abreaction; the use of cognitive distraction; self-efficacy suggestions; operant conditioning; gradual desensitization; and unselective eclecticism. Specific suggestions for increasing the efficiency of psychotherapy are given.
Url:
DOI: 10.1007/BF00946200
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:A471E342F9D4005E2CE64D7A889130ECA9CB9F7FLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Must most psychotherapists remain as incompetent as they now are?</title><author><name sortKey="Ellis, Albert" sort="Ellis, Albert" uniqKey="Ellis A" first="Albert" last="Ellis">Albert Ellis</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute for Rational-Emotive Therapy, 45 E. 65th Street, 10021, New York, N. Y.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:A471E342F9D4005E2CE64D7A889130ECA9CB9F7F</idno><date when="1982" year="1982">1982</date><idno type="doi">10.1007/BF00946200</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/A471E342F9D4005E2CE64D7A889130ECA9CB9F7F/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000820</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000820</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Must most psychotherapists remain as incompetent as they now are?</title><author><name sortKey="Ellis, Albert" sort="Ellis, Albert" uniqKey="Ellis A" first="Albert" last="Ellis">Albert Ellis</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute for Rational-Emotive Therapy, 45 E. 65th Street, 10021, New York, N. Y.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy</title><title level="j" type="sub">On the Cutting Edge of Modern Developments in Psychotherapy</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">J Contemp Psychother</title><idno type="ISSN">0022-0116</idno><idno type="eISSN">1573-3564</idno><imprint><publisher>Kluwer Academic Publishers-Human Sciences Press</publisher><pubPlace>New York</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1982-03-01">1982-03-01</date><biblScope unit="volume">13</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="17">17</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="28">28</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0022-0116</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0022-0116</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Albert ellis</term><term>Basic personality change</term><term>Behavior therapy</term><term>Behavioral change</term><term>Behavioral methods</term><term>Cognitive</term><term>Cognitive distraction</term><term>Discomfort anxiety</term><term>Efficient therapy</term><term>Elli</term><term>Ellis abrahms</term><term>Ellis grieger</term><term>Ellis whiteley</term><term>Emotional disturbance</term><term>Gradual desensitization</term><term>Marcus aurelius</term><term>Modeling</term><term>Operant conditioning</term><term>Palo alto</term><term>Past experiences</term><term>People change</term><term>Potential harm</term><term>Present disturbances</term><term>Psychotherapy</term><term>Reciprocal inhibition</term><term>Relaxation response</term><term>Several reasons</term><term>Show clients</term><term>Social reinforcement</term><term>Symptom removal</term><term>Therapy</term><term>Unselective eclecticism</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: Although psychotherapy often is effective or helpful for groups of people, it is frequently inefficient and therefore is wasteful for many clients and actually contributes to harming a sizable minority of them. Some of the main aspects of therapeutic inefficiency are discussed in this paper, including: overemphasis on past experience; encouraging dependency and the dire need for love; overemphasis on modeling; the stressing of insight; the use of catharsis and abreaction; the use of cognitive distraction; self-efficacy suggestions; operant conditioning; gradual desensitization; and unselective eclecticism. Specific suggestions for increasing the efficiency of psychotherapy are given.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>springer-journals</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>elli</json:string><json:string>behavior therapy</json:string><json:string>albert ellis</json:string><json:string>efficient therapy</json:string><json:string>past experiences</json:string><json:string>ellis whiteley</json:string><json:string>modeling</json:string><json:string>symptom removal</json:string><json:string>operant conditioning</json:string><json:string>people change</json:string><json:string>gradual desensitization</json:string><json:string>social reinforcement</json:string><json:string>discomfort anxiety</json:string><json:string>ellis abrahms</json:string><json:string>show clients</json:string><json:string>therapy</json:string><json:string>unselective eclecticism</json:string><json:string>cognitive distraction</json:string><json:string>emotional disturbance</json:string><json:string>relaxation response</json:string><json:string>basic personality change</json:string><json:string>palo alto</json:string><json:string>several reasons</json:string><json:string>reciprocal inhibition</json:string><json:string>behavioral methods</json:string><json:string>present disturbances</json:string><json:string>behavioral change</json:string><json:string>ellis grieger</json:string><json:string>potential harm</json:string><json:string>marcus aurelius</json:string><json:string>psychotherapy</json:string><json:string>cognitive</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Albert Ellis Ph.D.</name><affiliations><json:string>Institute for Rational-Emotive Therapy, 45 E. 65th Street, 10021, New York, N. Y.</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>BF00946200</json:string><json:string>Art2</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/1BB-HMXKF367-L</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>OriginalPaper</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Abstract: Although psychotherapy often is effective or helpful for groups of people, it is frequently inefficient and therefore is wasteful for many clients and actually contributes to harming a sizable minority of them. Some of the main aspects of therapeutic inefficiency are discussed in this paper, including: overemphasis on past experience; encouraging dependency and the dire need for love; overemphasis on modeling; the stressing of insight; the use of catharsis and abreaction; the use of cognitive distraction; self-efficacy suggestions; operant conditioning; gradual desensitization; and unselective eclecticism. Specific suggestions for increasing the efficiency of psychotherapy are given.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.628</score><pdfWordCount>4476</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>27869</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>12</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>432 x 648 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>96</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>702</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>0</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Must most psychotherapists remain as incompetent as they now are?</title><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><title>Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><publicationDate>1982</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1982</copyrightDate><issn><json:string>0022-0116</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1573-3564</json:string></eissn><journalId><json:string>10879</json:string></journalId><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><pages><first>17</first><last>28</last></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Public Health/Gesundheitswesen</value></json:item><json:item><value>Psychiatry</value></json:item><json:item><value>Clinical Psychology</value></json:item><json:item><value>Psychology of Personality</value></json:item><json:item><value>Social Psychology</value></json:item></subject></host><namedEntities><unitex><date></date><geogName></geogName><orgName></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName></persName><placeName></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/1BB-HMXKF367-L</json:string></ark><categories><wos></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - health sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - psychology & cognitive sciences</json:string><json:string>3 - clinical psychology</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Health Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Medicine</json:string><json:string>3 - Psychiatry and Mental health</json:string><json:string>1 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Psychology</json:string><json:string>3 - Clinical Psychology</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences humaines et sociales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>1982</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1982</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1007/BF00946200</json:string></doi><id>A471E342F9D4005E2CE64D7A889130ECA9CB9F7F</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A471E342F9D4005E2CE64D7A889130ECA9CB9F7F/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A471E342F9D4005E2CE64D7A889130ECA9CB9F7F/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/A471E342F9D4005E2CE64D7A889130ECA9CB9F7F/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Must most psychotherapists remain as incompetent as they now are?</title><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher scheme="https://publisher-list.data.istex.fr">Kluwer Academic Publishers-Human Sciences Press</publisher><pubPlace>New York</pubPlace><availability><licence><p>Human Sciences Press, 1982</p></licence><p scheme="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-3XSW68JL-F">springer</p></availability><date>1982</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="research-article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</note><note type="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Must most psychotherapists remain as incompetent as they now are?</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Albert</forename><surname>Ellis</surname></persName><roleName type="degree">Ph.D.</roleName><affiliation>Institute for Rational-Emotive Therapy, 45 E. 65th Street, 10021, New York, N. Y.</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">A471E342F9D4005E2CE64D7A889130ECA9CB9F7F</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/1BB-HMXKF367-L</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1007/BF00946200</idno><idno type="article-id">BF00946200</idno><idno type="article-id">Art2</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy</title><title level="j" type="sub">On the Cutting Edge of Modern Developments in Psychotherapy</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">J Contemp Psychother</title><idno type="pISSN">0022-0116</idno><idno type="eISSN">1573-3564</idno><idno type="journal-ID">true</idno><idno type="issue-article-count">8</idno><idno type="volume-issue-count">2</idno><imprint><publisher>Kluwer Academic Publishers-Human Sciences Press</publisher><pubPlace>New York</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1982-03-01"></date><biblScope unit="volume">13</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="17">17</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="28">28</biblScope></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1982</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Abstract: Although psychotherapy often is effective or helpful for groups of people, it is frequently inefficient and therefore is wasteful for many clients and actually contributes to harming a sizable minority of them. Some of the main aspects of therapeutic inefficiency are discussed in this paper, including: overemphasis on past experience; encouraging dependency and the dire need for love; overemphasis on modeling; the stressing of insight; the use of catharsis and abreaction; the use of cognitive distraction; self-efficacy suggestions; operant conditioning; gradual desensitization; and unselective eclecticism. Specific suggestions for increasing the efficiency of psychotherapy are given.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="Journal Subject"><list><head>Medicine & Public Health</head><item><term>Public Health/Gesundheitswesen</term></item><item><term>Psychiatry</term></item><item><term>Clinical Psychology</term></item><item><term>Psychology of Personality</term></item><item><term>Social Psychology</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1982-03-01">Published</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2017-12-1">References added</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A471E342F9D4005E2CE64D7A889130ECA9CB9F7F/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="corpus springer-journals not found" wicri:toSee="no header"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//Springer-Verlag//DTD A++ V2.4//EN" URI="http://devel.springer.de/A++/V2.4/DTD/A++V2.4.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><Publisher><PublisherInfo><PublisherName>Kluwer Academic Publishers-Human Sciences Press</PublisherName><PublisherLocation>New York</PublisherLocation></PublisherInfo><Journal><JournalInfo JournalProductType="ArchiveJournal" NumberingStyle="Unnumbered"><JournalID>10879</JournalID><JournalPrintISSN>0022-0116</JournalPrintISSN><JournalElectronicISSN>1573-3564</JournalElectronicISSN><JournalTitle>Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy</JournalTitle><JournalSubTitle>On the Cutting Edge of Modern Developments in Psychotherapy</JournalSubTitle><JournalAbbreviatedTitle>J Contemp Psychother</JournalAbbreviatedTitle><JournalSubjectGroup><JournalSubject Type="Primary">Medicine & Public Health</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Public Health/Gesundheitswesen</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Psychiatry</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Clinical Psychology</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Psychology of Personality</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Social Psychology</JournalSubject></JournalSubjectGroup></JournalInfo><Volume><VolumeInfo VolumeType="Regular" TocLevels="0"><VolumeIDStart>13</VolumeIDStart><VolumeIDEnd>13</VolumeIDEnd><VolumeIssueCount>2</VolumeIssueCount></VolumeInfo><Issue IssueType="Regular"><IssueInfo TocLevels="0"><IssueIDStart>1</IssueIDStart><IssueIDEnd>1</IssueIDEnd><IssueArticleCount>8</IssueArticleCount><IssueHistory><CoverDate><DateString>Spring/Summer 1982</DateString><Year>1982</Year><Month>3</Month></CoverDate></IssueHistory><IssueCopyright><CopyrightHolderName>Human Sciences Press</CopyrightHolderName><CopyrightYear>1982</CopyrightYear></IssueCopyright></IssueInfo><Article ID="Art2"><ArticleInfo Language="En" ArticleType="OriginalPaper" NumberingStyle="Unnumbered" TocLevels="0" ContainsESM="No"><ArticleID>BF00946200</ArticleID><ArticleDOI>10.1007/BF00946200</ArticleDOI><ArticleSequenceNumber>2</ArticleSequenceNumber><ArticleTitle Language="En">Must most psychotherapists remain as incompetent as they now are?</ArticleTitle><ArticleFirstPage>17</ArticleFirstPage><ArticleLastPage>28</ArticleLastPage><ArticleHistory><RegistrationDate><Year>2004</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>21</Day></RegistrationDate></ArticleHistory><ArticleCopyright><CopyrightHolderName>Human Sciences Press</CopyrightHolderName><CopyrightYear>1982</CopyrightYear></ArticleCopyright><ArticleGrants Type="Regular"><MetadataGrant Grant="OpenAccess"></MetadataGrant><AbstractGrant Grant="OpenAccess"></AbstractGrant><BodyPDFGrant Grant="Restricted"></BodyPDFGrant><BodyHTMLGrant Grant="Restricted"></BodyHTMLGrant><BibliographyGrant Grant="Restricted"></BibliographyGrant><ESMGrant Grant="Restricted"></ESMGrant></ArticleGrants><ArticleContext><JournalID>10879</JournalID><VolumeIDStart>13</VolumeIDStart><VolumeIDEnd>13</VolumeIDEnd><IssueIDStart>1</IssueIDStart><IssueIDEnd>1</IssueIDEnd></ArticleContext></ArticleInfo><ArticleHeader><AuthorGroup><Author AffiliationIDS="Aff1"><AuthorName DisplayOrder="Western"><GivenName>Albert</GivenName><FamilyName>Ellis</FamilyName><Degrees>Ph.D.</Degrees></AuthorName></Author><Affiliation ID="Aff1"><OrgName>Institute for Rational-Emotive Therapy</OrgName><OrgAddress><Street>45 E. 65th Street</Street><Postcode>10021</Postcode><City>New York</City><State>N. Y.</State></OrgAddress></Affiliation></AuthorGroup><Abstract ID="Abs1" Language="En"><Heading>Abstract</Heading><Para>Although psychotherapy often is effective or helpful for groups of people, it is frequently inefficient and therefore is wasteful for many clients and actually contributes to harming a sizable minority of them. Some of the main aspects of therapeutic inefficiency are discussed in this paper, including: overemphasis on past experience; encouraging dependency and the dire need for love; overemphasis on modeling; the stressing of insight; the use of catharsis and abreaction; the use of cognitive distraction; self-efficacy suggestions; operant conditioning; gradual desensitization; and unselective eclecticism. Specific suggestions for increasing the efficiency of psychotherapy are given.</Para></Abstract><ArticleNote Type="PresentedAt"><SimplePara>This paper was originally presented at the Symposium, “Competence in Psychology: Hopeless Ideal or Trainable and Measurable Reality?,” American Psychological Association Convention, Montreal, Sept. 2, 1980.</SimplePara></ArticleNote></ArticleHeader><NoBody></NoBody></Article></Issue></Volume></Journal></Publisher></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Must most psychotherapists remain as incompetent as they now are?</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Must most psychotherapists remain as incompetent as they now are?</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Albert</namePart><namePart type="family">Ellis</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">Ph.D.</namePart><affiliation>Institute for Rational-Emotive Therapy, 45 E. 65th Street, 10021, New York, N. Y.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="OriginalPaper" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Kluwer Academic Publishers-Human Sciences Press</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">New York</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1982-03-01</dateIssued><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1982</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1982</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><abstract lang="en">Abstract: Although psychotherapy often is effective or helpful for groups of people, it is frequently inefficient and therefore is wasteful for many clients and actually contributes to harming a sizable minority of them. Some of the main aspects of therapeutic inefficiency are discussed in this paper, including: overemphasis on past experience; encouraging dependency and the dire need for love; overemphasis on modeling; the stressing of insight; the use of catharsis and abreaction; the use of cognitive distraction; self-efficacy suggestions; operant conditioning; gradual desensitization; and unselective eclecticism. Specific suggestions for increasing the efficiency of psychotherapy are given.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy</title><subTitle>On the Cutting Edge of Modern Developments in Psychotherapy</subTitle></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>J Contemp Psychother</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" displayLabel="Archive Journal" authority="ISTEX" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><originInfo><publisher>Springer</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1982-03-01</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1982</copyrightDate></originInfo><subject><genre>Medicine & Public Health</genre><topic>Public Health/Gesundheitswesen</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Clinical Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology of Personality</topic><topic>Social Psychology</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0022-0116</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1573-3564</identifier><identifier type="JournalID">10879</identifier><identifier type="IssueArticleCount">8</identifier><identifier type="VolumeIssueCount">2</identifier><part><date>1982</date><detail type="volume"><number>13</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="issue"><number>1</number><caption>no.</caption></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>17</start><end>28</end></extent></part><recordInfo><recordOrigin>Human Sciences Press, 1982</recordOrigin></recordInfo></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">A471E342F9D4005E2CE64D7A889130ECA9CB9F7F</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/1BB-HMXKF367-L</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1007/BF00946200</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">BF00946200</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">Art2</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Human Sciences Press, 1982</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-3XSW68JL-F">springer</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Human Sciences Press, 1982</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A471E342F9D4005E2CE64D7A889130ECA9CB9F7F/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Psychologie/explor/BernheimV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000820 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000820 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Psychologie
|area= BernheimV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:A471E342F9D4005E2CE64D7A889130ECA9CB9F7F
|texte= Must most psychotherapists remain as incompetent as they now are?
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |