From traditional fallacies to structural hypotheses: Old and new conceptions in period style research
Identifieur interne : 000A03 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000A02; suivant : 000A04From traditional fallacies to structural hypotheses: Old and new conceptions in period style research
Auteurs : Patrick BradySource :
- Neophilologus [ 0028-2677 ] ; 1972-01-01.
English descriptors
- Teeft :
- Antisynaesthetic fallacy, Brady, Fallacy, First half, Genre theory, Good example, Human condition, Ibid, Internal modification, Manon lescaut, Patrick, Patrick brady, Period style, Period style concept, Period style research, Plastic arts, Plastic style, Rococo, Rococo period, Rococo society, Rococo style, Structuralism, Structuralist, Structuralist approach, Style concept, Style research, Traditional approach, Traditional fallacies, Traditional methods, Various times, Viva.
Abstract
Conclusion: The unsatisfactory quality of the period style work carried out in the past by exceptionally gifted scholars suggests that work on the relationship between the arts suffers from defects of a methodological nature. The weaknesses of the traditional methods are easier to point out than the advantages of any new method, which of necessity has yet to prove itself — but new methods must be tested if progress is to be made. The validity of a structural approach to period style will only be ultimately demonstrated (or discredited) by a full-length study of a period style following this method.
Url:
DOI: 10.1007/BF01740492
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:83D6B2551D67D5288ED89033176F69190928D123Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">From traditional fallacies to structural hypotheses: Old and new conceptions in period style research</title><author><name sortKey="Brady, Patrick" sort="Brady, Patrick" uniqKey="Brady P" first="Patrick" last="Brady">Patrick Brady</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>The Florida State University, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:83D6B2551D67D5288ED89033176F69190928D123</idno><date when="1972" year="1972">1972</date><idno type="doi">10.1007/BF01740492</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/1BB-TTTFFC69-P/fulltext.pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000A03</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000A03</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">From traditional fallacies to structural hypotheses: Old and new conceptions in period style research</title><author><name sortKey="Brady, Patrick" sort="Brady, Patrick" uniqKey="Brady P" first="Patrick" last="Brady">Patrick Brady</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>The Florida State University, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Neophilologus</title><title level="j" type="sub">An International Journal of Modern and Mediaeval Language and Literature</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Neophilologus</title><idno type="ISSN">0028-2677</idno><idno type="eISSN">1572-8668</idno><imprint><publisher>Kluwer Academic Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Dordrecht</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1972-01-01">1972-01-01</date><biblScope unit="volume">56</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="11">11</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0028-2677</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0028-2677</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Antisynaesthetic fallacy</term><term>Brady</term><term>Fallacy</term><term>First half</term><term>Genre theory</term><term>Good example</term><term>Human condition</term><term>Ibid</term><term>Internal modification</term><term>Manon lescaut</term><term>Patrick</term><term>Patrick brady</term><term>Period style</term><term>Period style concept</term><term>Period style research</term><term>Plastic arts</term><term>Plastic style</term><term>Rococo</term><term>Rococo period</term><term>Rococo society</term><term>Rococo style</term><term>Structuralism</term><term>Structuralist</term><term>Structuralist approach</term><term>Style concept</term><term>Style research</term><term>Traditional approach</term><term>Traditional fallacies</term><term>Traditional methods</term><term>Various times</term><term>Viva</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Conclusion: The unsatisfactory quality of the period style work carried out in the past by exceptionally gifted scholars suggests that work on the relationship between the arts suffers from defects of a methodological nature. The weaknesses of the traditional methods are easier to point out than the advantages of any new method, which of necessity has yet to prove itself — but new methods must be tested if progress is to be made. The validity of a structural approach to period style will only be ultimately demonstrated (or discredited) by a full-length study of a period style following this method.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>springer-journals</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>fallacy</json:string><json:string>traditional fallacies</json:string><json:string>period style</json:string><json:string>ibid</json:string><json:string>patrick brady</json:string><json:string>structuralism</json:string><json:string>structuralist</json:string><json:string>brady</json:string><json:string>structuralist approach</json:string><json:string>rococo style</json:string><json:string>viva</json:string><json:string>human condition</json:string><json:string>style concept</json:string><json:string>genre theory</json:string><json:string>traditional approach</json:string><json:string>period style research</json:string><json:string>manon lescaut</json:string><json:string>antisynaesthetic fallacy</json:string><json:string>rococo period</json:string><json:string>plastic style</json:string><json:string>internal modification</json:string><json:string>plastic arts</json:string><json:string>first half</json:string><json:string>traditional methods</json:string><json:string>rococo society</json:string><json:string>period style concept</json:string><json:string>good example</json:string><json:string>style research</json:string><json:string>various times</json:string><json:string>rococo</json:string><json:string>patrick</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Patrick Brady</name><affiliations><json:string>The Florida State University, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>BF01740492</json:string><json:string>Art1</json:string></articleId><arkIstex>ark:/67375/1BB-TTTFFC69-P</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>OriginalPaper</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Conclusion: The unsatisfactory quality of the period style work carried out in the past by exceptionally gifted scholars suggests that work on the relationship between the arts suffers from defects of a methodological nature. The weaknesses of the traditional methods are easier to point out than the advantages of any new method, which of necessity has yet to prove itself — but new methods must be tested if progress is to be made. The validity of a structural approach to period style will only be ultimately demonstrated (or discredited) by a full-length study of a period style following this method.</abstract><qualityIndicators><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>100</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>605</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>0</keywordCount><score>8.2</score><pdfWordCount>5342</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>28471</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>11</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>403.28 x 648 pts</pdfPageSize></qualityIndicators><title>From traditional fallacies to structural hypotheses: Old and new conceptions in period style research</title><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><title>Neophilologus</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><publicationDate>1972</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1972</copyrightDate><issn><json:string>0028-2677</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1572-8668</json:string></eissn><journalId><json:string>11061</json:string></journalId><volume>56</volume><issue>1</issue><pages><first>1</first><last>11</last></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><subject><json:item><value>Comparative Linguistics</value></json:item><json:item><value>Comparative Literature</value></json:item><json:item><value>Historical Linguistics</value></json:item><json:item><value>Philology</value></json:item><json:item><value>Syntax</value></json:item></subject></host><namedEntities><unitex><date></date><geogName></geogName><orgName></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName></persName><placeName></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/1BB-TTTFFC69-P</json:string></ark><categories><wos></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - arts & humanities</json:string><json:string>2 - communication & textual studies</json:string><json:string>3 - literary studies</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Arts and Humanities</json:string><json:string>3 - Literature and Literary Theory</json:string><json:string>1 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>3 - Linguistics and Language</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences humaines et sociales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>1972</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1972</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1007/BF01740492</json:string></doi><id>83D6B2551D67D5288ED89033176F69190928D123</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/1BB-TTTFFC69-P/fulltext.pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/1BB-TTTFFC69-P/bundle.zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/1BB-TTTFFC69-P/fulltext.tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">From traditional fallacies to structural hypotheses: Old and new conceptions in period style research</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher scheme="https://scientific-publisher.data.istex.fr">Kluwer Academic Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Dordrecht</pubPlace><availability><licence><p>Wolters-Noordhoff Publishing, 1972</p></licence><p scheme="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-3XSW68JL-F">springer</p></availability><date>1972</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="research-article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</note><note type="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note><note>Articles</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">From traditional fallacies to structural hypotheses: Old and new conceptions in period style research</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Patrick</forename><surname>Brady</surname></persName><affiliation>The Florida State University, USA</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">83D6B2551D67D5288ED89033176F69190928D123</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/1BB-TTTFFC69-P</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1007/BF01740492</idno><idno type="article-id">BF01740492</idno><idno type="article-id">Art1</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Neophilologus</title><title level="j" type="sub">An International Journal of Modern and Mediaeval Language and Literature</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Neophilologus</title><idno type="pISSN">0028-2677</idno><idno type="eISSN">1572-8668</idno><idno type="journal-ID">true</idno><idno type="issue-article-count">14</idno><idno type="volume-issue-count">4</idno><imprint><publisher>Kluwer Academic Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Dordrecht</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1972-01-01"></date><biblScope unit="volume">56</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="11">11</biblScope></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1972</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Conclusion: The unsatisfactory quality of the period style work carried out in the past by exceptionally gifted scholars suggests that work on the relationship between the arts suffers from defects of a methodological nature. The weaknesses of the traditional methods are easier to point out than the advantages of any new method, which of necessity has yet to prove itself — but new methods must be tested if progress is to be made. The validity of a structural approach to period style will only be ultimately demonstrated (or discredited) by a full-length study of a period style following this method.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="Journal Subject"><list><head>Linguistics</head><item><term>Comparative Linguistics</term></item><item><term>Comparative Literature</term></item><item><term>Historical Linguistics</term></item><item><term>Philology</term></item><item><term>Syntax</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1972-01-01">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/1BB-TTTFFC69-P/fulltext.txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="corpus springer-journals not found" wicri:toSee="no header"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//Springer-Verlag//DTD A++ V2.4//EN" URI="http://devel.springer.de/A++/V2.4/DTD/A++V2.4.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><Publisher><PublisherInfo><PublisherName>Kluwer Academic Publishers</PublisherName><PublisherLocation>Dordrecht</PublisherLocation></PublisherInfo><Journal><JournalInfo JournalProductType="ArchiveJournal" NumberingStyle="Unnumbered"><JournalID>11061</JournalID><JournalPrintISSN>0028-2677</JournalPrintISSN><JournalElectronicISSN>1572-8668</JournalElectronicISSN><JournalTitle>Neophilologus</JournalTitle><JournalSubTitle>An International Journal of Modern and Mediaeval Language and Literature</JournalSubTitle><JournalAbbreviatedTitle>Neophilologus</JournalAbbreviatedTitle><JournalSubjectGroup><JournalSubject Type="Primary">Linguistics</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Comparative Linguistics</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Comparative Literature</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Historical Linguistics</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Philology</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Syntax</JournalSubject></JournalSubjectGroup></JournalInfo><Volume><VolumeInfo VolumeType="Regular" TocLevels="0"><VolumeIDStart>56</VolumeIDStart><VolumeIDEnd>56</VolumeIDEnd><VolumeIssueCount>4</VolumeIssueCount></VolumeInfo><Issue IssueType="Regular"><IssueInfo TocLevels="0"><IssueIDStart>1</IssueIDStart><IssueIDEnd>1</IssueIDEnd><IssueArticleCount>14</IssueArticleCount><IssueHistory><CoverDate><Year>1972</Year><Month>1</Month></CoverDate></IssueHistory><IssueCopyright><CopyrightHolderName>Wolters-Noordhoff Publishing</CopyrightHolderName><CopyrightYear>1972</CopyrightYear></IssueCopyright></IssueInfo><Article ID="Art1"><ArticleInfo Language="En" ArticleType="OriginalPaper" NumberingStyle="Unnumbered" TocLevels="0" ContainsESM="No"><ArticleID>BF01740492</ArticleID><ArticleDOI>10.1007/BF01740492</ArticleDOI><ArticleSequenceNumber>1</ArticleSequenceNumber><ArticleTitle Language="En">From traditional fallacies to structural hypotheses: Old and new conceptions in period style research</ArticleTitle><ArticleCategory>Articles</ArticleCategory><ArticleFirstPage>1</ArticleFirstPage><ArticleLastPage>11</ArticleLastPage><ArticleHistory><RegistrationDate><Year>2005</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>5</Day></RegistrationDate></ArticleHistory><ArticleCopyright><CopyrightHolderName>Wolters-Noordhoff Publishing</CopyrightHolderName><CopyrightYear>1972</CopyrightYear></ArticleCopyright><ArticleGrants Type="Regular"><MetadataGrant Grant="OpenAccess"></MetadataGrant><AbstractGrant Grant="OpenAccess"></AbstractGrant><BodyPDFGrant Grant="Restricted"></BodyPDFGrant><BodyHTMLGrant Grant="Restricted"></BodyHTMLGrant><BibliographyGrant Grant="Restricted"></BibliographyGrant><ESMGrant Grant="Restricted"></ESMGrant></ArticleGrants><ArticleContext><JournalID>11061</JournalID><VolumeIDStart>56</VolumeIDStart><VolumeIDEnd>56</VolumeIDEnd><IssueIDStart>1</IssueIDStart><IssueIDEnd>1</IssueIDEnd></ArticleContext></ArticleInfo><ArticleHeader><AuthorGroup><Author AffiliationIDS="Aff1"><AuthorName DisplayOrder="Western"><GivenName>Patrick</GivenName><FamilyName>Brady</FamilyName></AuthorName></Author><Affiliation ID="Aff1"><OrgName>The Florida State University</OrgName><OrgAddress><Country>USA</Country></OrgAddress></Affiliation></AuthorGroup><Abstract ID="Abs1" Language="En"><Heading>Conclusion</Heading><Para>The unsatisfactory quality of the period style work carried out in the past by exceptionally gifted scholars suggests that work on the relationship between the arts suffers from defects of a methodological nature. The weaknesses of the traditional methods are easier to point out than the advantages of any new method, which of necessity has yet to prove itself — but new methods must be tested if progress is to be made. The validity of a structural approach to period style will only be ultimately demonstrated (or discredited) by a full-length study of a period style following this method.</Para></Abstract></ArticleHeader><NoBody></NoBody></Article></Issue></Volume></Journal></Publisher></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>From traditional fallacies to structural hypotheses: Old and new conceptions in period style research</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA"><title>From traditional fallacies to structural hypotheses: Old and new conceptions in period style research</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Patrick</namePart><namePart type="family">Brady</namePart><affiliation>The Florida State University, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="OriginalPaper" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Kluwer Academic Publishers</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Dordrecht</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1972-01-01</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1972</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><abstract lang="en">Conclusion: The unsatisfactory quality of the period style work carried out in the past by exceptionally gifted scholars suggests that work on the relationship between the arts suffers from defects of a methodological nature. The weaknesses of the traditional methods are easier to point out than the advantages of any new method, which of necessity has yet to prove itself — but new methods must be tested if progress is to be made. The validity of a structural approach to period style will only be ultimately demonstrated (or discredited) by a full-length study of a period style following this method.</abstract><note>Articles</note><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Neophilologus</title><subTitle>An International Journal of Modern and Mediaeval Language and Literature</subTitle></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Neophilologus</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><originInfo><publisher>Springer</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1972-01-01</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1972</copyrightDate></originInfo><subject><genre>Linguistics</genre><topic>Comparative Linguistics</topic><topic>Comparative Literature</topic><topic>Historical Linguistics</topic><topic>Philology</topic><topic>Syntax</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0028-2677</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1572-8668</identifier><identifier type="JournalID">11061</identifier><identifier type="IssueArticleCount">14</identifier><identifier type="VolumeIssueCount">4</identifier><part><date>1972</date><detail type="volume"><number>56</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="issue"><number>1</number><caption>no.</caption></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>1</start><end>11</end></extent></part><recordInfo><recordOrigin>Wolters-Noordhoff Publishing, 1972</recordOrigin></recordInfo></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">83D6B2551D67D5288ED89033176F69190928D123</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/1BB-TTTFFC69-P</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1007/BF01740492</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">BF01740492</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">Art1</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Wolters-Noordhoff Publishing, 1972</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-3XSW68JL-F">springer</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Wolters-Noordhoff Publishing, 1972</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/1BB-TTTFFC69-P/record.json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Musique/explor/BourgeoisGentilV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000A03 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000A03 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Musique
|area= BourgeoisGentilV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:83D6B2551D67D5288ED89033176F69190928D123
|texte= From traditional fallacies to structural hypotheses: Old and new conceptions in period style research
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |