Immediate Effect of Community Law in the New Member States: Is there a Place for a Consistent Doctrine?
Identifieur interne : 000B02 ( Main/Curation ); précédent : 000B01; suivant : 000B03Immediate Effect of Community Law in the New Member States: Is there a Place for a Consistent Doctrine?
Auteurs : Saulius Lukas KaledaSource :
- European Law Journal [ 1351-5993 ] ; 2004-01.
English descriptors
- Teeft :
- Accession, Austria, Austrian, Austrian court, Austrian government, Austrian legislation, Authorisation procedure, Beck, Blackwell, Blackwell publishing, Case andersson, Case beck, Case commission, Case crispoltoni, Case danisco sugar, Case decker, Case duchon, Case hessische knappschaft, Case irca, Case judgment, Case kauer, Case rumi, Case saldanha, Case stefan, Case westzucker, Cautio iudicatum solvi, Cautious attitude, Certain actions, Certain facts, Certain situations, Characteristic feature, Classic doctrine, Community freedom, Community principle, Community provisions, Community rights, Community rules, Constitutional court, Constitutional tribunal, Contractual certainty argument, Contractual relationships, Contractual situations, Data delecta, Directive, Duchon, Employment contract, Entitlement, Europe agreement, European court, European union, Factual situation, Formal criteria, Formal distinctions, Future effects, General doctrine, General principle, General principles, General rule, General solution, General view, Gewerkschaftsbund, Greater attention, Immediate application, Immediate effect, Interpretative, Jacobs, January, Journal volume, Kauer, Latter argument, Latter concept, Latter conclusion, Legal effects, Legal relationship, Legalistic, Legalistic doctrine, Legitimate expectations, Material time, Member state, Member states, Migrant workers, National court, National courts, National rules, Oberster gerichtshof, Other hand, Other member states, Oxford university press, Past actions, Past date, Past events, Pension entitlement, Practical arguments, Prawo cywilne, Preliminary ruling, Present application, Presumptive rule, Procedural rule, Procedural rules, Procurement rules, Public contracts, Ratione, Relevant conditions, Relevant member state, Retroactive, Retroactive effect, Retroactivity, Roubier, Saldanha, Same reasoning, Scope ratione materiae, Second senate, Social security, Sterreichischer, Sterreichischer gewerkschaftsbund, Strict delimitation, Substantive rules, Substantive situation, Such application, Such cases, Such effect, Such periods, Such situations, Swedish supreme court, Temporal, Temporal application, Temporal aspects, Temporal effect, Temporal scope, Theoretical concept, Transitional rule, Transposition period, Tsiotras case, Wider approach.
Abstract
Abstract: Extension of the acquis to the new Member States raises a number of questions relating to the temporal reach of Community rules. This paper examines a general doctrine underlying the solutions. It presents a classic intertemporal doctrine, which has influenced early jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice. Then, it comments upon the cases brought before the Court in the context of the 1995 enlargement, the entry into force of the EEA Agreement and also the Europe Agreements. These cases evidence substantial differences in the attitudes taken by the national courts, the Advocates General and the Court. One reason for divergence is that the line of reasoning adopted by the Court carries several interpretative difficulties characteristic of the classic doctrine. Secondly, controversies arise in the instances where the Court takes a proactive attitude, which is difficult to reconcile with the traditional scheme. It is argued that greater attention to the structure underlying the reasoning would help to strengthen justification of the Court's solutions and enhance their predictability. This is the more important, as the forthcoming accessions are likely to bring new disputes relating to the effects of Community law in time.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2004.00205.x
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :001732
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :001625
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000897
- to stream Main, to step Merge: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000B02
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:E1AD24B2BA594EB9AA54F038F0B7044D15D327A1Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Immediate Effect of Community Law in the New Member States: Is there a Place for a Consistent Doctrine?</title>
<author><name sortKey="Kaleda, Saulius Lukas" sort="Kaleda, Saulius Lukas" uniqKey="Kaleda S" first="Saulius Lukas" last="Kaleda">Saulius Lukas Kaleda</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:E1AD24B2BA594EB9AA54F038F0B7044D15D327A1</idno>
<date when="2004" year="2004">2004</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1468-0386.2004.00205.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/E1AD24B2BA594EB9AA54F038F0B7044D15D327A1/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001732</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001732</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001625</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000897</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000897</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">1351-5993:2004:Kaleda S:immediate:effect:of</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000B02</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000B02</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Immediate Effect of Community Law in the New Member States: Is there a Place for a Consistent Doctrine?</title>
<author><name sortKey="Kaleda, Saulius Lukas" sort="Kaleda, Saulius Lukas" uniqKey="Kaleda S" first="Saulius Lukas" last="Kaleda">Saulius Lukas Kaleda</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j">European Law Journal</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1351-5993</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1468-0386</idno>
<imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2004-01">2004-01</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">10</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="102">102</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="122">122</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">1351-5993</idno>
</series>
<idno type="istex">E1AD24B2BA594EB9AA54F038F0B7044D15D327A1</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1468-0386.2004.00205.x</idno>
<idno type="ArticleID">EULJ205</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1351-5993</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Accession</term>
<term>Austria</term>
<term>Austrian</term>
<term>Austrian court</term>
<term>Austrian government</term>
<term>Austrian legislation</term>
<term>Authorisation procedure</term>
<term>Beck</term>
<term>Blackwell</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>Case andersson</term>
<term>Case beck</term>
<term>Case commission</term>
<term>Case crispoltoni</term>
<term>Case danisco sugar</term>
<term>Case decker</term>
<term>Case duchon</term>
<term>Case hessische knappschaft</term>
<term>Case irca</term>
<term>Case judgment</term>
<term>Case kauer</term>
<term>Case rumi</term>
<term>Case saldanha</term>
<term>Case stefan</term>
<term>Case westzucker</term>
<term>Cautio iudicatum solvi</term>
<term>Cautious attitude</term>
<term>Certain actions</term>
<term>Certain facts</term>
<term>Certain situations</term>
<term>Characteristic feature</term>
<term>Classic doctrine</term>
<term>Community freedom</term>
<term>Community principle</term>
<term>Community provisions</term>
<term>Community rights</term>
<term>Community rules</term>
<term>Constitutional court</term>
<term>Constitutional tribunal</term>
<term>Contractual certainty argument</term>
<term>Contractual relationships</term>
<term>Contractual situations</term>
<term>Data delecta</term>
<term>Directive</term>
<term>Duchon</term>
<term>Employment contract</term>
<term>Entitlement</term>
<term>Europe agreement</term>
<term>European court</term>
<term>European union</term>
<term>Factual situation</term>
<term>Formal criteria</term>
<term>Formal distinctions</term>
<term>Future effects</term>
<term>General doctrine</term>
<term>General principle</term>
<term>General principles</term>
<term>General rule</term>
<term>General solution</term>
<term>General view</term>
<term>Gewerkschaftsbund</term>
<term>Greater attention</term>
<term>Immediate application</term>
<term>Immediate effect</term>
<term>Interpretative</term>
<term>Jacobs</term>
<term>January</term>
<term>Journal volume</term>
<term>Kauer</term>
<term>Latter argument</term>
<term>Latter concept</term>
<term>Latter conclusion</term>
<term>Legal effects</term>
<term>Legal relationship</term>
<term>Legalistic</term>
<term>Legalistic doctrine</term>
<term>Legitimate expectations</term>
<term>Material time</term>
<term>Member state</term>
<term>Member states</term>
<term>Migrant workers</term>
<term>National court</term>
<term>National courts</term>
<term>National rules</term>
<term>Oberster gerichtshof</term>
<term>Other hand</term>
<term>Other member states</term>
<term>Oxford university press</term>
<term>Past actions</term>
<term>Past date</term>
<term>Past events</term>
<term>Pension entitlement</term>
<term>Practical arguments</term>
<term>Prawo cywilne</term>
<term>Preliminary ruling</term>
<term>Present application</term>
<term>Presumptive rule</term>
<term>Procedural rule</term>
<term>Procedural rules</term>
<term>Procurement rules</term>
<term>Public contracts</term>
<term>Ratione</term>
<term>Relevant conditions</term>
<term>Relevant member state</term>
<term>Retroactive</term>
<term>Retroactive effect</term>
<term>Retroactivity</term>
<term>Roubier</term>
<term>Saldanha</term>
<term>Same reasoning</term>
<term>Scope ratione materiae</term>
<term>Second senate</term>
<term>Social security</term>
<term>Sterreichischer</term>
<term>Sterreichischer gewerkschaftsbund</term>
<term>Strict delimitation</term>
<term>Substantive rules</term>
<term>Substantive situation</term>
<term>Such application</term>
<term>Such cases</term>
<term>Such effect</term>
<term>Such periods</term>
<term>Such situations</term>
<term>Swedish supreme court</term>
<term>Temporal</term>
<term>Temporal application</term>
<term>Temporal aspects</term>
<term>Temporal effect</term>
<term>Temporal scope</term>
<term>Theoretical concept</term>
<term>Transitional rule</term>
<term>Transposition period</term>
<term>Tsiotras case</term>
<term>Wider approach</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract">Abstract: Extension of the acquis to the new Member States raises a number of questions relating to the temporal reach of Community rules. This paper examines a general doctrine underlying the solutions. It presents a classic intertemporal doctrine, which has influenced early jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice. Then, it comments upon the cases brought before the Court in the context of the 1995 enlargement, the entry into force of the EEA Agreement and also the Europe Agreements. These cases evidence substantial differences in the attitudes taken by the national courts, the Advocates General and the Court. One reason for divergence is that the line of reasoning adopted by the Court carries several interpretative difficulties characteristic of the classic doctrine. Secondly, controversies arise in the instances where the Court takes a proactive attitude, which is difficult to reconcile with the traditional scheme. It is argued that greater attention to the structure underlying the reasoning would help to strengthen justification of the Court's solutions and enhance their predictability. This is the more important, as the forthcoming accessions are likely to bring new disputes relating to the effects of Community law in time.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sarre/explor/MusicSarreV3/Data/Main/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000B02 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000B02 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Sarre |area= MusicSarreV3 |flux= Main |étape= Curation |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:E1AD24B2BA594EB9AA54F038F0B7044D15D327A1 |texte= Immediate Effect of Community Law in the New Member States: Is there a Place for a Consistent Doctrine? }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |