Can nonlinguistic musical training change the way the brain processes speech? The expanded OPERA hypothesis.
Identifieur interne : 000183 ( PubMed/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000182; suivant : 000184Can nonlinguistic musical training change the way the brain processes speech? The expanded OPERA hypothesis.
Auteurs : Aniruddh D. Patel [États-Unis]Source :
- Hearing research ; 2014.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- methods : Cochlear Implantation.
- physiology : Brain, Pitch Perception, Speech Perception.
- Acoustic Stimulation, Animals, Cochlear Implants, Cross-Sectional Studies, Education, Humans, Models, Neurological, Music, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurosciences.
Abstract
A growing body of research suggests that musical training has a beneficial impact on speech processing (e.g., hearing of speech in noise and prosody perception). As this research moves forward two key questions need to be addressed: 1) Can purely instrumental musical training have such effects? 2) If so, how and why would such effects occur? The current paper offers a conceptual framework for understanding such effects based on mechanisms of neural plasticity. The expanded OPERA hypothesis proposes that when music and speech share sensory or cognitive processing mechanisms in the brain, and music places higher demands on these mechanisms than speech does, this sets the stage for musical training to enhance speech processing. When these higher demands are combined with the emotional rewards of music, the frequent repetition that musical training engenders, and the focused attention that it requires, neural plasticity is activated and makes lasting changes in brain structure and function which impact speech processing. Initial data from a new study motivated by the OPERA hypothesis is presented, focusing on the impact of musical training on speech perception in cochlear-implant users. Suggestions for the development of animal models to test OPERA are also presented, to help motivate neurophysiological studies of how auditory training using non-biological sounds can impact the brain's perceptual processing of species-specific vocalizations. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled .
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.08.011
PubMed: 24055761
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:24055761Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Can nonlinguistic musical training change the way the brain processes speech? The expanded OPERA hypothesis.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Patel, Aniruddh D" sort="Patel, Aniruddh D" uniqKey="Patel A" first="Aniruddh D" last="Patel">Aniruddh D. Patel</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Dept. of Psychology, Tufts University, 490 Boston Ave., Medford, MA 02155, USA. Electronic address: a.patel@tufts.edu.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Dept. of Psychology, Tufts University, 490 Boston Ave., Medford, MA 02155</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName><region type="state">Massachusetts</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1016/j.heares.2013.08.011</idno>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:24055761</idno>
<idno type="pmid">24055761</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000208</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000208</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">000183</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Can nonlinguistic musical training change the way the brain processes speech? The expanded OPERA hypothesis.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Patel, Aniruddh D" sort="Patel, Aniruddh D" uniqKey="Patel A" first="Aniruddh D" last="Patel">Aniruddh D. Patel</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Dept. of Psychology, Tufts University, 490 Boston Ave., Medford, MA 02155, USA. Electronic address: a.patel@tufts.edu.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Dept. of Psychology, Tufts University, 490 Boston Ave., Medford, MA 02155</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName><region type="state">Massachusetts</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">Hearing research</title>
<idno type="e-ISSN">1878-5891</idno>
<imprint><date when="2014" type="published">2014</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Acoustic Stimulation</term>
<term>Animals</term>
<term>Brain (physiology)</term>
<term>Cochlear Implantation (methods)</term>
<term>Cochlear Implants</term>
<term>Cross-Sectional Studies</term>
<term>Education</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Models, Neurological</term>
<term>Music</term>
<term>Neuronal Plasticity</term>
<term>Neurosciences</term>
<term>Pitch Perception (physiology)</term>
<term>Speech Perception (physiology)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Cochlear Implantation</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Brain</term>
<term>Pitch Perception</term>
<term>Speech Perception</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Acoustic Stimulation</term>
<term>Animals</term>
<term>Cochlear Implants</term>
<term>Cross-Sectional Studies</term>
<term>Education</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Models, Neurological</term>
<term>Music</term>
<term>Neuronal Plasticity</term>
<term>Neurosciences</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">A growing body of research suggests that musical training has a beneficial impact on speech processing (e.g., hearing of speech in noise and prosody perception). As this research moves forward two key questions need to be addressed: 1) Can purely instrumental musical training have such effects? 2) If so, how and why would such effects occur? The current paper offers a conceptual framework for understanding such effects based on mechanisms of neural plasticity. The expanded OPERA hypothesis proposes that when music and speech share sensory or cognitive processing mechanisms in the brain, and music places higher demands on these mechanisms than speech does, this sets the stage for musical training to enhance speech processing. When these higher demands are combined with the emotional rewards of music, the frequent repetition that musical training engenders, and the focused attention that it requires, neural plasticity is activated and makes lasting changes in brain structure and function which impact speech processing. Initial data from a new study motivated by the OPERA hypothesis is presented, focusing on the impact of musical training on speech perception in cochlear-implant users. Suggestions for the development of animal models to test OPERA are also presented, to help motivate neurophysiological studies of how auditory training using non-biological sounds can impact the brain's perceptual processing of species-specific vocalizations. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled .</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">24055761</PMID>
<DateCreated><Year>2014</Year>
<Month>01</Month>
<Day>14</Day>
</DateCreated>
<DateCompleted><Year>2014</Year>
<Month>09</Month>
<Day>10</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1878-5891</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>308</Volume>
<PubDate><Year>2014</Year>
<Month>Feb</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Hearing research</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Hear. Res.</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Can nonlinguistic musical training change the way the brain processes speech? The expanded OPERA hypothesis.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>98-108</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1016/j.heares.2013.08.011</ELocationID>
<ELocationID EIdType="pii" ValidYN="Y">S0378-5955(13)00209-8</ELocationID>
<Abstract><AbstractText>A growing body of research suggests that musical training has a beneficial impact on speech processing (e.g., hearing of speech in noise and prosody perception). As this research moves forward two key questions need to be addressed: 1) Can purely instrumental musical training have such effects? 2) If so, how and why would such effects occur? The current paper offers a conceptual framework for understanding such effects based on mechanisms of neural plasticity. The expanded OPERA hypothesis proposes that when music and speech share sensory or cognitive processing mechanisms in the brain, and music places higher demands on these mechanisms than speech does, this sets the stage for musical training to enhance speech processing. When these higher demands are combined with the emotional rewards of music, the frequent repetition that musical training engenders, and the focused attention that it requires, neural plasticity is activated and makes lasting changes in brain structure and function which impact speech processing. Initial data from a new study motivated by the OPERA hypothesis is presented, focusing on the impact of musical training on speech perception in cochlear-implant users. Suggestions for the development of animal models to test OPERA are also presented, to help motivate neurophysiological studies of how auditory training using non-biological sounds can impact the brain's perceptual processing of species-specific vocalizations. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled .</AbstractText>
<CopyrightInformation>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</CopyrightInformation>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Patel</LastName>
<ForeName>Aniruddh D</ForeName>
<Initials>AD</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Dept. of Psychology, Tufts University, 490 Boston Ave., Medford, MA 02155, USA. Electronic address: a.patel@tufts.edu.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D016454">Review</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2013</Year>
<Month>09</Month>
<Day>20</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Netherlands</Country>
<MedlineTA>Hear Res</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>7900445</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0378-5955</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000161">Acoustic Stimulation</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000818">Animals</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D001921">Brain</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D019929">Cochlear Implantation</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000379">methods</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D003054">Cochlear Implants</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D003430">Cross-Sectional Studies</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D004493">Education</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008959">Models, Neurological</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D009146">Music</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D009473">Neuronal Plasticity</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D009488">Neurosciences</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D010898">Pitch Perception</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D013067">Speech Perception</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2013</Year>
<Month>6</Month>
<Day>19</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2013</Year>
<Month>8</Month>
<Day>18</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2013</Year>
<Month>8</Month>
<Day>26</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="aheadofprint"><Year>2013</Year>
<Month>9</Month>
<Day>20</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2013</Year>
<Month>9</Month>
<Day>24</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2013</Year>
<Month>9</Month>
<Day>24</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2014</Year>
<Month>9</Month>
<Day>11</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pii">S0378-5955(13)00209-8</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.heares.2013.08.011</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24055761</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
<affiliations><list><country><li>États-Unis</li>
</country>
<region><li>Massachusetts</li>
</region>
</list>
<tree><country name="États-Unis"><region name="Massachusetts"><name sortKey="Patel, Aniruddh D" sort="Patel, Aniruddh D" uniqKey="Patel A" first="Aniruddh D" last="Patel">Aniruddh D. Patel</name>
</region>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Musique/explor/OperaV1/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000183 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000183 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Musique |area= OperaV1 |flux= PubMed |étape= Checkpoint |type= RBID |clé= pubmed:24055761 |texte= Can nonlinguistic musical training change the way the brain processes speech? The expanded OPERA hypothesis. }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:24055761" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a OperaV1
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.21. | ![]() |