HISTORY AS THE MAIN COMPLAINT: WILLIAM KENTRIDGE AND THE MAKING OF POST‐APARTHEID SOUTH AFRICA
Identifieur interne : 000565 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000564; suivant : 000566HISTORY AS THE MAIN COMPLAINT: WILLIAM KENTRIDGE AND THE MAKING OF POST‐APARTHEID SOUTH AFRICA
Auteurs : Jessica Dubow ; Ruth RosengartenSource :
- Art History [ 0141-6790 ] ; 2004-09.
Abstract
This essay considers the relation of history to memory in the process of radical political change. Looking at the work of William Kentridge in the context of South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission, it argues the ways that the language of nation‐building fails to account for the experience of trauma as it resists absorption into the structures of historical time and the ‘talking cure’. In particular, it considers how Kentridge's unique graphic techniques of film animation contest the logic of closure, recovery and renewal that the political and psychic imperatives of ‘new’ nationhood seem to demand. In the radical upheaval to which he submits visuality as much as chronology and teleology, and in the eruption of historical debris through the visual surface, his work disables all sense of resolution.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.0141-6790.2004.00443.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:069B4E3758069763754F38E350B243E2CBFE82B1Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">HISTORY AS THE MAIN COMPLAINT: WILLIAM KENTRIDGE AND THE MAKING OF POST‐APARTHEID SOUTH AFRICA</title><author><name sortKey="Dubow, Jessica" sort="Dubow, Jessica" uniqKey="Dubow J" first="Jessica" last="Dubow">Jessica Dubow</name></author><author><name sortKey="Rosengarten, Ruth" sort="Rosengarten, Ruth" uniqKey="Rosengarten R" first="Ruth" last="Rosengarten">Ruth Rosengarten</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:069B4E3758069763754F38E350B243E2CBFE82B1</idno><date when="2004" year="2004">2004</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.0141-6790.2004.00443.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/069B4E3758069763754F38E350B243E2CBFE82B1/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000565</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">HISTORY AS THE MAIN COMPLAINT: WILLIAM KENTRIDGE AND THE MAKING OF POST‐APARTHEID SOUTH AFRICA</title><author><name sortKey="Dubow, Jessica" sort="Dubow, Jessica" uniqKey="Dubow J" first="Jessica" last="Dubow">Jessica Dubow</name></author><author><name sortKey="Rosengarten, Ruth" sort="Rosengarten, Ruth" uniqKey="Rosengarten R" first="Ruth" last="Rosengarten">Ruth Rosengarten</name></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Art History</title><idno type="ISSN">0141-6790</idno><idno type="eISSN">1467-8365</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2004-09">2004-09</date><biblScope unit="volume">27</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="671">671</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="690">690</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0141-6790</idno></series><idno type="istex">069B4E3758069763754F38E350B243E2CBFE82B1</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.0141-6790.2004.00443.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">AHIS443</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0141-6790</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This essay considers the relation of history to memory in the process of radical political change. Looking at the work of William Kentridge in the context of South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission, it argues the ways that the language of nation‐building fails to account for the experience of trauma as it resists absorption into the structures of historical time and the ‘talking cure’. In particular, it considers how Kentridge's unique graphic techniques of film animation contest the logic of closure, recovery and renewal that the political and psychic imperatives of ‘new’ nationhood seem to demand. In the radical upheaval to which he submits visuality as much as chronology and teleology, and in the eruption of historical debris through the visual surface, his work disables all sense of resolution.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Jessica Dubow</name></json:item><json:item><name>Ruth Rosengarten</name></json:item></author><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><abstract>This essay considers the relation of history to memory in the process of radical political change. Looking at the work of William Kentridge in the context of South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission, it argues the ways that the language of nation‐building fails to account for the experience of trauma as it resists absorption into the structures of historical time and the ‘talking cure’. In particular, it considers how Kentridge's unique graphic techniques of film animation contest the logic of closure, recovery and renewal that the political and psychic imperatives of ‘new’ nationhood seem to demand. In the radical upheaval to which he submits visuality as much as chronology and teleology, and in the eruption of historical debris through the visual surface, his work disables all sense of resolution.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.548</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>485 x 697 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><keywordCount>0</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>820</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>7856</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>40653</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>20</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>129</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>HISTORY AS THE MAIN COMPLAINT: WILLIAM KENTRIDGE AND THE MAKING OF POST‐APARTHEID SOUTH AFRICA</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>27</volume><pages><total>20</total><last>690</last><first>671</first></pages><issn><json:string>0141-6790</json:string></issn><issue>4</issue><genre></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1467-8365</json:string></eissn><title>Art History</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1467-8365</json:string></doi></host><publicationDate>2004</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2004</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.0141-6790.2004.00443.x</json:string></doi><id>069B4E3758069763754F38E350B243E2CBFE82B1</id><fulltext><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/069B4E3758069763754F38E350B243E2CBFE82B1/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><extension>zip</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/069B4E3758069763754F38E350B243E2CBFE82B1/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/069B4E3758069763754F38E350B243E2CBFE82B1/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">HISTORY AS THE MAIN COMPLAINT: WILLIAM KENTRIDGE AND THE MAKING OF POST‐APARTHEID SOUTH AFRICA</title><respStmt xml:id="ISTEX-API" resp="Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID" name="ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)"></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>WILEY</p></availability><date>2004</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">HISTORY AS THE MAIN COMPLAINT: WILLIAM KENTRIDGE AND THE MAKING OF POST‐APARTHEID SOUTH AFRICA</title><author><persName><forename type="first">Jessica</forename><surname>Dubow</surname></persName></author><author><persName><forename type="first">Ruth</forename><surname>Rosengarten</surname></persName></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Art History</title><idno type="pISSN">0141-6790</idno><idno type="eISSN">1467-8365</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-8365</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2004-09"></date><biblScope unit="volume">27</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="671">671</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="690">690</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">069B4E3758069763754F38E350B243E2CBFE82B1</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.0141-6790.2004.00443.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">AHIS443</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2004</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This essay considers the relation of history to memory in the process of radical political change. Looking at the work of William Kentridge in the context of South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission, it argues the ways that the language of nation‐building fails to account for the experience of trauma as it resists absorption into the structures of historical time and the ‘talking cure’. In particular, it considers how Kentridge's unique graphic techniques of film animation contest the logic of closure, recovery and renewal that the political and psychic imperatives of ‘new’ nationhood seem to demand. In the radical upheaval to which he submits visuality as much as chronology and teleology, and in the eruption of historical debris through the visual surface, his work disables all sense of resolution.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2004-09">Published</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2016-3-3">References added</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><extension>txt</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/069B4E3758069763754F38E350B243E2CBFE82B1/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-8365</doi><issn type="print">0141-6790</issn><issn type="electronic">1467-8365</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="AHIS"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="ART HISTORY">Art History</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="09004"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/ahis.2004.27.issue-4</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="27">27</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="4">4</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2004-09">September 2004</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="10" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.0141-6790.2004.00443.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="AHIS443"></id><id type="supplier" value="443"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="20"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2004-09-21"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2004-09-21"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-08"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-01"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-15"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="671">671</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="690">690</numbering></numberingGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:AHIS.AHIS443.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="7"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="3"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="7740"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="54"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">HISTORY AS THE MAIN COMPLAINT: WILLIAM KENTRIDGE AND THE MAKING OF POST‐APARTHEID SOUTH AFRICA</title><title type="short">WILLIAM KENTRIDGE AND THE MAKING OF POST‐APARTHEID SOUTH AFRICA</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1"><personName><givenNames>Jessica</givenNames><familyName>Dubow</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2"><personName><givenNames>Ruth</givenNames><familyName>Rosengarten</familyName></personName></creator></creators><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>This essay considers the relation of history to memory in the process of radical political change. Looking at the work of William Kentridge in the context of South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission, it argues the ways that the language of nation‐building fails to account for the experience of trauma as it resists absorption into the structures of historical time and the ‘talking cure’. In particular, it considers how Kentridge's unique graphic techniques of film animation contest the logic of closure, recovery and renewal that the political and psychic imperatives of ‘new’ nationhood seem to demand. In the radical upheaval to which he submits visuality as much as chronology and teleology, and in the eruption of historical debris through the visual surface, his work disables all sense of resolution.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>HISTORY AS THE MAIN COMPLAINT: WILLIAM KENTRIDGE AND THE MAKING OF POST‐APARTHEID SOUTH AFRICA</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>WILLIAM KENTRIDGE AND THE MAKING OF POST‐APARTHEID SOUTH AFRICA</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>HISTORY AS THE MAIN COMPLAINT: WILLIAM KENTRIDGE AND THE MAKING OF POST‐APARTHEID SOUTH AFRICA</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Jessica</namePart><namePart type="family">Dubow</namePart><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Ruth</namePart><namePart type="family">Rosengarten</namePart><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2004-09</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2004</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="figures">7</extent><extent unit="references">3</extent><extent unit="words">7740</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">This essay considers the relation of history to memory in the process of radical political change. Looking at the work of William Kentridge in the context of South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission, it argues the ways that the language of nation‐building fails to account for the experience of trauma as it resists absorption into the structures of historical time and the ‘talking cure’. In particular, it considers how Kentridge's unique graphic techniques of film animation contest the logic of closure, recovery and renewal that the political and psychic imperatives of ‘new’ nationhood seem to demand. In the radical upheaval to which he submits visuality as much as chronology and teleology, and in the eruption of historical debris through the visual surface, his work disables all sense of resolution.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Art History</title></titleInfo><genre type="Journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0141-6790</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1467-8365</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-8365</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">AHIS</identifier><part><date>2004</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>27</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>4</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>671</start><end>690</end><total>20</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">069B4E3758069763754F38E350B243E2CBFE82B1</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.0141-6790.2004.00443.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">AHIS443</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Musique/explor/MonteverdiV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000565 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000565 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Musique
|area= MonteverdiV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:069B4E3758069763754F38E350B243E2CBFE82B1
|texte= HISTORY AS THE MAIN COMPLAINT: WILLIAM KENTRIDGE AND THE MAKING OF POST‐APARTHEID SOUTH AFRICA
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.21. |  |