Roman Epic Theatre? Reception, performance, and the poet in Virgil's Aeneid
Identifieur interne : 001A18 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001A17; suivant : 001A19Roman Epic Theatre? Reception, performance, and the poet in Virgil's Aeneid
Auteurs : Andrew LairdSource :
- Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society [ 0068-6735 ] ; 2003.
Abstract
Past responses to ancient literature and the reading practices of previous centuries are of central relevance to the contemporary exegesis of Greek and Roman authors. Professional classicists have at last come to recognise this. However, accounts of reception still tend to engage in a traditional form of Nachleben, as they unselfconsciously describe the extent of classical influences on later literary production. This process of influence is not as straightforward as it may first seem. It is often taken for granted in practice, if not in theory, that the movement is in one direction only – from antiquity to some later point - and also that the ancient text which ‘impacts on’ on the culture of a later period is the same ancient text that we apprehend today. Of course it is never the same text, even leaving aside the problems of transmission. The interaction between a text and its reception in another place, in another time, in another text, is really a dynamic two-way process. That interaction (which has much in common with intertextuality) involves, or is rather constituted by, our own interpretation of it.
Url:
DOI: 10.1017/S0068673500000936
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:B179430DD4EF6123A96B79F56EC1004610996EC3Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>Roman Epic Theatre? Reception, performance, and the poet in Virgil's Aeneid</title>
<author><name sortKey="Laird, Andrew" sort="Laird, Andrew" uniqKey="Laird A" first="Andrew" last="Laird">Andrew Laird</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:B179430DD4EF6123A96B79F56EC1004610996EC3</idno>
<date when="2003" year="2003">2003</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1017/S0068673500000936</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/B179430DD4EF6123A96B79F56EC1004610996EC3/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001A18</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001A18</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">Roman Epic Theatre? Reception, performance, and the poet in Virgil's Aeneid</title>
<author><name sortKey="Laird, Andrew" sort="Laird, Andrew" uniqKey="Laird A" first="Andrew" last="Laird">Andrew Laird</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j">Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">Proc. Camb. Philol. Soc.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0068-6735</idno>
<imprint><publisher>Cambridge University Press</publisher>
<pubPlace>Cambridge, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2003">2003</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">49</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="19">19</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="39">39</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0068-6735</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0068-6735</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass></textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract">Past responses to ancient literature and the reading practices of previous centuries are of central relevance to the contemporary exegesis of Greek and Roman authors. Professional classicists have at last come to recognise this. However, accounts of reception still tend to engage in a traditional form of Nachleben, as they unselfconsciously describe the extent of classical influences on later literary production. This process of influence is not as straightforward as it may first seem. It is often taken for granted in practice, if not in theory, that the movement is in one direction only – from antiquity to some later point - and also that the ancient text which ‘impacts on’ on the culture of a later period is the same ancient text that we apprehend today. Of course it is never the same text, even leaving aside the problems of transmission. The interaction between a text and its reception in another place, in another time, in another text, is really a dynamic two-way process. That interaction (which has much in common with intertextuality) involves, or is rather constituted by, our own interpretation of it.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<istex><corpusName>cambridge</corpusName>
<author><json:item><name>Andrew Laird</name>
</json:item>
</author>
<articleId><json:string>00093</json:string>
</articleId>
<arkIstex>ark:/67375/6GQ-0NS76C9F-H</arkIstex>
<language><json:string>eng</json:string>
</language>
<originalGenre><json:string>research-article</json:string>
</originalGenre>
<abstract>Past responses to ancient literature and the reading practices of previous centuries are of central relevance to the contemporary exegesis of Greek and Roman authors. Professional classicists have at last come to recognise this. However, accounts of reception still tend to engage in a traditional form of Nachleben, as they unselfconsciously describe the extent of classical influences on later literary production. This process of influence is not as straightforward as it may first seem. It is often taken for granted in practice, if not in theory, that the movement is in one direction only – from antiquity to some later point - and also that the ancient text which ‘impacts on’ on the culture of a later period is the same ancient text that we apprehend today. Of course it is never the same text, even leaving aside the problems of transmission. The interaction between a text and its reception in another place, in another time, in another text, is really a dynamic two-way process. That interaction (which has much in common with intertextuality) involves, or is rather constituted by, our own interpretation of it.</abstract>
<qualityIndicators><score>9.22</score>
<pdfWordCount>9482</pdfWordCount>
<pdfCharCount>53993</pdfCharCount>
<pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion>
<pdfPageCount>21</pdfPageCount>
<pdfPageSize>446.4 x 612 pts</pdfPageSize>
<refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative>
<abstractWordCount>185</abstractWordCount>
<abstractCharCount>1124</abstractCharCount>
<keywordCount>0</keywordCount>
</qualityIndicators>
<title>Roman Epic Theatre? Reception, performance, and the poet in Virgil's Aeneid</title>
<pii><json:string>S0068673500000936</json:string>
</pii>
<genre><json:string>research-article</json:string>
</genre>
<host><title>Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society</title>
<language><json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<issn><json:string>0068-6735</json:string>
</issn>
<publisherId><json:string>CCJ</json:string>
</publisherId>
<volume>49</volume>
<pages><first>19</first>
<last>39</last>
<total>21</total>
</pages>
<genre><json:string>journal</json:string>
</genre>
</host>
<ark><json:string>ark:/67375/6GQ-0NS76C9F-H</json:string>
</ark>
<categories><inist><json:string>1 - sciences humaines et sociales</json:string>
</inist>
</categories>
<publicationDate>2003</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>2003</copyrightDate>
<doi><json:string>10.1017/S0068673500000936</json:string>
</doi>
<id>B179430DD4EF6123A96B79F56EC1004610996EC3</id>
<score>1</score>
<fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension>
<original>true</original>
<mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B179430DD4EF6123A96B79F56EC1004610996EC3/fulltext/pdf</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item><extension>zip</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/zip</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B179430DD4EF6123A96B79F56EC1004610996EC3/fulltext/zip</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item><extension>txt</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>text/plain</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B179430DD4EF6123A96B79F56EC1004610996EC3/fulltext/txt</uri>
</json:item>
<istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/B179430DD4EF6123A96B79F56EC1004610996EC3/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a">Roman Epic Theatre? Reception, performance, and the poet in Virgil's Aeneid</title>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority>
<publisher scheme="https://publisher-list.data.istex.fr">Cambridge University Press</publisher>
<pubPlace>Cambridge, UK</pubPlace>
<availability><licence><p>Copyright © The Author(s). Published online by Cambridge University Press 2003</p>
</licence>
<p scheme="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-G3RCRD03-V">cambridge</p>
</availability>
<date>2003</date>
</publicationStmt>
<notesStmt><note type="research-article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</note>
<note type="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note>
</notesStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a">Roman Epic Theatre? Reception, performance, and the poet in Virgil's Aeneid</title>
<author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Andrew</forename>
<surname>Laird</surname>
</persName>
</author>
<idno type="istex">B179430DD4EF6123A96B79F56EC1004610996EC3</idno>
<idno type="ark">ark:/67375/6GQ-0NS76C9F-H</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1017/S0068673500000936</idno>
<idno type="PII">S0068673500000936</idno>
<idno type="article-id">00093</idno>
</analytic>
<monogr><title level="j">Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">Proc. Camb. Philol. Soc.</title>
<idno type="pISSN">0068-6735</idno>
<idno type="publisher-id">CCJ</idno>
<imprint><publisher>Cambridge University Press</publisher>
<pubPlace>Cambridge, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2003"></date>
<biblScope unit="volume">49</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="19">19</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="39">39</biblScope>
</imprint>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><creation><date>2003</date>
</creation>
<langUsage><language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
<abstract style="text-abstract"><p>Past responses to ancient literature and the reading practices of previous centuries are of central relevance to the contemporary exegesis of Greek and Roman authors. Professional classicists have at last come to recognise this. However, accounts of reception still tend to engage in a traditional form of Nachleben, as they unselfconsciously describe the extent of classical influences on later literary production. This process of influence is not as straightforward as it may first seem. It is often taken for granted in practice, if not in theory, that the movement is in one direction only – from antiquity to some later point - and also that the ancient text which ‘impacts on’ on the culture of a later period is the same ancient text that we apprehend today. Of course it is never the same text, even leaving aside the problems of transmission. The interaction between a text and its reception in another place, in another time, in another text, is really a dynamic two-way process. That interaction (which has much in common with intertextuality) involves, or is rather constituted by, our own interpretation of it.</p>
</abstract>
</profileDesc>
<revisionDesc><change when="2003">Published</change>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:fulltextTEI>
</fulltext>
<metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="corpus cambridge not found" wicri:toSee="no header"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"</istex:xmlDeclaration>
<istex:docType PUBLIC="-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.2 20060430//EN" URI="journalpublishing.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType>
<istex:document><article dtd-version="2.2" article-type="research-article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">CCJ</journal-id>
<journal-title>Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title>Proc. Camb. Philol. Soc.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="ppub">0068-6735</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Cambridge University Press</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Cambridge, UK</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S0068673500000936</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="pii">S0068673500000936</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">00093</article-id>
<title-group><article-title>Roman Epic Theatre? Reception, performance, and the poet in Virgil's <italic>Aeneid</italic>
</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running">ANDREW LAIRD</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running">ROMAN EPIC THEATRE?</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib><name><surname>Laird</surname>
<given-names>Andrew</given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub"><year>2003</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>49</volume>
<fpage seq="4">19</fpage>
<lpage>39</lpage>
<permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright © The Author(s). Published online by Cambridge University Press 2003</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2003</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>The Author(s). Published online by Cambridge University Press</copyright-holder>
</permissions>
<abstract abstract-type="text-abstract"><p>Past responses to ancient literature and the reading practices of previous centuries are of central relevance to the contemporary exegesis of Greek and Roman authors. Professional classicists have at last come to recognise this. However, accounts of reception still tend to engage in a traditional form of <italic>Nachleben</italic>
, as they unselfconsciously describe the extent of classical influences on later literary production. This process of influence is not as straightforward as it may first seem. It is often taken for granted in practice, if not in theory, that the movement is in one direction only – from antiquity to some later point - and also that the ancient text which ‘impacts on’ on the culture of a later period is the same ancient text that we apprehend today. Of course it is <italic>never</italic>
the same text, even leaving aside the problems of transmission. The interaction between a text and its reception in another place, in another time, in another text, is really a dynamic two-way process. That interaction (which has much in common with intertextuality) involves, or is rather constituted by, our own interpretation of it.</p>
</abstract>
<counts><page-count count="21"></page-count>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap><custom-meta><meta-name>pdf</meta-name>
<meta-value>S0068673500000936a.pdf</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
<custom-meta><meta-name>series</meta-name>
<meta-value>1</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<back><ref-list><title>BIBLIOGRAPHY</title>
<ref><citation id="ref001" citation-type="journal"><name><surname>Austin</surname>
<given-names>R. G.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1968</year>
) ‘<article-title>Ille ego qui quondam</article-title>
’, <source>CQ</source>
<volume>18</volume>
, <fpage>107</fpage>
–15.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref002" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Austin</surname>
<given-names>R. G.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1964</year>
) <source>P. Vergili Maronis: Aeneidos liber secundus</source>
, <publisher-loc>Oxford</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref003" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Bakhtin</surname>
<given-names>M. M.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1981</year>
) <source>The dialogic imagination</source>
, tr. <name><surname>Emerson</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
and <name><surname>Holquist</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
, <publisher-loc>Austin</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref004" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Benjamin</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1973</year>
) <source>Illuminations</source>
, tr. <name><surname>Zorn</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
, <publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref005" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Benjamin</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1977</year>
) <source>The origin of German tragic drama</source>
, tr. <name><surname>Osborne</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
, <publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref006" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Benjamin</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1998</year>
a) ‘The author as producer’, in <name><surname>Benjamin</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
, <source>Understanding Brecht</source>
, tr. <name><surname>Bostock</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
, <publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>
, <fpage>85</fpage>
–<lpage>103</lpage>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref007" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Benjamin</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1998</year>
b) ‘Conversations with Brecht’, in <name><surname>Benjamin</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
, <source>Understanding Brecht</source>
, <publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>
, <fpage>105</fpage>
–21.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref008" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Benjamin</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1998</year>
c) ‘What is Epic Theatre? [second version]’ (<year>1939</year>
), <source>Understanding Brecht</source>
<publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>
, <fpage>15</fpage>
–<lpage>22</lpage>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref009" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Brecht</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1930</year>
) <source>Versuche</source>
, <publisher-loc>Berlin</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref010" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Brecht</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1965</year>
) <source>The Messingkauf dialogues</source>
, ed./tr. <name><surname>Willets</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
, <publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref011" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Caro</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1950</year>
) ‘Comentadores’, <source>Estudios de critica literaria y grammatical</source>
, vol. <volume>2</volume>
, <publisher-loc>Bogotá</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref012" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Clausen</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1994</year>
) <source>A commentary on Virgil's Eclogues</source>
, <publisher-loc>Oxford</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref013" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Clausen</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1995</year>
) Appendix: ‘Harvard school’, in <name><surname>Horsfall</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
, <source>A companion to the study of Virgil</source>
, <publisher-loc>Leiden</publisher-loc>
, <fpage>313</fpage>
–14.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref014" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Conte</surname>
<given-names>G. B.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1986</year>
) <source>Rhetoric of imitation</source>
, <publisher-loc>Cornell</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref015" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Cooper</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
and <name><surname>Gudeman</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1928</year>
) <source>A bibliography of the ‘Poetics’ of Aristotle</source>
, <publisher-loc>New Haven and London</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref016" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Cranz</surname>
<given-names>F. E.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1971</year>
) <source>A bibliography of Aristotle editions 1501–1600</source>
, <publisher-loc>Baden-Baden</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref017" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Crump</surname>
<given-names>M. M.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1931</year>
) <source>The epyllion from Theocritus to Ovid</source>
, <publisher-loc>Oxford</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref018" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Culler</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1981</year>
) <source>The pursuit of signs: semiotics, literature, deconstruction</source>
, <publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref019" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Curtius</surname>
<given-names>E. R.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1953</year>
) <source>European literature and the Latin Middle Ages</source>
, tr. <name><surname>Trask</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
, <publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref020" citation-type="book"><name><surname>De Jong</surname>
<given-names>I. J. F.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1987</year>
) <source>Narrators and focalizers: the presentation of the story in the Iliad</source>
, <publisher-loc>Amsterdam</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref021" citation-type="journal"><name><surname>De Smet</surname>
<given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1999</year>
) ‘<article-title>Not for classicists? The state of neo-Latin studies</article-title>
’, <source>JRS</source>
<volume>89</volume>
, <fpage>205</fpage>
–9.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref022" citation-type="book"><name><surname>De Smet</surname>
<given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
(<year>2001</year>
) ‘Giants on the shoulders of dwarves? Considerations on the value of Renaissance and early modern scholarship for today's classicists’, in <name><surname>Harrison</surname>
<given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
(ed.) <source>Texts, ideas, and the classics: scholarship, theory and classical literature</source>
, <publisher-loc>Oxford</publisher-loc>
, <fpage>252</fpage>
–64.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref023" citation-type="journal"><name><surname>Feeney</surname>
<given-names>D. C.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1983</year>
) ‘<article-title>The taciturnity of Aeneas</article-title>
’, <source>CQ</source>
<volume>33</volume>
, <fpage>204</fpage>
–19.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref024" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Feeney</surname>
<given-names>D. C.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1991</year>
) <source>The gods in Epic</source>
, <publisher-loc>Oxford</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref025" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Felson</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1994</year>
) <source>Regarding Penelope: from character to poetics</source>
, <publisher-loc>Princeton</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref026" citation-type="thesis"><name><surname>Fenik</surname>
<given-names>B. C.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1960</year>
) ‘The influence of Euripides on Virgil's Aeneid’, PhD thesis, <publisher-name>Princeton University</publisher-name>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref027" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Fornara</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1983</year>
) <source>The nature of history in ancient Greece and Rome</source>
, <publisher-name>Berkeley, Los Angeles and London</publisher-name>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref028" citation-type="journal"><name><surname>Fowler</surname>
<given-names>D. P.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1990</year>
) ‘<article-title>Deviant focalization in Vergil's <italic>Aeneid</italic>
</article-title>
’, <source>PCPS</source>
<volume>216</volume>
. <fpage>42</fpage>
–<lpage>63</lpage>
(= Fowler (2000) 40–63).</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref029" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Fowler</surname>
<given-names>D. P.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>2000</year>
) <source>Roman constructions: readings in postmodern Latin</source>
, <publisher-loc>Oxford</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref030" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Fusillo</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
, <name><surname>Hurst</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
and <name><surname>Paduano</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
(eds.) (<year>1991</year>
) <source>Licofrone: Alessandra</source>
, <publisher-loc>Milan</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref031" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Gamberale</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1991</year>
) ‘Preproemio’. in <source>Enciclopedia Virgiliana</source>
, vol. <volume>4</volume>
, <fpage>259</fpage>
–61, <publisher-loc>Rome</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref032" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Genette</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1980</year>
) <source>Narrative discourse</source>
, tr. <name><surname>Lewin</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
, <publisher-loc>Oxford</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref033" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Goold</surname>
<given-names>G. P.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1992</year>
), ‘The voice of Virgil’, in <name><surname>Woodman</surname>
<given-names>A. J.</given-names>
</name>
and <name><surname>Powell</surname>
<given-names>J. G. F.</given-names>
</name>
(eds.) <source>Author and audience in Latin literature</source>
, <publisher-loc>Cambridge</publisher-loc>
, <fpage>110</fpage>
–23.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref034" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Hardie</surname>
<given-names>P. R.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1993</year>
) <source>The epic successors of Virgil: a study in the dynamics of a tradition</source>
, <publisher-loc>Cambridge</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref035" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Hardie</surname>
<given-names>P. R.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1996</year>
) ‘Virgil and tragedy’, in <name><surname>Martindale</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
(ed.) <source>The Cambridge companion to Virgil</source>
, <publisher-loc>Cambridge</publisher-loc>
, <fpage>312</fpage>
–26.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref036" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Hardie</surname>
<given-names>P. R.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1997</year>
) ‘Closure in Latin epic’, in <name><surname>Roberts</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
. <name><surname>Dunn</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
, and <name><surname>Fowler</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
(eds.). <source>Classical closure: reading the end in Greek and Latin literature</source>
, <publisher-loc>Princeton</publisher-loc>
, <fpage>139</fpage>
–62.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref037" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Harrison</surname>
<given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1991</year>
) <source>Vergil: Aeneid 10</source>
. <publisher-loc>Oxford</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref038" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Heinze</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1999</year>
) <source>Virgil's epic technique</source>
, tr. <name><surname>Harvey</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
. <name><surname>Harvey</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
, and <name><surname>Robertson</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
, <publisher-loc>Bristol</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref039" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Horsfall</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1995</year>
) <source>A companion to the study of Virgil</source>
, <publisher-loc>Leiden</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref040" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Horsfall</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>2000</year>
) <source>Virgil, Aeneid 7: a commentary</source>
, <publisher-loc>Leiden</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref041" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Hutchinson</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1988</year>
) <source>Hellenistic poetry</source>
, <publisher-loc>Oxford</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref042" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Kallendorf</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1989</year>
) <source>In praise of Aeneas: Virgil and epideictic rhetoric in the early Italian Renaissance</source>
, <publisher-loc>Hanover</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref043" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Keller</surname>
<given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1975</year>
) <source>Brecht und der moderne Roman: Auseinandersetzung Brechts mit den Strukturen der Romane Döblins und Kafkas</source>
, <publisher-loc>Bern and Munich</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref044" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Koster</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1988</year>
) <source>Ille ego qui: Dichter zwischen Wort und Macht</source>
, <publisher-loc>Erlangen and Nuremburg</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref045" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Lada</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1996</year>
) ‘Emotion and meaning in tragic performance’, in <name><surname>Silk</surname>
<given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
(ed.) <source>Tragedy and the tragic</source>
, <publisher-loc>Oxford</publisher-loc>
, <fpage>397</fpage>
–<lpage>413</lpage>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref046" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Laird</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1999</year>
) <source>Powers of expression, expressions of power: speech presentation and Latin literature</source>
. <publisher-loc>Oxford</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref047" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Laird</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>2002</year>
a) ‘Authority and ontology of the Muses in epic reception’, in <name><surname>Spentzou</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
and <name><surname>Fowler</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
, <source>Cultivating the Muse</source>
. <publisher-loc>Oxford</publisher-loc>
. <fpage>117</fpage>
–40.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref048" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Laird</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>2002</year>
b) ‘Juan Luis De La Cerda and the predicament of commentary’, in <name><surname>Gibson</surname>
<given-names>R. K.</given-names>
</name>
and <name><surname>Kraus</surname>
<given-names>C. S.</given-names>
</name>
(eds.) <source>The classical commentary: history, practices, theory</source>
, <publisher-loc>Leiden</publisher-loc>
. <fpage>171</fpage>
–<lpage>203</lpage>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref049" citation-type="journal"><name><surname>Laird</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>2002</year>
c) ‘<article-title>Da Virgilio a Góngora: istruzione e innovazione nel commentario di La Cerda</article-title>
’, <source>Umanesimo latino e umanesimo volgare, Studi umanistici Piceni</source>
<volume>22</volume>
, <fpage>219</fpage>
–26.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref050" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Lawrance</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1994</year>
) ‘El comentario de textos, III: después de Nebrija’, in <name><surname>Condoñer</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
and <name><surname>Iglesias</surname>
<given-names>J. González</given-names>
</name>
(eds.) <source>Antonio de Nebrija: edad media y renacimiento</source>
, <publisher-name>Acta Salmanticensia, Estudios filológicos</publisher-name>
<volume>257</volume>
, <fpage>179</fpage>
–93.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref051" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Lessing</surname>
<given-names>G. E.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1766</year>
) <source>Laocöon</source>
, ed. <name><surname>McCormick</surname>
<given-names>E. A.</given-names>
</name>
<year>1962</year>
, <publisher-loc>Indianapolis and New York</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref052" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Macleod</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1983</year>
) ‘Homer on poetry and the poetry of Homer’, in <source>Collected papers</source>
, <publisher-loc>Oxford</publisher-loc>
, <fpage>1</fpage>
–<lpage>15</lpage>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref053" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Martindale</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1993</year>
) <source>Redeeming the text: Latin poetry and the hermeneutics of reception</source>
, <publisher-loc>Cambridge</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref054" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Martindale</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1996</year>
) ‘Reception’, <source>OCD.</source>
<publisher-loc>Oxford</publisher-loc>
, <fpage>1294</fpage>
–5.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref055" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Martindale</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1997</year>
) ‘Introduction: The classic of all Europe’. <name><surname>Martindale</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
(ed.) <source>The Cambridge companion to Virgil</source>
, <publisher-loc>Cambridge</publisher-loc>
, <fpage>1</fpage>
–<lpage>18</lpage>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref056" citation-type="journal"><name><surname>Muecke</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1983</year>
) ‘<article-title>Foreshadowing and dramatic irony in the story of Dido</article-title>
’, <source>AJP</source>
<volume>104</volume>
, <fpage>134</fpage>
–55.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref057" citation-type="journal"><name><surname>Murray</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1981</year>
) ‘<article-title>Poetic inspiration in early Greece</article-title>
’. <source>JHS</source>
<volume>101</volume>
, <fpage>87</fpage>
–<lpage>100</lpage>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref058" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Nicholls</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1989</year>
) <source>Deity and domination: images of God and the state in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries</source>
, <publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref059" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Nietzsche</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1980</year>
) <source>On the advantage and disadvantage of history for life</source>
, tr. <name><surname>Preuss</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
(German orig. <year>1874</year>
) <publisher-loc>Indianapolis</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref060" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Otis</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1964</year>
) <source>Ovid as an epic poet</source>
, <publisher-loc>Cambridge</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref061" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Quint</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1993</year>
) <source>Epic and empire: politics and generic form from Homer to Milton</source>
, <publisher-loc>Princeton</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref062" citation-type="journal"><name><surname>Porter</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>2002</year>
) review of W. R. Johnson. <source>Lucretius and the modern world (2000), Scholia Reviews</source>
n.s. <volume>11</volume>
, <fpage>13</fpage>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref063" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Reinelt</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1994</year>
) <source>After Brecht: British Epic Theatre</source>
, <publisher-loc>Ann Arbor</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref064" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Rousseau</surname>
<given-names>J.-J.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1975</year>
) <source>Du contrat social et autres oeuvres politiques</source>
, ed. <name><surname>Ehrard</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
, <publisher-loc>Paris</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref065" citation-type="journal"><name><surname>Schenkeveld</surname>
<given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1992</year>
) ‘<article-title>Prose usages of Άκούεν “to read”</article-title>
’, <source>CQ</source>
<volume>42</volume>
, <fpage>129</fpage>
–41.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref066" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Segal</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1992</year>
) ‘Bard and audience in Homer’, in <name><surname>Lamberton</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
and <name><surname>Keaney</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
(eds.) <source>Homer's ancient readers: the hermeneutics of Greek epic's earliest exegetes</source>
, <publisher-loc>Princeton</publisher-loc>
, <fpage>3</fpage>
–<lpage>30</lpage>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref067" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Silk</surname>
<given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>2001</year>
) ‘Aristotle, Rapin, Brecht’, in <name><surname>Andersen</surname>
<given-names>Ø.</given-names>
</name>
and <name><surname>Haarberg</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
, <source>Making sense of Aristotle: essays in poetics</source>
, <publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>
, <fpage>173</fpage>
–95.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref068" citation-type="other"><name><surname>Simón-Díaz</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1944</year>
) ‘Notas y commentarios para la biographia del P. Juan de la Cerda’, <italic>Razón y Fe</italic>
, <fpage>424</fpage>
–34.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref069" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Stahl</surname>
<given-names>H.-P.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1998</year>
) <source>Vergil's Aeneid. Augustan epic and political context</source>
, <publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref070" citation-type="journal"><name><surname>Stevens</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1945</year>
) ‘<article-title>Un humaniste espagnol: le père Juan-Luis De La Cerda, commentateur de Virgile</article-title>
’, <source>Les Études Classiques</source>
<volume>13</volume>
, <fpage>210</fpage>
–21.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref071" citation-type="journal"><name><surname>Taplin</surname>
<given-names>O. P.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1986</year>
) ‘<article-title>Fifth-century tragedy and comedy – a <italic>synkrisis</italic>
?</article-title>
’, <source>JHS</source>
<volume>106</volume>
, <fpage>163</fpage>
–74.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref072" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Thomas</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>2001</year>
) <source>Virgil and the Augustan reception</source>
, <publisher-loc>Cambridge</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref073" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Thomson</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
and <name><surname>Sacks</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
(eds.) (<year>1994</year>
) <source>Cambridge companion to Brecht</source>
, <publisher-loc>Cambridge</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref074" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Todorov</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1982</year>
) <source>Theories of the symbol</source>
, <publisher-loc>Ithaca</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref075" citation-type="journal"><name><surname>Van Sickle</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1995</year>
) review of Clausen (1994), <source>Vergilius</source>
<volume>41</volume>
, <fpage>1</fpage>
–<lpage>25</lpage>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref076" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Vogt-Spira</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1990</year>
) <source>Strukturen der Mundlichkeit in der römische Literatur</source>
, <publisher-loc>Tübingen</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref077" citation-type="journal"><name><surname>West</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1983</year>
) ‘<article-title>Notes on the text of Lycophron</article-title>
’, <source>CQ</source>
<volume>33</volume>
, <fpage>113</fpage>
–45.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref078" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Wigodsky</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1972</year>
) <source>Virgil and early Latin poetry, Hermes</source>
<publisher-name>Einzelschriften</publisher-name>
<volume>24</volume>
, <publisher-loc>Wiesbaden</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref079" citation-type="book"><name><surname>Willet</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
(ed.) (<year>1964</year>
) <source>Brecht on theatre: the development of an aesthetic</source>
, <publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>
.</citation>
</ref>
<ref><citation id="ref080" citation-type="journal"><name><surname>Wiseman</surname>
<given-names>T. P.</given-names>
</name>
(<year>1982</year>
) ‘<article-title>Acroasis: a forgotten feature of Roman literature</article-title>
’, <source>Latin teaching</source>
<volume>36.2</volume>
, <fpage>33</fpage>
–7.</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
</istex:document>
</istex:metadataXml>
<mods version="3.6"><titleInfo><title>Roman Epic Theatre? Reception, performance, and the poet in Virgil's Aeneid</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative"><title>ANDREW LAIRD</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA"><title>Roman Epic Theatre? Reception, performance, and the poet in Virgil's Aeneid</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Andrew</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Laird</namePart>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre type="research-article" displayLabel="research-article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</genre>
<originInfo><publisher>Cambridge University Press</publisher>
<place><placeTerm type="text">Cambridge, UK</placeTerm>
</place>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2003</dateIssued>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2003</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
</language>
<abstract type="text-abstract">Past responses to ancient literature and the reading practices of previous centuries are of central relevance to the contemporary exegesis of Greek and Roman authors. Professional classicists have at last come to recognise this. However, accounts of reception still tend to engage in a traditional form of Nachleben, as they unselfconsciously describe the extent of classical influences on later literary production. This process of influence is not as straightforward as it may first seem. It is often taken for granted in practice, if not in theory, that the movement is in one direction only – from antiquity to some later point - and also that the ancient text which ‘impacts on’ on the culture of a later period is the same ancient text that we apprehend today. Of course it is never the same text, even leaving aside the problems of transmission. The interaction between a text and its reception in another place, in another time, in another text, is really a dynamic two-way process. That interaction (which has much in common with intertextuality) involves, or is rather constituted by, our own interpretation of it.</abstract>
<relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Proc. Camb. Philol. Soc.</title>
</titleInfo>
<genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre>
<identifier type="ISSN">0068-6735</identifier>
<identifier type="PublisherID">CCJ</identifier>
<part><date>2003</date>
<detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption>
<number>49</number>
</detail>
<extent unit="pages"><start>19</start>
<end>39</end>
<total>21</total>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="istex">B179430DD4EF6123A96B79F56EC1004610996EC3</identifier>
<identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/6GQ-0NS76C9F-H</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1017/S0068673500000936</identifier>
<identifier type="PII">S0068673500000936</identifier>
<identifier type="ArticleID">00093</identifier>
<accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © The Author(s). Published online by Cambridge University Press 2003</accessCondition>
<recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-G3RCRD03-V">cambridge</recordContentSource>
<recordOrigin>Copyright © The Author(s). Published online by Cambridge University Press 2003</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
<json:item><extension>json</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/json</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B179430DD4EF6123A96B79F56EC1004610996EC3/metadata/json</uri>
</json:item>
</metadata>
<serie></serie>
</istex>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Musique/explor/MusiqueCeltiqueV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001A18 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001A18 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Musique |area= MusiqueCeltiqueV1 |flux= Istex |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:B179430DD4EF6123A96B79F56EC1004610996EC3 |texte= Roman Epic Theatre? Reception, performance, and the poet in Virgil's Aeneid }}
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.38. | ![]() |