Perception of the most creative Chinese by undergraduates in Beijing, Guangzhou, Hong Kong, and Taipei
Identifieur interne : 001427 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001426; suivant : 001428Perception of the most creative Chinese by undergraduates in Beijing, Guangzhou, Hong Kong, and Taipei
Auteurs : Xiao Dong Yue ; Elisabeth RudowiczSource :
- The Journal of Creative Behavior [ 0022-0175 ] ; 2002-06.
Abstract
This study surveys 489 undergraduates in Beijing, Guangzhou, Hong Kong and Taipei about their nomination of most creative Chinese people in history and in modern times. Politicians were nominated by all four samples as being the most creative individuals in the past and at present. Scientists and inventors ranked second in position. Taken together, they occupy over 90 percent of the total number of nominations. Artists, musicians and businessmen are rarely nominated. More than half of the reasons given for nominating these people are not directly related to creativity. This finding is attributed to a strong utilitarian view of creativity that lies in Chinese young people's perception of creativity. They are much more concerned with a creator's social influence or contribution in society than with his or her innovativeness in thinking. The paper concludes by addressing some methodological implications for further studies on the issue.
Url:
DOI: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.2002.tb01058.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:E241C187B4BC6344D8927506715F9E55FB717C6ALe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Perception of the most creative Chinese by undergraduates in Beijing, Guangzhou, Hong Kong, and Taipei</title><author><name sortKey="Yue, Xiao Dong" sort="Yue, Xiao Dong" uniqKey="Yue X" first="Xiao Dong" last="Yue">Xiao Dong Yue</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Applied Social Studies, City University of Hong Kong, 81 Chee Avenue, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, SAR China</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Rudowicz, Elisabeth" sort="Rudowicz, Elisabeth" uniqKey="Rudowicz E" first="Elisabeth" last="Rudowicz">Elisabeth Rudowicz</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Applied Social Studies, City University of Hong Kong, 81 Chee Avenue, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, SAR China</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:E241C187B4BC6344D8927506715F9E55FB717C6A</idno><date when="2002" year="2002">2002</date><idno type="doi">10.1002/j.2162-6057.2002.tb01058.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/E241C187B4BC6344D8927506715F9E55FB717C6A/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001427</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Perception of the most creative Chinese by undergraduates in Beijing, Guangzhou, Hong Kong, and Taipei</title><author><name sortKey="Yue, Xiao Dong" sort="Yue, Xiao Dong" uniqKey="Yue X" first="Xiao Dong" last="Yue">Xiao Dong Yue</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Applied Social Studies, City University of Hong Kong, 81 Chee Avenue, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, SAR China</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Rudowicz, Elisabeth" sort="Rudowicz, Elisabeth" uniqKey="Rudowicz E" first="Elisabeth" last="Rudowicz">Elisabeth Rudowicz</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Applied Social Studies, City University of Hong Kong, 81 Chee Avenue, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, SAR China</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">The Journal of Creative Behavior</title><idno type="ISSN">0022-0175</idno><idno type="eISSN">2162-6057</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2002-06">2002-06</date><biblScope unit="volume">36</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="88">88</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="104">104</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0022-0175</idno></series><idno type="istex">E241C187B4BC6344D8927506715F9E55FB717C6A</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/j.2162-6057.2002.tb01058.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">JOCB1058</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0022-0175</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This study surveys 489 undergraduates in Beijing, Guangzhou, Hong Kong and Taipei about their nomination of most creative Chinese people in history and in modern times. Politicians were nominated by all four samples as being the most creative individuals in the past and at present. Scientists and inventors ranked second in position. Taken together, they occupy over 90 percent of the total number of nominations. Artists, musicians and businessmen are rarely nominated. More than half of the reasons given for nominating these people are not directly related to creativity. This finding is attributed to a strong utilitarian view of creativity that lies in Chinese young people's perception of creativity. They are much more concerned with a creator's social influence or contribution in society than with his or her innovativeness in thinking. The paper concludes by addressing some methodological implications for further studies on the issue.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>XIAO DONG YUE</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Applied Social Studies, City University of Hong Kong, 81 Chee Avenue, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, SAR China</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>ELISABETH RUDOWICZ</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Applied Social Studies, City University of Hong Kong, 81 Chee Avenue, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, SAR China</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><abstract>This study surveys 489 undergraduates in Beijing, Guangzhou, Hong Kong and Taipei about their nomination of most creative Chinese people in history and in modern times. Politicians were nominated by all four samples as being the most creative individuals in the past and at present. Scientists and inventors ranked second in position. Taken together, they occupy over 90 percent of the total number of nominations. Artists, musicians and businessmen are rarely nominated. More than half of the reasons given for nominating these people are not directly related to creativity. This finding is attributed to a strong utilitarian view of creativity that lies in Chinese young people's perception of creativity. They are much more concerned with a creator's social influence or contribution in society than with his or her innovativeness in thinking. The paper concludes by addressing some methodological implications for further studies on the issue.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.21</score><pdfVersion>1.6</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>486 x 702 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><keywordCount>0</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>947</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>4970</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>32782</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>17</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>145</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Perception of the most creative Chinese by undergraduates in Beijing, Guangzhou, Hong Kong, and Taipei</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>36</volume><pages><total>17</total><last>104</last><first>88</first></pages><issn><json:string>0022-0175</json:string></issn><issue>2</issue><genre></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>2162-6057</json:string></eissn><title>The Journal of Creative Behavior</title><doi><json:string>10.1002/(ISSN)2162-6057</json:string></doi></host><publicationDate>2002</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2002</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1002/j.2162-6057.2002.tb01058.x</json:string></doi><id>E241C187B4BC6344D8927506715F9E55FB717C6A</id><fulltext><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E241C187B4BC6344D8927506715F9E55FB717C6A/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><extension>zip</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E241C187B4BC6344D8927506715F9E55FB717C6A/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/E241C187B4BC6344D8927506715F9E55FB717C6A/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Perception of the most creative Chinese by undergraduates in Beijing, Guangzhou, Hong Kong, and Taipei</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>WILEY</p></availability><date>2002</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Perception of the most creative Chinese by undergraduates in Beijing, Guangzhou, Hong Kong, and Taipei</title><author><persName><forename type="first">XIAO DONG</forename><surname>YUE</surname></persName><note type="correspondence"><p>Correspondence:</p></note><affiliation>Department of Applied Social Studies, City University of Hong Kong, 81 Chee Avenue, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, SAR China</affiliation></author><author><persName><forename type="first">ELISABETH</forename><surname>RUDOWICZ</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Applied Social Studies, City University of Hong Kong, 81 Chee Avenue, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, SAR China</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">The Journal of Creative Behavior</title><idno type="pISSN">0022-0175</idno><idno type="eISSN">2162-6057</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)2162-6057</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2002-06"></date><biblScope unit="volume">36</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="88">88</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="104">104</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">E241C187B4BC6344D8927506715F9E55FB717C6A</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/j.2162-6057.2002.tb01058.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">JOCB1058</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2002</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This study surveys 489 undergraduates in Beijing, Guangzhou, Hong Kong and Taipei about their nomination of most creative Chinese people in history and in modern times. Politicians were nominated by all four samples as being the most creative individuals in the past and at present. Scientists and inventors ranked second in position. Taken together, they occupy over 90 percent of the total number of nominations. Artists, musicians and businessmen are rarely nominated. More than half of the reasons given for nominating these people are not directly related to creativity. This finding is attributed to a strong utilitarian view of creativity that lies in Chinese young people's perception of creativity. They are much more concerned with a creator's social influence or contribution in society than with his or her innovativeness in thinking. The paper concludes by addressing some methodological implications for further studies on the issue.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2002-06">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><extension>txt</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E241C187B4BC6344D8927506715F9E55FB717C6A/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1002/(ISSN)2162-6057</doi><issn type="print">0022-0175</issn><issn type="electronic">2162-6057</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JOCB"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL OF CREATIVE BEHAVIOR, THE">The Journal of Creative Behavior</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="06102"><doi origin="wiley">10.1002/jocb.2002.36.issue-2</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="36">36</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="2">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2002-06">June 2002</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="2" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1002/j.2162-6057.2002.tb01058.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JOCB1058"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="17"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Article</title></titleGroup><copyright>2002 Creative Education Foundation</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.10 mode:FullText" date="2011-11-10"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2011-12-22"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2011-12-22"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-31"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-11-04"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="88">88</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="104">104</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><email>ssxdyue@cityu.edu.hk</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JOCB.JOCB1058.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="referenceTotal" number="36"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="3"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Perception of the most creative Chinese by undergraduates in Beijing, Guangzhou, Hong Kong, and Taipei</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>XIAO DONG</givenNames><familyName>YUE</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>ELISABETH</givenNames><familyName>RUDOWICZ</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Applied Social Studies, City University of Hong Kong, 81 Chee Avenue, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, SAR China</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>This study surveys 489 undergraduates in Beijing, Guangzhou, Hong Kong and Taipei about their nomination of most creative Chinese people in history and in modern times. Politicians were nominated by all four samples as being the most creative individuals in the past and at present. Scientists and inventors ranked second in position. Taken together, they occupy over 90 percent of the total number of nominations. Artists, musicians and businessmen are rarely nominated. More than half of the reasons given for nominating these people are not directly related to creativity. This finding is attributed to a strong utilitarian view of creativity that lies in Chinese young people's perception of creativity. They are much more concerned with a creator's social influence or contribution in society than with his or her innovativeness in thinking. The paper concludes by addressing some methodological implications for further studies on the issue.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Perception of the most creative Chinese by undergraduates in Beijing, Guangzhou, Hong Kong, and Taipei</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Perception of the most creative Chinese by undergraduates in Beijing, Guangzhou, Hong Kong, and Taipei</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">XIAO DONG</namePart><namePart type="family">YUE</namePart><affiliation>Department of Applied Social Studies, City University of Hong Kong, 81 Chee Avenue, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, SAR China</affiliation><description>Correspondence: </description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">ELISABETH</namePart><namePart type="family">RUDOWICZ</namePart><affiliation>Department of Applied Social Studies, City University of Hong Kong, 81 Chee Avenue, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, SAR China</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2002-06</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2002</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="references">36</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">This study surveys 489 undergraduates in Beijing, Guangzhou, Hong Kong and Taipei about their nomination of most creative Chinese people in history and in modern times. Politicians were nominated by all four samples as being the most creative individuals in the past and at present. Scientists and inventors ranked second in position. Taken together, they occupy over 90 percent of the total number of nominations. Artists, musicians and businessmen are rarely nominated. More than half of the reasons given for nominating these people are not directly related to creativity. This finding is attributed to a strong utilitarian view of creativity that lies in Chinese young people's perception of creativity. They are much more concerned with a creator's social influence or contribution in society than with his or her innovativeness in thinking. The paper concludes by addressing some methodological implications for further studies on the issue.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>The Journal of Creative Behavior</title></titleInfo><identifier type="ISSN">0022-0175</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">2162-6057</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)2162-6057</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JOCB</identifier><part><date>2002</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>36</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>88</start><end>104</end><total>17</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">E241C187B4BC6344D8927506715F9E55FB717C6A</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/j.2162-6057.2002.tb01058.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JOCB1058</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">2002 Creative Education Foundation</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Musique/explor/MozartV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001427 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001427 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Musique
|area= MozartV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:E241C187B4BC6344D8927506715F9E55FB717C6A
|texte= Perception of the most creative Chinese by undergraduates in Beijing, Guangzhou, Hong Kong, and Taipei
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.20. |  |