The persistence of ritual in nursing practice
Identifieur interne : 000299 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 000298; suivant : 000300The persistence of ritual in nursing practice
Auteurs : F. StrangeSource :
- Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing [ 1361-9004 ] ; 2001.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
As nursing attempts to become a research based profession, ritual has become stigmatized and associated with thoughtless repetition. Articles condemning ritualistic practice are frequently seen in nursing journals. Despite this condemnation, ritualistic practice appears to persist. This paper examines the origins and purpose of ritual, giving reasons for the negative association. It explores the role of ritual within western culture and nursing. This paper then draws on anthropological method to analyze the purpose of ritual within nursing and suggests reasons for its persistence. The paper concludes that there are cultural influences that promote a technical, rational approach to the study of the human condition. This worldview with its emphasis on cognition devalues the important emotional aspects of humanity by associating them with the primitive. The examination of factors which contribute to the persistence of ritual in nursing concludes that nursing work involves emotional encounters and breaches of the taboo aspects of culture. Rituals serve to normalize these transgressions. It helps the nurse and patient deal with emotions generated by these, the breaches of taboo, by re-labelling situations as caring rather than transgressing. Because they serve these emotional and social functions, rituals endure. Rationale for the article: my interest in ritual was re-awakened on reading Parker's (1999) article entitled Reason or ritual. It stimulated me to reflect on three questions: firstly, why do rituals persist when the nursing literature condemns them? Secondly, does ritual serve a purpose that ensures its survival in the face of criticism? Thirdly, why do the disciplines of nursing and anthropology perceive ritual in such different ways? This paper takes an anthropological approach to ritual, drawing on secondary anthropological and nursing data, in an attempt to answer the questions outlined above.
Url:
DOI: 10.1054/cein.2001.0240
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:7873EAB093EAAC8D4B9EF74611A5F9D4C790F960Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The persistence of ritual in nursing practice</title><author><name sortKey="Strange, F" sort="Strange, F" uniqKey="Strange F" first="F." last="Strange">F. Strange</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>St Bartholomew School of Nursing and Midwifery, 20 Bartholomew Close, London, EC1A 7QN, UK</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:7873EAB093EAAC8D4B9EF74611A5F9D4C790F960</idno><date when="2001" year="2001">2001</date><idno type="doi">10.1054/cein.2001.0240</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/7873EAB093EAAC8D4B9EF74611A5F9D4C790F960/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000299</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The persistence of ritual in nursing practice</title><author><name sortKey="Strange, F" sort="Strange, F" uniqKey="Strange F" first="F." last="Strange">F. Strange</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>St Bartholomew School of Nursing and Midwifery, 20 Bartholomew Close, London, EC1A 7QN, UK</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">YCEIN</title><idno type="ISSN">1361-9004</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="2001">2001</date><biblScope unit="volume">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="177">177</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="183">183</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1361-9004</idno></series><idno type="istex">7873EAB093EAAC8D4B9EF74611A5F9D4C790F960</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1054/cein.2001.0240</idno><idno type="PII">S1361-9004(01)90240-7</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1361-9004</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>anthropology</term><term>primitive</term><term>rites of passage</term><term>ritual</term><term>technical rationality</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">As nursing attempts to become a research based profession, ritual has become stigmatized and associated with thoughtless repetition. Articles condemning ritualistic practice are frequently seen in nursing journals. Despite this condemnation, ritualistic practice appears to persist. This paper examines the origins and purpose of ritual, giving reasons for the negative association. It explores the role of ritual within western culture and nursing. This paper then draws on anthropological method to analyze the purpose of ritual within nursing and suggests reasons for its persistence. The paper concludes that there are cultural influences that promote a technical, rational approach to the study of the human condition. This worldview with its emphasis on cognition devalues the important emotional aspects of humanity by associating them with the primitive. The examination of factors which contribute to the persistence of ritual in nursing concludes that nursing work involves emotional encounters and breaches of the taboo aspects of culture. Rituals serve to normalize these transgressions. It helps the nurse and patient deal with emotions generated by these, the breaches of taboo, by re-labelling situations as caring rather than transgressing. Because they serve these emotional and social functions, rituals endure. Rationale for the article: my interest in ritual was re-awakened on reading Parker's (1999) article entitled Reason or ritual. It stimulated me to reflect on three questions: firstly, why do rituals persist when the nursing literature condemns them? Secondly, does ritual serve a purpose that ensures its survival in the face of criticism? Thirdly, why do the disciplines of nursing and anthropology perceive ritual in such different ways? This paper takes an anthropological approach to ritual, drawing on secondary anthropological and nursing data, in an attempt to answer the questions outlined above.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>elsevier</corpusName><author><json:item><name>F. Strange TD, MA, BSc(Hons), PGDE, RGN</name><affiliations><json:string>St Bartholomew School of Nursing and Midwifery, 20 Bartholomew Close, London, EC1A 7QN, UK</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>anthropology</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>primitive</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>rites of passage</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>ritual</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>technical rationality</value></json:item></subject><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><abstract>As nursing attempts to become a research based profession, ritual has become stigmatized and associated with thoughtless repetition. Articles condemning ritualistic practice are frequently seen in nursing journals. Despite this condemnation, ritualistic practice appears to persist. This paper examines the origins and purpose of ritual, giving reasons for the negative association. It explores the role of ritual within western culture and nursing. This paper then draws on anthropological method to analyze the purpose of ritual within nursing and suggests reasons for its persistence. The paper concludes that there are cultural influences that promote a technical, rational approach to the study of the human condition. This worldview with its emphasis on cognition devalues the important emotional aspects of humanity by associating them with the primitive. The examination of factors which contribute to the persistence of ritual in nursing concludes that nursing work involves emotional encounters and breaches of the taboo aspects of culture. Rituals serve to normalize these transgressions. It helps the nurse and patient deal with emotions generated by these, the breaches of taboo, by re-labelling situations as caring rather than transgressing. Because they serve these emotional and social functions, rituals endure. Rationale for the article: my interest in ritual was re-awakened on reading Parker's (1999) article entitled Reason or ritual. It stimulated me to reflect on three questions: firstly, why do rituals persist when the nursing literature condemns them? Secondly, does ritual serve a purpose that ensures its survival in the face of criticism? Thirdly, why do the disciplines of nursing and anthropology perceive ritual in such different ways? This paper takes an anthropological approach to ritual, drawing on secondary anthropological and nursing data, in an attempt to answer the questions outlined above.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8</score><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>612 x 1008 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><keywordCount>5</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>1934</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>5117</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>30112</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>7</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>284</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>The persistence of ritual in nursing practice</title><pii><json:string>S1361-9004(01)90240-7</json:string></pii><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><volume>5</volume><pii><json:string>S1361-9004(00)X0007-6</json:string></pii><pages><last>183</last><first>177</first></pages><issn><json:string>1361-9004</json:string></issn><issue>4</issue><genre></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><title>Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing</title><publicationDate>2001</publicationDate></host><categories><wos><json:string>NURSING</json:string></wos></categories><publicationDate>2001</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2001</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1054/cein.2001.0240</json:string></doi><id>7873EAB093EAAC8D4B9EF74611A5F9D4C790F960</id><fulltext><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7873EAB093EAAC8D4B9EF74611A5F9D4C790F960/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><extension>zip</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7873EAB093EAAC8D4B9EF74611A5F9D4C790F960/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/7873EAB093EAAC8D4B9EF74611A5F9D4C790F960/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The persistence of ritual in nursing practice</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><availability><p>ELSEVIER</p></availability><date>2001</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content">Section title: Regular Article</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The persistence of ritual in nursing practice</title><author><persName><forename type="first">F.</forename><surname>Strange</surname></persName><roleName type="degree">TD, MA, BSc(Hons), PGDE, RGN</roleName><note type="biography">Lecturer in Applied Psychosocial Science</note><affiliation>Lecturer in Applied Psychosocial Science</affiliation><affiliation>St Bartholomew School of Nursing and Midwifery, 20 Bartholomew Close, London, EC1A 7QN, UK</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">YCEIN</title><idno type="pISSN">1361-9004</idno><idno type="PII">S1361-9004(00)X0007-6</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="2001"></date><biblScope unit="volume">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="177">177</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="183">183</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">7873EAB093EAAC8D4B9EF74611A5F9D4C790F960</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1054/cein.2001.0240</idno><idno type="PII">S1361-9004(01)90240-7</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2001</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>As nursing attempts to become a research based profession, ritual has become stigmatized and associated with thoughtless repetition. Articles condemning ritualistic practice are frequently seen in nursing journals. Despite this condemnation, ritualistic practice appears to persist. This paper examines the origins and purpose of ritual, giving reasons for the negative association. It explores the role of ritual within western culture and nursing. This paper then draws on anthropological method to analyze the purpose of ritual within nursing and suggests reasons for its persistence. The paper concludes that there are cultural influences that promote a technical, rational approach to the study of the human condition. This worldview with its emphasis on cognition devalues the important emotional aspects of humanity by associating them with the primitive. The examination of factors which contribute to the persistence of ritual in nursing concludes that nursing work involves emotional encounters and breaches of the taboo aspects of culture. Rituals serve to normalize these transgressions. It helps the nurse and patient deal with emotions generated by these, the breaches of taboo, by re-labelling situations as caring rather than transgressing. Because they serve these emotional and social functions, rituals endure. Rationale for the article: my interest in ritual was re-awakened on reading Parker's (1999) article entitled Reason or ritual. It stimulated me to reflect on three questions: firstly, why do rituals persist when the nursing literature condemns them? Secondly, does ritual serve a purpose that ensures its survival in the face of criticism? Thirdly, why do the disciplines of nursing and anthropology perceive ritual in such different ways? This paper takes an anthropological approach to ritual, drawing on secondary anthropological and nursing data, in an attempt to answer the questions outlined above.</p></abstract><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>Abbreviations</head><item><term>anthropology</term></item></list></keywords></textClass><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>Abbreviations</head><item><term>primitive</term></item></list></keywords></textClass><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>Abbreviations</head><item><term>rites of passage</term></item></list></keywords></textClass><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>Abbreviations</head><item><term>ritual</term></item></list></keywords></textClass><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>Abbreviations</head><item><term>technical rationality</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2001">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><extension>txt</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7873EAB093EAAC8D4B9EF74611A5F9D4C790F960/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Elsevier, elements deleted: tail"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//ES//DTD journal article DTD version 4.5.2//EN//XML" URI="art452.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><converted-article version="4.5.2" docsubtype="fla" xml:lang="en"><item-info><jid>YCEIN</jid><aid>90240</aid><ce:pii>S1361-9004(01)90240-7</ce:pii><ce:doi>10.1054/cein.2001.0240</ce:doi><ce:copyright type="full-transfer" year="2001">Harcourt Publishers Ltd</ce:copyright></item-info><head><ce:dochead><ce:textfn>Regular Article</ce:textfn></ce:dochead><ce:title>The persistence of ritual in nursing practice</ce:title><ce:author-group><ce:author><ce:given-name>F.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Strange</ce:surname><ce:degrees>TD, MA, BSc(Hons), PGDE, RGN</ce:degrees><ce:roles>Lecturer in Applied Psychosocial Science</ce:roles></ce:author><ce:affiliation><ce:textfn>St Bartholomew School of Nursing and Midwifery, 20 Bartholomew Close, London, EC1A 7QN, UK<ce:footnote id="F1"><ce:label>f1</ce:label><ce:note-para>Phone: +44 (0) 207 040 5987</ce:note-para></ce:footnote><ce:cross-ref refid="F1"><ce:sup>f1</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:footnote id="F2"><ce:label>f2</ce:label><ce:note-para>f.strange@city.ac.uk</ce:note-para></ce:footnote><ce:cross-ref refid="F2"><ce:sup>f2</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:textfn></ce:affiliation></ce:author-group><ce:abstract><ce:section-title>Abstract</ce:section-title><ce:abstract-sec><ce:simple-para>As nursing attempts to become a research based profession, ritual has become stigmatized and associated with thoughtless repetition. Articles condemning ritualistic practice are frequently seen in nursing journals. Despite this condemnation, ritualistic practice appears to persist. This paper examines the origins and purpose of ritual, giving reasons for the negative association. It explores the role of ritual within western culture and nursing. This paper then draws on anthropological method to analyze the purpose of ritual within nursing and suggests reasons for its persistence. The paper concludes that there are cultural influences that promote a technical, rational approach to the study of the human condition. This worldview with its emphasis on cognition devalues the important emotional aspects of humanity by associating them with the primitive. The examination of factors which contribute to the persistence of ritual in nursing concludes that nursing work involves emotional encounters and breaches of the taboo aspects of culture. Rituals serve to normalize these transgressions. It helps the nurse and patient deal with emotions generated by these, the breaches of taboo, by re-labelling situations as caring rather than transgressing. Because they serve these emotional and social functions, rituals endure.</ce:simple-para><ce:simple-para><ce:italic>Rationale for the article</ce:italic>: my interest in ritual was re-awakened on reading Parker's (1999) article entitled <ce:italic>Reason or ritual.</ce:italic> It stimulated me to reflect on three questions: firstly, why do rituals persist when the nursing literature condemns them? Secondly, does ritual serve a purpose that ensures its survival in the face of criticism? Thirdly, why do the disciplines of nursing and anthropology perceive ritual in such different ways?</ce:simple-para><ce:simple-para>This paper takes an anthropological approach to ritual, drawing on secondary anthropological and nursing data, in an attempt to answer the questions outlined above.</ce:simple-para></ce:abstract-sec></ce:abstract><ce:keywords class="abr"><ce:section-title>Abbreviations</ce:section-title><ce:keyword><ce:text>anthropology</ce:text></ce:keyword></ce:keywords><ce:keywords class="abr"><ce:section-title>Abbreviations</ce:section-title><ce:keyword><ce:text>primitive</ce:text></ce:keyword></ce:keywords><ce:keywords class="abr"><ce:section-title>Abbreviations</ce:section-title><ce:keyword><ce:text>rites of passage</ce:text></ce:keyword></ce:keywords><ce:keywords class="abr"><ce:section-title>Abbreviations</ce:section-title><ce:keyword><ce:text>ritual</ce:text></ce:keyword></ce:keywords><ce:keywords class="abr"><ce:section-title>Abbreviations</ce:section-title><ce:keyword><ce:text>technical rationality</ce:text></ce:keyword></ce:keywords></head></converted-article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>The persistence of ritual in nursing practice</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" lang="en" contentType="CDATA"><title>The persistence of ritual in nursing practice</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">F.</namePart><namePart type="family">Strange</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">TD, MA, BSc(Hons), PGDE, RGN</namePart><affiliation>St Bartholomew School of Nursing and Midwifery, 20 Bartholomew Close, London, EC1A 7QN, UK</affiliation><description>Lecturer in Applied Psychosocial Science</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="Full-length article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2001</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2001</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">As nursing attempts to become a research based profession, ritual has become stigmatized and associated with thoughtless repetition. Articles condemning ritualistic practice are frequently seen in nursing journals. Despite this condemnation, ritualistic practice appears to persist. This paper examines the origins and purpose of ritual, giving reasons for the negative association. It explores the role of ritual within western culture and nursing. This paper then draws on anthropological method to analyze the purpose of ritual within nursing and suggests reasons for its persistence. The paper concludes that there are cultural influences that promote a technical, rational approach to the study of the human condition. This worldview with its emphasis on cognition devalues the important emotional aspects of humanity by associating them with the primitive. The examination of factors which contribute to the persistence of ritual in nursing concludes that nursing work involves emotional encounters and breaches of the taboo aspects of culture. Rituals serve to normalize these transgressions. It helps the nurse and patient deal with emotions generated by these, the breaches of taboo, by re-labelling situations as caring rather than transgressing. Because they serve these emotional and social functions, rituals endure. Rationale for the article: my interest in ritual was re-awakened on reading Parker's (1999) article entitled Reason or ritual. It stimulated me to reflect on three questions: firstly, why do rituals persist when the nursing literature condemns them? Secondly, does ritual serve a purpose that ensures its survival in the face of criticism? Thirdly, why do the disciplines of nursing and anthropology perceive ritual in such different ways? This paper takes an anthropological approach to ritual, drawing on secondary anthropological and nursing data, in an attempt to answer the questions outlined above.</abstract><note type="content">Section title: Regular Article</note><subject lang="en"><genre>Abbreviations</genre><topic>anthropology</topic></subject><subject lang="en"><genre>Abbreviations</genre><topic>primitive</topic></subject><subject lang="en"><genre>Abbreviations</genre><topic>rites of passage</topic></subject><subject lang="en"><genre>Abbreviations</genre><topic>ritual</topic></subject><subject lang="en"><genre>Abbreviations</genre><topic>technical rationality</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>YCEIN</title></titleInfo><genre type="Journal">journal</genre><originInfo><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">200112</dateIssued></originInfo><identifier type="ISSN">1361-9004</identifier><identifier type="PII">S1361-9004(00)X0007-6</identifier><part><date>200112</date><detail type="volume"><number>5</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="issue"><number>4</number><caption>no.</caption></detail><extent unit="issue pages"><start>141</start><end>192</end></extent><extent unit="pages"><start>177</start><end>183</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">7873EAB093EAAC8D4B9EF74611A5F9D4C790F960</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1054/cein.2001.0240</identifier><identifier type="PII">S1361-9004(01)90240-7</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="">© 2001Harcourt Publishers Ltd</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>ELSEVIER</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Harcourt Publishers Ltd, ©2001</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><enrichments><istex:catWosTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/7873EAB093EAAC8D4B9EF74611A5F9D4C790F960/enrichments/catWos"><teiHeader><profileDesc><textClass><classCode scheme="WOS">NURSING</classCode></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:catWosTEI><istex:refBibTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/7873EAB093EAAC8D4B9EF74611A5F9D4C790F960/enrichments/refBib"><teiHeader></teiHeader><text><front></front><body></body><back><listBibl><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Record keeping and routine nursing practice Annandale E 1996 Working on the frontline: risk culture and working in the new NHS Beck Kehoe A 1998 Humans: an introduction to four-field anthropology Quality research and ritual in nursing The relations between researcher and researched Researching Language and Literacy in Social Context. Clevedon, Multilingual Matters Dawkins R 1976 The selfish gene. London, Penguin The persistence of ritual in nursing practice 183 de la Cuesta C 1983 The nursing process from development to implementation</title><author><persName><forename type="middle">N</forename><surname>Abercrombie</surname></persName></author><author><persName><forename type="middle">S</forename><surname>Hill</surname></persName></author><author><persName><surname>Turner</surname></persName></author><author><persName><forename type="middle">D</forename><surname>Cameron</surname></persName></author><author><persName><forename type="first">Harvey</forename><forename type="middle">E P</forename><surname>Frazer</surname></persName></author><author><persName><forename type="first">Rampton</forename><forename type="middle">M</forename><surname>Richardson</surname></persName></author></analytic><monogr><title level="m">Douglas M 1970 Natural Symbols. Explorations in Cosmology Implicit Meanings: essays in Anthropology</title><editor>Graddol D. et al.</editor><meeting><address>New York, Routledge Benton D, Avery ; New York, Pantheon Douglas</address></meeting><imprint><publisher>Cambridge University Press</publisher><date type="published" when="1978"></date><biblScope unit="page" from="1223" to="1230"></biblScope></imprint></monogr><note>49. Bourdieu P 1977 Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge</note></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Harmon Gamarnikow E 1978 Sexual division of labour: the case of nursing Research Mindedness for Practice: An Interactive Approach for Nursing and Health Researching Language & Literacy in Social Context. Clevedon, Multilingual Matters Helman CG 1990 Culture, Health and Illness. Oxford Butterworth-Heinemann Hockey J, Katz J, Small N 2001 Grief, Mourning and Death Ritual. Buckingham, Open University James N 1989 Emotional labour: skills and work in the social regulation of feelings</title><author><persName><forename type="first">Paul</forename><surname>London</surname></persName></author><author><persName><surname>Fairclough</surname></persName></author><author><persName><surname>Language</surname></persName></author><author><persName><surname>Power</surname></persName></author><author><persName><forename type="first">Longman</forename><surname>London</surname></persName></author><author><persName><forename type="first">Materialism</forename><surname>Feminism</surname></persName></author><author><persName><forename type="first">Paul</forename><surname>London</surname></persName></author><author><persName><forename type="middle">B</forename><surname>Goodman</surname></persName></author><author><persName><surname>Strange</surname></persName></author></analytic><monogr><title level="m">Behind the Screens: Nursing, Somology and the Problem of the Body. London, Churchill Livingstone LeDoux J 1992 Emotion and the limbic system concept Concepts in Neuroscience</title><editor>Kuhn A, Wolpe AM Ethnomethodology. In: Smith P Introducing Ethnograph In: Graddol D et al.</editor><meeting><address>New York ; London, Churchill Livingstone 256–268 Hammersley</address></meeting><imprint><date type="published" when="1991"></date><biblScope unit="page" from="15" to="42"></biblScope></imprint></monogr></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Catalyst (10–11): 78–103 Malinowski B 1954 Magic, Science and Religion. Prospect Heights, IL, Waveland Press Menzies I 1970 The Functioning of Social Systems as a Defence Against Anxiety. London, Tavistock Oakley A 1984 The importance of being a nurse</title><author><persName><surname>Lewin</surname></persName></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Nursing Times Dec. Oatley K 1999 Social goals and emotion. Psychologist Nursing Times</title><imprint><biblScope unit="volume">12</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">95 20</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="24" to="27"></biblScope><date type="published" when="1977-06"></date></imprint></monogr><note>Parker. L 1999 Ritual or reason</note></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">The functioning of nursing routines in the management of a transient workforce</title><author><persName><surname>Procter</surname></persName></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Journal of Advanced Nursing</title><imprint><biblScope unit="volume">14</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="180" to="189"></biblScope><date type="published" when="1989"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Nursing lecturer practitioners: can L.P.'s be music to our ears</title><author><persName><surname>Rhead</surname></persName></author><author><persName><surname>Strange</surname></persName></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Journal of Advanced Nursing</title><imprint><biblScope unit="volume">24</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1265" to="1272"></biblScope><date type="published" when="1996"></date></imprint></monogr><note>Schon. DA 1987 Educating the Reflective Practitioner. Bass. Schutz A 1972 The Phenomenology of the Social World</note></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Churchill Livingstone Spiller J 1992 For whose sake—patient or nurse? Professional Nurse, April Stannard C 1978 Old folks and dirty work: the social conditions for patient abuse in a nursing home Reading in the Sociology of Nursing 2116 Strange F 1996 Handover: a study of ritual in nursing practice</title><author><persName><forename type="first">Heinemann</forename><surname>London</surname></persName></author><author><persName><surname>Smith</surname></persName></author></analytic><monogr><title level="m">102–105 Taylor EB 1871 Primitive Culture, 2 vols</title><editor>Dingwall R and MacIntosh J</editor><meeting><address>Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone Strange ; London, Routledge & Kegan ; Oxford, Clarendon Walsh M, Ford ; London, Butterworth Heinemann</address></meeting><imprint><date type="published" when="1988"></date><biblScope unit="page" from="23" to="26"></biblScope></imprint></monogr><note>Paul. Thomlinson D 1990 Time to dispense with rituals. Turner. VW 1968 The Drums of Affliction</note></biblStruct></listBibl></back></text></istex:refBibTEI></enrichments><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Musique/explor/SchutzV1/Data/Main/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000299 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000299 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Musique
|area= SchutzV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:7873EAB093EAAC8D4B9EF74611A5F9D4C790F960
|texte= The persistence of ritual in nursing practice
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.38. |  |