2009 Association for the Sociology of Religion Presidential AddressCan Post-Secular Society Tolerate Religious Differences?1
Identifieur interne : 000205 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 000204; suivant : 0002062009 Association for the Sociology of Religion Presidential AddressCan Post-Secular Society Tolerate Religious Differences?1
Auteurs : Michele DillonSource :
- Sociology of Religion [ 1069-4404 ] ; 2010.
Abstract
Amidst the visibility of religion in everyday culture and in political and civic debates, Jurgen Habermas's recent construal of post-secular society offers an intriguing shift in his approach to the accommodation of religion in the public sphere. The post-secular society is one that recognizes the relevance of religious ideas and intuitions in informing civic discourse and contributing to remedying the social pathologies of modernity. This paper welcomes Habermas's recent religious turn, but it also underscores some of the challenges and limits religion poses to its civic accommodation. The active tolerance of, and reflexive engagement with, religion required of post-secular society unearths several tensions in how religion itself is understood and practiced, and in how western societies deal with religious and cultural Otherness. Moreover, while the state may appear as a neutral actor mediating religious-based civic disputes, it too is encrusted with culturally particular understandings of what is normal and normative.
Url:
DOI: 10.1093/socrel/srq024
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:65F63ADAC52FE8BF857BE9E64990D0CFB7453007Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>2009 Association for the Sociology of Religion Presidential AddressCan Post-Secular Society Tolerate Religious Differences?1</title><author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Dillon, Michele" sort="Dillon, Michele" uniqKey="Dillon M" first="Michele" last="Dillon">Michele Dillon</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of New Hampshire</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: michele.dillon@unh.edu</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:65F63ADAC52FE8BF857BE9E64990D0CFB7453007</idno><date when="2010" year="2010">2010</date><idno type="doi">10.1093/socrel/srq024</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/65F63ADAC52FE8BF857BE9E64990D0CFB7453007/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000205</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">2009 Association for the Sociology of Religion Presidential AddressCan Post-Secular Society Tolerate Religious Differences?1</title><author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Dillon, Michele" sort="Dillon, Michele" uniqKey="Dillon M" first="Michele" last="Dillon">Michele Dillon</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of New Hampshire</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: michele.dillon@unh.edu</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Sociology of Religion</title><idno type="ISSN">1069-4404</idno><idno type="eISSN">1759-8818</idno><imprint><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><date type="published" when="2010">2010</date><biblScope unit="volume">71</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="139">139</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="156">156</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1069-4404</idno></series><idno type="istex">65F63ADAC52FE8BF857BE9E64990D0CFB7453007</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1093/socrel/srq024</idno><idno type="ArticleID">srq024</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1069-4404</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Amidst the visibility of religion in everyday culture and in political and civic debates, Jurgen Habermas's recent construal of post-secular society offers an intriguing shift in his approach to the accommodation of religion in the public sphere. The post-secular society is one that recognizes the relevance of religious ideas and intuitions in informing civic discourse and contributing to remedying the social pathologies of modernity. This paper welcomes Habermas's recent religious turn, but it also underscores some of the challenges and limits religion poses to its civic accommodation. The active tolerance of, and reflexive engagement with, religion required of post-secular society unearths several tensions in how religion itself is understood and practiced, and in how western societies deal with religious and cultural Otherness. Moreover, while the state may appear as a neutral actor mediating religious-based civic disputes, it too is encrusted with culturally particular understandings of what is normal and normative.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>oup</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Michele Dillon</name><affiliations><json:string>University of New Hampshire</json:string><json:string>E-mail: michele.dillon@unh.edu</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>ARTICLES</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>post-secular</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Habermas</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>public sphere</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>religious citizens</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>secular citizens</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>tolerance</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>cultural differences</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>rationality</value></json:item></subject><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><abstract>Amidst the visibility of religion in everyday culture and in political and civic debates, Jurgen Habermas's recent construal of post-secular society offers an intriguing shift in his approach to the accommodation of religion in the public sphere. The post-secular society is one that recognizes the relevance of religious ideas and intuitions in informing civic discourse and contributing to remedying the social pathologies of modernity. This paper welcomes Habermas's recent religious turn, but it also underscores some of the challenges and limits religion poses to its civic accommodation. The active tolerance of, and reflexive engagement with, religion required of post-secular society unearths several tensions in how religion itself is understood and practiced, and in how western societies deal with religious and cultural Otherness. Moreover, while the state may appear as a neutral actor mediating religious-based civic disputes, it too is encrusted with culturally particular understandings of what is normal and normative.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.8</score><pdfVersion>1.5</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>468 x 684 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><keywordCount>9</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>1035</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>7077</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>45039</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>18</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>150</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>2009 Association for the Sociology of Religion Presidential AddressCan Post-Secular Society Tolerate Religious Differences?1</title><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><volume>71</volume><pages><last>156</last><first>139</first></pages><issn><json:string>1069-4404</json:string></issn><issue>2</issue><genre></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1759-8818</json:string></eissn><title>Sociology of Religion</title></host><categories><wos><json:string>SOCIOLOGY</json:string><json:string>RELIGION</json:string></wos></categories><publicationDate>2010</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2010</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1093/socrel/srq024</json:string></doi><id>65F63ADAC52FE8BF857BE9E64990D0CFB7453007</id><fulltext><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/65F63ADAC52FE8BF857BE9E64990D0CFB7453007/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><extension>zip</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/65F63ADAC52FE8BF857BE9E64990D0CFB7453007/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/65F63ADAC52FE8BF857BE9E64990D0CFB7453007/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a">2009 Association for the Sociology of Religion Presidential AddressCan Post-Secular Society Tolerate Religious Differences?1</title><respStmt xml:id="ISTEX-API" resp="Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID" name="ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)"></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><availability><p>OUP</p></availability><date>2010-04-13</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note>Direct correspondence to Michele Dillon, Department of Sociology, University of New Hampshire, USA.</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a">2009 Association for the Sociology of Religion Presidential AddressCan Post-Secular Society Tolerate Religious Differences?1</title><author><persName><forename type="first">Michele</forename><surname>Dillon</surname></persName><email>michele.dillon@unh.edu</email><affiliation>University of New Hampshire</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Sociology of Religion</title><idno type="JournalID">socrel</idno><idno type="pISSN">1069-4404</idno><idno type="eISSN">1759-8818</idno><imprint><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><date type="published" when="2010"></date><biblScope unit="volume">71</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="139">139</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="156">156</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">65F63ADAC52FE8BF857BE9E64990D0CFB7453007</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1093/socrel/srq024</idno><idno type="ArticleID">srq024</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2010-04-13</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract><p>Amidst the visibility of religion in everyday culture and in political and civic debates, Jurgen Habermas's recent construal of post-secular society offers an intriguing shift in his approach to the accommodation of religion in the public sphere. The post-secular society is one that recognizes the relevance of religious ideas and intuitions in informing civic discourse and contributing to remedying the social pathologies of modernity. This paper welcomes Habermas's recent religious turn, but it also underscores some of the challenges and limits religion poses to its civic accommodation. The active tolerance of, and reflexive engagement with, religion required of post-secular society unearths several tensions in how religion itself is understood and practiced, and in how western societies deal with religious and cultural Otherness. Moreover, while the state may appear as a neutral actor mediating religious-based civic disputes, it too is encrusted with culturally particular understandings of what is normal and normative.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>heading</head><item><term>ARTICLES</term></item></list></keywords></textClass><textClass><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>Keywords</head><item><term>post-secular</term></item><item><term>Habermas</term></item><item><term>public sphere</term></item><item><term>religious citizens</term></item><item><term>secular citizens</term></item><item><term>tolerance</term></item><item><term>cultural differences</term></item><item><term>rationality</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2010-04-13">Created</change><change when="2010">Published</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2016-0-26">References added</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><extension>txt</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/65F63ADAC52FE8BF857BE9E64990D0CFB7453007/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="corpus oup" wicri:toSee="no header"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" URI="journalpublishing.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><article article-type="research-article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">socrel</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="hwp">socrel</journal-id><journal-title>Sociology of Religion</journal-title><issn pub-type="ppub">1069-4404</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1759-8818</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Oxford University Press</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/socrel/srq024</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">srq024</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>ARTICLES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title><italic>2009 Association for the Sociology of Religion Presidential Address</italic><break></break>Can Post-Secular Society Tolerate Religious Differences?<sup><xref ref-type="fn" rid="FN2">*</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="FN1">1</xref></sup></article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Dillon</surname><given-names>Michele</given-names></name><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff><institution>University of New Hampshire</institution></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">E-mail: <email>michele.dillon@unh.edu</email></corresp><fn id="FN2"><label>*</label><p>Direct correspondence to Michele Dillon, Department of Sociology, University of New Hampshire, USA.</p></fn></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><season>SUMMER</season><year>2010</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>13</day><month>4</month><year>2010</year></pub-date><volume>71</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>139</fpage><lpage>156</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>© The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association for the Sociology of Religion. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2010</copyright-year></permissions><abstract><p>Amidst the visibility of religion in everyday culture and in political and civic debates, Jurgen Habermas's recent construal of post-secular society offers an intriguing shift in his approach to the accommodation of religion in the public sphere. The post-secular society is one that recognizes the relevance of religious ideas and intuitions in informing civic discourse and contributing to remedying the social pathologies of modernity. This paper welcomes Habermas's recent religious turn, but it also underscores some of the challenges and limits religion poses to its civic accommodation. The active tolerance of, and reflexive engagement with, religion required of post-secular society unearths several tensions in how religion itself is understood and practiced, and in how western societies deal with religious and cultural Otherness. Moreover, while the state may appear as a neutral actor mediating religious-based civic disputes, it too is encrusted with culturally particular understandings of what is normal and normative.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>post-secular</kwd><kwd>Habermas</kwd><kwd>public sphere</kwd><kwd>religious citizens</kwd><kwd>secular citizens</kwd><kwd>tolerance</kwd><kwd>cultural differences</kwd><kwd>rationality</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo><title>2009 Association for the Sociology of Religion Presidential AddressCan Post-Secular Society Tolerate Religious Differences?1</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA"><title>2009 Association for the Sociology of Religion Presidential AddressCan Post-Secular Society Tolerate Religious Differences?1</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Michele</namePart><namePart type="family">Dillon</namePart><affiliation>University of New Hampshire</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: michele.dillon@unh.edu</affiliation></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article">research-article</genre><subject><genre>heading</genre><topic>ARTICLES</topic></subject><originInfo><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2010</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2010-04-13</dateCreated><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract>Amidst the visibility of religion in everyday culture and in political and civic debates, Jurgen Habermas's recent construal of post-secular society offers an intriguing shift in his approach to the accommodation of religion in the public sphere. The post-secular society is one that recognizes the relevance of religious ideas and intuitions in informing civic discourse and contributing to remedying the social pathologies of modernity. This paper welcomes Habermas's recent religious turn, but it also underscores some of the challenges and limits religion poses to its civic accommodation. The active tolerance of, and reflexive engagement with, religion required of post-secular society unearths several tensions in how religion itself is understood and practiced, and in how western societies deal with religious and cultural Otherness. Moreover, while the state may appear as a neutral actor mediating religious-based civic disputes, it too is encrusted with culturally particular understandings of what is normal and normative.</abstract><note type="footnotes">Direct correspondence to Michele Dillon, Department of Sociology, University of New Hampshire, USA.</note><subject><genre>Keywords</genre><topic>post-secular</topic><topic>Habermas</topic><topic>public sphere</topic><topic>religious citizens</topic><topic>secular citizens</topic><topic>tolerance</topic><topic>cultural differences</topic><topic>rationality</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Sociology of Religion</title></titleInfo><identifier type="ISSN">1069-4404</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1759-8818</identifier><identifier type="JournalID">socrel</identifier><identifier type="JournalID-hwp">socrel</identifier><part><date>2010</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>71</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>139</start><end>156</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">65F63ADAC52FE8BF857BE9E64990D0CFB7453007</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1093/socrel/srq024</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">srq024</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="Copyright">The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association for the Sociology of Religion. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissionsoxfordjournals.org.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>OUP</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods></metadata><covers><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>image/tiff</mimetype><extension>tiff</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/65F63ADAC52FE8BF857BE9E64990D0CFB7453007/covers/tiff</uri></json:item></covers><annexes><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>image/jpeg</mimetype><extension>jpeg</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/65F63ADAC52FE8BF857BE9E64990D0CFB7453007/annexes/jpeg</uri></json:item><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>image/gif</mimetype><extension>gif</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/65F63ADAC52FE8BF857BE9E64990D0CFB7453007/annexes/gif</uri></json:item><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/65F63ADAC52FE8BF857BE9E64990D0CFB7453007/annexes/pdf</uri></json:item></annexes><enrichments><istex:catWosTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/65F63ADAC52FE8BF857BE9E64990D0CFB7453007/enrichments/catWos"><teiHeader><profileDesc><textClass><classCode scheme="WOS">SOCIOLOGY</classCode><classCode scheme="WOS">RELIGION</classCode></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:catWosTEI></enrichments><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Musique/explor/SchutzV1/Data/Main/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000205 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000205 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Musique
|area= SchutzV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:65F63ADAC52FE8BF857BE9E64990D0CFB7453007
|texte= 2009 Association for the Sociology of Religion Presidential AddressCan Post-Secular Society Tolerate Religious Differences?1
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.38. |  |