OperaV1, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 000255

What's in a Norm? Sources and Processes of Norm Change

Identifieur interne : 000255 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000254; suivant : 000256

What's in a Norm? Sources and Processes of Norm Change

Auteurs : Elizabeth Levy Paluck

Source :

Journal of personality and social psychology [ 0022-3514 ] ; 2009.

RBID : Francis:09-0280451

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Norme sociale, Préjugé, Etude expérimentale, Mass media, Relation intergroupe, Conflit, Croyance, Homme.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Belief, Conflict, Experimental study, Human, Intergroup relation, Mass media, Préjudice, Social norm.

Abstract

This reply to the commentary by E. Staub and L. A. Pearlman (2009) revisits the field experimental results of E. L. Paluck (2009). It introduces further evidence and theoretical elaboration supporting Paluck's conclusion that exposure to a reconciliation-themed radio soap opera changed perceptions of social norms and behaviors, not beliefs. Experimental and longitudinal survey evidence reinforces the finding that the radio program affected socially shared perceptions of typical or prescribed behavior-that is, social norms. Specifically, measurements of perceptions of social norms called into question by Staub and Pearlman are shown to correlate with perceptions of public opinion and public, not private, behaviors. Although measurement issues and the mechanisms of the radio program's influence merit further testing, theory and evidence point to social interactions and emotional engagement, not individual education, as the likely mechanisms of change. The present exchange makes salient what is at stake in this debate: a model of change based on learning and personal beliefs versus a model based on group influence and social norms. These theoretical models recommend very different strategies for prejudice and conflict reduction. Future field experiments should attempt to adjudicate between these models by testing relevant policies in real-world settings.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0022-3514`
A02	`01`			`@0 JPSPB2`
A03		`1`		`@0 J. pers. soc. psychol.`
A05				`@2 96`
A06				`@2 3`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 What's in a Norm? Sources and Processes of Norm Change`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 LEVY PALUCK (Elizabeth)`
A14	`01`			`@1 Harvard University @3 USA @Z 1 aut.`
A20				`@1 594-600`
A21				`@1 2009`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 13817 @5 354000187327100070`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2009 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 3/4 p.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 09-0280451`
A60				`@1 P`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Journal of personality and social psychology`
A66	`01`			`@0 USA`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 This reply to the commentary by E. Staub and L. A. Pearlman (2009) revisits the field experimental results of E. L. Paluck (2009). It introduces further evidence and theoretical elaboration supporting Paluck's conclusion that exposure to a reconciliation-themed radio soap opera changed perceptions of social norms and behaviors, not beliefs. Experimental and longitudinal survey evidence reinforces the finding that the radio program affected socially shared perceptions of typical or prescribed behavior-that is, social norms. Specifically, measurements of perceptions of social norms called into question by Staub and Pearlman are shown to correlate with perceptions of public opinion and public, not private, behaviors. Although measurement issues and the mechanisms of the radio program's influence merit further testing, theory and evidence point to social interactions and emotional engagement, not individual education, as the likely mechanisms of change. The present exchange makes salient what is at stake in this debate: a model of change based on learning and personal beliefs versus a model based on group influence and social norms. These theoretical models recommend very different strategies for prejudice and conflict reduction. Future field experiments should attempt to adjudicate between these models by testing relevant policies in real-world settings.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 770B13D @1 II`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Norme sociale @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Social norm @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Norma social @5 01`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Préjugé @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Préjudice @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Prejuicio @5 02`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Etude expérimentale @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Experimental study @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Estudio experimental @5 03`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Mass media @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Mass media @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Medios comunicación de masas @5 04`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Relation intergroupe @5 05`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Intergroup relation @5 05`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Relación intergrupo @5 05`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Conflit @5 06`
C03	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Conflict @5 06`
C03	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Conflicto @5 06`
C03	`07`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Croyance @5 07`
C03	`07`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Belief @5 07`
C03	`07`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Creencia @5 07`
C03	`08`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Homme @5 18`
C03	`08`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Human @5 18`
C03	`08`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Hombre @5 18`
C07	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Interaction sociale @5 37`
C07	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Social interaction @5 37`
C07	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Interacción social @5 37`
N21				`@1 208`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	FRANCIS 09-0280451 INIST
ET :	What's in a Norm? Sources and Processes of Norm Change
AU :	LEVY PALUCK (Elizabeth)
AF :	Harvard University/Etats-Unis (1 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO :	Journal of personality and social psychology; ISSN 0022-3514; Coden JPSPB2; Etats-Unis; Da. 2009; Vol. 96; No. 3; Pp. 594-600; Bibl. 3/4 p.
LA :	Anglais
EA :	This reply to the commentary by E. Staub and L. A. Pearlman (2009) revisits the field experimental results of E. L. Paluck (2009). It introduces further evidence and theoretical elaboration supporting Paluck's conclusion that exposure to a reconciliation-themed radio soap opera changed perceptions of social norms and behaviors, not beliefs. Experimental and longitudinal survey evidence reinforces the finding that the radio program affected socially shared perceptions of typical or prescribed behavior-that is, social norms. Specifically, measurements of perceptions of social norms called into question by Staub and Pearlman are shown to correlate with perceptions of public opinion and public, not private, behaviors. Although measurement issues and the mechanisms of the radio program's influence merit further testing, theory and evidence point to social interactions and emotional engagement, not individual education, as the likely mechanisms of change. The present exchange makes salient what is at stake in this debate: a model of change based on learning and personal beliefs versus a model based on group influence and social norms. These theoretical models recommend very different strategies for prejudice and conflict reduction. Future field experiments should attempt to adjudicate between these models by testing relevant policies in real-world settings.
CC :	770B13D
FD :	Norme sociale; Préjugé; Etude expérimentale; Mass media; Relation intergroupe; Conflit; Croyance; Homme
FG :	Interaction sociale
ED :	Social norm; Préjudice; Experimental study; Mass media; Intergroup relation; Conflict; Belief; Human
EG :	Social interaction
SD :	Norma social; Prejuicio; Estudio experimental; Medios comunicación de masas; Relación intergrupo; Conflicto; Creencia; Hombre
LO :	INIST-13817.354000187327100070
ID :	09-0280451

Links to Exploration step

Francis:09-0280451

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">What's in a Norm? Sources and Processes of Norm Change</title>
<author><name sortKey="Levy Paluck, Elizabeth" sort="Levy Paluck, Elizabeth" uniqKey="Levy Paluck E" first="Elizabeth" last="Levy Paluck">Elizabeth Levy Paluck</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Harvard University</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">09-0280451</idno>
<date when="2009">2009</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">FRANCIS 09-0280451 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Francis:09-0280451</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000255</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">What's in a Norm? Sources and Processes of Norm Change</title>
<author><name sortKey="Levy Paluck, Elizabeth" sort="Levy Paluck, Elizabeth" uniqKey="Levy Paluck E" first="Elizabeth" last="Levy Paluck">Elizabeth Levy Paluck</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Harvard University</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of personality and social psychology</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. pers. soc. psychol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3514</idno>
<imprint><date when="2009">2009</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Journal of personality and social psychology</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. pers. soc. psychol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3514</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Belief</term>
<term>Conflict</term>
<term>Experimental study</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Intergroup relation</term>
<term>Mass media</term>
<term>Préjudice</term>
<term>Social norm</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Norme sociale</term>
<term>Préjugé</term>
<term>Etude expérimentale</term>
<term>Mass media</term>
<term>Relation intergroupe</term>
<term>Conflit</term>
<term>Croyance</term>
<term>Homme</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This reply to the commentary by E. Staub and L. A. Pearlman (2009) revisits the field experimental results of E. L. Paluck (2009). It introduces further evidence and theoretical elaboration supporting Paluck's conclusion that exposure to a reconciliation-themed radio soap opera changed perceptions of social norms and behaviors, not beliefs. Experimental and longitudinal survey evidence reinforces the finding that the radio program affected socially shared perceptions of typical or prescribed behavior-that is, social norms. Specifically, measurements of perceptions of social norms called into question by Staub and Pearlman are shown to correlate with perceptions of public opinion and public, not private, behaviors. Although measurement issues and the mechanisms of the radio program's influence merit further testing, theory and evidence point to social interactions and emotional engagement, not individual education, as the likely mechanisms of change. The present exchange makes salient what is at stake in this debate: a model of change based on learning and personal beliefs versus a model based on group influence and social norms. These theoretical models recommend very different strategies for prejudice and conflict reduction. Future field experiments should attempt to adjudicate between these models by testing relevant policies in real-world settings.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0022-3514</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>JPSPB2</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>J. pers. soc. psychol.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>96</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>3</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>What's in a Norm? Sources and Processes of Norm Change</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>LEVY PALUCK (Elizabeth)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Harvard University</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>594-600</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2009</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>13817</s2>
<s5>354000187327100070</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2009 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>3/4 p.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>09-0280451</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Journal of personality and social psychology</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>This reply to the commentary by E. Staub and L. A. Pearlman (2009) revisits the field experimental results of E. L. Paluck (2009). It introduces further evidence and theoretical elaboration supporting Paluck's conclusion that exposure to a reconciliation-themed radio soap opera changed perceptions of social norms and behaviors, not beliefs. Experimental and longitudinal survey evidence reinforces the finding that the radio program affected socially shared perceptions of typical or prescribed behavior-that is, social norms. Specifically, measurements of perceptions of social norms called into question by Staub and Pearlman are shown to correlate with perceptions of public opinion and public, not private, behaviors. Although measurement issues and the mechanisms of the radio program's influence merit further testing, theory and evidence point to social interactions and emotional engagement, not individual education, as the likely mechanisms of change. The present exchange makes salient what is at stake in this debate: a model of change based on learning and personal beliefs versus a model based on group influence and social norms. These theoretical models recommend very different strategies for prejudice and conflict reduction. Future field experiments should attempt to adjudicate between these models by testing relevant policies in real-world settings.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>770B13D</s0>
<s1>II</s1>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Norme sociale</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Social norm</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Norma social</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Préjugé</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Préjudice</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Prejuicio</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etude expérimentale</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Experimental study</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estudio experimental</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Mass media</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Mass media</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Medios comunicación de masas</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Relation intergroupe</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Intergroup relation</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Relación intergrupo</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Conflit</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Conflict</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Conflicto</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Croyance</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Belief</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Creencia</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Interaction sociale</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Social interaction</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Interacción social</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>208</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>FRANCIS 09-0280451 INIST</NO>
<ET>What's in a Norm? Sources and Processes of Norm Change</ET>
<AU>LEVY PALUCK (Elizabeth)</AU>
<AF>Harvard University/Etats-Unis (1 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Journal of personality and social psychology; ISSN 0022-3514; Coden JPSPB2; Etats-Unis; Da. 2009; Vol. 96; No. 3; Pp. 594-600; Bibl. 3/4 p.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>This reply to the commentary by E. Staub and L. A. Pearlman (2009) revisits the field experimental results of E. L. Paluck (2009). It introduces further evidence and theoretical elaboration supporting Paluck's conclusion that exposure to a reconciliation-themed radio soap opera changed perceptions of social norms and behaviors, not beliefs. Experimental and longitudinal survey evidence reinforces the finding that the radio program affected socially shared perceptions of typical or prescribed behavior-that is, social norms. Specifically, measurements of perceptions of social norms called into question by Staub and Pearlman are shown to correlate with perceptions of public opinion and public, not private, behaviors. Although measurement issues and the mechanisms of the radio program's influence merit further testing, theory and evidence point to social interactions and emotional engagement, not individual education, as the likely mechanisms of change. The present exchange makes salient what is at stake in this debate: a model of change based on learning and personal beliefs versus a model based on group influence and social norms. These theoretical models recommend very different strategies for prejudice and conflict reduction. Future field experiments should attempt to adjudicate between these models by testing relevant policies in real-world settings.</EA>
<CC>770B13D</CC>
<FD>Norme sociale; Préjugé; Etude expérimentale; Mass media; Relation intergroupe; Conflit; Croyance; Homme</FD>
<FG>Interaction sociale</FG>
<ED>Social norm; Préjudice; Experimental study; Mass media; Intergroup relation; Conflict; Belief; Human</ED>
<EG>Social interaction</EG>
<SD>Norma social; Prejuicio; Estudio experimental; Medios comunicación de masas; Relación intergrupo; Conflicto; Creencia; Hombre</SD>
<LO>INIST-13817.354000187327100070</LO>
<ID>09-0280451</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Musique/explor/OperaV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000255 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000255 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Musique
   |area=    OperaV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Francis:09-0280451
   |texte=   What's in a Norm? Sources and Processes of Norm Change
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.21.
Data generation: Thu Apr 14 14:59:05 2016. Site generation: Thu Jan 4 23:09:23 2024

	Serveur d'exploration sur l'opéra
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur l'opéra

What's in a Norm? Sources and Processes of Norm Change

What's in a Norm? Sources and Processes of Norm Change

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri