GUIDELINES FOR UTILIZING COLLATERAL SOURCES OF INFORMATION IN CHILD CUSTODY EVALUATIONS
Identifieur interne : 000932 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000931; suivant : 000933GUIDELINES FOR UTILIZING COLLATERAL SOURCES OF INFORMATION IN CHILD CUSTODY EVALUATIONS
Auteurs : William G. Austin [Oman]Source :
- Family Court Review [ 1531-2445 ] ; 2002-04.
Abstract
A structure for utilizing third party or collateral sources of information in the child custody evaluation is discussed. Collateral information is vital to the process of trying to assess the credibility and validity of information obtained from the primary parties in a dispute. Information that is from more neutral parties has higher credibility and when the party has access to key information it produces more discriminant validity. When a source with high discriminant validity agrees with information from a primary party, then it enhances the convergent validity on an issue or hypothesis. Child custody cases are inherently characterized by biased data within the adversarial process. Gathering data from collateral sources and using a system to evaluate their usefulness on confirmation of hypotheses is a necessary part of the emerging forensic‐clinical‐scientific child custody evaluation paradigm.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.174-1617.2002.tb00828.x
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">GUIDELINES FOR UTILIZING COLLATERAL SOURCES OF INFORMATION IN CHILD CUSTODY EVALUATIONS</title><author><name sortKey="Austin, William G" sort="Austin, William G" uniqKey="Austin W" first="William G." last="Austin">William G. Austin</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:603B09F26E13346B7E5E57E85D7F27E6CC791765</idno><date when="2002" year="2002">2002</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.174-1617.2002.tb00828.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/603B09F26E13346B7E5E57E85D7F27E6CC791765/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000540</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000537</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000932</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Exploration">000932</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">GUIDELINES FOR UTILIZING COLLATERAL SOURCES OF INFORMATION IN CHILD CUSTODY EVALUATIONS</title><author><name sortKey="Austin, William G" sort="Austin, William G" uniqKey="Austin W" first="William G." last="Austin">William G. Austin</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country wicri:rule="url">Oman</country><wicri:regionArea>William G. Austin, Ph.D., has a private practice in clinical and forensic psychology at Northwest Colorado Psychological Services, Steamboat Springs</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Steamboat Springs</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Family Court Review</title><idno type="ISSN">1531-2445</idno><idno type="eISSN">1744-1617</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2002-04">2002-04</date><biblScope unit="volume">40</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="177">177</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="184">184</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1531-2445</idno></series><idno type="istex">603B09F26E13346B7E5E57E85D7F27E6CC791765</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.174-1617.2002.tb00828.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">FCRE177</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1531-2445</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">A structure for utilizing third party or collateral sources of information in the child custody evaluation is discussed. Collateral information is vital to the process of trying to assess the credibility and validity of information obtained from the primary parties in a dispute. Information that is from more neutral parties has higher credibility and when the party has access to key information it produces more discriminant validity. When a source with high discriminant validity agrees with information from a primary party, then it enhances the convergent validity on an issue or hypothesis. Child custody cases are inherently characterized by biased data within the adversarial process. Gathering data from collateral sources and using a system to evaluate their usefulness on confirmation of hypotheses is a necessary part of the emerging forensic‐clinical‐scientific child custody evaluation paradigm.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>Oman</li></country></list><tree><country name="Oman"><noRegion><name sortKey="Austin, William G" sort="Austin, William G" uniqKey="Austin W" first="William G." last="Austin">William G. Austin</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Musique/explor/SchutzV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000932 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000932 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Musique
|area= SchutzV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:603B09F26E13346B7E5E57E85D7F27E6CC791765
|texte= GUIDELINES FOR UTILIZING COLLATERAL SOURCES OF INFORMATION IN CHILD CUSTODY EVALUATIONS
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.38. |  |