Distinctions Between Everyday and Representational Communication
Identifieur interne : 001278 ( Main/Curation ); précédent : 001277; suivant : 001279Distinctions Between Everyday and Representational Communication
Auteurs : David B. Mitchell [Canada]Source :
- Communication Theory [ 1050-3293 ] ; 1994-05.
Abstract
This essay extends a series of distinctions Giddens bas made between “ta1k” and “cultural objects” respectively in terms of “everyday” and “representational communication.” Everyday communication is equivalent to face‐to‐face communication. Representational communication entails conventional aesthetic practices—and is not synonymous with technologically mediated communication. Historically, the stress on linguistic models has limited our understanding of these analogous and yet distinctive modes of communication. The two varieties are distinctive: first, in terms of the role of verbal language; second, in terms of how meaning is processed over and against background frames of understanding; third, in terms of the relationship between levels of analysis; fourth, in terms of pragmatic features. These distinctions are relevant to how we think about cultural history and practice from a communicational perspective. They are also germane to the prospect of integrating theories of symbolic form with those of pragmatic action.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.1994.tb00086.x
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Main, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :001336
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:91FC6CADD7E71FB19976E8B83BA43717E87F0B64Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Distinctions Between Everyday and Representational Communication</title>
<author><name sortKey="Mitchell, David B" sort="Mitchell, David B" uniqKey="Mitchell D" first="David B." last="Mitchell">David B. Mitchell</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3"><mods:affiliation>David B. Mitchell is assistant professor in the Graduate Program in Communication Studies at the University of Calgary, Calgary Alberta. He would like to thank Anthony Giddens (Cambridge) for insights gained in lectures and conversations, and Edna Einsiedel(Calgary) for her constant support.</mods:affiliation>
<country>Canada</country>
<placeName><settlement type="city">Calgary</settlement>
<region type="state">Alberta</region>
</placeName>
<wicri:orgArea>David B. Mitchell is assistant professor in the Graduate Program in Communication Studies at the University of Calgary, Calgary Alberta. He would like to thank Anthony Giddens (Cambridge) for insights gained in lectures and conversations</wicri:orgArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:91FC6CADD7E71FB19976E8B83BA43717E87F0B64</idno>
<date when="1994" year="1994">1994</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1468-2885.1994.tb00086.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/91FC6CADD7E71FB19976E8B83BA43717E87F0B64/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">001336</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">001278</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Distinctions Between Everyday and Representational Communication</title>
<author><name sortKey="Mitchell, David B" sort="Mitchell, David B" uniqKey="Mitchell D" first="David B." last="Mitchell">David B. Mitchell</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3"><mods:affiliation>David B. Mitchell is assistant professor in the Graduate Program in Communication Studies at the University of Calgary, Calgary Alberta. He would like to thank Anthony Giddens (Cambridge) for insights gained in lectures and conversations, and Edna Einsiedel(Calgary) for her constant support.</mods:affiliation>
<country>Canada</country>
<placeName><settlement type="city">Calgary</settlement>
<region type="state">Alberta</region>
</placeName>
<wicri:orgArea>David B. Mitchell is assistant professor in the Graduate Program in Communication Studies at the University of Calgary, Calgary Alberta. He would like to thank Anthony Giddens (Cambridge) for insights gained in lectures and conversations</wicri:orgArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j">Communication Theory</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1050-3293</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1468-2885</idno>
<imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="1994-05">1994-05</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="111">111</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="131">131</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">1050-3293</idno>
</series>
<idno type="istex">91FC6CADD7E71FB19976E8B83BA43717E87F0B64</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1468-2885.1994.tb00086.x</idno>
<idno type="ArticleID">COMT111</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1050-3293</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass></textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This essay extends a series of distinctions Giddens bas made between “ta1k” and “cultural objects” respectively in terms of “everyday” and “representational communication.” Everyday communication is equivalent to face‐to‐face communication. Representational communication entails conventional aesthetic practices—and is not synonymous with technologically mediated communication. Historically, the stress on linguistic models has limited our understanding of these analogous and yet distinctive modes of communication. The two varieties are distinctive: first, in terms of the role of verbal language; second, in terms of how meaning is processed over and against background frames of understanding; third, in terms of the relationship between levels of analysis; fourth, in terms of pragmatic features. These distinctions are relevant to how we think about cultural history and practice from a communicational perspective. They are also germane to the prospect of integrating theories of symbolic form with those of pragmatic action.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Musique/explor/SchutzV1/Data/Main/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001278 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 001278 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Musique |area= SchutzV1 |flux= Main |étape= Curation |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:91FC6CADD7E71FB19976E8B83BA43717E87F0B64 |texte= Distinctions Between Everyday and Representational Communication }}
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.38. | ![]() |