Serveur d'exploration Debussy

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Alexander Goehr: The Recent Music (II)

Identifieur interne : 000A20 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000A19; suivant : 000A21

Alexander Goehr: The Recent Music (II)

Auteurs : Bayan Northcott

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:09247C80D7AD4719DAE26925AAF49205D986C1CB

Abstract

‘I have the greatest regard for Goehr, but I think his music gets worse and worse,’ one of our senior chroniclers of the avant-garde remarked to me some five years ago: ‘First it was neo-expressionism, then neo-romanticism, now it is neoclassicism—where will it end?’ To be fair, the same speaker has since endorsed with delight Goehr's setting of Psalm IV (1976). Moreover, any indictment of backsliding from historical necessity has been complicated, for instance, by the composition of the ‘expressionistic’ Symphony in One Movement (1970) two years after the ‘romantic’ Romanza for Cello and Orchestra (1968), and by Goehr's considerable success in approaching an ideal of piano writing as ‘a sort of Bach crossed with Debussy—polyphonic impressionism’ in Nonomiya (1969). And, as I have already argued, his reclamation of ‘historical’ procedures and genres could be seen as the necessary complement to the stability of the serial-modal, bloc sonore harmonic method he developed after the Two Choruses (1962)—in other words, as modifications and enrichments of a technique and aesthetic essentially deriving from the Modern Masters. Yet it must be admitted that any residual questions posed by such a synthesis would seem vastly more pressing in the light of his unexpected progress since the appearance of Psalm IV.

Url:
DOI: 10.1017/S0040298200030096

Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:09247C80D7AD4719DAE26925AAF49205D986C1CB

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Alexander Goehr: The Recent Music (II)</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Northcott, Bayan" sort="Northcott, Bayan" uniqKey="Northcott B" first="Bayan" last="Northcott">Bayan Northcott</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:09247C80D7AD4719DAE26925AAF49205D986C1CB</idno>
<date when="1978" year="1978">1978</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1017/S0040298200030096</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/09247C80D7AD4719DAE26925AAF49205D986C1CB/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000A20</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000A20</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Alexander Goehr: The Recent Music (II)</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Northcott, Bayan" sort="Northcott, Bayan" uniqKey="Northcott B" first="Bayan" last="Northcott">Bayan Northcott</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">Tempo</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">Tempo</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0040-2982</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1478-2286</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>Cambridge University Press</publisher>
<pubPlace>Cambridge, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="1978-06">1978-06</date>
<biblScope unit="issue">125</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="12">12</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="18">18</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0040-2982</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0040-2982</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">‘I have the greatest regard for Goehr, but I think his music gets worse and worse,’ one of our senior chroniclers of the avant-garde remarked to me some five years ago: ‘First it was neo-expressionism, then neo-romanticism, now it is neoclassicism—where will it end?’ To be fair, the same speaker has since endorsed with delight Goehr's setting of Psalm IV (1976). Moreover, any indictment of backsliding from historical necessity has been complicated, for instance, by the composition of the ‘expressionistic’ Symphony in One Movement (1970) two years after the ‘romantic’ Romanza for Cello and Orchestra (1968), and by Goehr's considerable success in approaching an ideal of piano writing as ‘a sort of Bach crossed with Debussy—polyphonic impressionism’ in Nonomiya (1969). And, as I have already argued, his reclamation of ‘historical’ procedures and genres could be seen as the necessary complement to the stability of the serial-modal, bloc sonore harmonic method he developed after the Two Choruses (1962)—in other words, as modifications and enrichments of a technique and aesthetic essentially deriving from the Modern Masters. Yet it must be admitted that any residual questions posed by such a synthesis would seem vastly more pressing in the light of his unexpected progress since the appearance of Psalm IV.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<istex>
<corpusName>cambridge</corpusName>
<author>
<json:item>
<name>Bayan Northcott</name>
</json:item>
</author>
<articleId>
<json:string>03009</json:string>
</articleId>
<arkIstex>ark:/67375/6GQ-1RF3F8T3-G</arkIstex>
<language>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</language>
<originalGenre>
<json:string>research-article</json:string>
</originalGenre>
<abstract>‘I have the greatest regard for Goehr, but I think his music gets worse and worse,’ one of our senior chroniclers of the avant-garde remarked to me some five years ago: ‘First it was neo-expressionism, then neo-romanticism, now it is neoclassicism—where will it end?’ To be fair, the same speaker has since endorsed with delight Goehr's setting of Psalm IV (1976). Moreover, any indictment of backsliding from historical necessity has been complicated, for instance, by the composition of the ‘expressionistic’ Symphony in One Movement (1970) two years after the ‘romantic’ Romanza for Cello and Orchestra (1968), and by Goehr's considerable success in approaching an ideal of piano writing as ‘a sort of Bach crossed with Debussy—polyphonic impressionism’ in Nonomiya (1969). And, as I have already argued, his reclamation of ‘historical’ procedures and genres could be seen as the necessary complement to the stability of the serial-modal, bloc sonore harmonic method he developed after the Two Choruses (1962)—in other words, as modifications and enrichments of a technique and aesthetic essentially deriving from the Modern Masters. Yet it must be admitted that any residual questions posed by such a synthesis would seem vastly more pressing in the light of his unexpected progress since the appearance of Psalm IV.</abstract>
<qualityIndicators>
<score>7.43</score>
<pdfWordCount>2958</pdfWordCount>
<pdfCharCount>16675</pdfCharCount>
<pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion>
<pdfPageCount>9</pdfPageCount>
<pdfPageSize>488.88 x 722.88 pts</pdfPageSize>
<refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative>
<abstractWordCount>206</abstractWordCount>
<abstractCharCount>1320</abstractCharCount>
<keywordCount>0</keywordCount>
</qualityIndicators>
<title>Alexander Goehr: The Recent Music (II)</title>
<pii>
<json:string>S0040298200030096</json:string>
</pii>
<genre>
<json:string>research-article</json:string>
</genre>
<host>
<title>Tempo</title>
<language>
<json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<issn>
<json:string>0040-2982</json:string>
</issn>
<eissn>
<json:string>1478-2286</json:string>
</eissn>
<publisherId>
<json:string>TEM</json:string>
</publisherId>
<issue>125</issue>
<pages>
<first>12</first>
<last>18</last>
<total>7</total>
</pages>
<genre>
<json:string>journal</json:string>
</genre>
</host>
<ark>
<json:string>ark:/67375/6GQ-1RF3F8T3-G</json:string>
</ark>
<categories>
<inist>
<json:string>1 - sciences humaines et sociales</json:string>
</inist>
</categories>
<publicationDate>1978</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>1978</copyrightDate>
<doi>
<json:string>10.1017/S0040298200030096</json:string>
</doi>
<id>09247C80D7AD4719DAE26925AAF49205D986C1CB</id>
<score>1</score>
<fulltext>
<json:item>
<extension>pdf</extension>
<original>true</original>
<mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/09247C80D7AD4719DAE26925AAF49205D986C1CB/fulltext/pdf</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<extension>zip</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/zip</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/09247C80D7AD4719DAE26925AAF49205D986C1CB/fulltext/zip</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<extension>txt</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>text/plain</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/09247C80D7AD4719DAE26925AAF49205D986C1CB/fulltext/txt</uri>
</json:item>
<istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/09247C80D7AD4719DAE26925AAF49205D986C1CB/fulltext/tei">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Alexander Goehr: The Recent Music (II)</title>
<respStmt>
<resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp>
<name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>ISTEX</authority>
<publisher scheme="https://publisher-list.data.istex.fr">Cambridge University Press</publisher>
<pubPlace>Cambridge, UK</pubPlace>
<availability>
<licence>
<p>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978</p>
</licence>
<p scheme="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-G3RCRD03-V">cambridge</p>
</availability>
<date>1978</date>
</publicationStmt>
<notesStmt>
<note type="research-article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</note>
<note type="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note>
</notesStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct type="inbook">
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Alexander Goehr: The Recent Music (II)</title>
<author xml:id="author-0000">
<persName>
<forename type="first">Bayan</forename>
<surname>Northcott</surname>
</persName>
</author>
<idno type="istex">09247C80D7AD4719DAE26925AAF49205D986C1CB</idno>
<idno type="ark">ark:/67375/6GQ-1RF3F8T3-G</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1017/S0040298200030096</idno>
<idno type="PII">S0040298200030096</idno>
<idno type="article-id">03009</idno>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<title level="j">Tempo</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">Tempo</title>
<idno type="pISSN">0040-2982</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1478-2286</idno>
<idno type="publisher-id">TEM</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>Cambridge University Press</publisher>
<pubPlace>Cambridge, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="1978-06"></date>
<biblScope unit="issue">125</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="12">12</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="18">18</biblScope>
</imprint>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<creation>
<date>1978</date>
</creation>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
<abstract xml:lang="en" style="text-abstract">
<p>‘I have the greatest regard for Goehr, but I think his music gets worse and worse,’ one of our senior chroniclers of the avant-garde remarked to me some five years ago: ‘First it was neo-expressionism, then neo-romanticism, now it is neoclassicism—where will it end?’ To be fair, the same speaker has since endorsed with delight Goehr's setting of Psalm IV (1976). Moreover, any indictment of backsliding from historical necessity has been complicated, for instance, by the composition of the ‘expressionistic’ Symphony in One Movement (1970) two years after the ‘romantic’ Romanza for Cello and Orchestra (1968), and by Goehr's considerable success in approaching an ideal of piano writing as ‘a sort of Bach crossed with Debussy—polyphonic impressionism’ in Nonomiya (1969). And, as I have already argued, his reclamation of ‘historical’ procedures and genres could be seen as the necessary complement to the stability of the serial-modal, bloc sonore harmonic method he developed after the Two Choruses (1962)—in other words, as modifications and enrichments of a technique and aesthetic essentially deriving from the Modern Masters. Yet it must be admitted that any residual questions posed by such a synthesis would seem vastly more pressing in the light of his unexpected progress since the appearance of Psalm IV.</p>
</abstract>
</profileDesc>
<revisionDesc>
<change when="1978-06">Published</change>
<change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2017-09-5">References added</change>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:fulltextTEI>
</fulltext>
<metadata>
<istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="corpus cambridge not found" wicri:toSee="no header">
<istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"</istex:xmlDeclaration>
<istex:docType PUBLIC="-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.2 20060430//EN" URI="journalpublishing.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType>
<istex:document>
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.2" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">TEM</journal-id>
<journal-title>Tempo</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title>Tempo</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="ppub">0040-2982</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">1478-2286</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Cambridge University Press</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Cambridge, UK</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S0040298200030096</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="pii">S0040298200030096</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">03009</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Alexander Goehr: The Recent Music (II)</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running">TEMPO</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running">GOEHR: THE RECENT MUSIC</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib>
<name name-style="western">
<surname>Northcott</surname>
<given-names>Bayan</given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<month>06</month>
<year>1978</year>
</pub-date>
<issue>125</issue>
<fpage seq="5">12</fpage>
<lpage>18</lpage>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>1978</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Cambridge University Press</copyright-holder>
</permissions>
<abstract abstract-type="text-abstract">
<p>‘I have the greatest regard for Goehr, but I think his music gets worse and worse,’ one of our senior chroniclers of the avant-garde remarked to me some five years ago: ‘First it was neo-expressionism, then neo-romanticism, now it is neoclassicism—where will it end?’ To be fair, the same speaker has since endorsed with delight Goehr's setting of
<italic>Psalm IV</italic>
(1976). Moreover, any indictment of backsliding from historical necessity has been complicated, for instance, by the composition of the ‘expressionistic’ Symphony in One Movement (1970) two years
<italic>after</italic>
the ‘romantic’
<italic>Romanza</italic>
for Cello and Orchestra (1968), and by Goehr's considerable success in approaching an ideal of piano writing as ‘a sort of Bach crossed with Debussy—polyphonic impressionism’ in
<italic>Nonomiya</italic>
(1969). And, as I have already argued, his reclamation of ‘historical’ procedures and genres could be seen as the necessary complement to the stability of the serial-modal,
<italic>bloc sonore</italic>
harmonic method he developed after the Two Choruses (1962)—in other words, as modifications and enrichments of a technique and aesthetic essentially deriving from the Modern Masters. Yet it must be admitted that any residual questions posed by such a synthesis would seem vastly more pressing in the light of his unexpected progress since the appearance of
<italic>Psalm IV</italic>
.</p>
</abstract>
<counts>
<page-count count="7"></page-count>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>pdf</meta-name>
<meta-value>S0040298200030096a.pdf</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>series</meta-name>
<meta-value>1</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>seriesText</meta-name>
<meta-value>New Series</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<back>
<fn-group>
<fn id="fn01" symbol="1">
<label>
<sup>1</sup>
</label>
<p>TEMPO 123. A small error, however, crept into Ex. 1 (
<italic>e</italic>
) where the F and G# at the end of the second group should have been simultaneous, not successive. Also I now gather that a more accurate timing for the film score of
<italic>Bauern, Bomben und Bonzen</italic>
would be about one hour and that Goehr completed it within a fortnight.</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>
</istex:document>
</istex:metadataXml>
<mods version="3.6">
<titleInfo lang="en">
<title>Alexander Goehr: The Recent Music (II)</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative">
<title>TEMPO</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative" lang="en" contentType="CDATA">
<title>Alexander Goehr: The Recent Music (II)</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Bayan</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Northcott</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre type="research-article" displayLabel="research-article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</genre>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Cambridge University Press</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Cambridge, UK</placeTerm>
</place>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1978-06</dateIssued>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1978</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
</language>
<abstract type="text-abstract" lang="en">‘I have the greatest regard for Goehr, but I think his music gets worse and worse,’ one of our senior chroniclers of the avant-garde remarked to me some five years ago: ‘First it was neo-expressionism, then neo-romanticism, now it is neoclassicism—where will it end?’ To be fair, the same speaker has since endorsed with delight Goehr's setting of Psalm IV (1976). Moreover, any indictment of backsliding from historical necessity has been complicated, for instance, by the composition of the ‘expressionistic’ Symphony in One Movement (1970) two years after the ‘romantic’ Romanza for Cello and Orchestra (1968), and by Goehr's considerable success in approaching an ideal of piano writing as ‘a sort of Bach crossed with Debussy—polyphonic impressionism’ in Nonomiya (1969). And, as I have already argued, his reclamation of ‘historical’ procedures and genres could be seen as the necessary complement to the stability of the serial-modal, bloc sonore harmonic method he developed after the Two Choruses (1962)—in other words, as modifications and enrichments of a technique and aesthetic essentially deriving from the Modern Masters. Yet it must be admitted that any residual questions posed by such a synthesis would seem vastly more pressing in the light of his unexpected progress since the appearance of Psalm IV.</abstract>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Tempo</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="abbreviated">
<title>Tempo</title>
</titleInfo>
<genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre>
<identifier type="ISSN">0040-2982</identifier>
<identifier type="eISSN">1478-2286</identifier>
<identifier type="PublisherID">TEM</identifier>
<part>
<date>1978</date>
<detail type="issue">
<caption>no.</caption>
<number>125</number>
</detail>
<extent unit="pages">
<start>12</start>
<end>18</end>
<total>7</total>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="istex">09247C80D7AD4719DAE26925AAF49205D986C1CB</identifier>
<identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/6GQ-1RF3F8T3-G</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1017/S0040298200030096</identifier>
<identifier type="PII">S0040298200030096</identifier>
<identifier type="ArticleID">03009</identifier>
<accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978</accessCondition>
<recordInfo>
<recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-G3RCRD03-V">cambridge</recordContentSource>
<recordOrigin>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
<json:item>
<extension>json</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/json</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/09247C80D7AD4719DAE26925AAF49205D986C1CB/metadata/json</uri>
</json:item>
</metadata>
<serie></serie>
</istex>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Musique/explor/DebussyV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000A20 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000A20 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Musique
   |area=    DebussyV1
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:09247C80D7AD4719DAE26925AAF49205D986C1CB
   |texte=   Alexander Goehr: The Recent Music (II)
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Tue Sep 25 16:34:07 2018. Site generation: Mon Mar 11 10:31:28 2024