Serveur d'exploration sur la musique celtique

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Antiquity in the French constitutional debate in the nineteenth century

Identifieur interne : 000008 ( Hal/Corpus ); précédent : 000007; suivant : 000009

Antiquity in the French constitutional debate in the nineteenth century

Auteurs : Baptiste Delrue

Source :

RBID : Hal:tel-01268152

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

It has been shown that the Greco-Roman antiquity had a very strong influence over the political discourse during the French Revolution. Thus, it seemed interesting to study the political debates of the XIXth and more specifically the constitutional debates, in order to validate or on the contrary to invalidate the commonly accepted view under which the antiquity would have had barely any influence during the XIXth century. Before modern times France experienced numerous revivals of Antiquity, also the question was to find out if there was another revival of the Antiquity under the XIXth century and if this revival was the beginning of something new or the swan song of the influence of the Antiquity. The present analyses propose to understand through a both chronological and thematic study, covering the period from 1814 to 1875, and by combining history of political ideas and history of the institutions, if the Antiquity had an influence on the political debates and the construction of the political models of the XIXth century. Indeed, as early as the first restoration the influence of antiquity already declined as compared to the previous period, but this backflow is in fact limited (the humanities remained in common culture) and also ambivalent (since an antic model such as the hybrid presidential-parliamentary-judicial interested the politicians). However, this led in the second half of the nineteenth century to a scientific neutralization of the Greco-Roman antiquity : its interest and value were put in perspective, because of the desire of the men of the XIXth century to write a national novel (in opposition to Germany), but also because they wanted a new political order based on some modern principles such as Contractualism, Republicanism and Parliamentarianism.

Url:

Links to Exploration step

Hal:tel-01268152

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Antiquity in the French constitutional debate in the nineteenth century</title>
<title xml:lang="fr">L'Antiquité dans les débats constitutionnels français au XIXe siècle</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Delrue, Baptiste" sort="Delrue, Baptiste" uniqKey="Delrue B" first="Baptiste" last="Delrue">Baptiste Delrue</name>
<affiliation>
<hal:affiliation type="laboratory" xml:id="struct-40823" status="VALID">
<orgName>Centre d'Études Internationales sur la Romanité</orgName>
<orgName type="acronym">CEIR</orgName>
<desc>
<address>
<addrLine>45 rue François de Vaux de Foletier F-17042 La Rochelle Cedex 1</addrLine>
<country key="FR"></country>
</address>
<ref type="url">http://ceir.univ-larochelle.fr/</ref>
</desc>
<listRelation>
<relation name="EA4227" active="#struct-300311" type="direct"></relation>
</listRelation>
<tutelles>
<tutelle name="EA4227" active="#struct-300311" type="direct">
<org type="institution" xml:id="struct-300311" status="VALID">
<idno type="IdRef">035375043</idno>
<idno type="ISNI">0000 0001 2169 7335</idno>
<orgName>Université de La Rochelle</orgName>
<orgName type="acronym">ULR</orgName>
<desc>
<address>
<addrLine>Technoforum - 23 avenue Albert Einstein - BP 33060 - 17031 La Rochelle - France</addrLine>
<country key="FR"></country>
</address>
<ref type="url">http://www.univ-larochelle.fr</ref>
</desc>
</org>
</tutelle>
</tutelles>
</hal:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">HAL</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Hal:tel-01268152</idno>
<idno type="halId">tel-01268152</idno>
<idno type="halUri">https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01268152</idno>
<idno type="url">https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01268152</idno>
<date when="2014-12-05">2014-12-05</date>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Hal/Corpus">000008</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">Antiquity in the French constitutional debate in the nineteenth century</title>
<title xml:lang="fr">L'Antiquité dans les débats constitutionnels français au XIXe siècle</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Delrue, Baptiste" sort="Delrue, Baptiste" uniqKey="Delrue B" first="Baptiste" last="Delrue">Baptiste Delrue</name>
<affiliation>
<hal:affiliation type="laboratory" xml:id="struct-40823" status="VALID">
<orgName>Centre d'Études Internationales sur la Romanité</orgName>
<orgName type="acronym">CEIR</orgName>
<desc>
<address>
<addrLine>45 rue François de Vaux de Foletier F-17042 La Rochelle Cedex 1</addrLine>
<country key="FR"></country>
</address>
<ref type="url">http://ceir.univ-larochelle.fr/</ref>
</desc>
<listRelation>
<relation name="EA4227" active="#struct-300311" type="direct"></relation>
</listRelation>
<tutelles>
<tutelle name="EA4227" active="#struct-300311" type="direct">
<org type="institution" xml:id="struct-300311" status="VALID">
<idno type="IdRef">035375043</idno>
<idno type="ISNI">0000 0001 2169 7335</idno>
<orgName>Université de La Rochelle</orgName>
<orgName type="acronym">ULR</orgName>
<desc>
<address>
<addrLine>Technoforum - 23 avenue Albert Einstein - BP 33060 - 17031 La Rochelle - France</addrLine>
<country key="FR"></country>
</address>
<ref type="url">http://www.univ-larochelle.fr</ref>
</desc>
</org>
</tutelle>
</tutelles>
</hal:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="mix" xml:lang="en">
<term>Antiquity</term>
<term>Bonapartism</term>
<term>Caesarism</term>
<term>Celts</term>
<term>Contemporary history</term>
<term>Empire</term>
<term>Legitimism</term>
<term>Liberalism</term>
<term>Monarchy</term>
<term>Nineteenth century</term>
<term>Social catholicism</term>
<term>Socialism</term>
<term>Sovereignty</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="mix" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Antiquité</term>
<term>Barbares</term>
<term>Bonapartisme</term>
<term>Catholicisme social</term>
<term>Celtes</term>
<term>Constitutions</term>
<term>Césarisme</term>
<term>Histoire contemporaine</term>
<term>Libéralisme</term>
<term>Légitimisme</term>
<term>Monarchie</term>
<term>Socialisme</term>
<term>Souveraineté</term>
<term>XIXe siècle</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">It has been shown that the Greco-Roman antiquity had a very strong influence over the political discourse during the French Revolution. Thus, it seemed interesting to study the political debates of the XIXth and more specifically the constitutional debates, in order to validate or on the contrary to invalidate the commonly accepted view under which the antiquity would have had barely any influence during the XIXth century. Before modern times France experienced numerous revivals of Antiquity, also the question was to find out if there was another revival of the Antiquity under the XIXth century and if this revival was the beginning of something new or the swan song of the influence of the Antiquity. The present analyses propose to understand through a both chronological and thematic study, covering the period from 1814 to 1875, and by combining history of political ideas and history of the institutions, if the Antiquity had an influence on the political debates and the construction of the political models of the XIXth century. Indeed, as early as the first restoration the influence of antiquity already declined as compared to the previous period, but this backflow is in fact limited (the humanities remained in common culture) and also ambivalent (since an antic model such as the hybrid presidential-parliamentary-judicial interested the politicians). However, this led in the second half of the nineteenth century to a scientific neutralization of the Greco-Roman antiquity : its interest and value were put in perspective, because of the desire of the men of the XIXth century to write a national novel (in opposition to Germany), but also because they wanted a new political order based on some modern principles such as Contractualism, Republicanism and Parliamentarianism.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<hal api="V3">
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Antiquity in the French constitutional debate in the nineteenth century</title>
<title xml:lang="fr">L'Antiquité dans les débats constitutionnels français au XIXe siècle</title>
<author role="aut">
<persName>
<forename type="first">Baptiste</forename>
<surname>Delrue</surname>
</persName>
<idno type="halauthorid">1287270</idno>
<affiliation ref="#struct-40823"></affiliation>
</author>
<editor role="depositor">
<persName>
<forename>ABES</forename>
<surname>STAR</surname>
</persName>
<email type="md5">f5aa7f563b02bb6adbba7496989af39a</email>
<email type="domain">abes.fr</email>
</editor>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="v1" type="current">
<date type="whenSubmitted">2016-02-04 21:45:07</date>
<date type="whenModified">2018-05-17 05:16:51</date>
<date type="whenReleased">2016-02-05 09:37:42</date>
<date type="whenProduced">2014-12-05</date>
<date type="whenEndEmbargoed">2016-02-04</date>
<ref type="file" target="https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01268152/document">
<date notBefore="2016-02-04"></date>
</ref>
<ref type="file" subtype="author" n="1" target="https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01268152/file/2014Delrue62301.pdf">
<date notBefore="2016-02-04"></date>
</ref>
</edition>
<respStmt>
<resp>contributor</resp>
<name key="131274">
<persName>
<forename>ABES</forename>
<surname>STAR</surname>
</persName>
<email type="md5">f5aa7f563b02bb6adbba7496989af39a</email>
<email type="domain">abes.fr</email>
</name>
</respStmt>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<distributor>CCSD</distributor>
<idno type="halId">tel-01268152</idno>
<idno type="halUri">https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01268152</idno>
<idno type="halBibtex">delrue:tel-01268152</idno>
<idno type="halRefHtml">Droit. Université de La Rochelle, 2014. Français. 〈NNT : 2014LAROD003〉</idno>
<idno type="halRef">Droit. Université de La Rochelle, 2014. Français. 〈NNT : 2014LAROD003〉</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="stamp" n="STAR">STAR - Dépôt national des thèses électroniques</idno>
<idno type="stamp" n="AO-DROIT">Archives ouvertes des Sciences juridiques</idno>
<idno type="stamp" n="SHS">Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</idno>
<idno type="stamp" n="UNIV-ROCHELLE">Université de La Rochelle</idno>
</seriesStmt>
<notesStmt></notesStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">Antiquity in the French constitutional debate in the nineteenth century</title>
<title xml:lang="fr">L'Antiquité dans les débats constitutionnels français au XIXe siècle</title>
<author role="aut">
<persName>
<forename type="first">Baptiste</forename>
<surname>Delrue</surname>
</persName>
<idno type="halauthorid">1287270</idno>
<affiliation ref="#struct-40823"></affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<idno type="nnt">2014LAROD003</idno>
<imprint>
<date type="dateDefended">2014-12-05</date>
</imprint>
<authority type="institution">Université de La Rochelle</authority>
<authority type="school">École doctorale Droit et Science Politique Pierre Couvrat (Poitiers)</authority>
<authority type="supervisor">Jacques Bouineau</authority>
<authority type="supervisor">Philippe Sturmel</authority>
<authority type="jury">Paolo Alvazzi Del Frate [Président]</authority>
<authority type="jury">Stamatios Tzitzis [Rapporteur]</authority>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<profileDesc>
<langUsage>
<language ident="fr">French</language>
</langUsage>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="author">
<term xml:lang="en">Celts</term>
<term xml:lang="en">Caesarism</term>
<term xml:lang="en">Social catholicism</term>
<term xml:lang="en">Bonapartism</term>
<term xml:lang="en">Antiquity</term>
<term xml:lang="en">Nineteenth century</term>
<term xml:lang="en">Empire</term>
<term xml:lang="en">Contemporary history</term>
<term xml:lang="en">Legitimism</term>
<term xml:lang="en">Liberalism</term>
<term xml:lang="en">Monarchy</term>
<term xml:lang="en">Socialism</term>
<term xml:lang="en">Sovereignty</term>
<term xml:lang="fr">Souveraineté</term>
<term xml:lang="fr">Socialisme</term>
<term xml:lang="fr">Monarchie</term>
<term xml:lang="fr">Libéralisme</term>
<term xml:lang="fr">Légitimisme</term>
<term xml:lang="fr">Histoire contemporaine</term>
<term xml:lang="fr">XIXe siècle</term>
<term xml:lang="fr">Constitutions</term>
<term xml:lang="fr">Césarisme</term>
<term xml:lang="fr">Celtes</term>
<term xml:lang="fr">Catholicisme social</term>
<term xml:lang="fr">Bonapartisme</term>
<term xml:lang="fr">Barbares</term>
<term xml:lang="fr">Antiquité</term>
</keywords>
<classCode scheme="halDomain" n="shs.droit">Humanities and Social Sciences/Law</classCode>
<classCode scheme="halTypology" n="THESE">Theses</classCode>
</textClass>
<abstract xml:lang="en">It has been shown that the Greco-Roman antiquity had a very strong influence over the political discourse during the French Revolution. Thus, it seemed interesting to study the political debates of the XIXth and more specifically the constitutional debates, in order to validate or on the contrary to invalidate the commonly accepted view under which the antiquity would have had barely any influence during the XIXth century. Before modern times France experienced numerous revivals of Antiquity, also the question was to find out if there was another revival of the Antiquity under the XIXth century and if this revival was the beginning of something new or the swan song of the influence of the Antiquity. The present analyses propose to understand through a both chronological and thematic study, covering the period from 1814 to 1875, and by combining history of political ideas and history of the institutions, if the Antiquity had an influence on the political debates and the construction of the political models of the XIXth century. Indeed, as early as the first restoration the influence of antiquity already declined as compared to the previous period, but this backflow is in fact limited (the humanities remained in common culture) and also ambivalent (since an antic model such as the hybrid presidential-parliamentary-judicial interested the politicians). However, this led in the second half of the nineteenth century to a scientific neutralization of the Greco-Roman antiquity : its interest and value were put in perspective, because of the desire of the men of the XIXth century to write a national novel (in opposition to Germany), but also because they wanted a new political order based on some modern principles such as Contractualism, Republicanism and Parliamentarianism.</abstract>
<abstract xml:lang="fr">Il a été démontré que l’Antiquité gréco-romaine avait eu une très forte influence sur le discours et la pratique de la Révolution. Il est donc apparu intéressant d’étudier la présence et l’impact des Antiquités (y compris celtique et germanique) dans les débats politiques et, plus particulièrement, constitutionnels au XIXe siècle afin de vérifier la véracité de la position couramment admise selon laquelle l’Antiquité aurait été presque totalement absente. La France a connu, avant l’époque contemporaine, une succession de renaissances de l’Antiquité. Aussi, celle du XIXe siècle a-t-elle constitué une nouvelle illustration de cet éternel recommencement ou a-t-elle incarné le début d’un épuisement ? En s’appuyant sur un plan chrono-thématique couvrant la période allant de 1814 à 1875, la présente analyse combine histoires des idées et des institutions. Comment l’invocation de l’Antiquité dans les débats constitutionnels et les argumentaires politiques a-t-elle influé sur l’évolution des régimes et la transformation des institutions de la France au XIXe siècle ? Dès la Restauration, l’Antiquité gréco-romaine a effectivement connu un recul idéologique par rapport à la période précédente ; cependant, ce reflux ne fut que relatif (les humanités restaient dans la culture commune) et, pour le moins, ambivalent (car des modèles antiques comme celui du régime mixte attiraient). Cela a toutefois conduit, dans la seconde moitié du XIXe siècle, à une neutralisation scientifique de l’Antiquité gréco-romaine : son intérêt et sa valeur furent comme subjectivisés en raison de la volonté de construire un roman national (en opposition à l’Allemagne) et un avenir politique fondé sur des principes résolument modernes (contractualisme, républicanisme, parlementarisme…).</abstract>
</profileDesc>
</hal>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Musique/explor/MusiqueCeltiqueV1/Data/Hal/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000008 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Hal/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000008 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Musique
   |area=    MusiqueCeltiqueV1
   |flux=    Hal
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Hal:tel-01268152
   |texte=   Antiquity in the French constitutional debate in the nineteenth century
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.38.
Data generation: Sat May 29 22:04:25 2021. Site generation: Sat May 29 22:08:31 2021