Aldhelm and the Two Cultures of Anglo‐Saxon Poetry
Identifieur interne : 001B21 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001B20; suivant : 001B22Aldhelm and the Two Cultures of Anglo‐Saxon Poetry
Auteurs : Christopher AbramSource :
- Literature Compass [ 1741-4113 ] ; 2007-09.
Abstract
Old English literature dominates the study of Anglo‐Saxon culture as a whole, to the extent that ‘Anglo‐Saxon’ and ‘Old English’ were for a long time considered synonymous. The Anglo‐Saxons, however, also produced a large body of texts in Latin. In this survey, I examine the often false dichotomy sometimes made between Old English and Anglo‐Latin literary aesthetics and textual production as they are revealed through Anglo‐Saxon poetry, and discuss the post‐medieval intellectual contexts that produce and sustain this dichotomy. The figure and work of Aldhelm (c.639 ce–709 ce) is used as an example of how Anglo‐Saxon poets often occupied a liminal position between Latinate and Germanic culture. I argue that a proper understanding of Anglo‐Saxon culture (and poetry’s place within it) requires us to disassemble the artificial barriers that have been erected between Old English and Anglo‐Latin verse.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-4113.2007.00483.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:7673384B39A023A7C4CA0689806ED2D37D5F0686Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Aldhelm and the Two Cultures of Anglo‐Saxon Poetry</title><author><name sortKey="Abram, Christopher" sort="Abram, Christopher" uniqKey="Abram C" first="Christopher" last="Abram">Christopher Abram</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University College London</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:7673384B39A023A7C4CA0689806ED2D37D5F0686</idno><date when="2007" year="2007">2007</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1741-4113.2007.00483.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/7673384B39A023A7C4CA0689806ED2D37D5F0686/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001B21</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Aldhelm and the Two Cultures of Anglo‐Saxon Poetry</title><author><name sortKey="Abram, Christopher" sort="Abram, Christopher" uniqKey="Abram C" first="Christopher" last="Abram">Christopher Abram</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University College London</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Literature Compass</title><idno type="ISSN">1741-4113</idno><idno type="eISSN">1741-4113</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-09">2007-09</date><biblScope unit="volume">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1354">1354</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1377">1377</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1741-4113</idno></series><idno type="istex">7673384B39A023A7C4CA0689806ED2D37D5F0686</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1741-4113.2007.00483.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">LIC3483</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1741-4113</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Old English literature dominates the study of Anglo‐Saxon culture as a whole, to the extent that ‘Anglo‐Saxon’ and ‘Old English’ were for a long time considered synonymous. The Anglo‐Saxons, however, also produced a large body of texts in Latin. In this survey, I examine the often false dichotomy sometimes made between Old English and Anglo‐Latin literary aesthetics and textual production as they are revealed through Anglo‐Saxon poetry, and discuss the post‐medieval intellectual contexts that produce and sustain this dichotomy. The figure and work of Aldhelm (c.639 ce–709 ce) is used as an example of how Anglo‐Saxon poets often occupied a liminal position between Latinate and Germanic culture. I argue that a proper understanding of Anglo‐Saxon culture (and poetry’s place within it) requires us to disassemble the artificial barriers that have been erected between Old English and Anglo‐Latin verse.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Christopher Abram</name><affiliations><json:string>University College London</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>LIC3483</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><abstract>Old English literature dominates the study of Anglo‐Saxon culture as a whole, to the extent that ‘Anglo‐Saxon’ and ‘Old English’ were for a long time considered synonymous. The Anglo‐Saxons, however, also produced a large body of texts in Latin. In this survey, I examine the often false dichotomy sometimes made between Old English and Anglo‐Latin literary aesthetics and textual production as they are revealed through Anglo‐Saxon poetry, and discuss the post‐medieval intellectual contexts that produce and sustain this dichotomy. The figure and work of Aldhelm (c.639 ce–709 ce) is used as an example of how Anglo‐Saxon poets often occupied a liminal position between Latinate and Germanic culture. I argue that a proper understanding of Anglo‐Saxon culture (and poetry’s place within it) requires us to disassemble the artificial barriers that have been erected between Old English and Anglo‐Latin verse.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.156</score><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>422 x 649 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><keywordCount>0</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>909</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>10828</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>65208</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>24</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>138</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Aldhelm and the Two Cultures of Anglo‐Saxon Poetry</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>4</volume><publisherId><json:string>LIC3</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>24</total><last>1377</last><first>1354</first></pages><issn><json:string>1741-4113</json:string></issn><issue>5</issue><genre><json:string>Journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1741-4113</json:string></eissn><title>Literature Compass</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1741-4113</json:string></doi></host><publicationDate>2007</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2007</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1741-4113.2007.00483.x</json:string></doi><id>7673384B39A023A7C4CA0689806ED2D37D5F0686</id><fulltext><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7673384B39A023A7C4CA0689806ED2D37D5F0686/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><extension>zip</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7673384B39A023A7C4CA0689806ED2D37D5F0686/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/7673384B39A023A7C4CA0689806ED2D37D5F0686/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Aldhelm and the Two Cultures of Anglo‐Saxon Poetry</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>WILEY</p></availability><date>2007</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Aldhelm and the Two Cultures of Anglo‐Saxon Poetry</title><author><persName><forename type="first">Christopher</forename><surname>Abram</surname></persName><note type="correspondence"><p>Correspondence address: University College London, Gower Street, London, London, United Kingdom, WC1E 6BT. E‐mail: c.abram@ucl.ac.uk.</p></note><affiliation>University College London</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Literature Compass</title><idno type="pISSN">1741-4113</idno><idno type="eISSN">1741-4113</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1741-4113</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-09"></date><biblScope unit="volume">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1354">1354</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1377">1377</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">7673384B39A023A7C4CA0689806ED2D37D5F0686</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1741-4113.2007.00483.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">LIC3483</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2007</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Old English literature dominates the study of Anglo‐Saxon culture as a whole, to the extent that ‘Anglo‐Saxon’ and ‘Old English’ were for a long time considered synonymous. The Anglo‐Saxons, however, also produced a large body of texts in Latin. In this survey, I examine the often false dichotomy sometimes made between Old English and Anglo‐Latin literary aesthetics and textual production as they are revealed through Anglo‐Saxon poetry, and discuss the post‐medieval intellectual contexts that produce and sustain this dichotomy. The figure and work of Aldhelm (c.639 ce–709 ce) is used as an example of how Anglo‐Saxon poets often occupied a liminal position between Latinate and Germanic culture. I argue that a proper understanding of Anglo‐Saxon culture (and poetry’s place within it) requires us to disassemble the artificial barriers that have been erected between Old English and Anglo‐Latin verse.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2007-09">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><extension>txt</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7673384B39A023A7C4CA0689806ED2D37D5F0686/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1741-4113</doi><issn type="print">1741-4113</issn><issn type="electronic">1741-4113</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="LIC3"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="LITERATURE COMPASS">Literature Compass</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="09005"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/lico.2007.4.issue-5</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="4">4</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="5">5</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2007-09">September 2007</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="2" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1741-4113.2007.00483.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="LIC3483"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="24"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Medieval</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2007-07-18"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2007-07-18"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.15 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-07-19"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-02-01"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-31"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="1354">1354</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="1377">1377</numbering></numberingGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:LIC3.LIC3483.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory><i>Literature Compass</i> 4/5 (2007): 1354–1377, 10.1111/j.1741‐4113.2007.00483.x</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="1"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="76"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Aldhelm and the Two Cultures of Anglo‐Saxon Poetry</title><title type="shortAuthors">Aldhelm and the Two Cultures of Anglo‐Saxon Poetry</title><title type="short">Aldhelm and the Two Cultures of Anglo‐Saxon Poetry</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" noteRef="#fn01"><personName><givenNames>Christopher</givenNames><familyName>Abram</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation>University College London</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p>Old English literature dominates the study of Anglo‐Saxon culture as a whole, to the extent that ‘Anglo‐Saxon’ and ‘Old English’ were for a long time considered synonymous. The Anglo‐Saxons, however, also produced a large body of texts in Latin. In this survey, I examine the often false dichotomy sometimes made between Old English and Anglo‐Latin literary aesthetics and textual production as they are revealed through Anglo‐Saxon poetry, and discuss the post‐medieval intellectual contexts that produce and sustain this dichotomy. The figure and work of Aldhelm (<i>c.</i>639 <sc>ce</sc>–709 <sc>ce</sc>) is used as an example of how Anglo‐Saxon poets often occupied a liminal position between Latinate and Germanic culture. I argue that a proper understanding of Anglo‐Saxon culture (and poetry’s place within it) requires us to disassemble the artificial barriers that have been erected between Old English and Anglo‐Latin verse.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Aldhelm and the Two Cultures of Anglo‐Saxon Poetry</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Aldhelm and the Two Cultures of Anglo‐Saxon Poetry</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Aldhelm and the Two Cultures of Anglo‐Saxon Poetry</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Christopher</namePart><namePart type="family">Abram</namePart><affiliation>University College London</affiliation><description>Correspondence address: University College London, Gower Street, London, London, United Kingdom, WC1E 6BT. E‐mail: c.abram@ucl.ac.uk.</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2007-09</dateIssued><edition>Literature Compass 4/5 (2007): 1354–1377, 10.1111/j.1741‐4113.2007.00483.x</edition><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2007</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="tables">1</extent><extent unit="references">76</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Old English literature dominates the study of Anglo‐Saxon culture as a whole, to the extent that ‘Anglo‐Saxon’ and ‘Old English’ were for a long time considered synonymous. The Anglo‐Saxons, however, also produced a large body of texts in Latin. In this survey, I examine the often false dichotomy sometimes made between Old English and Anglo‐Latin literary aesthetics and textual production as they are revealed through Anglo‐Saxon poetry, and discuss the post‐medieval intellectual contexts that produce and sustain this dichotomy. The figure and work of Aldhelm (c.639 ce–709 ce) is used as an example of how Anglo‐Saxon poets often occupied a liminal position between Latinate and Germanic culture. I argue that a proper understanding of Anglo‐Saxon culture (and poetry’s place within it) requires us to disassemble the artificial barriers that have been erected between Old English and Anglo‐Latin verse.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Literature Compass</title></titleInfo><genre type="Journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1741-4113</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1741-4113</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1741-4113</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">LIC3</identifier><part><date>2007</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>4</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>5</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>1354</start><end>1377</end><total>24</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">7673384B39A023A7C4CA0689806ED2D37D5F0686</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1741-4113.2007.00483.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">LIC3483</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Musique/explor/OperaV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001B21 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001B21 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Musique
|area= OperaV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:7673384B39A023A7C4CA0689806ED2D37D5F0686
|texte= Aldhelm and the Two Cultures of Anglo‐Saxon Poetry
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.21. |  |