EROS AND THANATOS: A FICINIAN AND LAURENTIAN READING OF VERDELOT'S SÌ LIETA E GRATA MORTE
Identifieur interne : 000960 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000959; suivant : 000961EROS AND THANATOS: A FICINIAN AND LAURENTIAN READING OF VERDELOT'S SÌ LIETA E GRATA MORTE
Auteurs : Stefano La ViaSource :
- Early Music History [ 0261-1279 ] ; 2002-10.
Abstract
The literary origins of the Italian sixteenth-century madrigal, as well as the presumed inexpressive nature of the so-called prima pratica as compared with the seconda pratica, perhaps represent two of the most abused commonplaces of modern musical historiography. Most scholars still believe that the linguistic, rhetorical and stylistic principles codified by Petrarchist humanists such as Pietro Bembo directly stimulated the birth of the new literary-musical genre. Even more problematic is the attitude of those who extract the dichotomy prima/seconda pratica from its specific cultural context - the Artusi-Monteverdi controversy - and apply it to an extended historical period, largely covering the whole history of the madrigal itself.
Url:
DOI: 10.1017/S0261127902002036
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:13FADE6B5A402DBD3256DE9A9B75ED2F2B303060Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">EROS AND THANATOS: A FICINIAN AND LAURENTIAN READING OF VERDELOT'S SÌ LIETA E GRATA MORTE</title><author><name sortKey="La Via, Stefano" sort="La Via, Stefano" uniqKey="La Via S" first="Stefano" last="La Via">Stefano La Via</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Università degli Studi di Pavia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:13FADE6B5A402DBD3256DE9A9B75ED2F2B303060</idno><date when="2002" year="2002">2002</date><idno type="doi">10.1017/S0261127902002036</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/13FADE6B5A402DBD3256DE9A9B75ED2F2B303060/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000960</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000960</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">EROS AND THANATOS: A FICINIAN AND LAURENTIAN READING OF VERDELOT'S SÌ LIETA E GRATA MORTE</title><author><name sortKey="La Via, Stefano" sort="La Via, Stefano" uniqKey="La Via S" first="Stefano" last="La Via">Stefano La Via</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Università degli Studi di Pavia</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Early Music History</title><idno type="ISSN">0261-1279</idno><idno type="eISSN">1474-0559</idno><imprint><publisher>Cambridge University Press</publisher><pubPlace>Cambridge, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2002-10">2002-10</date><biblScope unit="volume">21</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="75">75</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="116">116</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0261-1279</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0261-1279</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The literary origins of the Italian sixteenth-century madrigal, as well as the presumed inexpressive nature of the so-called prima pratica as compared with the seconda pratica, perhaps represent two of the most abused commonplaces of modern musical historiography. Most scholars still believe that the linguistic, rhetorical and stylistic principles codified by Petrarchist humanists such as Pietro Bembo directly stimulated the birth of the new literary-musical genre. Even more problematic is the attitude of those who extract the dichotomy prima/seconda pratica from its specific cultural context - the Artusi-Monteverdi controversy - and apply it to an extended historical period, largely covering the whole history of the madrigal itself.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>cambridge</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Stefano La Via</name><affiliations><json:string>Università degli Studi di Pavia</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><arkIstex>ark:/67375/6GQ-JQPJSN0H-1</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>research-article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>The literary origins of the Italian sixteenth-century madrigal, as well as the presumed inexpressive nature of the so-called prima pratica as compared with the seconda pratica, perhaps represent two of the most abused commonplaces of modern musical historiography. Most scholars still believe that the linguistic, rhetorical and stylistic principles codified by Petrarchist humanists such as Pietro Bembo directly stimulated the birth of the new literary-musical genre. Even more problematic is the attitude of those who extract the dichotomy prima/seconda pratica from its specific cultural context - the Artusi-Monteverdi controversy - and apply it to an extended historical period, largely covering the whole history of the madrigal itself.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.284</score><pdfWordCount>13289</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>72642</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>42</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>430 x 640 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>107</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>743</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>0</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>EROS AND THANATOS: A FICINIAN AND LAURENTIAN READING OF VERDELOT'S SÌ LIETA E GRATA MORTE</title><pii><json:string>S0261127902002036</json:string></pii><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><title>Early Music History</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><issn><json:string>0261-1279</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1474-0559</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>EMH</json:string></publisherId><volume>21</volume><pages><first>75</first><last>116</last><total>42</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/6GQ-JQPJSN0H-1</json:string></ark><categories><inist><json:string>1 - sciences humaines et sociales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>2002</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2002</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1017/S0261127902002036</json:string></doi><id>13FADE6B5A402DBD3256DE9A9B75ED2F2B303060</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/13FADE6B5A402DBD3256DE9A9B75ED2F2B303060/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/13FADE6B5A402DBD3256DE9A9B75ED2F2B303060/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/13FADE6B5A402DBD3256DE9A9B75ED2F2B303060/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/13FADE6B5A402DBD3256DE9A9B75ED2F2B303060/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">EROS AND THANATOS: A FICINIAN AND LAURENTIAN READING OF VERDELOT'S SÌ LIETA E GRATA MORTE</title><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher scheme="https://publisher-list.data.istex.fr">Cambridge University Press</publisher><pubPlace>Cambridge, UK</pubPlace><availability><licence><p>© Cambridge University Press</p></licence><p scheme="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-G3RCRD03-V">cambridge</p></availability><date>2002-09-04</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="research-article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</note><note type="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">EROS AND THANATOS: A FICINIAN AND LAURENTIAN READING OF VERDELOT'S SÌ LIETA E GRATA MORTE</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Stefano</forename><surname>La Via</surname></persName><affiliation>Università degli Studi di Pavia</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">13FADE6B5A402DBD3256DE9A9B75ED2F2B303060</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/6GQ-JQPJSN0H-1</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1017/S0261127902002036</idno><idno type="PII">S0261127902002036</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Early Music History</title><idno type="pISSN">0261-1279</idno><idno type="eISSN">1474-0559</idno><idno type="publisher-id">EMH</idno><imprint><publisher>Cambridge University Press</publisher><pubPlace>Cambridge, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2002-10"></date><biblScope unit="volume">21</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="75">75</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="116">116</biblScope></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2002-09-04</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en" style="text-abstract"><p>The literary origins of the Italian sixteenth-century madrigal, as well as the presumed inexpressive nature of the so-called prima pratica as compared with the seconda pratica, perhaps represent two of the most abused commonplaces of modern musical historiography. Most scholars still believe that the linguistic, rhetorical and stylistic principles codified by Petrarchist humanists such as Pietro Bembo directly stimulated the birth of the new literary-musical genre. Even more problematic is the attitude of those who extract the dichotomy prima/seconda pratica from its specific cultural context - the Artusi-Monteverdi controversy - and apply it to an extended historical period, largely covering the whole history of the madrigal itself.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2002-09-04">Created</change><change when="2002-10">Published</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2017-09-5">References added</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="corpus cambridge not found" wicri:toSee="no header"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" URI="journalpublishing1.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><article dtd-version="1.0" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">EMH</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Early Music History</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title>Early Music History</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1474-0559</issn><issn pub-type="ppub">0261-1279</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Cambridge University Press</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Cambridge, UK</publisher-loc></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pii">S0261127902002036</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S0261127902002036</article-id><title-group><article-title><italic>EROS</italic> AND <italic>THANATOS</italic>: A FICINIAN AND LAURENTIAN READING OF VERDELOT'S
<italic>SÌ LIETA E GRATA MORTE</italic></article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib><name><surname>La Via </surname><given-names>Stefano </given-names></name><aff><institution>Università degli Studi di Pavia</institution></aff></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>4</day><month>9</month><year>2002</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>10</month><year>2002</year></pub-date><volume>21</volume><fpage>75</fpage><lpage>116</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>© Cambridge University Press</copyright-statement></permissions><abstract abstract-type="text-abstract"><p>The literary origins of the Italian sixteenth-century madrigal, as well as the presumed inexpressive nature of the so-called <italic>prima pratica</italic> as compared with the <italic>seconda pratica</italic>, perhaps represent two of the most abused commonplaces of modern musical historiography. Most scholars still believe that the linguistic, rhetorical and stylistic principles codified by Petrarchist humanists such as Pietro Bembo directly stimulated the birth of the new literary-musical genre. Even more problematic is the attitude of those who extract the dichotomy <italic>prima/seconda pratica</italic> from its specific cultural context - the Artusi-Monteverdi controversy - and apply it to an extended historical period, largely covering the whole history of the madrigal itself.</p></abstract><counts><page-count count="42"></page-count></counts><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>pdf</meta-name><meta-value>S0261127902002036a.pdf</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front></article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>EROS AND THANATOS: A FICINIAN AND LAURENTIAN READING OF VERDELOT'S SÌ LIETA E GRATA MORTE</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" lang="en" contentType="CDATA"><title>EROS AND THANATOS: A FICINIAN AND LAURENTIAN READING OF VERDELOT'S SÌ LIETA E GRATA MORTE</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Stefano</namePart><namePart type="family">La Via</namePart><affiliation>Università degli Studi di Pavia</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="research-article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Cambridge University Press</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Cambridge, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2002-10</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2002-09-04</dateCreated><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2002</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><abstract type="text-abstract" lang="en">The literary origins of the Italian sixteenth-century madrigal, as well as the presumed inexpressive nature of the so-called prima pratica as compared with the seconda pratica, perhaps represent two of the most abused commonplaces of modern musical historiography. Most scholars still believe that the linguistic, rhetorical and stylistic principles codified by Petrarchist humanists such as Pietro Bembo directly stimulated the birth of the new literary-musical genre. Even more problematic is the attitude of those who extract the dichotomy prima/seconda pratica from its specific cultural context - the Artusi-Monteverdi controversy - and apply it to an extended historical period, largely covering the whole history of the madrigal itself.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Early Music History</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0261-1279</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1474-0559</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">EMH</identifier><part><date>2002</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>21</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>75</start><end>116</end><total>42</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">13FADE6B5A402DBD3256DE9A9B75ED2F2B303060</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/6GQ-JQPJSN0H-1</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1017/S0261127902002036</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0261127902002036</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© Cambridge University Press</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-G3RCRD03-V">cambridge</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>© Cambridge University Press</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/13FADE6B5A402DBD3256DE9A9B75ED2F2B303060/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Musique/explor/LassusV2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000960 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000960 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Musique
|area= LassusV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:13FADE6B5A402DBD3256DE9A9B75ED2F2B303060
|texte= EROS AND THANATOS: A FICINIAN AND LAURENTIAN READING OF VERDELOT'S SÌ LIETA E GRATA MORTE
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |