On the Generic Use of Indefinite Singulars
Identifieur interne : 000296 ( Main/Curation ); précédent : 000295; suivant : 000297On the Generic Use of Indefinite Singulars
Auteurs : Ariel Cohen [Israël]Source :
- Journal of Semantics [ 0167-5133 ] ; 2001-08.
English descriptors
- Teeft :
- Ariel, Ariel cohen, Bare plurals, Brave astronauts, Camel, Carlson, Carlson pelletier, Chicago press, Cobuild dictionary, Cohen, Dangerous challenge, Differentia, Dinosaur, Direct kind predication, Dromedary, Essential property, Extinct, Favourite, Favourite composer, Generic, Generic book, Generic reading, Generic readings, Generic sentences, Genericity, Inductivist, Inductivist reading, Inductivist view, Krifka, Logical form, Madrigal, Madrigal polyphonic, Manned space mission, Messy room, Narrow scope reading, Noun, Other hand, Plural, Polyphonic, Popular song, Potential rules, Predicate, Predication, Scope ambiguity, Semantics, Stork, Topic constraint, Wide scope.
Abstract
The distribution of indefinite singular generics is much more restricted than that of bare plural generics. The former, unlike the latter, seem to require that the property predicated of their subject be, in some sense, ‘definitional’. Moreover, the two constructions exhibit different scopal behaviour, and differ in their felicity in conjunctions, questions, and expressions describing the speaker's confidence. I propose that the reason is that the two expressions, in fact, have rather different meanings. Carlson (1995) makes a distinction between inductivist and rules‐and‐regulations theories of generics. Instead, I draw a distinction between inductivist and rules‐and‐regulations readings of generics. On one reading, a generic expresses the way things are, and its logical form involves quantification; on the other reading, a generic refers to some rule or regulation (often a definition), and states that it is in effect. While bare plurals are ambiguous between the two readings, indefinite singulars can only refer to a rule or a regulation. This difference between the two constructions follows from the fact that bare plurals, but not (nonspecific) indefinite singulars, are acceptable topics. The topic of bare plural generics, then, is the bare plural itself. It is mapped onto the restrictor of the generic quantifier, hence an inductivist reading is available. In contrast, this option is not open to indefinite singular generics. Thus, an inductivist reading is ruled out, and the only possible topic is a rule or regulation. The various differences between the two types of generic are then shown to follow.
Url:
DOI: 10.1093/jos/18.3.183
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000869
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000867
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000292
- to stream Main, to step Merge: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000298
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:935C7ED4EFFFED1356EB386E2F2B46ED5523BD75Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">On the Generic Use of Indefinite Singulars</title>
<author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Cohen, Ariel" sort="Cohen, Ariel" uniqKey="Cohen A" first="Ariel" last="Cohen">Ariel Cohen</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:935C7ED4EFFFED1356EB386E2F2B46ED5523BD75</idno>
<date when="2001" year="2001">2001</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1093/jos/18.3.183</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/935C7ED4EFFFED1356EB386E2F2B46ED5523BD75/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000869</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000869</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000867</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000292</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000292</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0167-5133:2001:Cohen A:on:the:generic</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000298</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000296</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">On the Generic Use of Indefinite Singulars</title>
<author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Cohen, Ariel" sort="Cohen, Ariel" uniqKey="Cohen A" first="Ariel" last="Cohen">Ariel Cohen</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country wicri:rule="url">Israël</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Foreign Literatures and Linguistics, Ben Gurion University, Beer Sheva 84105</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Beer Sheva 84105</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j">Journal of Semantics</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">J Semantics</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0167-5133</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1477-4593</idno>
<imprint><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher>
<date type="published" when="2001-08">2001-08</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">18</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="183">183</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="209">209</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0167-5133</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0167-5133</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Ariel</term>
<term>Ariel cohen</term>
<term>Bare plurals</term>
<term>Brave astronauts</term>
<term>Camel</term>
<term>Carlson</term>
<term>Carlson pelletier</term>
<term>Chicago press</term>
<term>Cobuild dictionary</term>
<term>Cohen</term>
<term>Dangerous challenge</term>
<term>Differentia</term>
<term>Dinosaur</term>
<term>Direct kind predication</term>
<term>Dromedary</term>
<term>Essential property</term>
<term>Extinct</term>
<term>Favourite</term>
<term>Favourite composer</term>
<term>Generic</term>
<term>Generic book</term>
<term>Generic reading</term>
<term>Generic readings</term>
<term>Generic sentences</term>
<term>Genericity</term>
<term>Inductivist</term>
<term>Inductivist reading</term>
<term>Inductivist view</term>
<term>Krifka</term>
<term>Logical form</term>
<term>Madrigal</term>
<term>Madrigal polyphonic</term>
<term>Manned space mission</term>
<term>Messy room</term>
<term>Narrow scope reading</term>
<term>Noun</term>
<term>Other hand</term>
<term>Plural</term>
<term>Polyphonic</term>
<term>Popular song</term>
<term>Potential rules</term>
<term>Predicate</term>
<term>Predication</term>
<term>Scope ambiguity</term>
<term>Semantics</term>
<term>Stork</term>
<term>Topic constraint</term>
<term>Wide scope</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The distribution of indefinite singular generics is much more restricted than that of bare plural generics. The former, unlike the latter, seem to require that the property predicated of their subject be, in some sense, ‘definitional’. Moreover, the two constructions exhibit different scopal behaviour, and differ in their felicity in conjunctions, questions, and expressions describing the speaker's confidence. I propose that the reason is that the two expressions, in fact, have rather different meanings. Carlson (1995) makes a distinction between inductivist and rules‐and‐regulations theories of generics. Instead, I draw a distinction between inductivist and rules‐and‐regulations readings of generics. On one reading, a generic expresses the way things are, and its logical form involves quantification; on the other reading, a generic refers to some rule or regulation (often a definition), and states that it is in effect. While bare plurals are ambiguous between the two readings, indefinite singulars can only refer to a rule or a regulation. This difference between the two constructions follows from the fact that bare plurals, but not (nonspecific) indefinite singulars, are acceptable topics. The topic of bare plural generics, then, is the bare plural itself. It is mapped onto the restrictor of the generic quantifier, hence an inductivist reading is available. In contrast, this option is not open to indefinite singular generics. Thus, an inductivist reading is ruled out, and the only possible topic is a rule or regulation. The various differences between the two types of generic are then shown to follow.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Musique/explor/LassusV2/Data/Main/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000296 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000296 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Musique |area= LassusV2 |flux= Main |étape= Curation |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:935C7ED4EFFFED1356EB386E2F2B46ED5523BD75 |texte= On the Generic Use of Indefinite Singulars }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |