Facework Solidarity, Approbation, and Tact
Identifieur interne : 001140 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 001139; suivant : 001141Facework Solidarity, Approbation, and Tact
Auteurs : Tae Eop Lim ; John Waite BowersSource :
- Human Communication Research [ 0360-3989 ] ; 1991-03.
Abstract
This study extended Brown and Levinson's model of politeness in order to explain more complicated forms of interaction and proposed three different types of facework: solidarity, approbation, and tact. The effects of three social factors—relational intimacy, power difference, and the right to perform a given act in a given situation—on the three types of facework were examined. Relational intimacy was the strongest positive predictor of facework. Its effect was consistent across different types of facework and across different levels of power and right. The right to perform a certain act and speaker's power decreased facework, but these effects were mediated by relational intimacy, achieving significance mainly in distant relationships. The study also examined the relationships among different types of facework. Respondents used multiple types of facework when multiple face wants were threatened, and the use of one type of facework did not decrease the use of other types.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1991.tb00239.x
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Facework Solidarity, Approbation, and Tact</title><author><name sortKey="Lim, Tae Eop" sort="Lim, Tae Eop" uniqKey="Lim T" first="Tae Eop" last="Lim">Tae Eop Lim</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bowers, John Waite" sort="Bowers, John Waite" uniqKey="Bowers J" first="John Waite" last="Bowers">John Waite Bowers</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:BC5A798F31F44411B4F3BB4C5E1F4C7C9433196E</idno><date when="1991" year="1991">1991</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1468-2958.1991.tb00239.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/BC5A798F31F44411B4F3BB4C5E1F4C7C9433196E/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000785</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000780</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">001140</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Exploration">001140</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Facework Solidarity, Approbation, and Tact</title><author><name sortKey="Lim, Tae Eop" sort="Lim, Tae Eop" uniqKey="Lim T" first="Tae Eop" last="Lim">Tae Eop Lim</name><affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="no comma">Tae‐Seop Lim is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Communication Arts at the University of Wisconsin—Madison.</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bowers, John Waite" sort="Bowers, John Waite" uniqKey="Bowers J" first="John Waite" last="Bowers">John Waite Bowers</name><affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="no comma">John Waite Bowers is a Professor in the Department of Communication at the University of Colorado at Boulder.</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Human Communication Research</title><idno type="ISSN">0360-3989</idno><idno type="eISSN">1468-2958</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1991-03">1991-03</date><biblScope unit="volume">17</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="415">415</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="450">450</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0360-3989</idno></series><idno type="istex">BC5A798F31F44411B4F3BB4C5E1F4C7C9433196E</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1468-2958.1991.tb00239.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">HCRE415</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0360-3989</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This study extended Brown and Levinson's model of politeness in order to explain more complicated forms of interaction and proposed three different types of facework: solidarity, approbation, and tact. The effects of three social factors—relational intimacy, power difference, and the right to perform a given act in a given situation—on the three types of facework were examined. Relational intimacy was the strongest positive predictor of facework. Its effect was consistent across different types of facework and across different levels of power and right. The right to perform a certain act and speaker's power decreased facework, but these effects were mediated by relational intimacy, achieving significance mainly in distant relationships. The study also examined the relationships among different types of facework. Respondents used multiple types of facework when multiple face wants were threatened, and the use of one type of facework did not decrease the use of other types.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Bowers, John Waite" sort="Bowers, John Waite" uniqKey="Bowers J" first="John Waite" last="Bowers">John Waite Bowers</name><name sortKey="Lim, Tae Eop" sort="Lim, Tae Eop" uniqKey="Lim T" first="Tae Eop" last="Lim">Tae Eop Lim</name></noCountry></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Musique/explor/SchutzV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001140 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 001140 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Musique
|area= SchutzV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:BC5A798F31F44411B4F3BB4C5E1F4C7C9433196E
|texte= Facework Solidarity, Approbation, and Tact
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.38. |  |