Serveur d'exploration sur l'opéra

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Perturbation and nonlinear dynamic analysis of different singing styles.

Identifieur interne : 000428 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 000427; suivant : 000429

Perturbation and nonlinear dynamic analysis of different singing styles.

Auteurs : Caitlin J. Butte [États-Unis] ; Yu Zhang ; Huangqiang Song ; Jack J. Jiang

Source :

RBID : pubmed:18504114

English descriptors

Abstract

Previous research has used perturbation analysis methods to study the singing voice. Using perturbation and nonlinear dynamic analysis (NDA) methods in conjunction may provide more accurate information on the singing voice and may distinguish vocal usage in different styles. Acoustic samples from different styles of singing were compared using nonlinear dynamic and perturbation measures. Twenty-six songs from different musical styles were obtained from an online music database (Rhapsody, RealNetworks, Inc., Seattle, WA). One-second samples were selected from each song for analysis. Perturbation analyses of jitter, shimmer, and signal-to-noise ratio and NDA of correlation dimension (D(2)) were performed on samples from each singing style. Percent jitter and shimmer median values were low normal for country (0.32% and 3.82%), musical theater (MT) (0.280% and 2.80%), jazz (0.440% and 2.34%), and soul (0.430% and 6.42%). The popular style had slightly higher median jitter and shimmer values (1.13% and 6.78%) than other singing styles, although this was not statistically significant. The opera singing style had median jitter of 0.520%, and yielded significantly high shimmer (P=0.001) of 7.72%. All six singing styles were measured reliably using NDA, indicating that operatic singing is notably more chaotic than other singing styles. Median correlation dimension values were low to normal, compared to healthy voices, in country (median D(2)=2.14), jazz (median D(2)=2.24), pop (median D(2)=2.60), MT (median D(2)=2.73), and soul (mean D(2)=3.26). Correlation dimension was significantly higher in opera (P<0.001) with median D(2)=6.19. In this study, acoustic analysis in opera singing gave significantly high values for shimmer and D(2), suggesting that it is more irregular than other singing styles; a previously unknown quality of opera singing. Perturbation analysis also suggested significant differences in vocal output in different singing styles. This preliminary study using acoustic analysis with nonlinear dynamic measures and perturbation measures may represent a valuable procedure in quantitatively describing the properties of the singing voice. Further research with human test subjects may allow us to characterize singing styles and diagnose vocal dysfunction in the singing voice.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.02.004
PubMed: 18504114

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

pubmed:18504114

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Perturbation and nonlinear dynamic analysis of different singing styles.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Butte, Caitlin J" sort="Butte, Caitlin J" uniqKey="Butte C" first="Caitlin J" last="Butte">Caitlin J. Butte</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, Wisconsin 53703, USA.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, Wisconsin 53703</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Zhang, Yu" sort="Zhang, Yu" uniqKey="Zhang Y" first="Yu" last="Zhang">Yu Zhang</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Song, Huangqiang" sort="Song, Huangqiang" uniqKey="Song H" first="Huangqiang" last="Song">Huangqiang Song</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Jiang, Jack J" sort="Jiang, Jack J" uniqKey="Jiang J" first="Jack J" last="Jiang">Jack J. Jiang</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2009">2009</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.02.004</idno>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:18504114</idno>
<idno type="pmid">18504114</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000428</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000428</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">Perturbation and nonlinear dynamic analysis of different singing styles.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Butte, Caitlin J" sort="Butte, Caitlin J" uniqKey="Butte C" first="Caitlin J" last="Butte">Caitlin J. Butte</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, Wisconsin 53703, USA.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, Wisconsin 53703</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Zhang, Yu" sort="Zhang, Yu" uniqKey="Zhang Y" first="Yu" last="Zhang">Yu Zhang</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Song, Huangqiang" sort="Song, Huangqiang" uniqKey="Song H" first="Huangqiang" last="Song">Huangqiang Song</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Jiang, Jack J" sort="Jiang, Jack J" uniqKey="Jiang J" first="Jack J" last="Jiang">Jack J. Jiang</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation</title>
<idno type="e-ISSN">1873-4588</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2009" type="published">2009</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Acoustics</term>
<term>Databases as Topic</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Internet</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Music</term>
<term>Nonlinear Dynamics</term>
<term>Voice</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en">
<term>Acoustics</term>
<term>Databases as Topic</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Internet</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Music</term>
<term>Nonlinear Dynamics</term>
<term>Voice</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Previous research has used perturbation analysis methods to study the singing voice. Using perturbation and nonlinear dynamic analysis (NDA) methods in conjunction may provide more accurate information on the singing voice and may distinguish vocal usage in different styles. Acoustic samples from different styles of singing were compared using nonlinear dynamic and perturbation measures. Twenty-six songs from different musical styles were obtained from an online music database (Rhapsody, RealNetworks, Inc., Seattle, WA). One-second samples were selected from each song for analysis. Perturbation analyses of jitter, shimmer, and signal-to-noise ratio and NDA of correlation dimension (D(2)) were performed on samples from each singing style. Percent jitter and shimmer median values were low normal for country (0.32% and 3.82%), musical theater (MT) (0.280% and 2.80%), jazz (0.440% and 2.34%), and soul (0.430% and 6.42%). The popular style had slightly higher median jitter and shimmer values (1.13% and 6.78%) than other singing styles, although this was not statistically significant. The opera singing style had median jitter of 0.520%, and yielded significantly high shimmer (P=0.001) of 7.72%. All six singing styles were measured reliably using NDA, indicating that operatic singing is notably more chaotic than other singing styles. Median correlation dimension values were low to normal, compared to healthy voices, in country (median D(2)=2.14), jazz (median D(2)=2.24), pop (median D(2)=2.60), MT (median D(2)=2.73), and soul (mean D(2)=3.26). Correlation dimension was significantly higher in opera (P<0.001) with median D(2)=6.19. In this study, acoustic analysis in opera singing gave significantly high values for shimmer and D(2), suggesting that it is more irregular than other singing styles; a previously unknown quality of opera singing. Perturbation analysis also suggested significant differences in vocal output in different singing styles. This preliminary study using acoustic analysis with nonlinear dynamic measures and perturbation measures may represent a valuable procedure in quantitatively describing the properties of the singing voice. Further research with human test subjects may allow us to characterize singing styles and diagnose vocal dysfunction in the singing voice.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed>
<MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE">
<PMID Version="1">18504114</PMID>
<DateCreated>
<Year>2009</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>02</Day>
</DateCreated>
<DateCompleted>
<Year>2010</Year>
<Month>01</Month>
<Day>25</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised>
<Year>2015</Year>
<Month>03</Month>
<Day>09</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print-Electronic">
<Journal>
<ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1873-4588</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet">
<Volume>23</Volume>
<Issue>6</Issue>
<PubDate>
<Year>2009</Year>
<Month>Nov</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>J Voice</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Perturbation and nonlinear dynamic analysis of different singing styles.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination>
<MedlinePgn>647-52</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.02.004</ELocationID>
<Abstract>
<AbstractText>Previous research has used perturbation analysis methods to study the singing voice. Using perturbation and nonlinear dynamic analysis (NDA) methods in conjunction may provide more accurate information on the singing voice and may distinguish vocal usage in different styles. Acoustic samples from different styles of singing were compared using nonlinear dynamic and perturbation measures. Twenty-six songs from different musical styles were obtained from an online music database (Rhapsody, RealNetworks, Inc., Seattle, WA). One-second samples were selected from each song for analysis. Perturbation analyses of jitter, shimmer, and signal-to-noise ratio and NDA of correlation dimension (D(2)) were performed on samples from each singing style. Percent jitter and shimmer median values were low normal for country (0.32% and 3.82%), musical theater (MT) (0.280% and 2.80%), jazz (0.440% and 2.34%), and soul (0.430% and 6.42%). The popular style had slightly higher median jitter and shimmer values (1.13% and 6.78%) than other singing styles, although this was not statistically significant. The opera singing style had median jitter of 0.520%, and yielded significantly high shimmer (P=0.001) of 7.72%. All six singing styles were measured reliably using NDA, indicating that operatic singing is notably more chaotic than other singing styles. Median correlation dimension values were low to normal, compared to healthy voices, in country (median D(2)=2.14), jazz (median D(2)=2.24), pop (median D(2)=2.60), MT (median D(2)=2.73), and soul (mean D(2)=3.26). Correlation dimension was significantly higher in opera (P<0.001) with median D(2)=6.19. In this study, acoustic analysis in opera singing gave significantly high values for shimmer and D(2), suggesting that it is more irregular than other singing styles; a previously unknown quality of opera singing. Perturbation analysis also suggested significant differences in vocal output in different singing styles. This preliminary study using acoustic analysis with nonlinear dynamic measures and perturbation measures may represent a valuable procedure in quantitatively describing the properties of the singing voice. Further research with human test subjects may allow us to characterize singing styles and diagnose vocal dysfunction in the singing voice.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y">
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Butte</LastName>
<ForeName>Caitlin J</ForeName>
<Initials>CJ</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, Wisconsin 53703, USA.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Zhang</LastName>
<ForeName>Yu</ForeName>
<Initials>Y</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Song</LastName>
<ForeName>Huangqiang</ForeName>
<Initials>H</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Jiang</LastName>
<ForeName>Jack J</ForeName>
<Initials>JJ</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<GrantList CompleteYN="Y">
<Grant>
<GrantID>1-RO1DC006019</GrantID>
<Acronym>DC</Acronym>
<Agency>NIDCD NIH HHS</Agency>
<Country>United States</Country>
</Grant>
<Grant>
<GrantID>1-RO1DC05522</GrantID>
<Acronym>DC</Acronym>
<Agency>NIDCD NIH HHS</Agency>
<Country>United States</Country>
</Grant>
<Grant>
<GrantID>R01 DC005522</GrantID>
<Acronym>DC</Acronym>
<Agency>NIDCD NIH HHS</Agency>
<Country>United States</Country>
</Grant>
<Grant>
<GrantID>R01 DC005522-11</GrantID>
<Acronym>DC</Acronym>
<Agency>NIDCD NIH HHS</Agency>
<Country>United States</Country>
</Grant>
<Grant>
<GrantID>R01 DC006019</GrantID>
<Acronym>DC</Acronym>
<Agency>NIDCD NIH HHS</Agency>
<Country>United States</Country>
</Grant>
<Grant>
<GrantID>R01 DC006019-05</GrantID>
<Acronym>DC</Acronym>
<Agency>NIDCD NIH HHS</Agency>
<Country>United States</Country>
</Grant>
</GrantList>
<PublicationTypeList>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D052061">Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic">
<Year>2008</Year>
<Month>05</Month>
<Day>27</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo>
<Country>United States</Country>
<MedlineTA>J Voice</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>8712262</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0892-1997</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<CommentsCorrectionsList>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Voice. 2006 Mar;20(1):2-17</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15964740</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Voice. 2005 Dec;19(4):519-28</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16301098</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Voice. 2008 Jan;22(1):1-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16978835</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Voice. 2000 Sep;14(3):301-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11021498</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Med Eng Phys. 2000 Jul;22(6):413-8</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11086252</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2001;26(2):82-93</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11769346</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Voice. 2001 Mar;15(1):54-60</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12269635</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Voice. 2003 Jun;17(2):228-44</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12825655</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Oct;114(4 Pt 1):2198-205</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">14587617</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Voice. 2004 Mar;18(1):1-12</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15070219</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Speech Hear Res. 1985 Jun;28(2):169-74</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">4010246</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Speech Hear Res. 1987 Jun;30(2):252-60</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">3599957</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Acoust Soc Am. 1988 May;83(5):1876-82</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">3403803</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Voice. 1994 Mar;8(1):18-23</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">8167783</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Oct;102(4):2371-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">9348696</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2004;29(4):147-53</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15764208</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Oct;118(4):2551-60</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16266175</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Voice. 2007 Jan;21(1):64-71</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16377130</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
</CommentsCorrectionsList>
<MeshHeadingList>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D000162">Acoustics</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D019992">Databases as Topic</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005260">Female</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D020407">Internet</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008297">Male</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D009146">Music</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D017711">Nonlinear Dynamics</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D014831">Voice</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
<OtherID Source="NLM">NIHMS363612</OtherID>
<OtherID Source="NLM">PMC3313593</OtherID>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData>
<History>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received">
<Year>2007</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>9</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted">
<Year>2008</Year>
<Month>2</Month>
<Day>14</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="aheadofprint">
<Year>2008</Year>
<Month>5</Month>
<Day>27</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed">
<Year>2008</Year>
<Month>5</Month>
<Day>28</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline">
<Year>2010</Year>
<Month>1</Month>
<Day>26</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez">
<Year>2008</Year>
<Month>5</Month>
<Day>28</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pii">S0892-1997(08)00029-5</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.02.004</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18504114</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC3313593</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="mid">NIHMS363612</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Musique/explor/OperaV1/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000428 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000428 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Musique
   |area=    OperaV1
   |flux=    PubMed
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:18504114
   |texte=   Perturbation and nonlinear dynamic analysis of different singing styles.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:18504114" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a OperaV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.21.
Data generation: Thu Apr 14 14:59:05 2016. Site generation: Thu Jan 4 23:09:23 2024