OperaV1, PascalFrancis, Checkpoint, bibRecord, 000950

Determination of categories of acoustical quality in concert halls using the questionnaire and interview method

Identifieur interne : 000950 ( PascalFrancis/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000949; suivant : 000951

Determination of categories of acoustical quality in concert halls using the questionnaire and interview method

Auteurs : Leo L. Beranek [États-Unis]

Source :

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America [ 0001-4966 ] ; 1995-05.

RBID : Pascal:95-0237139

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Etude expérimentale, 4355H, 4355G, Salle, Levé, Propriété acoustique, Evaluation comparative, Musique, Classification.
Wicri :
- topic : Musique, Classification.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Acoustic properties, Classification, Comparative evaluations, Experimental study, Music, Rooms, Surveys.

Abstract

There are three common alternative techniques for judging subjective acoustical quality in concert halls and opera houses: (1) the binaural comparison method; (2) the expert-group round-robin listening method; and (3) the questionnaire and interview method. The questionnaire and interview method was utilized by me in rank-ordering 55 concert halls in 22 countries. Conductors, musicians, and music critics were interviewed and each was asked to rank-order the halls he/she knew well. In addition, to cover all halls, opinions were solicited from those who listen often to symphonic music in many halls, which included acoustical consultants and selected listeners who travel extensively and attend symphonic concerts. I have attended symphonic concerts in all but six. The halls were then separated into six categories from A+(super), A(excellent), B+(good to excellent), B(good), C+(fair to good), and C(fair). No rank-orderings were attempted within each category. It is probable that some halls might be ranked one category higher or one category lower than its present assignment if a different group if interviewees were selected. A shift of two categories is highly unlikely. The results for the 55 concert halls are presented and discussed.

Affiliations:

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

to stream PascalFrancis, to step Corpus: 000A30
to stream PascalFrancis, to step Curation: 000B33

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:95-0237139

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Determination of categories of acoustical quality in concert halls using the questionnaire and interview method</title>
<author><name sortKey="Beranek, Leo L" sort="Beranek, Leo L" uniqKey="Beranek L" first="Leo L." last="Beranek">Leo L. Beranek</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>975 Memorial Dr., Ste. 804, Cambridge, MA 02138-5755</s1>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<placeName><region type="state">Massachusetts</region>
</placeName>
<wicri:cityArea>975 Memorial Dr., Ste. 804, Cambridge</wicri:cityArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">95-0237139</idno>
<date when="1995-05">1995-05</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 95-0237139 AIP</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:95-0237139</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000A30</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Curation">000B33</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Checkpoint">000950</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Determination of categories of acoustical quality in concert halls using the questionnaire and interview method</title>
<author><name sortKey="Beranek, Leo L" sort="Beranek, Leo L" uniqKey="Beranek L" first="Leo L." last="Beranek">Leo L. Beranek</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>975 Memorial Dr., Ste. 804, Cambridge, MA 02138-5755</s1>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<placeName><region type="state">Massachusetts</region>
</placeName>
<wicri:cityArea>975 Memorial Dr., Ste. 804, Cambridge</wicri:cityArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. Acoust. Soc. Am.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0001-4966</idno>
<imprint><date when="1995-05">1995-05</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. Acoust. Soc. Am.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0001-4966</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Acoustic properties</term>
<term>Classification</term>
<term>Comparative evaluations</term>
<term>Experimental study</term>
<term>Music</term>
<term>Rooms</term>
<term>Surveys</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Etude expérimentale</term>
<term>4355H</term>
<term>4355G</term>
<term>Salle</term>
<term>Levé</term>
<term>Propriété acoustique</term>
<term>Evaluation comparative</term>
<term>Musique</term>
<term>Classification</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Musique</term>
<term>Classification</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">There are three common alternative techniques for judging subjective acoustical quality in concert halls and opera houses: (1) the binaural comparison method; (2) the expert-group round-robin listening method; and (3) the questionnaire and interview method. The questionnaire and interview method was utilized by me in rank-ordering 55 concert halls in 22 countries. Conductors, musicians, and music critics were interviewed and each was asked to rank-order the halls he/she knew well. In addition, to cover all halls, opinions were solicited from those who listen often to symphonic music in many halls, which included acoustical consultants and selected listeners who travel extensively and attend symphonic concerts. I have attended symphonic concerts in all but six. The halls were then separated into six categories from A+(super), A(excellent), B+(good to excellent), B(good), C+(fair to good), and C(fair). No rank-orderings were attempted within each category. It is probable that some halls might be ranked one category higher or one category lower than its present assignment if a different group if interviewees were selected. A shift of two categories is highly unlikely. The results for the 55 concert halls are presented and discussed.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0001-4966</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>JASMAN</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>J. Acoust. Soc. Am.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>97</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>5</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Determination of categories of acoustical quality in concert halls using the questionnaire and interview method</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>BERANEK (Leo L.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>975 Memorial Dr., Ste. 804, Cambridge, MA 02138-5755</s1>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>3318-3318</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>1995-05</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>129</s2>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>8100</s0>
<s1>© AIP</s1>
</fA44>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>95-0237139</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
<s2>C</s2>
<s3>E</s3>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>There are three common alternative techniques for judging subjective acoustical quality in concert halls and opera houses: (1) the binaural comparison method; (2) the expert-group round-robin listening method; and (3) the questionnaire and interview method. The questionnaire and interview method was utilized by me in rank-ordering 55 concert halls in 22 countries. Conductors, musicians, and music critics were interviewed and each was asked to rank-order the halls he/she knew well. In addition, to cover all halls, opinions were solicited from those who listen often to symphonic music in many halls, which included acoustical consultants and selected listeners who travel extensively and attend symphonic concerts. I have attended symphonic concerts in all but six. The halls were then separated into six categories from A+(super), A(excellent), B+(good to excellent), B(good), C+(fair to good), and C(fair). No rank-orderings were attempted within each category. It is probable that some halls might be ranked one category higher or one category lower than its present assignment if a different group if interviewees were selected. A shift of two categories is highly unlikely. The results for the 55 concert halls are presented and discussed.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="3"><s0>001B40C55</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="3" l="FRE"><s0>Etude expérimentale</s0>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="3" l="ENG"><s0>Experimental study</s0>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="3" l="FRE"><s0>4355H</s0>
<s2>PAC</s2>
<s4>INC</s4>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="3" l="FRE"><s0>4355G</s0>
<s2>PAC</s2>
<s4>INC</s4>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="3" l="FRE"><s0>Salle</s0>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="3" l="ENG"><s0>Rooms</s0>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="3" l="FRE"><s0>Levé</s0>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="3" l="ENG"><s0>Surveys</s0>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="3" l="FRE"><s0>Propriété acoustique</s0>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="3" l="ENG"><s0>Acoustic properties</s0>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="3" l="FRE"><s0>Evaluation comparative</s0>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="3" l="ENG"><s0>Comparative evaluations</s0>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="3" l="FRE"><s0>Musique</s0>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="3" l="ENG"><s0>Music</s0>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="3" l="FRE"><s0>Classification</s0>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="3" l="ENG"><s0>Classification</s0>
</fC03>
<fN21><s1>136</s1>
</fN21>
<fN47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>9509M1394</s0>
</fN47>
</pA>
<pR><fA30 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>The 129th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America</s1>
<s3>Washington, DC (USA)</s3>
</fA30>
</pR>
</standard>
</inist>
<affiliations><list><country><li>États-Unis</li>
</country>
<region><li>Massachusetts</li>
</region>
</list>
<tree><country name="États-Unis"><region name="Massachusetts"><name sortKey="Beranek, Leo L" sort="Beranek, Leo L" uniqKey="Beranek L" first="Leo L." last="Beranek">Leo L. Beranek</name>
</region>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Musique/explor/OperaV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Checkpoint

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000950 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000950 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Musique
   |area=    OperaV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Checkpoint
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:95-0237139
   |texte=   Determination of categories of acoustical quality in concert halls using the questionnaire and interview method
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.21.
Data generation: Thu Apr 14 14:59:05 2016. Site generation: Thu Jan 4 23:09:23 2024

	Serveur d'exploration sur l'opéra
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur l'opéra

Determination of categories of acoustical quality in concert halls using the questionnaire and interview method

Determination of categories of acoustical quality in concert halls using the questionnaire and interview method

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri