Luhmann, Habermas and the theory of communication
Identifieur interne : 000820 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 000819; suivant : 000821Luhmann, Habermas and the theory of communication
Auteurs : Loet LeydesdorffSource :
- Systems Research and Behavioral Science [ 1092-7026 ] ; 2000-05.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
In his critique of Luhmann's sociology, Habermas (1987) argued that individuation and socialization are possible on the basis of linguistic structures. This critique touches the blind spot of sociological systems theory as a meta‐biology. Whereas the paradigm shift from action theory towards communication theory was fully reflected in Luhmann's sociology, the difference between the self‐organization of social systems and the autopoiesis of biological systems remained underspecified. Social systems allow for communication about observations from within the system and/or from another perspective. Observers are able to participate both in the variation and in the selection; Giddens (1976) introduced in this context the metaphor of a ‘double hermeneutics’. Through language the distinction between uncertainty and meaningful information is communicated reflexively, and the consequent codification may be changed without becoming confused. The implied communicative competences can be specified from the perspective of communication theory. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Url:
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1743(200005/06)17:3<273::AID-SRES329>3.0.CO;2-R
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:DCE0FF073B8305E0125728044AF2FD76BACFFFEDLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Luhmann, Habermas and the theory of communication</title><author><name sortKey="Leydesdorff, Loet" sort="Leydesdorff, Loet" uniqKey="Leydesdorff L" first="Loet" last="Leydesdorff">Loet Leydesdorff</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Science and Technology Dynamics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:DCE0FF073B8305E0125728044AF2FD76BACFFFED</idno><date when="2000" year="2000">2000</date><idno type="doi">10.1002/(SICI)1099-1743(200005/06)17:3<273::AID-SRES329>3.0.CO;2-R</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/DCE0FF073B8305E0125728044AF2FD76BACFFFED/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000820</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Luhmann, Habermas and the theory of communication</title><author><name sortKey="Leydesdorff, Loet" sort="Leydesdorff, Loet" uniqKey="Leydesdorff L" first="Loet" last="Leydesdorff">Loet Leydesdorff</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Science and Technology Dynamics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Systems Research and Behavioral Science</title><title level="j" type="sub">The Official Journal of the International Federation for Systems Research</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Syst. Res.</title><idno type="ISSN">1092-7026</idno><idno type="eISSN">1099-1743</idno><imprint><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2000-05">2000-05</date><biblScope unit="volume">17</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="273">273</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="288">288</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1092-7026</idno></series><idno type="istex">DCE0FF073B8305E0125728044AF2FD76BACFFFED</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/(SICI)1099-1743(200005/06)17:3<273::AID-SRES329>3.0.CO;2-R</idno><idno type="ArticleID">SRES329</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1092-7026</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Habermas</term><term>Luhmann</term><term>communication</term><term>reflexivity</term><term>self‐organization</term><term>sociology</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">In his critique of Luhmann's sociology, Habermas (1987) argued that individuation and socialization are possible on the basis of linguistic structures. This critique touches the blind spot of sociological systems theory as a meta‐biology. Whereas the paradigm shift from action theory towards communication theory was fully reflected in Luhmann's sociology, the difference between the self‐organization of social systems and the autopoiesis of biological systems remained underspecified. Social systems allow for communication about observations from within the system and/or from another perspective. Observers are able to participate both in the variation and in the selection; Giddens (1976) introduced in this context the metaphor of a ‘double hermeneutics’. Through language the distinction between uncertainty and meaningful information is communicated reflexively, and the consequent codification may be changed without becoming confused. The implied communicative competences can be specified from the perspective of communication theory. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Loet Leydesdorff</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Science and Technology Dynamics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>self‐organization</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>communication</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>sociology</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Habermas</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Luhmann</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>reflexivity</value></json:item></subject><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><abstract>In his critique of Luhmann's sociology, Habermas (1987) argued that individuation and socialization are possible on the basis of linguistic structures. This critique touches the blind spot of sociological systems theory as a meta‐biology. Whereas the paradigm shift from action theory towards communication theory was fully reflected in Luhmann's sociology, the difference between the self‐organization of social systems and the autopoiesis of biological systems remained underspecified. Social systems allow for communication about observations from within the system and/or from another perspective. Observers are able to participate both in the variation and in the selection; Giddens (1976) introduced in this context the metaphor of a ‘double hermeneutics’. Through language the distinction between uncertainty and meaningful information is communicated reflexively, and the consequent codification may be changed without becoming confused. The implied communicative competences can be specified from the perspective of communication theory. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.788</score><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>567 x 737 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><keywordCount>6</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>1087</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>8671</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>58448</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>16</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>149</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Luhmann, Habermas and the theory of communication</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>17</volume><pages><total>16</total><last>288</last><first>273</first></pages><issn><json:string>1092-7026</json:string></issn><issue>3</issue><subject><json:item><value>Research Paper</value></json:item></subject><genre></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1099-1743</json:string></eissn><title>Systems Research and Behavioral Science</title><doi><json:string>10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1743a</json:string></doi></host><publicationDate>2000</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2000</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1002/(SICI)1099-1743(200005/06)17:3>273::AID-SRES329>3.0.CO;2-R</json:string></doi><id>DCE0FF073B8305E0125728044AF2FD76BACFFFED</id><fulltext><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/DCE0FF073B8305E0125728044AF2FD76BACFFFED/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><extension>zip</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/DCE0FF073B8305E0125728044AF2FD76BACFFFED/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/DCE0FF073B8305E0125728044AF2FD76BACFFFED/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Luhmann, Habermas and the theory of communication</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>WILEY</p></availability><date>2000</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content">*A previous version of this paper was presented at the World Congress of Sociology, Montreal, August 1998 (Sociological Abstracts 98S35047/ISA/1998/12288).</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Luhmann, Habermas and the theory of communication</title><author><persName><forename type="first">Loet</forename><surname>Leydesdorff</surname></persName><note type="correspondence"><p>Correspondence: Department of Science and Technology Dynamics, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, 1018 WV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.</p></note><affiliation>Department of Science and Technology Dynamics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Systems Research and Behavioral Science</title><title level="j" type="sub">The Official Journal of the International Federation for Systems Research</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Syst. Res.</title><idno type="pISSN">1092-7026</idno><idno type="eISSN">1099-1743</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1743a</idno><imprint><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>Chichester, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2000-05"></date><biblScope unit="volume">17</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="273">273</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="288">288</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">DCE0FF073B8305E0125728044AF2FD76BACFFFED</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/(SICI)1099-1743(200005/06)17:3<273::AID-SRES329>3.0.CO;2-R</idno><idno type="ArticleID">SRES329</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2000</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>In his critique of Luhmann's sociology, Habermas (1987) argued that individuation and socialization are possible on the basis of linguistic structures. This critique touches the blind spot of sociological systems theory as a meta‐biology. Whereas the paradigm shift from action theory towards communication theory was fully reflected in Luhmann's sociology, the difference between the self‐organization of social systems and the autopoiesis of biological systems remained underspecified. Social systems allow for communication about observations from within the system and/or from another perspective. Observers are able to participate both in the variation and in the selection; Giddens (1976) introduced in this context the metaphor of a ‘double hermeneutics’. Through language the distinction between uncertainty and meaningful information is communicated reflexively, and the consequent codification may be changed without becoming confused. The implied communicative competences can be specified from the perspective of communication theory. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p></abstract><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>Keywords</head><item><term>self‐organization</term></item><item><term>communication</term></item><item><term>sociology</term></item><item><term>Habermas</term></item><item><term>Luhmann</term></item><item><term>reflexivity</term></item></list></keywords></textClass><textClass><keywords scheme="Journal Subject"><list><head>article category</head><item><term>Research Paper</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2000-05">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><extension>txt</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/DCE0FF073B8305E0125728044AF2FD76BACFFFED/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisherName><publisherLoc>Chichester, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi registered="yes">10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1743a</doi><issn type="print">1092-7026</issn><issn type="electronic">1099-1743</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="SRES"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" xml:lang="en" sort="SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE">Systems Research and Behavioral Science</title><title type="subtitle">The Official Journal of the International Federation for Systems Research</title><title type="short">Syst. Res.</title></titleGroup><selfCitationGroup><citation type="ancestor" xml:id="cit1"><journalTitle>Systems Research</journalTitle><accessionId ref="info:x-wiley/issn/07317239">0731-7239</accessionId><accessionId ref="info:x-wiley/issn/10991735">1099-1735</accessionId><pubYear year="1996">1996</pubYear><vol>13</vol><issue>4</issue></citation></selfCitationGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="30"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1002/(SICI)1099-1743(200005/06)17:3<>1.0.CO;2-R</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="17">17</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">3</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2000-05">May/June 2000</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="5" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1002/(SICI)1099-1743(200005/06)17:3<273::AID-SRES329>3.0.CO;2-R</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="SRES329"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="16"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Research Paper</title><title type="tocHeading1">Research Papers</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2000-05-15"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2000-05-15"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:JWSART34_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-03-04"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-02-08"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-11-04"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">273</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">288</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Department of Science and Technology Dynamics, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, 1018 WV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.</correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:SRES.SRES329.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="3"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="50"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" xml:lang="en">Luhmann, Habermas and the theory of communication<link href="#fn1"></link></title><title type="short" xml:lang="en">Luhmann, Habermas and the Theory of Communication</title></titleGroup><creators><creator xml:id="au1" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Loet</givenNames><familyName>Leydesdorff</familyName></personName><contactDetails><email>loet@chem.uva.nl</email></contactDetails></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="af1" countryCode="NL" type="organization"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Science and Technology Dynamics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en" type="author"><keyword xml:id="kwd1">self‐organization</keyword><keyword xml:id="kwd2">communication</keyword><keyword xml:id="kwd3">sociology</keyword><keyword xml:id="kwd4">Habermas</keyword><keyword xml:id="kwd5">Luhmann</keyword><keyword xml:id="kwd6">reflexivity</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p>In his critique of Luhmann's sociology, Habermas (1987) argued that individuation and socialization are possible on the basis of linguistic structures. This critique touches the blind spot of sociological systems theory as a meta‐biology. Whereas the paradigm shift from action theory towards communication theory was fully reflected in Luhmann's sociology, the difference between the self‐organization of social systems and the autopoiesis of biological systems remained underspecified. Social systems allow for communication about observations from within the system and/or from another perspective. Observers are able to participate both in the variation and in the selection; Giddens (1976) introduced in this context the metaphor of a ‘double hermeneutics’. Through language the distinction between uncertainty and meaningful information is communicated reflexively, and the consequent codification may be changed without becoming confused. The implied communicative competences can be specified from the perspective of communication theory. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta><noteGroup><note xml:id="fn1"><p>A previous version of this paper was presented at the World Congress of Sociology, Montreal, August 1998 (<i>Sociological Abstracts</i> 98S35047/ISA/1998/12288).</p></note></noteGroup></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Luhmann, Habermas and the theory of communication</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Luhmann, Habermas and the Theory of Communication</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Luhmann, Habermas and the theory of communication</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Loet</namePart><namePart type="family">Leydesdorff</namePart><affiliation>Department of Science and Technology Dynamics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands</affiliation><description>Correspondence: Department of Science and Technology Dynamics, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, 1018 WV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Chichester, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-05</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2000</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="figures">3</extent><extent unit="references">50</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">In his critique of Luhmann's sociology, Habermas (1987) argued that individuation and socialization are possible on the basis of linguistic structures. This critique touches the blind spot of sociological systems theory as a meta‐biology. Whereas the paradigm shift from action theory towards communication theory was fully reflected in Luhmann's sociology, the difference between the self‐organization of social systems and the autopoiesis of biological systems remained underspecified. Social systems allow for communication about observations from within the system and/or from another perspective. Observers are able to participate both in the variation and in the selection; Giddens (1976) introduced in this context the metaphor of a ‘double hermeneutics’. Through language the distinction between uncertainty and meaningful information is communicated reflexively, and the consequent codification may be changed without becoming confused. The implied communicative competences can be specified from the perspective of communication theory. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><note type="content">*A previous version of this paper was presented at the World Congress of Sociology, Montreal, August 1998 (Sociological Abstracts 98S35047/ISA/1998/12288).</note><subject lang="en"><genre>Keywords</genre><topic>self‐organization</topic><topic>communication</topic><topic>sociology</topic><topic>Habermas</topic><topic>Luhmann</topic><topic>reflexivity</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Systems Research and Behavioral Science</title><subTitle>The Official Journal of the International Federation for Systems Research</subTitle></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Syst. Res.</title></titleInfo><genre type="Journal">journal</genre><subject><genre>article category</genre><topic>Research Paper</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">1092-7026</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1099-1743</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1743a</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">SRES</identifier><part><date>2000</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>17</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>3</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>273</start><end>288</end><total>16</total></extent></part></relatedItem><relatedItem type="preceding"><titleInfo><title>Systems Research</title></titleInfo><identifier type="ISSN">0731-7239</identifier><identifier type="ISSN">1099-1735</identifier><part><date point="end">1996</date><detail type="volume"><caption>last vol.</caption><number>13</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>last no.</caption><number>4</number></detail></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">DCE0FF073B8305E0125728044AF2FD76BACFFFED</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/(SICI)1099-1743(200005/06)17:3<273::AID-SRES329>3.0.CO;2-R</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">SRES329</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Musique/explor/SchutzV1/Data/Main/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000820 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000820 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Musique
|area= SchutzV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:DCE0FF073B8305E0125728044AF2FD76BACFFFED
|texte= Luhmann, Habermas and the theory of communication
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.38. |  |