Adorno on the Ethical and the Ineffable
Identifieur interne : 000D20 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 000D19; suivant : 000D21Adorno on the Ethical and the Ineffable
Auteurs : James Gordon FinlaysonSource :
- European Journal of Philosophy [ 0966-8373 ] ; 2002-04.
Abstract
The thesis is that Adorno has a normative ethics, albeit a minimal and negative ethics of resistance. However Adorno’s ethical theory faces two problems: the problem of the availability of the good and the problem of whether a normative ethics is consistent with philosophical negativism. The author argues that a correct of understanding the role of the ineffable in Adorno’s Negative Dialectics solves both problems: it provides an account of the availability of the good that is consistent with his philosophical negativism. The author counters the prevalent objection that Adorno’s aporetic philosophy, like some negative theology, leads to irrationalism and mysticism. The parallel with negative theology is developed by means of a comparison with Nicholas of Cusa. Drawing on Wittgentstein’s saying/showing distinction and Adrian Moore’s work the author argues that Nicholas and Adorno can be seen to share a philosophically defensible notion of ineffable knowledge.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/1468-0378.00147
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:6C6878853BE045FFD2C85CEC9EA607597F39458ALe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Adorno on the Ethical and the Ineffable</title><author><name sortKey="Finlayson, James Gordon" sort="Finlayson, James Gordon" uniqKey="Finlayson J" first="James Gordon" last="Finlayson">James Gordon Finlayson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Philosophy, University of York, UKjgf2@york.ac.uk</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:6C6878853BE045FFD2C85CEC9EA607597F39458A</idno><date when="2002" year="2002">2002</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/1468-0378.00147</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/6C6878853BE045FFD2C85CEC9EA607597F39458A/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000D20</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Adorno on the Ethical and the Ineffable</title><author><name sortKey="Finlayson, James Gordon" sort="Finlayson, James Gordon" uniqKey="Finlayson J" first="James Gordon" last="Finlayson">James Gordon Finlayson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Philosophy, University of York, UKjgf2@york.ac.uk</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">European Journal of Philosophy</title><idno type="ISSN">0966-8373</idno><idno type="eISSN">1468-0378</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2002-04">2002-04</date><biblScope unit="volume">10</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="25">25</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0966-8373</idno></series><idno type="istex">6C6878853BE045FFD2C85CEC9EA607597F39458A</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/1468-0378.00147</idno><idno type="ArticleID">EJOP147</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0966-8373</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The thesis is that Adorno has a normative ethics, albeit a minimal and negative ethics of resistance. However Adorno’s ethical theory faces two problems: the problem of the availability of the good and the problem of whether a normative ethics is consistent with philosophical negativism. The author argues that a correct of understanding the role of the ineffable in Adorno’s Negative Dialectics solves both problems: it provides an account of the availability of the good that is consistent with his philosophical negativism. The author counters the prevalent objection that Adorno’s aporetic philosophy, like some negative theology, leads to irrationalism and mysticism. The parallel with negative theology is developed by means of a comparison with Nicholas of Cusa. Drawing on Wittgentstein’s saying/showing distinction and Adrian Moore’s work the author argues that Nicholas and Adorno can be seen to share a philosophically defensible notion of ineffable knowledge.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>James Gordon Finlayson</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Philosophy, University of York, UKjgf2@york.ac.uk</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><abstract>The thesis is that Adorno has a normative ethics, albeit a minimal and negative ethics of resistance. However Adorno’s ethical theory faces two problems: the problem of the availability of the good and the problem of whether a normative ethics is consistent with philosophical negativism. The author argues that a correct of understanding the role of the ineffable in Adorno’s Negative Dialectics solves both problems: it provides an account of the availability of the good that is consistent with his philosophical negativism. The author counters the prevalent objection that Adorno’s aporetic philosophy, like some negative theology, leads to irrationalism and mysticism. The parallel with negative theology is developed by means of a comparison with Nicholas of Cusa. Drawing on Wittgentstein’s saying/showing distinction and Adrian Moore’s work the author argues that Nicholas and Adorno can be seen to share a philosophically defensible notion of ineffable knowledge.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.74</score><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>451 x 698 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><keywordCount>0</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>972</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>11644</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>65123</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>25</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>145</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Adorno on the Ethical and the Ineffable</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>10</volume><pages><total>25</total><last>25</last><first>1</first></pages><issn><json:string>0966-8373</json:string></issn><issue>1</issue><genre></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1468-0378</json:string></eissn><title>European Journal of Philosophy</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1468-0378</json:string></doi></host><publicationDate>2002</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2002</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/1468-0378.00147</json:string></doi><id>6C6878853BE045FFD2C85CEC9EA607597F39458A</id><fulltext><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/6C6878853BE045FFD2C85CEC9EA607597F39458A/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><extension>zip</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/6C6878853BE045FFD2C85CEC9EA607597F39458A/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/6C6878853BE045FFD2C85CEC9EA607597F39458A/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Adorno on the Ethical and the Ineffable</title><respStmt xml:id="ISTEX-API" resp="Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID" name="ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)"></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</pubPlace><availability><p>WILEY</p></availability><date>2002</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Adorno on the Ethical and the Ineffable</title><author><persName><forename type="first">James Gordon</forename><surname>Finlayson</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Philosophy, University of York, UKjgf2@york.ac.uk</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">European Journal of Philosophy</title><idno type="pISSN">0966-8373</idno><idno type="eISSN">1468-0378</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1468-0378</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2002-04"></date><biblScope unit="volume">10</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="25">25</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">6C6878853BE045FFD2C85CEC9EA607597F39458A</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/1468-0378.00147</idno><idno type="ArticleID">EJOP147</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2002</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The thesis is that Adorno has a normative ethics, albeit a minimal and negative ethics of resistance. However Adorno’s ethical theory faces two problems: the problem of the availability of the good and the problem of whether a normative ethics is consistent with philosophical negativism. The author argues that a correct of understanding the role of the ineffable in Adorno’s Negative Dialectics solves both problems: it provides an account of the availability of the good that is consistent with his philosophical negativism. The author counters the prevalent objection that Adorno’s aporetic philosophy, like some negative theology, leads to irrationalism and mysticism. The parallel with negative theology is developed by means of a comparison with Nicholas of Cusa. Drawing on Wittgentstein’s saying/showing distinction and Adrian Moore’s work the author argues that Nicholas and Adorno can be seen to share a philosophically defensible notion of ineffable knowledge.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2002-04">Published</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2016-3-2">References added</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><extension>txt</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/6C6878853BE045FFD2C85CEC9EA607597F39458A/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley component found"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1468-0378</doi><issn type="print">0966-8373</issn><issn type="electronic">1468-0378</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="EJOP"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY">European Journal of Philosophy</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="04001"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/ejop.2002.10.issue-1</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="10">10</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="1">1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2002-04">April 2002</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0000100" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/1468-0378.00147</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="EJOP147"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="25"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright>Blackwell Publishers Ltd. 2002</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2002-12-16"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2002-12-16"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:Header result:Header" date="2010-03-04"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-24"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="1">1</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="25">25</numbering></numberingGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:EJOP.EJOP147.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Adorno on the Ethical and the Ineffable</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>James Gordon</givenNames><familyName>Finlayson</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="GB"><unparsedAffiliation> Department of Philosophy, University of York, UK<email>jgf2@york.ac.uk</email></unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>The thesis is that Adorno has a normative ethics, albeit a minimal and negative ethics of resistance. However Adorno’s ethical theory faces two problems: the problem of the availability of the good and the problem of whether a normative ethics is consistent with philosophical negativism. The author argues that a correct of understanding the role of the ineffable in Adorno’s Negative Dialectics solves both problems: it provides an account of the availability of the good that is consistent with his philosophical negativism. The author counters the prevalent objection that Adorno’s aporetic philosophy, like some negative theology, leads to irrationalism and mysticism. The parallel with negative theology is developed by means of a comparison with Nicholas of Cusa. Drawing on Wittgentstein’s saying/showing distinction and Adrian Moore’s work the author argues that Nicholas and Adorno can be seen to share a philosophically defensible notion of ineffable knowledge.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Adorno on the Ethical and the Ineffable</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Adorno on the Ethical and the Ineffable</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">James Gordon</namePart><namePart type="family">Finlayson</namePart><affiliation>Department of Philosophy, University of York, UKjgf2@york.ac.uk</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2002-04</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2002</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">The thesis is that Adorno has a normative ethics, albeit a minimal and negative ethics of resistance. However Adorno’s ethical theory faces two problems: the problem of the availability of the good and the problem of whether a normative ethics is consistent with philosophical negativism. The author argues that a correct of understanding the role of the ineffable in Adorno’s Negative Dialectics solves both problems: it provides an account of the availability of the good that is consistent with his philosophical negativism. The author counters the prevalent objection that Adorno’s aporetic philosophy, like some negative theology, leads to irrationalism and mysticism. The parallel with negative theology is developed by means of a comparison with Nicholas of Cusa. Drawing on Wittgentstein’s saying/showing distinction and Adrian Moore’s work the author argues that Nicholas and Adorno can be seen to share a philosophically defensible notion of ineffable knowledge.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>European Journal of Philosophy</title></titleInfo><genre type="Journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0966-8373</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1468-0378</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1468-0378</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">EJOP</identifier><part><date>2002</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>10</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>1</start><end>25</end><total>25</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">6C6878853BE045FFD2C85CEC9EA607597F39458A</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/1468-0378.00147</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">EJOP147</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Blackwell Publishers Ltd. 2002</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Musique/explor/SchutzV1/Data/Main/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000D20 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000D20 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Musique
|area= SchutzV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:6C6878853BE045FFD2C85CEC9EA607597F39458A
|texte= Adorno on the Ethical and the Ineffable
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.38. |  |