TOWARD A DEFINITION OF POPULAR CULTURE
Identifieur interne : 001558 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001557; suivant : 001559TOWARD A DEFINITION OF POPULAR CULTURE
Auteurs : Holt N. ParkerSource :
- History and Theory [ 0018-2656 ] ; 2011-05.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
The most common definitions of popular culture suffer from a presentist bias and cannot be applied to pre‐industrial and pre‐capitalist societies. A survey reveals serious conceptual difficulties as well. We may, however, gain insight in two ways. 1) By moving from a Marxist model (economic/class/production) to a more Weberian approach (societal/status/consumption). 2) By looking to Bourdieu's “cultural capital” and Danto's and Dickie's “Institutional Theory of Art,” and defining popular culture as “unauthorized culture.”
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2303.2011.00574.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:A4F90ACBE5D7F5636C4995B1A1371A0DE89315B7Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">TOWARD A DEFINITION OF POPULAR CULTURE</title><author><name sortKey="Parker, Holt N" sort="Parker, Holt N" uniqKey="Parker H" first="Holt N." last="Parker">Holt N. Parker</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Cincinnati</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:A4F90ACBE5D7F5636C4995B1A1371A0DE89315B7</idno><date when="2011" year="2011">2011</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1468-2303.2011.00574.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/A4F90ACBE5D7F5636C4995B1A1371A0DE89315B7/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001558</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">TOWARD A DEFINITION OF POPULAR CULTURE</title><author><name sortKey="Parker, Holt N" sort="Parker, Holt N" uniqKey="Parker H" first="Holt N." last="Parker">Holt N. Parker</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Cincinnati</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">History and Theory</title><idno type="ISSN">0018-2656</idno><idno type="eISSN">1468-2303</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2011-05">2011-05</date><biblScope unit="volume">50</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="147">147</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="170">170</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0018-2656</idno></series><idno type="istex">A4F90ACBE5D7F5636C4995B1A1371A0DE89315B7</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1468-2303.2011.00574.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">HITH574</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0018-2656</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Antonio Gramsci</term><term>Arthur Danto</term><term>George Dickie</term><term>Pierre Bourdieu</term><term>cultural capital</term><term>popular culture</term><term>“institutional theory of art”</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The most common definitions of popular culture suffer from a presentist bias and cannot be applied to pre‐industrial and pre‐capitalist societies. A survey reveals serious conceptual difficulties as well. We may, however, gain insight in two ways. 1) By moving from a Marxist model (economic/class/production) to a more Weberian approach (societal/status/consumption). 2) By looking to Bourdieu's “cultural capital” and Danto's and Dickie's “Institutional Theory of Art,” and defining popular culture as “unauthorized culture.”</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>HOLT N. PARKER</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Cincinnati</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>popular culture</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>cultural capital</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>“institutional theory of art”</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Arthur Danto</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>George Dickie</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Pierre Bourdieu</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Antonio Gramsci</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>HITH574</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><abstract>The most common definitions of popular culture suffer from a presentist bias and cannot be applied to pre‐industrial and pre‐capitalist societies. A survey reveals serious conceptual difficulties as well. We may, however, gain insight in two ways. 1) By moving from a Marxist model (economic/class/production) to a more Weberian approach (societal/status/consumption). 2) By looking to Bourdieu's “cultural capital” and Danto's and Dickie's “Institutional Theory of Art,” and defining popular culture as “unauthorized culture.”</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.376</score><pdfVersion>1.6</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>522 x 765 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><keywordCount>7</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>527</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>13390</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>78298</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>24</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>73</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>TOWARD A DEFINITION OF POPULAR CULTURE</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>50</volume><publisherId><json:string>HITH</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>24</total><last>170</last><first>147</first></pages><issn><json:string>0018-2656</json:string></issn><issue>2</issue><genre><json:string>Journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1468-2303</json:string></eissn><title>History and Theory</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1468-2303</json:string></doi></host><publicationDate>2011</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2011</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1468-2303.2011.00574.x</json:string></doi><id>A4F90ACBE5D7F5636C4995B1A1371A0DE89315B7</id><fulltext><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A4F90ACBE5D7F5636C4995B1A1371A0DE89315B7/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><extension>zip</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A4F90ACBE5D7F5636C4995B1A1371A0DE89315B7/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/A4F90ACBE5D7F5636C4995B1A1371A0DE89315B7/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">TOWARD A DEFINITION OF POPULAR CULTURE</title><respStmt xml:id="ISTEX-API" resp="Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID" name="ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)"></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace><availability><p>WILEY</p></availability><date>2011</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">TOWARD A DEFINITION OF POPULAR CULTURE</title><author><persName><forename type="first">HOLT N.</forename><surname>PARKER</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Cincinnati</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">History and Theory</title><idno type="pISSN">0018-2656</idno><idno type="eISSN">1468-2303</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1468-2303</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2011-05"></date><biblScope unit="volume">50</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="147">147</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="170">170</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">A4F90ACBE5D7F5636C4995B1A1371A0DE89315B7</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1468-2303.2011.00574.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">HITH574</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2011</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The most common definitions of popular culture suffer from a presentist bias and cannot be applied to pre‐industrial and pre‐capitalist societies. A survey reveals serious conceptual difficulties as well. We may, however, gain insight in two ways. 1) By moving from a Marxist model (economic/class/production) to a more Weberian approach (societal/status/consumption). 2) By looking to Bourdieu's “cultural capital” and Danto's and Dickie's “Institutional Theory of Art,” and defining popular culture as “unauthorized culture.”</p></abstract><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>Keywords</head><item><term>popular culture</term></item><item><term>cultural capital</term></item><item><term>“institutional theory of art”</term></item><item><term>Arthur Danto</term></item><item><term>George Dickie</term></item><item><term>Pierre Bourdieu</term></item><item><term>Antonio Gramsci</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2011-05">Published</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2016-3-3">References added</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><extension>txt</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/A4F90ACBE5D7F5636C4995B1A1371A0DE89315B7/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisherName><publisherLoc>Malden, USA</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1468-2303</doi><issn type="print">0018-2656</issn><issn type="electronic">1468-2303</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="HITH"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="HISTORY THEORY">History and Theory</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="05102"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/hith.2011.50.issue-2</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="50">50</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="2">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2011-05">May 2011</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="1" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1468-2303.2011.00574.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="HITH574"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="24"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2011 Wesleyan University</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.4.8 mode:FullText" date="2011-05-03"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2011-04-26"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2011-04-26"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-27"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-24"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="147">147</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="170">170</numbering></numberingGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:HITH.HITH574.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="referenceTotal" number="18"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="1"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">TOWARD A DEFINITION OF POPULAR CULTURE</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>HOLT N.</givenNames><familyName>PARKER</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation>University of Cincinnati</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">popular culture</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">cultural capital</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">“institutional theory of art”</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">Arthur Danto</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">George Dickie</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">Pierre Bourdieu</keyword><keyword xml:id="k7">Antonio Gramsci</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">ABSTRACT</title><p>The most common definitions of popular culture suffer from a presentist bias and cannot be applied to pre‐industrial and pre‐capitalist societies. A survey reveals serious conceptual difficulties as well. We may, however, gain insight in two ways. 1) By moving from a Marxist model (economic/class/production) to a more Weberian approach (societal/status/consumption). 2) By looking to Bourdieu's “cultural capital” and Danto's and Dickie's “Institutional Theory of Art,” and defining popular culture as “unauthorized culture.”</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>TOWARD A DEFINITION OF POPULAR CULTURE</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>TOWARD A DEFINITION OF POPULAR CULTURE</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">HOLT N.</namePart><namePart type="family">PARKER</namePart><affiliation>University of Cincinnati</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Malden, USA</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2011-05</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="references">18</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">The most common definitions of popular culture suffer from a presentist bias and cannot be applied to pre‐industrial and pre‐capitalist societies. A survey reveals serious conceptual difficulties as well. We may, however, gain insight in two ways. 1) By moving from a Marxist model (economic/class/production) to a more Weberian approach (societal/status/consumption). 2) By looking to Bourdieu's “cultural capital” and Danto's and Dickie's “Institutional Theory of Art,” and defining popular culture as “unauthorized culture.”</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>Keywords</genre><topic>popular culture</topic><topic>cultural capital</topic><topic>“institutional theory of art”</topic><topic>Arthur Danto</topic><topic>George Dickie</topic><topic>Pierre Bourdieu</topic><topic>Antonio Gramsci</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>History and Theory</title></titleInfo><genre type="Journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0018-2656</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1468-2303</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1468-2303</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">HITH</identifier><part><date>2011</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>50</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>147</start><end>170</end><total>24</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">A4F90ACBE5D7F5636C4995B1A1371A0DE89315B7</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1468-2303.2011.00574.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">HITH574</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2011 Wesleyan University</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Inc</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Musique/explor/OperaV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001558 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001558 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Musique
|area= OperaV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:A4F90ACBE5D7F5636C4995B1A1371A0DE89315B7
|texte= TOWARD A DEFINITION OF POPULAR CULTURE
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.21. |  |