Max Weber's methodology: An ideal‐type
Identifieur interne : 000A91 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000A90; suivant : 000A92Max Weber's methodology: An ideal‐type
Auteurs : Sven EliaesonSource :
- Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences [ 0022-5061 ] ; 2000-06.
Abstract
Weber dealt—in contrast to the textbook image of his method—with rational and nonempathetic explanatory interpretation. His ideal‐type for social action emerged in a very formative period, as a mediation between history and theory and can be characterized as releasing what was inherent in a historicist tradition in crisis. Theoretical elements from Austrian marginalism provided Weber with the prototype for developing contrafactual schemes into ideal‐types. Weber as a scholar at the crossroads resolved the problem of uncontrolled value‐intrusion in a way that provided rational evidence and limited objectivity, in the form of instrumental means–end analysis. His methodology was coherent over time but gradually emerged when contemporary polemics called for his voice to be heard. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Url:
DOI: 10.1002/1520-6696(200022)36:3<241::AID-JHBS3>3.0.CO;2-C
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Max Weber's methodology: An ideal‐type</title><author><name sortKey="Eliaeson, Sven" sort="Eliaeson, Sven" uniqKey="Eliaeson S" first="Sven" last="Eliaeson">Sven Eliaeson</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:0212A4EA9DE513A97A7D26A5387915AFB7D9B793</idno><date when="2000" year="2000">2000</date><idno type="doi">10.1002/1520-6696(200022)36:3<241::AID-JHBS3>3.0.CO;2-C</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/0212A4EA9DE513A97A7D26A5387915AFB7D9B793/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000E08</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000D86</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000A91</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Exploration">000A91</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Max Weber's methodology: An ideal‐type</title><author><name sortKey="Eliaeson, Sven" sort="Eliaeson, Sven" uniqKey="Eliaeson S" first="Sven" last="Eliaeson">Sven Eliaeson</name><affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="no comma">Stockholm's university</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">J. Hist. Behav. Sci.</title><idno type="ISSN">0022-5061</idno><idno type="eISSN">1520-6696</idno><imprint><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</publisher><pubPlace>New York</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2000-06">2000-06</date><biblScope unit="volume">36</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="241">241</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="263">263</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0022-5061</idno></series><idno type="istex">0212A4EA9DE513A97A7D26A5387915AFB7D9B793</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/1520-6696(200022)36:3<241::AID-JHBS3>3.0.CO;2-C</idno><idno type="ArticleID">JHBS3</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0022-5061</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Weber dealt—in contrast to the textbook image of his method—with rational and nonempathetic explanatory interpretation. His ideal‐type for social action emerged in a very formative period, as a mediation between history and theory and can be characterized as releasing what was inherent in a historicist tradition in crisis. Theoretical elements from Austrian marginalism provided Weber with the prototype for developing contrafactual schemes into ideal‐types. Weber as a scholar at the crossroads resolved the problem of uncontrolled value‐intrusion in a way that provided rational evidence and limited objectivity, in the form of instrumental means–end analysis. His methodology was coherent over time but gradually emerged when contemporary polemics called for his voice to be heard. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Eliaeson, Sven" sort="Eliaeson, Sven" uniqKey="Eliaeson S" first="Sven" last="Eliaeson">Sven Eliaeson</name></noCountry></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Musique/explor/SchutzV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000A91 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000A91 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Musique
|area= SchutzV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:0212A4EA9DE513A97A7D26A5387915AFB7D9B793
|texte= Max Weber's methodology: An ideal‐type
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.38. |  |