Serveur d'exploration sur Mozart

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Another Go at Musical Profundity: Stephen Davies and the Game of Chess

Identifieur interne : 002E66 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 002E65; suivant : 002E67

Another Go at Musical Profundity: Stephen Davies and the Game of Chess

Auteurs : Peter Kivy

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:9FDF25CDBDD2063F9CCEE4A3CDFBF1AF5673EBB1

Abstract

I have argued previously that the art of absolute music, unlike, for example, the art of literature, is not capable of profundity, which I characterized as treating a profound subject matter, at the highest artistic level, in a manner appropriate to its profundity. Stephen Davies has recently argued that there is another way of being profound, which he calls non‐propositional profundity, and for which chess provides his principal example. He argues, further, that absolute music also exhibits this non‐propositional profundity. I argue in the present paper that Davies's attempt to rescue profundity for absolute music will not work, because it does not allow what I take to be the crucial distinction between great works of absolute music that are profound and great works of absolute music that are not. In other words, it has the unwelcome implication that all great works of absolute music are profound works.

Url:
DOI: 10.1093/bjaesthetics/43.4.401

Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:9FDF25CDBDD2063F9CCEE4A3CDFBF1AF5673EBB1

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Another Go at Musical Profundity: Stephen Davies and the Game of Chess</title>
<author wicri:is="90%">
<name sortKey="Kivy, Peter" sort="Kivy, Peter" uniqKey="Kivy P" first="Peter" last="Kivy">Peter Kivy</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Department of Philosophy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, USA</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:9FDF25CDBDD2063F9CCEE4A3CDFBF1AF5673EBB1</idno>
<date when="2003" year="2003">2003</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1093/bjaesthetics/43.4.401</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/9FDF25CDBDD2063F9CCEE4A3CDFBF1AF5673EBB1/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002E66</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Another Go at Musical Profundity: Stephen Davies and the Game of Chess</title>
<author wicri:is="90%">
<name sortKey="Kivy, Peter" sort="Kivy, Peter" uniqKey="Kivy P" first="Peter" last="Kivy">Peter Kivy</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Department of Philosophy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, USA</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">The British Journal of Aesthetics</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">Brit J Aesthetics</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0007-0904</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1468-2842</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher>
<date type="published" when="2003-10">2003-10</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">43</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="401">401</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="411">411</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0007-0904</idno>
</series>
<idno type="istex">9FDF25CDBDD2063F9CCEE4A3CDFBF1AF5673EBB1</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1093/bjaesthetics/43.4.401</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0007-0904</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">I have argued previously that the art of absolute music, unlike, for example, the art of literature, is not capable of profundity, which I characterized as treating a profound subject matter, at the highest artistic level, in a manner appropriate to its profundity. Stephen Davies has recently argued that there is another way of being profound, which he calls non‐propositional profundity, and for which chess provides his principal example. He argues, further, that absolute music also exhibits this non‐propositional profundity. I argue in the present paper that Davies's attempt to rescue profundity for absolute music will not work, because it does not allow what I take to be the crucial distinction between great works of absolute music that are profound and great works of absolute music that are not. In other words, it has the unwelcome implication that all great works of absolute music are profound works.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<istex>
<corpusName>oup</corpusName>
<author>
<json:item>
<name>Peter Kivy</name>
<affiliations>
<json:string>Department of Philosophy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, USA</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
</author>
<subject>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>Paper</value>
</json:item>
</subject>
<language>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</language>
<abstract>I have argued previously that the art of absolute music, unlike, for example, the art of literature, is not capable of profundity, which I characterized as treating a profound subject matter, at the highest artistic level, in a manner appropriate to its profundity. Stephen Davies has recently argued that there is another way of being profound, which he calls non‐propositional profundity, and for which chess provides his principal example. He argues, further, that absolute music also exhibits this non‐propositional profundity. I argue in the present paper that Davies's attempt to rescue profundity for absolute music will not work, because it does not allow what I take to be the crucial distinction between great works of absolute music that are profound and great works of absolute music that are not. In other words, it has the unwelcome implication that all great works of absolute music are profound works.</abstract>
<qualityIndicators>
<score>7.264</score>
<pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion>
<pdfPageSize>433.72 x 662 pts</pdfPageSize>
<refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative>
<keywordCount>1</keywordCount>
<abstractCharCount>917</abstractCharCount>
<pdfWordCount>5070</pdfWordCount>
<pdfCharCount>26929</pdfCharCount>
<pdfPageCount>11</pdfPageCount>
<abstractWordCount>147</abstractWordCount>
</qualityIndicators>
<title>Another Go at Musical Profundity: Stephen Davies and the Game of Chess</title>
<genre>
<json:string>research-article</json:string>
</genre>
<host>
<volume>43</volume>
<pages>
<last>411</last>
<first>401</first>
</pages>
<issn>
<json:string>0007-0904</json:string>
</issn>
<issue>4</issue>
<genre></genre>
<language>
<json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<eissn>
<json:string>1468-2842</json:string>
</eissn>
<title>The British Journal of Aesthetics</title>
</host>
<categories>
<wos>
<json:string>HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY</json:string>
</wos>
</categories>
<publicationDate>2003</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>2003</copyrightDate>
<doi>
<json:string>10.1093/bjaesthetics/43.4.401</json:string>
</doi>
<id>9FDF25CDBDD2063F9CCEE4A3CDFBF1AF5673EBB1</id>
<fulltext>
<json:item>
<original>true</original>
<mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype>
<extension>pdf</extension>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/9FDF25CDBDD2063F9CCEE4A3CDFBF1AF5673EBB1/fulltext/pdf</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/zip</mimetype>
<extension>zip</extension>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/9FDF25CDBDD2063F9CCEE4A3CDFBF1AF5673EBB1/fulltext/zip</uri>
</json:item>
<istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/9FDF25CDBDD2063F9CCEE4A3CDFBF1AF5673EBB1/fulltext/tei">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Another Go at Musical Profundity: Stephen Davies and the Game of Chess</title>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>ISTEX</authority>
<publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher>
<availability>
<p>OUP</p>
</availability>
<date>2003</date>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct type="inbook">
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Another Go at Musical Profundity: Stephen Davies and the Game of Chess</title>
<author>
<persName>
<forename type="first">Peter</forename>
<surname>Kivy</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Department of Philosophy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, USA</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<title level="j">The British Journal of Aesthetics</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">Brit J Aesthetics</title>
<idno type="JournalID">aesthj</idno>
<idno type="pISSN">0007-0904</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1468-2842</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher>
<date type="published" when="2003-10"></date>
<biblScope unit="volume">43</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="401">401</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="411">411</biblScope>
</imprint>
</monogr>
<idno type="istex">9FDF25CDBDD2063F9CCEE4A3CDFBF1AF5673EBB1</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1093/bjaesthetics/43.4.401</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<creation>
<date>2003</date>
</creation>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
<abstract xml:lang="en">
<p>I have argued previously that the art of absolute music, unlike, for example, the art of literature, is not capable of profundity, which I characterized as treating a profound subject matter, at the highest artistic level, in a manner appropriate to its profundity. Stephen Davies has recently argued that there is another way of being profound, which he calls non‐propositional profundity, and for which chess provides his principal example. He argues, further, that absolute music also exhibits this non‐propositional profundity. I argue in the present paper that Davies's attempt to rescue profundity for absolute music will not work, because it does not allow what I take to be the crucial distinction between great works of absolute music that are profound and great works of absolute music that are not. In other words, it has the unwelcome implication that all great works of absolute music are profound works.</p>
</abstract>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="keyword">
<list>
<head>heading</head>
<item>
<term>Paper</term>
</item>
</list>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
<revisionDesc>
<change when="2003-10">Published</change>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:fulltextTEI>
<json:item>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>text/plain</mimetype>
<extension>txt</extension>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/9FDF25CDBDD2063F9CCEE4A3CDFBF1AF5673EBB1/fulltext/txt</uri>
</json:item>
</fulltext>
<metadata>
<istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="corpus oup" wicri:toSee="no header">
<istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"</istex:xmlDeclaration>
<istex:docType PUBLIC="-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" URI="journalpublishing.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType>
<istex:document>
<article xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">aesthj</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="hwp">aesthj</journal-id>
<journal-title>The British Journal of Aesthetics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">Brit J Aesthetics</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="ppub">0007-0904</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">1468-2842</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Oxford University Press</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bjaesthetics/43.4.401</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="other">430401</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Paper</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Another Go at Musical Profundity: Stephen Davies and the Game of Chess</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kivy</surname>
<given-names>Peter</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="AFF1">1</xref>
</contrib>
<aff>
<target target-type="aff" id="AFF1"></target>
<label>1</label>
Department of Philosophy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, USA</aff>
</contrib-group>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<month>10</month>
<year>2003</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>43</volume>
<issue>4</issue>
<fpage>401</fpage>
<lpage>411</lpage>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright British Society of Aesthetics Press 2003</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2003</copyright-year>
</permissions>
<abstract xml:lang="en">
<p>I have argued previously that the art of absolute music, unlike, for example, the art of literature, is not capable of profundity, which I characterized as treating a profound subject matter, at the highest artistic level, in a manner appropriate to its profundity. Stephen Davies has recently argued that there is another way of being profound, which he calls non‐propositional profundity, and for which chess provides his principal example. He argues, further, that absolute music also exhibits this non‐propositional profundity. I argue in the present paper that Davies's attempt to rescue profundity for absolute music will not work, because it does not allow what I take to be the crucial distinction between great works of absolute music that
<italic>are</italic>
profound and great works of absolute music that are
<italic>not</italic>
. In other words, it has the unwelcome implication that all great works of absolute music are profound works.</p>
</abstract>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>hwp-legacy-fpage</meta-name>
<meta-value>401</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>hwp-legacy-dochead</meta-name>
<meta-value>Paper</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
</article>
</istex:document>
</istex:metadataXml>
<mods version="3.6">
<titleInfo lang="en">
<title>Another Go at Musical Profundity: Stephen Davies and the Game of Chess</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative" lang="en" contentType="CDATA">
<title>Another Go at Musical Profundity: Stephen Davies and the Game of Chess</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Peter</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Kivy</namePart>
<affiliation>Department of Philosophy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, USA</affiliation>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre type="research-article">research-article</genre>
<subject>
<genre>heading</genre>
<topic>Paper</topic>
</subject>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2003-10</dateIssued>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2003</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription>
<internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType>
</physicalDescription>
<abstract lang="en">I have argued previously that the art of absolute music, unlike, for example, the art of literature, is not capable of profundity, which I characterized as treating a profound subject matter, at the highest artistic level, in a manner appropriate to its profundity. Stephen Davies has recently argued that there is another way of being profound, which he calls non‐propositional profundity, and for which chess provides his principal example. He argues, further, that absolute music also exhibits this non‐propositional profundity. I argue in the present paper that Davies's attempt to rescue profundity for absolute music will not work, because it does not allow what I take to be the crucial distinction between great works of absolute music that are profound and great works of absolute music that are not. In other words, it has the unwelcome implication that all great works of absolute music are profound works.</abstract>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>The British Journal of Aesthetics</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="abbreviated">
<title>Brit J Aesthetics</title>
</titleInfo>
<identifier type="ISSN">0007-0904</identifier>
<identifier type="eISSN">1468-2842</identifier>
<identifier type="JournalID">aesthj</identifier>
<identifier type="JournalID-hwp">aesthj</identifier>
<part>
<date>2003</date>
<detail type="volume">
<caption>vol.</caption>
<number>43</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue">
<caption>no.</caption>
<number>4</number>
</detail>
<extent unit="pages">
<start>401</start>
<end>411</end>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="istex">9FDF25CDBDD2063F9CCEE4A3CDFBF1AF5673EBB1</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1093/bjaesthetics/43.4.401</identifier>
<accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="Copyright">Copyright British Society of Aesthetics Press 2003</accessCondition>
<recordInfo>
<recordContentSource>OUP</recordContentSource>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
</metadata>
<enrichments>
<istex:catWosTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/9FDF25CDBDD2063F9CCEE4A3CDFBF1AF5673EBB1/enrichments/catWos">
<teiHeader>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<classCode scheme="WOS">HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY</classCode>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:catWosTEI>
</enrichments>
<serie></serie>
</istex>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Musique/explor/MozartV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002E66 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002E66 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Musique
   |area=    MozartV1
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:9FDF25CDBDD2063F9CCEE4A3CDFBF1AF5673EBB1
   |texte=   Another Go at Musical Profundity: Stephen Davies and the Game of Chess
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.20.
Data generation: Sun Apr 10 15:06:14 2016. Site generation: Tue Feb 7 15:40:35 2023