Serveur d'exploration Hippolyte Bernheim

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Internationally Common Features of Public Old-Age Pensions, and Their Implications for Models of the Public Sector

Identifieur interne : 000802 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000801; suivant : 000803

Internationally Common Features of Public Old-Age Pensions, and Their Implications for Models of the Public Sector

Auteurs : Casey B. Mulligan ; Xavier Sala-I-Martin

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:51F3B3C485586A3A9B1173B28163FD3C4D533DA1

English descriptors

Abstract

What does the international history of old-age Social Security program design say about the forces creating and sustaining it as a public program? First, because many program features are internationally common, and/or explained by country characteristics, SS may emerge and grow due to systematic political and economic forces. Second, some observations suggest that political forces are important: (a) SS redistributes from young to old, even when the elderly consume as much or more than do the young, and (b) benefits increase with lifetime earnings and are hardly means-tested. On the other hand, it is not simply a matter of the elderly out-voting the young, because: (c) benefit formulas induce retirement, especially in the countries with the largest SS budgets, and (d) similar public pension programs emerge and grow under very different political regimes. We explain how empirical observations, and some currently unanswered empirical questions, relate to various public pension theories.

Url:
DOI: 10.2202/1538-0637.1067

Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:51F3B3C485586A3A9B1173B28163FD3C4D533DA1

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Internationally Common Features of Public Old-Age Pensions, and Their Implications for Models of the Public Sector</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Mulligan, Casey B" sort="Mulligan, Casey B" uniqKey="Mulligan C" first="Casey B" last="Mulligan">Casey B. Mulligan</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>University of Chicago, c-mulligan@uchicago.edu</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>E-mail: c-mulligan@uchicago.edu</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>University of Chicago, </mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sala I Martin, Xavier" sort="Sala I Martin, Xavier" uniqKey="Sala I Martin X" first="Xavier" last="Sala-I-Martin">Xavier Sala-I-Martin</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Columbia University, xs23@columbia.edu</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>E-mail: xs23@columbia.edu</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Columbia University, </mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:51F3B3C485586A3A9B1173B28163FD3C4D533DA1</idno>
<date when="2011" year="2011">2011</date>
<idno type="doi">10.2202/1538-0637.1067</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/51F3B3C485586A3A9B1173B28163FD3C4D533DA1/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000802</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000802</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Internationally Common Features of Public Old-Age Pensions, and Their Implications for Models of the Public Sector</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Mulligan, Casey B" sort="Mulligan, Casey B" uniqKey="Mulligan C" first="Casey B" last="Mulligan">Casey B. Mulligan</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>University of Chicago, c-mulligan@uchicago.edu</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>E-mail: c-mulligan@uchicago.edu</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>University of Chicago, </mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sala I Martin, Xavier" sort="Sala I Martin, Xavier" uniqKey="Sala I Martin X" first="Xavier" last="Sala-I-Martin">Xavier Sala-I-Martin</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Columbia University, xs23@columbia.edu</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>E-mail: xs23@columbia.edu</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Columbia University, </mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1538-0637</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>De Gruyter</publisher>
<date type="published" when="2004-05-01">2004-05-01</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Administrative costs</term>
<term>Annuity</term>
<term>Asset income</term>
<term>Assistance programs</term>
<term>Auerbach</term>
<term>Basic data</term>
<term>Becker</term>
<term>Beneficiary</term>
<term>Benefit dollar</term>
<term>Benefit formulas</term>
<term>Capita costs</term>
<term>Capita income growth</term>
<term>Capita money income</term>
<term>Capital income</term>
<term>Caput</term>
<term>Cash income</term>
<term>Cash transfers</term>
<term>Census bureau</term>
<term>Chicago press</term>
<term>Columbia university</term>
<term>Common features</term>
<term>Companion paper</term>
<term>Conservative assumption</term>
<term>Consumer economics</term>
<term>Country characteristics</term>
<term>Current population reports</term>
<term>Current system</term>
<term>Danziger</term>
<term>Danzinger</term>
<term>Deadweight costs</term>
<term>Democratic countries</term>
<term>Demographic variables</term>
<term>Didier blanchet</term>
<term>Discrimination laws</term>
<term>Earnings test</term>
<term>Earnings tests</term>
<term>Economic advisers</term>
<term>Economic analysis policy</term>
<term>Economic forces</term>
<term>Economic growth</term>
<term>Economic history</term>
<term>Economic literature</term>
<term>Economic perspectives</term>
<term>Education spending</term>
<term>Efficiency models</term>
<term>Efficiency theories</term>
<term>Efficient policy</term>
<term>Elderly</term>
<term>Elderly adult consumption</term>
<term>Elderly consumption</term>
<term>Elderly crowds</term>
<term>Elderly household cash income</term>
<term>Elderly households</term>
<term>Elderly income</term>
<term>Elderly person</term>
<term>Elderly population</term>
<term>Empirical observations</term>
<term>Empirical questions</term>
<term>Empirical regularities</term>
<term>Environmental regulation</term>
<term>Environmental regulations</term>
<term>Family income</term>
<term>Federal district</term>
<term>Future benefits</term>
<term>Gale johnson</term>
<term>Generational</term>
<term>Generational accounting</term>
<term>Generational incidence</term>
<term>Generational redistribution</term>
<term>Government budgets</term>
<term>Government printing office</term>
<term>Government regulation</term>
<term>Government spending</term>
<term>Government subsidies</term>
<term>Governments finance</term>
<term>Gruber</term>
<term>Health care</term>
<term>Health care expenditure</term>
<term>House committee</term>
<term>Household size</term>
<term>Hurd</term>
<term>Important questions</term>
<term>Individual accounts systems</term>
<term>Inefficiency</term>
<term>Insurance markets</term>
<term>Intergenerational redistribution</term>
<term>International history</term>
<term>International labour review</term>
<term>Jonathan gruber</term>
<term>Jonathan skinner</term>
<term>Labor income</term>
<term>Larger incentives</term>
<term>Larger programs</term>
<term>Life annuities</term>
<term>Life annuity</term>
<term>Life cycle</term>
<term>Lifetime income</term>
<term>Little progressivity</term>
<term>Main purpose</term>
<term>Many others</term>
<term>Martin feldstein</term>
<term>Medical care</term>
<term>Medicare</term>
<term>Medicare policy</term>
<term>Money income</term>
<term>More detail</term>
<term>More labor income</term>
<term>More money income</term>
<term>Motive traces</term>
<term>Mulligan</term>
<term>Mute preference intensity</term>
<term>Nancial support</term>
<term>Nber</term>
<term>Nondemocratic</term>
<term>Nondemocratic countries</term>
<term>Nonelderly</term>
<term>Nonelderly consumption</term>
<term>Nonelderly households</term>
<term>Nonelderly income</term>
<term>Nonelderly money income</term>
<term>Normal retirement</term>
<term>Oecd</term>
<term>Oecd countries</term>
<term>Older workers</term>
<term>Other direction</term>
<term>Other government policies</term>
<term>Other government spending</term>
<term>Other hand</term>
<term>Other sources</term>
<term>Other spending</term>
<term>Other variables</term>
<term>Other words</term>
<term>Panel study</term>
<term>Payroll taxes</term>
<term>Pennsylvania press</term>
<term>Pension</term>
<term>Pension income</term>
<term>Pension programs</term>
<term>Pension systems</term>
<term>Percentage points</term>
<term>Personal income</term>
<term>Political activity</term>
<term>Political behavior</term>
<term>Political competition</term>
<term>Political component</term>
<term>Political economy</term>
<term>Political forces</term>
<term>Political frictions</term>
<term>Political institutions</term>
<term>Political models</term>
<term>Political power</term>
<term>Political process</term>
<term>Political struggle</term>
<term>Political system</term>
<term>Political theories</term>
<term>Population fraction</term>
<term>Positive theories</term>
<term>Positive theory</term>
<term>Previous literature</term>
<term>Previous studies</term>
<term>Private pension plans</term>
<term>Program size</term>
<term>Program spending</term>
<term>Provident funds</term>
<term>Public choice</term>
<term>Public pension income</term>
<term>Public pension programs</term>
<term>Public pensions</term>
<term>Public policy</term>
<term>Public programs</term>
<term>Public sector</term>
<term>Recent data</term>
<term>Recent years</term>
<term>Redistribution</term>
<term>Relative consumption</term>
<term>Relative consumption estimate</term>
<term>Relative importance</term>
<term>Relative incomes</term>
<term>Relative money income</term>
<term>Retiree</term>
<term>Retirement</term>
<term>Retirement incentives</term>
<term>Retirement regulation</term>
<term>Retirement test</term>
<term>Retirement tests</term>
<term>Same direction</term>
<term>Same time</term>
<term>Social security</term>
<term>Social security bulletin</term>
<term>Social security programs</term>
<term>Social security reform</term>
<term>Social security taxes</term>
<term>Soviet union</term>
<term>Spending growth</term>
<term>Stylized facts</term>
<term>Subsidy</term>
<term>Third world</term>
<term>Various issues</term>
<term>Vast majority</term>
<term>Welfare program</term>
<term>Western european systems</term>
<term>Young workers</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">What does the international history of old-age Social Security program design say about the forces creating and sustaining it as a public program? First, because many program features are internationally common, and/or explained by country characteristics, SS may emerge and grow due to systematic political and economic forces. Second, some observations suggest that political forces are important: (a) SS redistributes from young to old, even when the elderly consume as much or more than do the young, and (b) benefits increase with lifetime earnings and are hardly means-tested. On the other hand, it is not simply a matter of the elderly out-voting the young, because: (c) benefit formulas induce retirement, especially in the countries with the largest SS budgets, and (d) similar public pension programs emerge and grow under very different political regimes. We explain how empirical observations, and some currently unanswered empirical questions, relate to various public pension theories.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<istex>
<corpusName>degruyter-journals</corpusName>
<keywords>
<teeft>
<json:string>social security</json:string>
<json:string>nonelderly</json:string>
<json:string>caput</json:string>
<json:string>common features</json:string>
<json:string>nber</json:string>
<json:string>annuity</json:string>
<json:string>economic analysis policy</json:string>
<json:string>generational</json:string>
<json:string>medicare</json:string>
<json:string>public pensions</json:string>
<json:string>gruber</json:string>
<json:string>redistribution</json:string>
<json:string>chicago press</json:string>
<json:string>labor income</json:string>
<json:string>relative money income</json:string>
<json:string>positive theories</json:string>
<json:string>hurd</json:string>
<json:string>social security programs</json:string>
<json:string>benefit formulas</json:string>
<json:string>danziger</json:string>
<json:string>oecd</json:string>
<json:string>other government spending</json:string>
<json:string>danzinger</json:string>
<json:string>retiree</json:string>
<json:string>money income</json:string>
<json:string>relative consumption</json:string>
<json:string>economic growth</json:string>
<json:string>nondemocratic</json:string>
<json:string>elderly consumption</json:string>
<json:string>other hand</json:string>
<json:string>becker</json:string>
<json:string>earnings test</json:string>
<json:string>earnings tests</json:string>
<json:string>efficiency theories</json:string>
<json:string>government spending</json:string>
<json:string>payroll taxes</json:string>
<json:string>jonathan gruber</json:string>
<json:string>retirement incentives</json:string>
<json:string>efficiency models</json:string>
<json:string>generational incidence</json:string>
<json:string>elderly</json:string>
<json:string>mulligan</json:string>
<json:string>retirement test</json:string>
<json:string>house committee</json:string>
<json:string>political institutions</json:string>
<json:string>political forces</json:string>
<json:string>government printing office</json:string>
<json:string>asset income</json:string>
<json:string>nonelderly households</json:string>
<json:string>political models</json:string>
<json:string>public policy</json:string>
<json:string>oecd countries</json:string>
<json:string>environmental regulation</json:string>
<json:string>life annuities</json:string>
<json:string>capital income</json:string>
<json:string>recent years</json:string>
<json:string>economic forces</json:string>
<json:string>cash transfers</json:string>
<json:string>lifetime income</json:string>
<json:string>panel study</json:string>
<json:string>program size</json:string>
<json:string>pension programs</json:string>
<json:string>nonelderly consumption</json:string>
<json:string>beneficiary</json:string>
<json:string>inefficiency</json:string>
<json:string>auerbach</json:string>
<json:string>pension</json:string>
<json:string>generational accounting</json:string>
<json:string>political frictions</json:string>
<json:string>political power</json:string>
<json:string>health care</json:string>
<json:string>political system</json:string>
<json:string>empirical observations</json:string>
<json:string>provident funds</json:string>
<json:string>government budgets</json:string>
<json:string>political activity</json:string>
<json:string>political process</json:string>
<json:string>administrative costs</json:string>
<json:string>various issues</json:string>
<json:string>previous studies</json:string>
<json:string>elderly person</json:string>
<json:string>capita costs</json:string>
<json:string>martin feldstein</json:string>
<json:string>relative importance</json:string>
<json:string>democratic countries</json:string>
<json:string>didier blanchet</json:string>
<json:string>jonathan skinner</json:string>
<json:string>life annuity</json:string>
<json:string>political theories</json:string>
<json:string>basic data</json:string>
<json:string>discrimination laws</json:string>
<json:string>retirement tests</json:string>
<json:string>social security reform</json:string>
<json:string>political economy</json:string>
<json:string>elderly households</json:string>
<json:string>public sector</json:string>
<json:string>other words</json:string>
<json:string>census bureau</json:string>
<json:string>young workers</json:string>
<json:string>companion paper</json:string>
<json:string>subsidy</json:string>
<json:string>empirical questions</json:string>
<json:string>more money income</json:string>
<json:string>capita money income</json:string>
<json:string>pension income</json:string>
<json:string>elderly household cash income</json:string>
<json:string>cash income</json:string>
<json:string>public pension income</json:string>
<json:string>relative consumption estimate</json:string>
<json:string>household size</json:string>
<json:string>elderly adult consumption</json:string>
<json:string>relative incomes</json:string>
<json:string>conservative assumption</json:string>
<json:string>elderly population</json:string>
<json:string>economic advisers</json:string>
<json:string>family income</json:string>
<json:string>nonelderly money income</json:string>
<json:string>medical care</json:string>
<json:string>personal income</json:string>
<json:string>health care expenditure</json:string>
<json:string>welfare program</json:string>
<json:string>other government policies</json:string>
<json:string>third world</json:string>
<json:string>more labor income</json:string>
<json:string>elderly income</json:string>
<json:string>social security taxes</json:string>
<json:string>little progressivity</json:string>
<json:string>public pension programs</json:string>
<json:string>other sources</json:string>
<json:string>nondemocratic countries</json:string>
<json:string>pension systems</json:string>
<json:string>soviet union</json:string>
<json:string>western european systems</json:string>
<json:string>spending growth</json:string>
<json:string>many others</json:string>
<json:string>other variables</json:string>
<json:string>deadweight costs</json:string>
<json:string>generational redistribution</json:string>
<json:string>vast majority</json:string>
<json:string>demographic variables</json:string>
<json:string>larger incentives</json:string>
<json:string>larger programs</json:string>
<json:string>government subsidies</json:string>
<json:string>program spending</json:string>
<json:string>other direction</json:string>
<json:string>public programs</json:string>
<json:string>education spending</json:string>
<json:string>older workers</json:string>
<json:string>governments finance</json:string>
<json:string>intergenerational redistribution</json:string>
<json:string>government regulation</json:string>
<json:string>nonelderly income</json:string>
<json:string>population fraction</json:string>
<json:string>medicare policy</json:string>
<json:string>same direction</json:string>
<json:string>political behavior</json:string>
<json:string>assistance programs</json:string>
<json:string>normal retirement</json:string>
<json:string>future benefits</json:string>
<json:string>recent data</json:string>
<json:string>environmental regulations</json:string>
<json:string>retirement regulation</json:string>
<json:string>federal district</json:string>
<json:string>empirical regularities</json:string>
<json:string>other spending</json:string>
<json:string>percentage points</json:string>
<json:string>elderly crowds</json:string>
<json:string>more detail</json:string>
<json:string>previous literature</json:string>
<json:string>capita income growth</json:string>
<json:string>private pension plans</json:string>
<json:string>benefit dollar</json:string>
<json:string>insurance markets</json:string>
<json:string>political struggle</json:string>
<json:string>stylized facts</json:string>
<json:string>political competition</json:string>
<json:string>mute preference intensity</json:string>
<json:string>main purpose</json:string>
<json:string>consumer economics</json:string>
<json:string>efficient policy</json:string>
<json:string>political component</json:string>
<json:string>life cycle</json:string>
<json:string>individual accounts systems</json:string>
<json:string>motive traces</json:string>
<json:string>same time</json:string>
<json:string>pennsylvania press</json:string>
<json:string>current system</json:string>
<json:string>positive theory</json:string>
<json:string>important questions</json:string>
<json:string>nancial support</json:string>
<json:string>gale johnson</json:string>
<json:string>columbia university</json:string>
<json:string>public choice</json:string>
<json:string>country characteristics</json:string>
<json:string>economic history</json:string>
<json:string>international labour review</json:string>
<json:string>social security bulletin</json:string>
<json:string>economic literature</json:string>
<json:string>international history</json:string>
<json:string>economic perspectives</json:string>
<json:string>current population reports</json:string>
<json:string>retirement</json:string>
</teeft>
</keywords>
<author>
<json:item>
<name>Casey B Mulligan</name>
<affiliations>
<json:string>University of Chicago, c-mulligan@uchicago.edu</json:string>
<json:string>E-mail: c-mulligan@uchicago.edu</json:string>
<json:string>University of Chicago,</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<name>Xavier Sala-i-Martin</name>
<affiliations>
<json:string>Columbia University, xs23@columbia.edu</json:string>
<json:string>E-mail: xs23@columbia.edu</json:string>
<json:string>Columbia University,</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
</author>
<subject>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>Social Security</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>Pensions</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>Elderly</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>Retirement</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>Political Economics</value>
</json:item>
</subject>
<articleId>
<json:string>1538-0637.1067</json:string>
</articleId>
<arkIstex>ark:/67375/QT4-9SW4XVP7-Q</arkIstex>
<language>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</language>
<originalGenre>
<json:string>research-article</json:string>
</originalGenre>
<abstract>What does the international history of old-age Social Security program design say about the forces creating and sustaining it as a public program? First, because many program features are internationally common, and/or explained by country characteristics, SS may emerge and grow due to systematic political and economic forces. Second, some observations suggest that political forces are important: (a) SS redistributes from young to old, even when the elderly consume as much or more than do the young, and (b) benefits increase with lifetime earnings and are hardly means-tested. On the other hand, it is not simply a matter of the elderly out-voting the young, because: (c) benefit formulas induce retirement, especially in the countries with the largest SS budgets, and (d) similar public pension programs emerge and grow under very different political regimes. We explain how empirical observations, and some currently unanswered empirical questions, relate to various public pension theories.</abstract>
<qualityIndicators>
<refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative>
<abstractWordCount>150</abstractWordCount>
<abstractCharCount>999</abstractCharCount>
<keywordCount>5</keywordCount>
<score>8.8</score>
<pdfWordCount>15064</pdfWordCount>
<pdfCharCount>90334</pdfCharCount>
<pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion>
<pdfPageCount>37</pdfPageCount>
<pdfPageSize>612 x 792 pts (letter)</pdfPageSize>
</qualityIndicators>
<title>Internationally Common Features of Public Old-Age Pensions, and Their Implications for Models of the Public Sector</title>
<genre>
<json:string>research-article</json:string>
</genre>
<host>
<title>Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy</title>
<language>
<json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<eissn>
<json:string>1538-0637</json:string>
</eissn>
<publisherId>
<json:string>bejeap</json:string>
</publisherId>
<volume>4</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<genre>
<json:string>journal</json:string>
</genre>
</host>
<namedEntities>
<unitex>
<date>
<json:string>1939</json:string>
<json:string>1979</json:string>
<json:string>1941</json:string>
<json:string>1970</json:string>
<json:string>1997</json:string>
<json:string>1946</json:string>
<json:string>1880s</json:string>
<json:string>1935</json:string>
<json:string>1975</json:string>
<json:string>1913</json:string>
<json:string>1982</json:string>
<json:string>1890</json:string>
<json:string>1958</json:string>
<json:string>1976</json:string>
<json:string>2004-05-01</json:string>
<json:string>1954</json:string>
<json:string>20th century</json:string>
<json:string>1943</json:string>
<json:string>1983</json:string>
<json:string>1919</json:string>
<json:string>1999</json:string>
<json:string>1908</json:string>
<json:string>1970s</json:string>
<json:string>1950</json:string>
<json:string>1990</json:string>
<json:string>1937</json:string>
<json:string>1995</json:string>
<json:string>1973</json:string>
<json:string>1922</json:string>
<json:string>1967</json:string>
<json:string>2004</json:string>
<json:string>1996</json:string>
</date>
<geogName></geogName>
<orgName>
<json:string>Stigler Center</json:string>
<json:string>National Science Foundation</json:string>
<json:string>Columbia University</json:string>
<json:string>India, Malaysia, Singapore, Jamaica, Bahrain</json:string>
<json:string>Environmental Protection Agency</json:string>
<json:string>Air Act</json:string>
<json:string>Canada, and Japan</json:string>
<json:string>Union Army Pensions</json:string>
<json:string>American and Western European</json:string>
<json:string>Seychelles, Egypt</json:string>
<json:string>National Institute of Social Services</json:string>
<json:string>– Greece, Portugal, Spain, Italy, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Peru, and Uruguay</json:string>
<json:string>Belgium, France, Italy, and the Netherlands</json:string>
<json:string>University of Chicago</json:string>
<json:string>– New Zealand, Thailand, and Sweden</json:string>
<json:string>United States, the Congress</json:string>
<json:string>American Association of Retired Persons</json:string>
<json:string>Department of Economics, Columbia University, New York, NY</json:string>
<json:string>Canada, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, and Sweden</json:string>
<json:string>American SS</json:string>
<json:string>Congress</json:string>
<json:string>Grants SEC2001</json:string>
</orgName>
<orgName_funder>
<json:string>Grants SEC2001</json:string>
</orgName_funder>
<orgName_provider></orgName_provider>
<persName>
<json:string>Sherwin Rosen</json:string>
<json:string>Kevin Tsui</json:string>
<json:string>Selim Ariturk</json:string>
<json:string>Marco Bassetto</json:string>
<json:string>Xavier Sala</json:string>
<json:string>Hong Kong</json:string>
<json:string>Casey B. Mulligan</json:string>
<json:string>Lindert</json:string>
<json:string>U.S. Council</json:string>
<json:string>Randy Krozner</json:string>
<json:string>King Alfonso</json:string>
<json:string>Tomas Philipson</json:string>
<json:string>C. Are</json:string>
<json:string>Didier Blanchet</json:string>
<json:string>V.V. Chari</json:string>
<json:string>Martin Abstract</json:string>
<json:string>Hurd</json:string>
<json:string>Martin</json:string>
<json:string>Gary Becker</json:string>
<json:string>John Allread</json:string>
<json:string>Nancy Stokey</json:string>
<json:string>Amy Finkelstein</json:string>
<json:string>Don Fullerton</json:string>
<json:string>Daniel Beland</json:string>
</persName>
<placeName>
<json:string>IL</json:string>
<json:string>Germany</json:string>
<json:string>Mexico</json:string>
<json:string>Chile</json:string>
<json:string>Brazil</json:string>
<json:string>UK</json:string>
<json:string>Washington</json:string>
<json:string>Turkey</json:string>
<json:string>Canada</json:string>
<json:string>Argentina</json:string>
<json:string>China</json:string>
<json:string>St. Vincent</json:string>
<json:string>Europe</json:string>
<json:string>Japan</json:string>
<json:string>Kuwait</json:string>
<json:string>France</json:string>
<json:string>Italy</json:string>
<json:string>Sweden</json:string>
<json:string>Spain</json:string>
<json:string>Belgium</json:string>
</placeName>
<ref_url></ref_url>
<ref_bibl>
<json:string>Mulligan and Philipson (2000)</json:string>
<json:string>Boldrin et al., 1999, p. 322</json:string>
<json:string>Sala-i-Martin, 1996</json:string>
<json:string>Martin (2002)</json:string>
<json:string>Torrey and Thompson (1980)</json:string>
<json:string>Börsch-Supan and Schnabel, 1999, p. 147</json:string>
<json:string>Cutler and Johnson 2004</json:string>
<json:string>Danzinger et al. (1984)</json:string>
<json:string>Lee et al. (1999)</json:string>
<json:string>Tyabji, 1993, p. 59</json:string>
<json:string>Pampel and Williamson, 1989</json:string>
<json:string>Hurd (1990)</json:string>
<json:string>Gruat, 1990, p. 416</json:string>
<json:string>Martin (1999)</json:string>
<json:string>Miron and Weil, 1998, p. 301</json:string>
<json:string>Blanchet and Pelé, 1999</json:string>
<json:string>American Relative Elderly Adult Consumption, 1973</json:string>
<json:string>Liu, 1993, p. 61</json:string>
<json:string>Pestieau and Stijns, 1999, p. 498</json:string>
<json:string>Danzinger et al.</json:string>
<json:string>Nelson, 1983</json:string>
<json:string>Myers, 1993, p. 274</json:string>
<json:string>Jensen and Raffelhuschen, 1997</json:string>
<json:string>Myers, 1993, p. 147</json:string>
<json:string>Sala-iMartin, 1996</json:string>
<json:string>Foxley et al., 1979, p. 124</json:string>
<json:string>Auerbach et al., 1999, p. 77</json:string>
<json:string>Becker and Mulligan, 2003</json:string>
<json:string>Coronado et al., 199924</json:string>
<json:string>Rhodebeck (1993)</json:string>
<json:string>Auerbach et al., 1999, p. 6</json:string>
<json:string>SSA, 1995</json:string>
<json:string>Edwards, 1998, p. 37</json:string>
<json:string>OECD, 1997</json:string>
<json:string>Palme and Svensson, 1999, p. 366</json:string>
<json:string>Auerbach et al. (1999, p. 5)</json:string>
<json:string>Garrett, 1995</json:string>
<json:string>Gruat, 1990, p. 408</json:string>
<json:string>Auerbach et al., 1992</json:string>
<json:string>McClellan and Skinner, 1997</json:string>
<json:string>Blundell and Tanner (1998)</json:string>
<json:string>Gruber and Wise (1999)</json:string>
<json:string>Bhattacharya and Lakdawalla (2002)</json:string>
<json:string>Preston (1984)</json:string>
<json:string>Radner, 1981</json:string>
<json:string>Boskin et al. (1987)</json:string>
<json:string>see also Gruber and Wise, 1999</json:string>
<json:string>Danziger et al., 1984</json:string>
<json:string>Hagemann and John, 1997</json:string>
<json:string>Danziger et al. (1984, p. 188)</json:string>
<json:string>Coronado et al. (1999)</json:string>
<json:string>Cashin (1995)</json:string>
<json:string>Parsons (1982)</json:string>
<json:string>Chay et al., 2003</json:string>
<json:string>Lindert, 1994, p. 5</json:string>
<json:string>Burkhauser and Warlick, 1981</json:string>
<json:string>Danziger et al. (1984)</json:string>
<json:string>Haanes-Olsen, 1989, p. 19</json:string>
<json:string>the relative importance of each varies widely across countries – see Mulligan & Sala-iMartin, 1999</json:string>
<json:string>Department of Economics, University of Chicago, 1126</json:string>
<json:string>Hurd and Rohwedder (2003)</json:string>
<json:string>Danzinger et al. 1984</json:string>
<json:string>Jenkins, 1981, p. 633</json:string>
<json:string>Becker and Mulligan, 2000</json:string>
<json:string>Mulligan, 1997</json:string>
<json:string>House Committee, 1996, p. 31</json:string>
<json:string>[2004]</json:string>
</ref_bibl>
<bibl></bibl>
</unitex>
</namedEntities>
<ark>
<json:string>ark:/67375/QT4-9SW4XVP7-Q</json:string>
</ark>
<categories>
<inist>
<json:string>1 - sciences humaines et sociales</json:string>
<json:string>2 - art et archeologie</json:string>
</inist>
</categories>
<publicationDate>2004</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>2011</copyrightDate>
<doi>
<json:string>10.2202/1538-0637.1067</json:string>
</doi>
<id>51F3B3C485586A3A9B1173B28163FD3C4D533DA1</id>
<score>1</score>
<fulltext>
<json:item>
<extension>pdf</extension>
<original>true</original>
<mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/51F3B3C485586A3A9B1173B28163FD3C4D533DA1/fulltext/pdf</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<extension>zip</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/zip</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/51F3B3C485586A3A9B1173B28163FD3C4D533DA1/fulltext/zip</uri>
</json:item>
<istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/51F3B3C485586A3A9B1173B28163FD3C4D533DA1/fulltext/tei">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Internationally Common Features of Public Old-Age Pensions, and Their Implications for Models of the Public Sector</title>
<respStmt>
<resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp>
<name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>ISTEX</authority>
<publisher scheme="https://publisher-list.data.istex.fr">De Gruyter</publisher>
<availability>
<licence>
<p>©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston</p>
</licence>
<p scheme="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-B4QPMMZB-D">degruyter-journals</p>
</availability>
<date>2004-05-01</date>
</publicationStmt>
<notesStmt>
<note type="research-article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</note>
<note type="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note>
</notesStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct type="inbook">
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Internationally Common Features of Public Old-Age Pensions, and Their Implications for Models of the Public Sector</title>
<author xml:id="author-0000">
<persName>
<forename type="first">Casey B</forename>
<surname>Mulligan</surname>
</persName>
<email>c-mulligan@uchicago.edu</email>
<affiliation>University of Chicago, c-mulligan@uchicago.edu</affiliation>
<affiliation>University of Chicago,</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-0001">
<persName>
<forename type="first">Xavier</forename>
<surname>Sala-i-Martin</surname>
</persName>
<email>xs23@columbia.edu</email>
<affiliation>Columbia University, xs23@columbia.edu</affiliation>
<affiliation>Columbia University,</affiliation>
</author>
<idno type="istex">51F3B3C485586A3A9B1173B28163FD3C4D533DA1</idno>
<idno type="ark">ark:/67375/QT4-9SW4XVP7-Q</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.2202/1538-0637.1067</idno>
<idno type="article-id">1538-0637.1067</idno>
<idno type="pdf">bejeap.2004.4.1.1067.pdf</idno>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<title level="j">Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1538-0637</idno>
<idno type="publisher-id">bejeap</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>De Gruyter</publisher>
<date type="published" when="2004-05-01"></date>
<biblScope unit="volume">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>
</imprint>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<creation>
<date>2004-05-01</date>
</creation>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
<abstract xml:lang="en">
<p>What does the international history of old-age Social Security program design say about the forces creating and sustaining it as a public program? First, because many program features are internationally common, and/or explained by country characteristics, SS may emerge and grow due to systematic political and economic forces. Second, some observations suggest that political forces are important: (a) SS redistributes from young to old, even when the elderly consume as much or more than do the young, and (b) benefits increase with lifetime earnings and are hardly means-tested. On the other hand, it is not simply a matter of the elderly out-voting the young, because: (c) benefit formulas induce retirement, especially in the countries with the largest SS budgets, and (d) similar public pension programs emerge and grow under very different political regimes. We explain how empirical observations, and some currently unanswered empirical questions, relate to various public pension theories.</p>
</abstract>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="keyword">
<list>
<head>Keywords</head>
<item>
<term>Social Security</term>
</item>
<item>
<term>Pensions</term>
</item>
<item>
<term>Elderly</term>
</item>
<item>
<term>Retirement</term>
</item>
<item>
<term>Political Economics</term>
</item>
</list>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
<revisionDesc>
<change when="2004-05-01">Created</change>
<change when="2004-05-01">Published</change>
<change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2017-10-5">References added</change>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:fulltextTEI>
<json:item>
<extension>txt</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>text/plain</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/51F3B3C485586A3A9B1173B28163FD3C4D533DA1/fulltext/txt</uri>
</json:item>
</fulltext>
<metadata>
<istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="corpus degruyter-journals" wicri:toSee="no header">
<istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration>
<istex:docType PUBLIC="-//Atypon//DTD Atypon Systems Journal Archiving and Interchange NLM DTD v3.0.2 20101108//EN" URI="atypon_archive-interchange-dtd-3.0.2/atypon-archivearticle3.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType>
<istex:document>
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">bejeap</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1538-0637</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>De Gruyter</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1538-0637.1067</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2202/1538-0637.1067</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Advances Article</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Internationally Common Features of Public Old-Age Pensions, and Their Implications for Models of the Public Sector</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mulligan</surname>
<given-names>Casey B</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="a1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<aff id="a1">
<sup>1</sup>
University of Chicago,
<email xlink:href="mailto:c-mulligan@uchicago.edu">c-mulligan@uchicago.edu</email>
</aff>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sala-i-Martin</surname>
<given-names>Xavier</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="a2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<aff id="a2">
<sup>2</sup>
Columbia University,
<email xlink:href="mailto:xs23@columbia.edu">xs23@columbia.edu</email>
</aff>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>1</day>
<month>5</month>
<year>2004</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>4</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2011</copyright-year>
</permissions>
<related-article related-article-type="pdf" xlink:href="bejeap.2004.4.1.1067.pdf"></related-article>
<abstract>
<title>Abstract</title>
<p>What does the international history of old-age Social Security program design say about the forces creating and sustaining it as a public program? First, because many program features are internationally common, and/or explained by country characteristics, SS may emerge and grow due to systematic political and economic forces. Second, some observations suggest that political forces are important: (a) SS redistributes from young to old, even when the elderly consume as much or more than do the young, and (b) benefits increase with lifetime earnings and are hardly means-tested. On the other hand, it is not simply a matter of the elderly out-voting the young, because: (c) benefit formulas induce retirement, especially in the countries with the largest SS budgets, and (d) similar public pension programs emerge and grow under very different political regimes. We explain how empirical observations, and some currently unanswered empirical questions, relate to various public pension theories.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<title>Keywords</title>
<kwd>Social Security</kwd>
<kwd>Pensions</kwd>
<kwd>Elderly</kwd>
<kwd>Retirement</kwd>
<kwd>Political Economics</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<page-count count="37"></page-count>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
</article>
</istex:document>
</istex:metadataXml>
<mods version="3.6">
<titleInfo lang="en">
<title>Internationally Common Features of Public Old-Age Pensions, and Their Implications for Models of the Public Sector</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative" lang="en" contentType="CDATA">
<title>Internationally Common Features of Public Old-Age Pensions, and Their Implications for Models of the Public Sector</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Casey B</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Mulligan</namePart>
<affiliation>University of Chicago, c-mulligan@uchicago.edu</affiliation>
<affiliation>E-mail: c-mulligan@uchicago.edu</affiliation>
<affiliation>University of Chicago, </affiliation>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Xavier</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Sala-i-Martin</namePart>
<affiliation>Columbia University, xs23@columbia.edu</affiliation>
<affiliation>E-mail: xs23@columbia.edu</affiliation>
<affiliation>Columbia University, </affiliation>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre type="research-article" displayLabel="research-article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</genre>
<originInfo>
<publisher>De Gruyter</publisher>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2004-05-01</dateIssued>
<dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2004-05-01</dateCreated>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
</language>
<abstract lang="en">What does the international history of old-age Social Security program design say about the forces creating and sustaining it as a public program? First, because many program features are internationally common, and/or explained by country characteristics, SS may emerge and grow due to systematic political and economic forces. Second, some observations suggest that political forces are important: (a) SS redistributes from young to old, even when the elderly consume as much or more than do the young, and (b) benefits increase with lifetime earnings and are hardly means-tested. On the other hand, it is not simply a matter of the elderly out-voting the young, because: (c) benefit formulas induce retirement, especially in the countries with the largest SS budgets, and (d) similar public pension programs emerge and grow under very different political regimes. We explain how empirical observations, and some currently unanswered empirical questions, relate to various public pension theories.</abstract>
<subject>
<genre>Keywords</genre>
<topic>Social Security</topic>
<topic>Pensions</topic>
<topic>Elderly</topic>
<topic>Retirement</topic>
<topic>Political Economics</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy</title>
</titleInfo>
<genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre>
<originInfo></originInfo>
<identifier type="eISSN">1538-0637</identifier>
<identifier type="PublisherID">bejeap</identifier>
<part>
<date>2004</date>
<detail type="volume">
<caption>vol.</caption>
<number>4</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue">
<caption>no.</caption>
<number>1</number>
</detail>
<extent unit="pages">
<total>37</total>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="istex">51F3B3C485586A3A9B1173B28163FD3C4D533DA1</identifier>
<identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/QT4-9SW4XVP7-Q</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.2202/1538-0637.1067</identifier>
<identifier type="ArticleID">1538-0637.1067</identifier>
<identifier type="pdf">bejeap.2004.4.1.1067.pdf</identifier>
<accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston</accessCondition>
<recordInfo>
<recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-B4QPMMZB-D">degruyter-journals</recordContentSource>
<recordOrigin>©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
<json:item>
<extension>json</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/json</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/51F3B3C485586A3A9B1173B28163FD3C4D533DA1/metadata/json</uri>
</json:item>
</metadata>
<serie></serie>
</istex>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Psychologie/explor/BernheimV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000802 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000802 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Psychologie
   |area=    BernheimV1
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:51F3B3C485586A3A9B1173B28163FD3C4D533DA1
   |texte=   Internationally Common Features of Public Old-Age Pensions, and Their Implications for Models of the Public Sector
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Mon Mar 5 17:33:33 2018. Site generation: Thu Apr 29 15:49:51 2021