Serveur d'exploration Hippolyte Bernheim

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Pollution Havens and the Regulation of Multinationals with Asymmetric Information

Identifieur interne : 000648 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000647; suivant : 000649

Pollution Havens and the Regulation of Multinationals with Asymmetric Information

Auteurs : Xiaodong Wu

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:CB598FDFC2CAFB52ED0E094A1D97BFC85B5B07AB

English descriptors

Abstract

This paper develops a common agency model to analyze the strategic interaction between governments in regulating polluting multinationals. We show that when a firm has private information about its production technology relating output to pollution that is difficult to monitor, the information rent extraction behavior of non-cooperative governments will work against the "pollution haven" hypothesis in a Nash equilibrium with or without pooling. The "pollution haven" result is more likely to be reversed in a separating equilibrium than in a pooling equilibrium as a firm's output is further away from the most efficient outcome. This result provides an explanation for why many empirical studies do not support the "pollution haven" hypothesis even after controlling for private non-environmental cost differentials.

Url:
DOI: 10.2202/1538-0645.1265

Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:CB598FDFC2CAFB52ED0E094A1D97BFC85B5B07AB

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Pollution Havens and the Regulation of Multinationals with Asymmetric Information</title>
<author wicri:is="90%">
<name sortKey="Wu, Xiaodong" sort="Wu, Xiaodong" uniqKey="Wu X" first="Xiaodong" last="Wu">Xiaodong Wu</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>1University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, wux@email.unc.edu</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, wux@email.unc.edu</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>E-mail: wux@email.unc.edu</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:CB598FDFC2CAFB52ED0E094A1D97BFC85B5B07AB</idno>
<date when="2011" year="2011">2011</date>
<idno type="doi">10.2202/1538-0645.1265</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/CB598FDFC2CAFB52ED0E094A1D97BFC85B5B07AB/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000648</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000648</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Pollution Havens and the Regulation of Multinationals with Asymmetric Information</title>
<author wicri:is="90%">
<name sortKey="Wu, Xiaodong" sort="Wu, Xiaodong" uniqKey="Wu X" first="Xiaodong" last="Wu">Xiaodong Wu</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>1University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, wux@email.unc.edu</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, wux@email.unc.edu</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>E-mail: wux@email.unc.edu</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">Contributions in Economic Analysis & Policy</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1538-0645</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>De Gruyter</publisher>
<date type="published" when="2003-12-31">2003-12-31</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">3</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Adverse selection</term>
<term>Adverse selection problem</term>
<term>Agency problem</term>
<term>Asymmetric</term>
<term>Asymmetric information</term>
<term>Asymmetric information works</term>
<term>Cambridge university press</term>
<term>Chapel hill</term>
<term>Claudio mezzetti</term>
<term>Common agency</term>
<term>Common agency model</term>
<term>Common agency models</term>
<term>Common agency problem</term>
<term>Comparative advantage</term>
<term>Competitive industry</term>
<term>Cooperative equilibrium</term>
<term>Cooperative governments</term>
<term>Cooperative outcome</term>
<term>Cost function</term>
<term>Development economics</term>
<term>Different technologies</term>
<term>Direct mechanism</term>
<term>Direct mechanisms</term>
<term>Dirty industry</term>
<term>Disutility</term>
<term>Domestic production</term>
<term>Economic analysis</term>
<term>Economic analysis policy</term>
<term>Economic growth</term>
<term>Economic studies</term>
<term>Economic theory</term>
<term>Empirical implications</term>
<term>Empirical studies</term>
<term>Environmental economics</term>
<term>Environmental regulation</term>
<term>Environmental regulations</term>
<term>Equilibrium</term>
<term>Equilibrium output levels</term>
<term>Externality</term>
<term>Extraction</term>
<term>Foreign country</term>
<term>Foreign government</term>
<term>Foreign governments</term>
<term>Foreign maximization problem</term>
<term>Foreign objective function</term>
<term>Foreign output</term>
<term>Foreign output scheme</term>
<term>Foreign production</term>
<term>Foreign residents</term>
<term>Foreign schemes</term>
<term>Free trade</term>
<term>Freer trade</term>
<term>Full information</term>
<term>General case</term>
<term>Global implementability</term>
<term>Gresik</term>
<term>Grossman</term>
<term>Henk folmer</term>
<term>Higher information rent</term>
<term>Home attempt</term>
<term>Home country</term>
<term>Home government</term>
<term>Home maximization problem</term>
<term>Home output</term>
<term>Home output level</term>
<term>Home production</term>
<term>Home rent extraction attempt</term>
<term>Home residents</term>
<term>Imperfect information</term>
<term>Implementability</term>
<term>Implementable</term>
<term>Incomplete information</term>
<term>Individual welfare</term>
<term>Information cost</term>
<term>Information rent</term>
<term>Information rent extraction behavior</term>
<term>Information rents</term>
<term>International economics</term>
<term>International trade</term>
<term>Jean tirole</term>
<term>Joint welfare</term>
<term>Last term</term>
<term>Lower output</term>
<term>Marginal cost</term>
<term>Marginal disutility</term>
<term>Martimort</term>
<term>Mezzetti</term>
<term>Monotonicity</term>
<term>Monotonicity condition</term>
<term>Moral hazard</term>
<term>Moral hazard problem</term>
<term>More pollution</term>
<term>Multinational</term>
<term>Multinational firms</term>
<term>Multinationals</term>
<term>Multiple equilibria</term>
<term>Nash</term>
<term>Nash equilibrium</term>
<term>Objective function</term>
<term>Objective functions</term>
<term>Optimal choice</term>
<term>Optimal output</term>
<term>Order condition</term>
<term>Order conditions</term>
<term>Other hand</term>
<term>Output levels</term>
<term>Output scheme</term>
<term>Overall effect</term>
<term>Perfect information</term>
<term>Pollution</term>
<term>Pollution emissions</term>
<term>Pollution haven</term>
<term>Pollution haven hypothesis</term>
<term>Pollution havens</term>
<term>Pollution intensity</term>
<term>Pollution reduction</term>
<term>Private information</term>
<term>Production technology</term>
<term>Public economics</term>
<term>Rand journal</term>
<term>Regulatory agencies</term>
<term>Regulatory regime</term>
<term>Rent extraction</term>
<term>Rent extraction behavior</term>
<term>Rent extraction effect</term>
<term>Rent extraction incentive</term>
<term>Resource economics</term>
<term>Resource users</term>
<term>Revelation principle</term>
<term>Right hand side</term>
<term>Same output</term>
<term>Same technology</term>
<term>Scale effect</term>
<term>Second order derivatives</term>
<term>Second term</term>
<term>Single problem</term>
<term>Social welfare</term>
<term>Special case</term>
<term>Standard result</term>
<term>Strategic interaction</term>
<term>Superior information</term>
<term>Technique effect</term>
<term>Third term</term>
<term>Total output</term>
<term>Transboundary</term>
<term>Transboundary pollution</term>
<term>Transfer scheme</term>
<term>Transfer schemes</term>
<term>Transportation costs</term>
<term>True technology</term>
<term>Uninformed</term>
<term>Uninformed government</term>
<term>Uninformed principals</term>
<term>World bank</term>
<term>World price</term>
<term>World welfare</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This paper develops a common agency model to analyze the strategic interaction between governments in regulating polluting multinationals. We show that when a firm has private information about its production technology relating output to pollution that is difficult to monitor, the information rent extraction behavior of non-cooperative governments will work against the "pollution haven" hypothesis in a Nash equilibrium with or without pooling. The "pollution haven" result is more likely to be reversed in a separating equilibrium than in a pooling equilibrium as a firm's output is further away from the most efficient outcome. This result provides an explanation for why many empirical studies do not support the "pollution haven" hypothesis even after controlling for private non-environmental cost differentials.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<istex>
<corpusName>degruyter-journals</corpusName>
<keywords>
<teeft>
<json:string>foreign government</json:string>
<json:string>home government</json:string>
<json:string>multinationals</json:string>
<json:string>transboundary</json:string>
<json:string>multinational</json:string>
<json:string>transboundary pollution</json:string>
<json:string>pollution havens</json:string>
<json:string>asymmetric information</json:string>
<json:string>pollution haven</json:string>
<json:string>common agency</json:string>
<json:string>foreign country</json:string>
<json:string>economic analysis policy</json:string>
<json:string>order condition</json:string>
<json:string>output scheme</json:string>
<json:string>disutility</json:string>
<json:string>martimort</json:string>
<json:string>gresik</json:string>
<json:string>pollution</json:string>
<json:string>externality</json:string>
<json:string>uninformed</json:string>
<json:string>common agency problem</json:string>
<json:string>mezzetti</json:string>
<json:string>foreign governments</json:string>
<json:string>monotonicity</json:string>
<json:string>transfer schemes</json:string>
<json:string>implementable</json:string>
<json:string>implementability</json:string>
<json:string>last term</json:string>
<json:string>joint welfare</json:string>
<json:string>strategic interaction</json:string>
<json:string>nash</json:string>
<json:string>public economics</json:string>
<json:string>common agency model</json:string>
<json:string>order conditions</json:string>
<json:string>nash equilibrium</json:string>
<json:string>rent extraction effect</json:string>
<json:string>asymmetric</json:string>
<json:string>perfect information</json:string>
<json:string>rand journal</json:string>
<json:string>single problem</json:string>
<json:string>world bank</json:string>
<json:string>production technology</json:string>
<json:string>world price</json:string>
<json:string>marginal cost</json:string>
<json:string>freer trade</json:string>
<json:string>home country</json:string>
<json:string>superior information</json:string>
<json:string>full information</json:string>
<json:string>dirty industry</json:string>
<json:string>information rent</json:string>
<json:string>home residents</json:string>
<json:string>foreign output</json:string>
<json:string>environmental regulation</json:string>
<json:string>home output</json:string>
<json:string>more pollution</json:string>
<json:string>economic theory</json:string>
<json:string>total output</json:string>
<json:string>monotonicity condition</json:string>
<json:string>grossman</json:string>
<json:string>direct mechanism</json:string>
<json:string>adverse selection</json:string>
<json:string>pollution reduction</json:string>
<json:string>technique effect</json:string>
<json:string>foreign production</json:string>
<json:string>foreign maximization problem</json:string>
<json:string>output levels</json:string>
<json:string>private information</json:string>
<json:string>home production</json:string>
<json:string>overall effect</json:string>
<json:string>marginal disutility</json:string>
<json:string>rent extraction incentive</json:string>
<json:string>cooperative governments</json:string>
<json:string>extraction</json:string>
<json:string>empirical implications</json:string>
<json:string>competitive industry</json:string>
<json:string>henk folmer</json:string>
<json:string>same technology</json:string>
<json:string>resource users</json:string>
<json:string>information rent extraction behavior</json:string>
<json:string>regulatory regime</json:string>
<json:string>moral hazard problem</json:string>
<json:string>adverse selection problem</json:string>
<json:string>information cost</json:string>
<json:string>moral hazard</json:string>
<json:string>rent extraction behavior</json:string>
<json:string>chapel hill</json:string>
<json:string>transportation costs</json:string>
<json:string>environmental regulations</json:string>
<json:string>true technology</json:string>
<json:string>claudio mezzetti</json:string>
<json:string>pollution haven hypothesis</json:string>
<json:string>objective function</json:string>
<json:string>special case</json:string>
<json:string>direct mechanisms</json:string>
<json:string>objective functions</json:string>
<json:string>world welfare</json:string>
<json:string>economic growth</json:string>
<json:string>uninformed government</json:string>
<json:string>agency problem</json:string>
<json:string>same output</json:string>
<json:string>scale effect</json:string>
<json:string>international trade</json:string>
<json:string>foreign schemes</json:string>
<json:string>foreign residents</json:string>
<json:string>pollution intensity</json:string>
<json:string>right hand side</json:string>
<json:string>home output level</json:string>
<json:string>other hand</json:string>
<json:string>optimal choice</json:string>
<json:string>domestic production</json:string>
<json:string>rent extraction</json:string>
<json:string>cooperative equilibrium</json:string>
<json:string>individual welfare</json:string>
<json:string>home attempt</json:string>
<json:string>comparative advantage</json:string>
<json:string>higher information rent</json:string>
<json:string>home rent extraction attempt</json:string>
<json:string>imperfect information</json:string>
<json:string>regulatory agencies</json:string>
<json:string>transfer scheme</json:string>
<json:string>home maximization problem</json:string>
<json:string>information rents</json:string>
<json:string>pollution emissions</json:string>
<json:string>foreign objective function</json:string>
<json:string>incomplete information</json:string>
<json:string>different technologies</json:string>
<json:string>second order derivatives</json:string>
<json:string>cooperative outcome</json:string>
<json:string>multiple equilibria</json:string>
<json:string>optimal output</json:string>
<json:string>lower output</json:string>
<json:string>standard result</json:string>
<json:string>common agency models</json:string>
<json:string>second term</json:string>
<json:string>third term</json:string>
<json:string>empirical studies</json:string>
<json:string>cost function</json:string>
<json:string>global implementability</json:string>
<json:string>foreign output scheme</json:string>
<json:string>general case</json:string>
<json:string>free trade</json:string>
<json:string>uninformed principals</json:string>
<json:string>economic analysis</json:string>
<json:string>equilibrium output levels</json:string>
<json:string>multinational firms</json:string>
<json:string>asymmetric information works</json:string>
<json:string>cambridge university press</json:string>
<json:string>international economics</json:string>
<json:string>economic studies</json:string>
<json:string>environmental economics</json:string>
<json:string>revelation principle</json:string>
<json:string>development economics</json:string>
<json:string>resource economics</json:string>
<json:string>jean tirole</json:string>
<json:string>social welfare</json:string>
<json:string>equilibrium</json:string>
</teeft>
</keywords>
<author>
<json:item>
<name>Xiaodong Wu</name>
<affiliations>
<json:string>1University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, wux@email.unc.edu</json:string>
<json:string>University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, wux@email.unc.edu</json:string>
<json:string>E-mail: wux@email.unc.edu</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
</author>
<subject>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>multinational corporations</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>environmental regulation</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>common agency</value>
</json:item>
</subject>
<articleId>
<json:string>1538-0645.1265</json:string>
</articleId>
<arkIstex>ark:/67375/QT4-41CXLPPN-K</arkIstex>
<language>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</language>
<originalGenre>
<json:string>research-article</json:string>
</originalGenre>
<abstract>This paper develops a common agency model to analyze the strategic interaction between governments in regulating polluting multinationals. We show that when a firm has private information about its production technology relating output to pollution that is difficult to monitor, the information rent extraction behavior of non-cooperative governments will work against the "pollution haven" hypothesis in a Nash equilibrium with or without pooling. The "pollution haven" result is more likely to be reversed in a separating equilibrium than in a pooling equilibrium as a firm's output is further away from the most efficient outcome. This result provides an explanation for why many empirical studies do not support the "pollution haven" hypothesis even after controlling for private non-environmental cost differentials.</abstract>
<qualityIndicators>
<score>8.428</score>
<pdfWordCount>11607</pdfWordCount>
<pdfCharCount>60540</pdfCharCount>
<pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion>
<pdfPageCount>27</pdfPageCount>
<pdfPageSize>612 x 792 pts (letter)</pdfPageSize>
<refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative>
<abstractWordCount>119</abstractWordCount>
<abstractCharCount>821</abstractCharCount>
<keywordCount>3</keywordCount>
</qualityIndicators>
<title>Pollution Havens and the Regulation of Multinationals with Asymmetric Information</title>
<genre>
<json:string>research-article</json:string>
</genre>
<host>
<title>Contributions in Economic Analysis & Policy</title>
<language>
<json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<eissn>
<json:string>1538-0645</json:string>
</eissn>
<publisherId>
<json:string>bejeap</json:string>
</publisherId>
<volume>3</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<genre>
<json:string>journal</json:string>
</genre>
<subject>
<json:item>
<value>F23, D82, Q28</value>
</json:item>
</subject>
</host>
<namedEntities>
<unitex>
<date>
<json:string>1990s</json:string>
<json:string>2003-12-31</json:string>
<json:string>between the 1960s and 1990s</json:string>
</date>
<geogName></geogName>
<orgName>
<json:string>World Bank</json:string>
<json:string>University of Illinois</json:string>
<json:string>World Congress</json:string>
<json:string>University of Washington</json:string>
<json:string>Ford Foundation</json:string>
</orgName>
<orgName_funder>
<json:string>Ford Foundation</json:string>
</orgName_funder>
<orgName_provider></orgName_provider>
<persName>
<json:string>Meetings</json:string>
<json:string>Patrick Conway</json:string>
<json:string>Gary Biglaiser</json:string>
<json:string>Avinash Dixit</json:string>
<json:string>Haven Hypothesis</json:string>
<json:string>Robert Shimer</json:string>
<json:string>Claudio Mezzetti</json:string>
<json:string>Fc</json:string>
<json:string>Eric Bond</json:string>
<json:string>Don Fullerton</json:string>
</persName>
<placeName></placeName>
<ref_url></ref_url>
<ref_bibl>
<json:string>Fudenberg and Tirole (1991)</json:string>
<json:string>Caves (1996)</json:string>
<json:string>Wu (2000)</json:string>
<json:string>UNCTAD, 1993</json:string>
<json:string>Grossman and Hart (1983)</json:string>
<json:string>Antweiler et al.</json:string>
<json:string>Oates and Schwab, 1988</json:string>
<json:string>Epstein and Peters (1999)</json:string>
<json:string>Folmer et al. (1993)</json:string>
<json:string>Ivaldi and Martimort (1994)</json:string>
<json:string>Copeland and Taylor (1995)</json:string>
<json:string>Biglaiser and Mezzetti (2000)</json:string>
<json:string>Komen et al. (1997)</json:string>
<json:string>Selden and Song (1994)</json:string>
<json:string>Grossman and Krueger (1995)</json:string>
<json:string>Eskeland and Harrison (2003)</json:string>
<json:string>Bui (1998)</json:string>
<json:string>Javorcik and Wei (2004)</json:string>
<json:string>Peters (2001)</json:string>
<json:string>Martimort (1996)</json:string>
<json:string>Biglaiser and Mezzetti (1993)</json:string>
<json:string>Markusen et al.</json:string>
<json:string>Mezzetti (1997)</json:string>
<json:string>Martimort (1992)</json:string>
<json:string>Gal-Or (1991)</json:string>
<json:string>Jaffe et al. (1995)</json:string>
<json:string>Bernheim and Whinston (1986)</json:string>
<json:string>Bond and Gresik (2004)</json:string>
<json:string>Bank (1992, p. 78)</json:string>
<json:string>Wu, 2000</json:string>
<json:string>Bond and Gresik (1996)</json:string>
<json:string>Markusen et al. (1995)</json:string>
<json:string>Laffont and Tirole (1991)</json:string>
<json:string>Martimort and Stole (2002)</json:string>
<json:string>Peters (2003)</json:string>
<json:string>Fudenberg and Tirole, 1991</json:string>
<json:string>Bank (1992)</json:string>
<json:string>Grossman and Krueger (1993)</json:string>
<json:string>Bhagwati and Hudec, 1996</json:string>
<json:string>Caves, 1996</json:string>
<json:string>Ulph, 1998</json:string>
<json:string>Martimort and Stole (2003)</json:string>
<json:string>Stole (1991)</json:string>
<json:string>Antweiler et al. (2001)</json:string>
<json:string>Spulber (1988)</json:string>
<json:string>[2004]</json:string>
<json:string>Dasgupta et al. (1980)</json:string>
</ref_bibl>
<bibl></bibl>
</unitex>
</namedEntities>
<ark>
<json:string>ark:/67375/QT4-41CXLPPN-K</json:string>
</ark>
<categories>
<inist>
<json:string>1 - sciences humaines et sociales</json:string>
</inist>
</categories>
<publicationDate>2003</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>2011</copyrightDate>
<doi>
<json:string>10.2202/1538-0645.1265</json:string>
</doi>
<id>CB598FDFC2CAFB52ED0E094A1D97BFC85B5B07AB</id>
<score>1</score>
<fulltext>
<json:item>
<extension>pdf</extension>
<original>true</original>
<mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/CB598FDFC2CAFB52ED0E094A1D97BFC85B5B07AB/fulltext/pdf</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<extension>zip</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/zip</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/CB598FDFC2CAFB52ED0E094A1D97BFC85B5B07AB/fulltext/zip</uri>
</json:item>
<istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/CB598FDFC2CAFB52ED0E094A1D97BFC85B5B07AB/fulltext/tei">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Pollution Havens and the Regulation of Multinationals with Asymmetric Information</title>
<respStmt>
<resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp>
<name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>ISTEX</authority>
<publisher scheme="https://publisher-list.data.istex.fr">De Gruyter</publisher>
<availability>
<licence>
<p>©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston</p>
</licence>
<p scheme="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-B4QPMMZB-D">degruyter-journals</p>
</availability>
<date>2003-12-31</date>
</publicationStmt>
<notesStmt>
<note type="research-article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</note>
<note type="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note>
</notesStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct type="inbook">
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Pollution Havens and the Regulation of Multinationals with Asymmetric Information</title>
<author xml:id="author-0000">
<persName>
<forename type="first">Xiaodong</forename>
<surname>Wu</surname>
</persName>
<email>wux@email.unc.edu</email>
<affiliation>1University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, wux@email.unc.edu</affiliation>
<affiliation>University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, wux@email.unc.edu</affiliation>
</author>
<idno type="istex">CB598FDFC2CAFB52ED0E094A1D97BFC85B5B07AB</idno>
<idno type="ark">ark:/67375/QT4-41CXLPPN-K</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.2202/1538-0645.1265</idno>
<idno type="article-id">1538-0645.1265</idno>
<idno type="pdf">bejeap.2004.3.2.1265.pdf</idno>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<title level="j">Contributions in Economic Analysis & Policy</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1538-0645</idno>
<idno type="publisher-id">bejeap</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>De Gruyter</publisher>
<date type="published" when="2003-12-31"></date>
<biblScope unit="volume">3</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope>
</imprint>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<creation>
<date>2003-12-31</date>
</creation>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
<abstract xml:lang="en">
<p>This paper develops a common agency model to analyze the strategic interaction between governments in regulating polluting multinationals. We show that when a firm has private information about its production technology relating output to pollution that is difficult to monitor, the information rent extraction behavior of non-cooperative governments will work against the "pollution haven" hypothesis in a Nash equilibrium with or without pooling. The "pollution haven" result is more likely to be reversed in a separating equilibrium than in a pooling equilibrium as a firm's output is further away from the most efficient outcome. This result provides an explanation for why many empirical studies do not support the "pollution haven" hypothesis even after controlling for private non-environmental cost differentials.</p>
</abstract>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="keyword">
<list>
<head>Keywords</head>
<item>
<term>multinational corporations</term>
</item>
<item>
<term>environmental regulation</term>
</item>
<item>
<term>common agency</term>
</item>
</list>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="Journal Subject">
<list>
<head></head>
<item>
<term>F23, D82, Q28</term>
</item>
</list>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
<revisionDesc>
<change when="2003-12-31">Created</change>
<change when="2003-12-31">Published</change>
<change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2017-10-5">References added</change>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:fulltextTEI>
<json:item>
<extension>txt</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>text/plain</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/CB598FDFC2CAFB52ED0E094A1D97BFC85B5B07AB/fulltext/txt</uri>
</json:item>
</fulltext>
<metadata>
<istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="corpus degruyter-journals" wicri:toSee="no header">
<istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration>
<istex:docType PUBLIC="-//Atypon//DTD Atypon Systems Journal Archiving and Interchange NLM DTD v3.0.2 20101108//EN" URI="atypon_archive-interchange-dtd-3.0.2/atypon-archivearticle3.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType>
<istex:document>
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">bejeap</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Contributions in Economic Analysis & Policy</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1538-0645</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>De Gruyter</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1538-0645.1265</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2202/1538-0645.1265</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Contributions Article</subject>
</subj-group>
<subj-group>
<subject>F23, D82, Q28</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Pollution Havens and the Regulation of Multinationals with Asymmetric Information</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>Xiaodong</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="a1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<aff id="a1">
<sup>1</sup>
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,
<email xlink:href="mailto:wux@email.unc.edu">wux@email.unc.edu</email>
</aff>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>31</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2003</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>3</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2011</copyright-year>
</permissions>
<related-article related-article-type="pdf" xlink:href="bejeap.2004.3.2.1265.pdf"></related-article>
<abstract>
<title>Abstract</title>
<p>This paper develops a common agency model to analyze the strategic interaction between governments in regulating polluting multinationals. We show that when a firm has private information about its production technology relating output to pollution that is difficult to monitor, the information rent extraction behavior of non-cooperative governments will work against the "pollution haven" hypothesis in a Nash equilibrium with or without pooling. The "pollution haven" result is more likely to be reversed in a separating equilibrium than in a pooling equilibrium as a firm's output is further away from the most efficient outcome. This result provides an explanation for why many empirical studies do not support the "pollution haven" hypothesis even after controlling for private non-environmental cost differentials.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<title>Keywords</title>
<kwd>multinational corporations</kwd>
<kwd>environmental regulation</kwd>
<kwd>common agency</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<page-count count="27"></page-count>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
</article>
</istex:document>
</istex:metadataXml>
<mods version="3.6">
<titleInfo lang="en">
<title>Pollution Havens and the Regulation of Multinationals with Asymmetric Information</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative" lang="en" contentType="CDATA">
<title>Pollution Havens and the Regulation of Multinationals with Asymmetric Information</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Xiaodong</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Wu</namePart>
<affiliation>1University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, wux@email.unc.edu</affiliation>
<affiliation>University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, wux@email.unc.edu</affiliation>
<affiliation>E-mail: wux@email.unc.edu</affiliation>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre type="research-article" displayLabel="research-article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</genre>
<originInfo>
<publisher>De Gruyter</publisher>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2003-12-31</dateIssued>
<dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2003-12-31</dateCreated>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
</language>
<abstract lang="en">This paper develops a common agency model to analyze the strategic interaction between governments in regulating polluting multinationals. We show that when a firm has private information about its production technology relating output to pollution that is difficult to monitor, the information rent extraction behavior of non-cooperative governments will work against the "pollution haven" hypothesis in a Nash equilibrium with or without pooling. The "pollution haven" result is more likely to be reversed in a separating equilibrium than in a pooling equilibrium as a firm's output is further away from the most efficient outcome. This result provides an explanation for why many empirical studies do not support the "pollution haven" hypothesis even after controlling for private non-environmental cost differentials.</abstract>
<subject>
<genre>Keywords</genre>
<topic>multinational corporations</topic>
<topic>environmental regulation</topic>
<topic>common agency</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Contributions in Economic Analysis & Policy</title>
</titleInfo>
<genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre>
<originInfo></originInfo>
<subject>
<topic>F23, D82, Q28</topic>
</subject>
<identifier type="eISSN">1538-0645</identifier>
<identifier type="PublisherID">bejeap</identifier>
<part>
<date>2003</date>
<detail type="volume">
<caption>vol.</caption>
<number>3</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue">
<caption>no.</caption>
<number>2</number>
</detail>
<extent unit="pages">
<total>27</total>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="istex">CB598FDFC2CAFB52ED0E094A1D97BFC85B5B07AB</identifier>
<identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/QT4-41CXLPPN-K</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.2202/1538-0645.1265</identifier>
<identifier type="ArticleID">1538-0645.1265</identifier>
<identifier type="pdf">bejeap.2004.3.2.1265.pdf</identifier>
<accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston</accessCondition>
<recordInfo>
<recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-B4QPMMZB-D">degruyter-journals</recordContentSource>
<recordOrigin>©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
<json:item>
<extension>json</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/json</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/CB598FDFC2CAFB52ED0E094A1D97BFC85B5B07AB/metadata/json</uri>
</json:item>
</metadata>
<serie></serie>
</istex>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Psychologie/explor/BernheimV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000648 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000648 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Psychologie
   |area=    BernheimV1
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:CB598FDFC2CAFB52ED0E094A1D97BFC85B5B07AB
   |texte=   Pollution Havens and the Regulation of Multinationals with Asymmetric Information
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Mon Mar 5 17:33:33 2018. Site generation: Thu Apr 29 15:49:51 2021