OperaV1, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 000023

What Is the Difference Between OASIS and OPERA? Roughly Five Pixels: Orthographic Structure Biases the Perceived Length of Letter Strings

Identifieur interne : 000023 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000022; suivant : 000024

What Is the Difference Between OASIS and OPERA? Roughly Five Pixels: Orthographic Structure Biases the Perceived Length of Letter Strings

Auteurs : Fabienne Chetail ; Alain Content

Source :

Psychological science [ 0956-7976 ] ; 2014.

RBID : Francis:14-0071099

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Etude comparative, Orthographe, Longueur, Lettre alphabet, Lecture, Mot, Identification stimulus, Consonne, Voyelle, Psycholinguistique, Reconnaissance, Etude expérimentale, Homme.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Comparative study, Consonant, Experimental study, Human, Length, Letter, Orthography, Psycholinguistics, Reading, Recognition, Stimulus identification, Vowel, Word.

Abstract

A thorough understanding of monosyllabic-word-recognition processes, in contrast with multisyllabic-word processing, has accumulated over the past decades. One fundamental challenge regarding multisyllabic words concerns their parsing into smaller units and the nature of the cues determining the parsing. We propose that the organization of consonant and vowel letters provides powerful cues for parsing, and we present data from a new task showing that a word's orthographic structure, as determined by the number of vowel-letter clusters, influences estimations of its length. Words were briefly presented on a computer screen, and participants had to estimate word length by drawing a line on the screen with the mouse. In three experiments, participants estimated words comprising fewer orthographic units as shorter than words comprising more units even though the words matched for number of letters. Further results demonstrated that the length bias was driven by orthographic information and not by phonological structure.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0956-7976`
A03		`1`		`@0 Psychol. sci.`
A05				`@2 25`
A06				`@2 1`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 What Is the Difference Between OASIS and OPERA? Roughly Five Pixels: Orthographic Structure Biases the Perceived Length of Letter Strings`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 CHETAIL (Fabienne)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 CONTENT (Alain)`
A14	`01`			`@1 Laboratoire Cognition, Langage et Développement and Centre de Recherche Cognition & Neurosciences, Université Libre de Bruxelles @3 BEL @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut.`
A20				`@1 243-249`
A21				`@1 2014`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 28079 @5 354000150085510270`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2014 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 3/4 p.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 14-0071099`
A60				`@1 P @3 C`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Psychological science`
A66	`01`			`@0 USA`
A99				`@0 1 notes`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 A thorough understanding of monosyllabic-word-recognition processes, in contrast with multisyllabic-word processing, has accumulated over the past decades. One fundamental challenge regarding multisyllabic words concerns their parsing into smaller units and the nature of the cues determining the parsing. We propose that the organization of consonant and vowel letters provides powerful cues for parsing, and we present data from a new task showing that a word's orthographic structure, as determined by the number of vowel-letter clusters, influences estimations of its length. Words were briefly presented on a computer screen, and participants had to estimate word length by drawing a line on the screen with the mouse. In three experiments, participants estimated words comprising fewer orthographic units as shorter than words comprising more units even though the words matched for number of letters. Further results demonstrated that the length bias was driven by orthographic information and not by phonological structure.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 770B09D @1 II`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Etude comparative @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Comparative study @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Estudio comparativo @5 01`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Orthographe @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Orthography @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Ortografía @5 02`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Longueur @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Length @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Longitud @5 03`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Lettre alphabet @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Letter @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Letra alfabeto @5 04`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Lecture @5 05`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Reading @5 05`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Lectura @5 05`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Mot @5 06`
C03	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Word @5 06`
C03	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Palabra @5 06`
C03	`07`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Identification stimulus @5 07`
C03	`07`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Stimulus identification @5 07`
C03	`07`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Identificacion estímulo @5 07`
C03	`08`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Consonne @5 08`
C03	`08`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Consonant @5 08`
C03	`08`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Consonante @5 08`
C03	`09`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Voyelle @5 09`
C03	`09`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Vowel @5 09`
C03	`09`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Vocal @5 09`
C03	`10`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Psycholinguistique @5 10`
C03	`10`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Psycholinguistics @5 10`
C03	`10`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Psicolinguística @5 10`
C03	`11`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Reconnaissance @5 11`
C03	`11`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Recognition @5 11`
C03	`11`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Reconocimiento @5 11`
C03	`12`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Etude expérimentale @5 12`
C03	`12`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Experimental study @5 12`
C03	`12`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Estudio experimental @5 12`
C03	`13`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Homme @5 18`
C03	`13`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Human @5 18`
C03	`13`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Hombre @5 18`
C07	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Langage @5 37`
C07	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Language @5 37`
C07	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Lenguaje @5 37`
C07	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Cognition @5 38`
C07	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Cognition @5 38`
C07	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Cognición @5 38`
N21				`@1 097`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	FRANCIS 14-0071099 INIST
ET :	What Is the Difference Between OASIS and OPERA? Roughly Five Pixels: Orthographic Structure Biases the Perceived Length of Letter Strings
AU :	CHETAIL (Fabienne); CONTENT (Alain)
AF :	Laboratoire Cognition, Langage et Développement and Centre de Recherche Cognition & Neurosciences, Université Libre de Bruxelles/Belgique (1 aut., 2 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Compte-rendu; Niveau analytique
SO :	Psychological science; ISSN 0956-7976; Etats-Unis; Da. 2014; Vol. 25; No. 1; Pp. 243-249; Bibl. 3/4 p.
LA :	Anglais
EA :	A thorough understanding of monosyllabic-word-recognition processes, in contrast with multisyllabic-word processing, has accumulated over the past decades. One fundamental challenge regarding multisyllabic words concerns their parsing into smaller units and the nature of the cues determining the parsing. We propose that the organization of consonant and vowel letters provides powerful cues for parsing, and we present data from a new task showing that a word's orthographic structure, as determined by the number of vowel-letter clusters, influences estimations of its length. Words were briefly presented on a computer screen, and participants had to estimate word length by drawing a line on the screen with the mouse. In three experiments, participants estimated words comprising fewer orthographic units as shorter than words comprising more units even though the words matched for number of letters. Further results demonstrated that the length bias was driven by orthographic information and not by phonological structure.
CC :	770B09D
FD :	Etude comparative; Orthographe; Longueur; Lettre alphabet; Lecture; Mot; Identification stimulus; Consonne; Voyelle; Psycholinguistique; Reconnaissance; Etude expérimentale; Homme
FG :	Langage; Cognition
ED :	Comparative study; Orthography; Length; Letter; Reading; Word; Stimulus identification; Consonant; Vowel; Psycholinguistics; Recognition; Experimental study; Human
EG :	Language; Cognition
SD :	Estudio comparativo; Ortografía; Longitud; Letra alfabeto; Lectura; Palabra; Identificacion estímulo; Consonante; Vocal; Psicolinguística; Reconocimiento; Estudio experimental; Hombre
LO :	INIST-28079.354000150085510270
ID :	14-0071099

Links to Exploration step

Francis:14-0071099

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">What Is the Difference Between OASIS and OPERA? Roughly Five Pixels: Orthographic Structure Biases the Perceived Length of Letter Strings</title>
<author><name sortKey="Chetail, Fabienne" sort="Chetail, Fabienne" uniqKey="Chetail F" first="Fabienne" last="Chetail">Fabienne Chetail</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Laboratoire Cognition, Langage et Développement and Centre de Recherche Cognition & Neurosciences, Université Libre de Bruxelles</s1>
<s3>BEL</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Content, Alain" sort="Content, Alain" uniqKey="Content A" first="Alain" last="Content">Alain Content</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Laboratoire Cognition, Langage et Développement and Centre de Recherche Cognition & Neurosciences, Université Libre de Bruxelles</s1>
<s3>BEL</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">14-0071099</idno>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">FRANCIS 14-0071099 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Francis:14-0071099</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000023</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">What Is the Difference Between OASIS and OPERA? Roughly Five Pixels: Orthographic Structure Biases the Perceived Length of Letter Strings</title>
<author><name sortKey="Chetail, Fabienne" sort="Chetail, Fabienne" uniqKey="Chetail F" first="Fabienne" last="Chetail">Fabienne Chetail</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Laboratoire Cognition, Langage et Développement and Centre de Recherche Cognition & Neurosciences, Université Libre de Bruxelles</s1>
<s3>BEL</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Content, Alain" sort="Content, Alain" uniqKey="Content A" first="Alain" last="Content">Alain Content</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Laboratoire Cognition, Langage et Développement and Centre de Recherche Cognition & Neurosciences, Université Libre de Bruxelles</s1>
<s3>BEL</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Psychological science</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Psychol. sci.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0956-7976</idno>
<imprint><date when="2014">2014</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Psychological science</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Psychol. sci.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0956-7976</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Comparative study</term>
<term>Consonant</term>
<term>Experimental study</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Length</term>
<term>Letter</term>
<term>Orthography</term>
<term>Psycholinguistics</term>
<term>Reading</term>
<term>Recognition</term>
<term>Stimulus identification</term>
<term>Vowel</term>
<term>Word</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Etude comparative</term>
<term>Orthographe</term>
<term>Longueur</term>
<term>Lettre alphabet</term>
<term>Lecture</term>
<term>Mot</term>
<term>Identification stimulus</term>
<term>Consonne</term>
<term>Voyelle</term>
<term>Psycholinguistique</term>
<term>Reconnaissance</term>
<term>Etude expérimentale</term>
<term>Homme</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">A thorough understanding of monosyllabic-word-recognition processes, in contrast with multisyllabic-word processing, has accumulated over the past decades. One fundamental challenge regarding multisyllabic words concerns their parsing into smaller units and the nature of the cues determining the parsing. We propose that the organization of consonant and vowel letters provides powerful cues for parsing, and we present data from a new task showing that a word's orthographic structure, as determined by the number of vowel-letter clusters, influences estimations of its length. Words were briefly presented on a computer screen, and participants had to estimate word length by drawing a line on the screen with the mouse. In three experiments, participants estimated words comprising fewer orthographic units as shorter than words comprising more units even though the words matched for number of letters. Further results demonstrated that the length bias was driven by orthographic information and not by phonological structure.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0956-7976</s0>
</fA01>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Psychol. sci.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>25</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>1</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>What Is the Difference Between OASIS and OPERA? Roughly Five Pixels: Orthographic Structure Biases the Perceived Length of Letter Strings</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>CHETAIL (Fabienne)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>CONTENT (Alain)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Laboratoire Cognition, Langage et Développement and Centre de Recherche Cognition & Neurosciences, Université Libre de Bruxelles</s1>
<s3>BEL</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>243-249</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2014</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>28079</s2>
<s5>354000150085510270</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2014 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>3/4 p.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>14-0071099</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
<s3>C</s3>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Psychological science</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fA99><s0>1 notes</s0>
</fA99>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>A thorough understanding of monosyllabic-word-recognition processes, in contrast with multisyllabic-word processing, has accumulated over the past decades. One fundamental challenge regarding multisyllabic words concerns their parsing into smaller units and the nature of the cues determining the parsing. We propose that the organization of consonant and vowel letters provides powerful cues for parsing, and we present data from a new task showing that a word's orthographic structure, as determined by the number of vowel-letter clusters, influences estimations of its length. Words were briefly presented on a computer screen, and participants had to estimate word length by drawing a line on the screen with the mouse. In three experiments, participants estimated words comprising fewer orthographic units as shorter than words comprising more units even though the words matched for number of letters. Further results demonstrated that the length bias was driven by orthographic information and not by phonological structure.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>770B09D</s0>
<s1>II</s1>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etude comparative</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Comparative study</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estudio comparativo</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Orthographe</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Orthography</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Ortografía</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Longueur</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Length</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Longitud</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Lettre alphabet</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Letter</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Letra alfabeto</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Lecture</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Reading</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Lectura</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Mot</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Word</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Palabra</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Identification stimulus</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Stimulus identification</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Identificacion estímulo</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Consonne</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Consonant</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Consonante</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Voyelle</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Vowel</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Vocal</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Psycholinguistique</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Psycholinguistics</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Psicolinguística</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Reconnaissance</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Recognition</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Reconocimiento</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etude expérimentale</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Experimental study</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estudio experimental</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Langage</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Language</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Lenguaje</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cognición</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>097</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>FRANCIS 14-0071099 INIST</NO>
<ET>What Is the Difference Between OASIS and OPERA? Roughly Five Pixels: Orthographic Structure Biases the Perceived Length of Letter Strings</ET>
<AU>CHETAIL (Fabienne); CONTENT (Alain)</AU>
<AF>Laboratoire Cognition, Langage et Développement and Centre de Recherche Cognition & Neurosciences, Université Libre de Bruxelles/Belgique (1 aut., 2 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Compte-rendu; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Psychological science; ISSN 0956-7976; Etats-Unis; Da. 2014; Vol. 25; No. 1; Pp. 243-249; Bibl. 3/4 p.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>A thorough understanding of monosyllabic-word-recognition processes, in contrast with multisyllabic-word processing, has accumulated over the past decades. One fundamental challenge regarding multisyllabic words concerns their parsing into smaller units and the nature of the cues determining the parsing. We propose that the organization of consonant and vowel letters provides powerful cues for parsing, and we present data from a new task showing that a word's orthographic structure, as determined by the number of vowel-letter clusters, influences estimations of its length. Words were briefly presented on a computer screen, and participants had to estimate word length by drawing a line on the screen with the mouse. In three experiments, participants estimated words comprising fewer orthographic units as shorter than words comprising more units even though the words matched for number of letters. Further results demonstrated that the length bias was driven by orthographic information and not by phonological structure.</EA>
<CC>770B09D</CC>
<FD>Etude comparative; Orthographe; Longueur; Lettre alphabet; Lecture; Mot; Identification stimulus; Consonne; Voyelle; Psycholinguistique; Reconnaissance; Etude expérimentale; Homme</FD>
<FG>Langage; Cognition</FG>
<ED>Comparative study; Orthography; Length; Letter; Reading; Word; Stimulus identification; Consonant; Vowel; Psycholinguistics; Recognition; Experimental study; Human</ED>
<EG>Language; Cognition</EG>
<SD>Estudio comparativo; Ortografía; Longitud; Letra alfabeto; Lectura; Palabra; Identificacion estímulo; Consonante; Vocal; Psicolinguística; Reconocimiento; Estudio experimental; Hombre</SD>
<LO>INIST-28079.354000150085510270</LO>
<ID>14-0071099</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Musique/explor/OperaV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000023 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000023 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Musique
   |area=    OperaV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Francis:14-0071099
   |texte=   What Is the Difference Between OASIS and OPERA? Roughly Five Pixels: Orthographic Structure Biases the Perceived Length of Letter Strings
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.21.
Data generation: Thu Apr 14 14:59:05 2016. Site generation: Thu Jan 4 23:09:23 2024

	Serveur d'exploration sur l'opéra
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur l'opéra

What Is the Difference Between OASIS and OPERA? Roughly Five Pixels: Orthographic Structure Biases the Perceived Length of Letter Strings

What Is the Difference Between OASIS and OPERA? Roughly Five Pixels: Orthographic Structure Biases the Perceived Length of Letter Strings

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri