Serveur d'exploration Hippolyte Bernheim

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

THE ‘UNCONSCIOUS’ AND CATHOLICISM IN FRANCE

Identifieur interne : 000015 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000014; suivant : 000016

THE ‘UNCONSCIOUS’ AND CATHOLICISM IN FRANCE

Auteurs : Ruth Harris

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:5764BEE46596354D6421AAC40D93EF009A4A18F6

Abstract

In nineteenth-century France, science and religion have often been portrayed as irredeemably opposed to one another. This article seeks to revise this interpretation by showing how these apparently dissonant views intermingled in the study of hysteria. Through a survey of attitudes towards Catholicism and in their treatment of Catholic patients, the article shows how French psychiatrists and neurologists were deeply indebted to religious iconography and experience, despite their vehement anti-clericalism. Because of their hatred of the church, they focused on the treatment of female hysterics who manifested ‘religious’ symptoms – demonopathy, mystical states, and stigmata – in order to amass conclusive evidence of Catholic ‘superstition’. Their preoccupation with such patients meant, however, that they paradoxically re-embedded Catholicism into their scientific practice by incorporating religious motifs, bodily poses, and iconography into their diagnosis of hysteria. At the same time, their disdain for the Catholic religious imagination meant that they refused to explore the fantasies of their subjects. For physicians like Jean-Martin Charcot and the more subtle Pierre Janet – a contemporary and competitor of Sigmund Freud – fantasies of bodily suffering, unearthly physical perfection, and an array of Catholic maternal fantasies associated with images of Mary and Christ were all nothing more than delusions, not the stuff from which an appreciation or understanding of the ‘unconscious’ could emerge. The result was that French physicians offered no psychodynamic transformation or symbolic reinterpretation of their words or physical symptoms, a resistance that was one reason among many for their hostility to psychoanalysis.

Url:
DOI: 10.1017/S0018246X04003711

Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:5764BEE46596354D6421AAC40D93EF009A4A18F6

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>THE ‘UNCONSCIOUS’ AND CATHOLICISM IN FRANCE</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Harris, Ruth" sort="Harris, Ruth" uniqKey="Harris R" first="Ruth" last="Harris">Ruth Harris</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>New College</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:5764BEE46596354D6421AAC40D93EF009A4A18F6</idno>
<date when="2004" year="2004">2004</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1017/S0018246X04003711</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/5764BEE46596354D6421AAC40D93EF009A4A18F6/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000015</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000015</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a">THE ‘UNCONSCIOUS’ AND CATHOLICISM IN FRANCE</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Harris, Ruth" sort="Harris, Ruth" uniqKey="Harris R" first="Ruth" last="Harris">Ruth Harris</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>New College</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">The Historical Journal</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0018-246X</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1469-5103</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>Cambridge University Press</publisher>
<pubPlace>Cambridge, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2004-06">2004-06</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">47</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="331">331</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="354">354</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0018-246X</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0018-246X</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract">In nineteenth-century France, science and religion have often been portrayed as irredeemably opposed to one another. This article seeks to revise this interpretation by showing how these apparently dissonant views intermingled in the study of hysteria. Through a survey of attitudes towards Catholicism and in their treatment of Catholic patients, the article shows how French psychiatrists and neurologists were deeply indebted to religious iconography and experience, despite their vehement anti-clericalism. Because of their hatred of the church, they focused on the treatment of female hysterics who manifested ‘religious’ symptoms – demonopathy, mystical states, and stigmata – in order to amass conclusive evidence of Catholic ‘superstition’. Their preoccupation with such patients meant, however, that they paradoxically re-embedded Catholicism into their scientific practice by incorporating religious motifs, bodily poses, and iconography into their diagnosis of hysteria. At the same time, their disdain for the Catholic religious imagination meant that they refused to explore the fantasies of their subjects. For physicians like Jean-Martin Charcot and the more subtle Pierre Janet – a contemporary and competitor of Sigmund Freud – fantasies of bodily suffering, unearthly physical perfection, and an array of Catholic maternal fantasies associated with images of Mary and Christ were all nothing more than delusions, not the stuff from which an appreciation or understanding of the ‘unconscious’ could emerge. The result was that French physicians offered no psychodynamic transformation or symbolic reinterpretation of their words or physical symptoms, a resistance that was one reason among many for their hostility to psychoanalysis.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<istex>
<corpusName>cambridge</corpusName>
<author>
<json:item>
<name>RUTH HARRIS</name>
<affiliations>
<json:string>New College</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
</author>
<arkIstex>ark:/67375/6GQ-L7SXGTHP-7</arkIstex>
<language>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</language>
<originalGenre>
<json:string>research-article</json:string>
</originalGenre>
<abstract>In nineteenth-century France, science and religion have often been portrayed as irredeemably opposed to one another. This article seeks to revise this interpretation by showing how these apparently dissonant views intermingled in the study of hysteria. Through a survey of attitudes towards Catholicism and in their treatment of Catholic patients, the article shows how French psychiatrists and neurologists were deeply indebted to religious iconography and experience, despite their vehement anti-clericalism. Because of their hatred of the church, they focused on the treatment of female hysterics who manifested ‘religious’ symptoms – demonopathy, mystical states, and stigmata – in order to amass conclusive evidence of Catholic ‘superstition’. Their preoccupation with such patients meant, however, that they paradoxically re-embedded Catholicism into their scientific practice by incorporating religious motifs, bodily poses, and iconography into their diagnosis of hysteria. At the same time, their disdain for the Catholic religious imagination meant that they refused to explore the fantasies of their subjects. For physicians like Jean-Martin Charcot and the more subtle Pierre Janet – a contemporary and competitor of Sigmund Freud – fantasies of bodily suffering, unearthly physical perfection, and an array of Catholic maternal fantasies associated with images of Mary and Christ were all nothing more than delusions, not the stuff from which an appreciation or understanding of the ‘unconscious’ could emerge. The result was that French physicians offered no psychodynamic transformation or symbolic reinterpretation of their words or physical symptoms, a resistance that was one reason among many for their hostility to psychoanalysis.</abstract>
<qualityIndicators>
<score>9.988</score>
<pdfWordCount>10264</pdfWordCount>
<pdfCharCount>59220</pdfCharCount>
<pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion>
<pdfPageCount>24</pdfPageCount>
<pdfPageSize>431 x 646 pts</pdfPageSize>
<refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative>
<abstractWordCount>249</abstractWordCount>
<abstractCharCount>1750</abstractCharCount>
<keywordCount>0</keywordCount>
</qualityIndicators>
<title>THE ‘UNCONSCIOUS’ AND CATHOLICISM IN FRANCE</title>
<pii>
<json:string>S0018246X04003711</json:string>
</pii>
<genre>
<json:string>research-article</json:string>
</genre>
<host>
<title>The Historical Journal</title>
<language>
<json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<issn>
<json:string>0018-246X</json:string>
</issn>
<eissn>
<json:string>1469-5103</json:string>
</eissn>
<publisherId>
<json:string>HIS</json:string>
</publisherId>
<volume>47</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<pages>
<first>331</first>
<last>354</last>
<total>24</total>
</pages>
<genre>
<json:string>journal</json:string>
</genre>
</host>
<ark>
<json:string>ark:/67375/6GQ-L7SXGTHP-7</json:string>
</ark>
<categories>
<inist>
<json:string>1 - sciences humaines et sociales</json:string>
</inist>
</categories>
<publicationDate>2004</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>2004</copyrightDate>
<doi>
<json:string>10.1017/S0018246X04003711</json:string>
</doi>
<id>5764BEE46596354D6421AAC40D93EF009A4A18F6</id>
<score>1</score>
<fulltext>
<json:item>
<extension>pdf</extension>
<original>true</original>
<mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5764BEE46596354D6421AAC40D93EF009A4A18F6/fulltext/pdf</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<extension>zip</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/zip</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5764BEE46596354D6421AAC40D93EF009A4A18F6/fulltext/zip</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<extension>txt</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>text/plain</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5764BEE46596354D6421AAC40D93EF009A4A18F6/fulltext/txt</uri>
</json:item>
<istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/5764BEE46596354D6421AAC40D93EF009A4A18F6/fulltext/tei">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title level="a">THE ‘UNCONSCIOUS’ AND CATHOLICISM IN FRANCE</title>
<respStmt>
<resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp>
<name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>ISTEX</authority>
<publisher scheme="https://publisher-list.data.istex.fr">Cambridge University Press</publisher>
<pubPlace>Cambridge, UK</pubPlace>
<availability>
<licence>
<p>2004 Cambridge University Press</p>
</licence>
<p scheme="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-G3RCRD03-V">cambridge</p>
</availability>
<date>2004-05-24</date>
</publicationStmt>
<notesStmt>
<note type="research-article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</note>
<note type="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note>
</notesStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct type="inbook">
<analytic>
<title level="a">THE ‘UNCONSCIOUS’ AND CATHOLICISM IN FRANCE</title>
<author xml:id="author-0000">
<persName>
<forename type="first">RUTH</forename>
<surname>HARRIS</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>New College</affiliation>
</author>
<idno type="istex">5764BEE46596354D6421AAC40D93EF009A4A18F6</idno>
<idno type="ark">ark:/67375/6GQ-L7SXGTHP-7</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1017/S0018246X04003711</idno>
<idno type="PII">S0018246X04003711</idno>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<title level="j">The Historical Journal</title>
<idno type="pISSN">0018-246X</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1469-5103</idno>
<idno type="publisher-id">HIS</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>Cambridge University Press</publisher>
<pubPlace>Cambridge, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2004-06"></date>
<biblScope unit="volume">47</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="331">331</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="354">354</biblScope>
</imprint>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<creation>
<date>2004-05-24</date>
</creation>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
<abstract>
<p>In nineteenth-century France, science and religion have often been portrayed as irredeemably opposed to one another. This article seeks to revise this interpretation by showing how these apparently dissonant views intermingled in the study of hysteria. Through a survey of attitudes towards Catholicism and in their treatment of Catholic patients, the article shows how French psychiatrists and neurologists were deeply indebted to religious iconography and experience, despite their vehement anti-clericalism. Because of their hatred of the church, they focused on the treatment of female hysterics who manifested ‘religious’ symptoms – demonopathy, mystical states, and stigmata – in order to amass conclusive evidence of Catholic ‘superstition’. Their preoccupation with such patients meant, however, that they paradoxically re-embedded Catholicism into their scientific practice by incorporating religious motifs, bodily poses, and iconography into their diagnosis of hysteria. At the same time, their disdain for the Catholic religious imagination meant that they refused to explore the fantasies of their subjects. For physicians like Jean-Martin Charcot and the more subtle Pierre Janet – a contemporary and competitor of Sigmund Freud – fantasies of bodily suffering, unearthly physical perfection, and an array of Catholic maternal fantasies associated with images of Mary and Christ were all nothing more than delusions, not the stuff from which an appreciation or understanding of the ‘unconscious’ could emerge. The result was that French physicians offered no psychodynamic transformation or symbolic reinterpretation of their words or physical symptoms, a resistance that was one reason among many for their hostility to psychoanalysis.</p>
</abstract>
</profileDesc>
<revisionDesc>
<change when="2004-05-24">Created</change>
<change when="2004-06">Published</change>
<change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2017-09-5">References added</change>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:fulltextTEI>
</fulltext>
<metadata>
<istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="corpus cambridge not found" wicri:toSee="no header">
<istex:xmlDeclaration>version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'</istex:xmlDeclaration>
<istex:docType PUBLIC="-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" URI="JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType>
<istex:document>
<article dtd-version="1.0" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">HIS</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>The Historical Journal</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title>Hist. J.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1469-5103</issn>
<issn pub-type="ppub">0018-246X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Cambridge University Press</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Cambridge, UK</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="pii">S0018246X04003711</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S0018246X04003711</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>THE ‘UNCONSCIOUS’ AND CATHOLICISM IN FRANCE</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib>
<name>
<surname>HARRIS</surname>
<given-names>RUTH</given-names>
</name>
<aff>
<institution>New College</institution>
, Oxford</aff>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>24</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2004</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<month>6</month>
<year>2004</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>47</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<fpage>331</fpage>
<lpage>354</lpage>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>2004 Cambridge University Press</copyright-statement>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>In nineteenth-century France, science and religion have often been portrayed as irredeemably opposed to one another. This article seeks to revise this interpretation by showing how these apparently dissonant views intermingled in the study of hysteria. Through a survey of attitudes towards Catholicism and in their treatment of Catholic patients, the article shows how French psychiatrists and neurologists were deeply indebted to religious iconography and experience, despite their vehement anti-clericalism. Because of their hatred of the church, they focused on the treatment of female hysterics who manifested ‘religious’ symptoms – demonopathy, mystical states, and stigmata – in order to amass conclusive evidence of Catholic ‘superstition’. Their preoccupation with such patients meant, however, that they paradoxically re-embedded Catholicism into their scientific practice by incorporating religious motifs, bodily poses, and iconography into their diagnosis of hysteria. At the same time, their disdain for the Catholic religious imagination meant that they refused to explore the fantasies of their subjects. For physicians like Jean-Martin Charcot and the more subtle Pierre Janet – a contemporary and competitor of Sigmund Freud – fantasies of bodily suffering, unearthly physical perfection, and an array of Catholic maternal fantasies associated with images of Mary and Christ were all nothing more than delusions, not the stuff from which an appreciation or understanding of the ‘unconscious’ could emerge. The result was that French physicians offered no psychodynamic transformation or symbolic reinterpretation of their words or physical symptoms, a resistance that was one reason among many for their hostility to psychoanalysis.</p>
</abstract>
<counts>
<page-count count="24"></page-count>
</counts>
<custom-meta-group>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>pdf</meta-name>
<meta-value>S0018246X04003711a.pdf</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
</article>
</istex:document>
</istex:metadataXml>
<mods version="3.6">
<titleInfo>
<title>THE ‘UNCONSCIOUS’ AND CATHOLICISM IN FRANCE</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA">
<title>THE ‘UNCONSCIOUS’ AND CATHOLICISM IN FRANCE</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">RUTH</namePart>
<namePart type="family">HARRIS</namePart>
<affiliation>New College</affiliation>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre type="research-article" displayLabel="research-article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</genre>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Cambridge University Press</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Cambridge, UK</placeTerm>
</place>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2004-06</dateIssued>
<dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2004-05-24</dateCreated>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2004</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
</language>
<abstract>In nineteenth-century France, science and religion have often been portrayed as irredeemably opposed to one another. This article seeks to revise this interpretation by showing how these apparently dissonant views intermingled in the study of hysteria. Through a survey of attitudes towards Catholicism and in their treatment of Catholic patients, the article shows how French psychiatrists and neurologists were deeply indebted to religious iconography and experience, despite their vehement anti-clericalism. Because of their hatred of the church, they focused on the treatment of female hysterics who manifested ‘religious’ symptoms – demonopathy, mystical states, and stigmata – in order to amass conclusive evidence of Catholic ‘superstition’. Their preoccupation with such patients meant, however, that they paradoxically re-embedded Catholicism into their scientific practice by incorporating religious motifs, bodily poses, and iconography into their diagnosis of hysteria. At the same time, their disdain for the Catholic religious imagination meant that they refused to explore the fantasies of their subjects. For physicians like Jean-Martin Charcot and the more subtle Pierre Janet – a contemporary and competitor of Sigmund Freud – fantasies of bodily suffering, unearthly physical perfection, and an array of Catholic maternal fantasies associated with images of Mary and Christ were all nothing more than delusions, not the stuff from which an appreciation or understanding of the ‘unconscious’ could emerge. The result was that French physicians offered no psychodynamic transformation or symbolic reinterpretation of their words or physical symptoms, a resistance that was one reason among many for their hostility to psychoanalysis.</abstract>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>The Historical Journal</title>
</titleInfo>
<genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre>
<identifier type="ISSN">0018-246X</identifier>
<identifier type="eISSN">1469-5103</identifier>
<identifier type="PublisherID">HIS</identifier>
<part>
<date>2004</date>
<detail type="volume">
<caption>vol.</caption>
<number>47</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue">
<caption>no.</caption>
<number>2</number>
</detail>
<extent unit="pages">
<start>331</start>
<end>354</end>
<total>24</total>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="istex">5764BEE46596354D6421AAC40D93EF009A4A18F6</identifier>
<identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/6GQ-L7SXGTHP-7</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1017/S0018246X04003711</identifier>
<identifier type="PII">S0018246X04003711</identifier>
<accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">2004 Cambridge University Press</accessCondition>
<recordInfo>
<recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-G3RCRD03-V">cambridge</recordContentSource>
<recordOrigin>2004 Cambridge University Press</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
<json:item>
<extension>json</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/json</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5764BEE46596354D6421AAC40D93EF009A4A18F6/metadata/json</uri>
</json:item>
</metadata>
<annexes>
<json:item>
<extension>gif</extension>
<original>true</original>
<mimetype>image/gif</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5764BEE46596354D6421AAC40D93EF009A4A18F6/annexes/gif</uri>
</json:item>
</annexes>
<serie></serie>
</istex>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Psychologie/explor/BernheimV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000015 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000015 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Psychologie
   |area=    BernheimV1
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:5764BEE46596354D6421AAC40D93EF009A4A18F6
   |texte=   THE ‘UNCONSCIOUS’ AND CATHOLICISM IN FRANCE
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Mon Mar 5 17:33:33 2018. Site generation: Thu Apr 29 15:49:51 2021