Semantic markup for literary scholars: How descriptive markup affects the study and teaching of literature
Identifieur interne : 000111 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000110; suivant : 000112Semantic markup for literary scholars: How descriptive markup affects the study and teaching of literature
Auteurs : D. Grant CampbellSource :
- Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology [ 0044-7870 ] ; 2002-11.
Abstract
This paper describes a qualitative study, which investigated the attitudes of literary scholars towards the features of semantic markup for primary texts. The scholars were shown seven variations of the same text in XML format, each varying according to the two main features of semantic markup: the separation of structure from layout, and the ability to add interpretive markup to enhance searchability. The responses suggest that, contrary to many popular assumptions, layout is a vital part of the reading process, which implies that the standardization of DTDs begun with the Text Encoding Initiative should extend to styling as well. Second, interpretive markup achieves problematic results: while searchability is improved, the markup threatens to inhibit the reader's experience of the text.
Url:
DOI: 10.1002/meet.1450390119
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:70DA96E9A00A25129BB3B9C97EBFD5C777179B71Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Semantic markup for literary scholars: How descriptive markup affects the study and teaching of literature</title><author><name sortKey="Campbell, D Grant" sort="Campbell, D Grant" uniqKey="Campbell D" first="D. Grant" last="Campbell">D. Grant Campbell</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Faculty of Information and Media Studies, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5B7</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: gcampbel@uwo.ca</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:70DA96E9A00A25129BB3B9C97EBFD5C777179B71</idno><date when="2002" year="2002">2002</date><idno type="doi">10.1002/meet.1450390119</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/70DA96E9A00A25129BB3B9C97EBFD5C777179B71/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000111</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Semantic markup for literary scholars: How descriptive markup affects the study and teaching of literature</title><author><name sortKey="Campbell, D Grant" sort="Campbell, D Grant" uniqKey="Campbell D" first="D. Grant" last="Campbell">D. Grant Campbell</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Faculty of Information and Media Studies, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5B7</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: gcampbel@uwo.ca</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Proc. Am. Soc. Info. Sci. Tech.</title><idno type="ISSN">0044-7870</idno><idno type="eISSN">1550-8390</idno><imprint><publisher>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><pubPlace>Hoboken</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2002-11">2002-11</date><biblScope unit="volume">39</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="171">171</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="180">180</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0044-7870</idno></series><idno type="istex">70DA96E9A00A25129BB3B9C97EBFD5C777179B71</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/meet.1450390119</idno><idno type="ArticleID">MEET1450390119</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0044-7870</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This paper describes a qualitative study, which investigated the attitudes of literary scholars towards the features of semantic markup for primary texts. The scholars were shown seven variations of the same text in XML format, each varying according to the two main features of semantic markup: the separation of structure from layout, and the ability to add interpretive markup to enhance searchability. The responses suggest that, contrary to many popular assumptions, layout is a vital part of the reading process, which implies that the standardization of DTDs begun with the Text Encoding Initiative should extend to styling as well. Second, interpretive markup achieves problematic results: while searchability is improved, the markup threatens to inhibit the reader's experience of the text.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>D. Grant Campbell</name><affiliations><json:string>Faculty of Information and Media Studies, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5B7</json:string><json:string>E-mail: gcampbel@uwo.ca</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>MEET1450390119</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>This paper describes a qualitative study, which investigated the attitudes of literary scholars towards the features of semantic markup for primary texts. The scholars were shown seven variations of the same text in XML format, each varying according to the two main features of semantic markup: the separation of structure from layout, and the ability to add interpretive markup to enhance searchability. The responses suggest that, contrary to many popular assumptions, layout is a vital part of the reading process, which implies that the standardization of DTDs begun with the Text Encoding Initiative should extend to styling as well. Second, interpretive markup achieves problematic results: while searchability is improved, the markup threatens to inhibit the reader's experience of the text.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.44</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>594 x 792 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><keywordCount>0</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>799</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>5029</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>30240</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>10</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>120</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Semantic markup for literary scholars: How descriptive markup affects the study and teaching of literature</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>39</volume><publisherId><json:string>MEET</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>10</total><last>180</last><first>171</first></pages><issn><json:string>0044-7870</json:string></issn><issue>1</issue><subject><json:item><value>semantic analysis</value></json:item><json:item><value>XML</value></json:item><json:item><value>literature</value></json:item><json:item><value>markup languages</value></json:item><json:item><value>encoding</value></json:item><json:item><value>metadata</value></json:item><json:item><value>usability</value></json:item><json:item><value>Metadata</value></json:item></subject><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1550-8390</json:string></eissn><title>Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology</title><doi><json:string>10.1002/(ISSN)1550-8390</json:string></doi></host><publicationDate>2002</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2002</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1002/meet.1450390119</json:string></doi><id>70DA96E9A00A25129BB3B9C97EBFD5C777179B71</id><score>0.3095667</score><fulltext><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/70DA96E9A00A25129BB3B9C97EBFD5C777179B71/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><extension>zip</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/70DA96E9A00A25129BB3B9C97EBFD5C777179B71/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/70DA96E9A00A25129BB3B9C97EBFD5C777179B71/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Semantic markup for literary scholars: How descriptive markup affects the study and teaching of literature</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><pubPlace>Hoboken</pubPlace><availability><p>WILEY</p></availability><date>2002</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Semantic markup for literary scholars: How descriptive markup affects the study and teaching of literature</title><author><persName><forename type="first">D. Grant</forename><surname>Campbell</surname></persName><email>gcampbel@uwo.ca</email><affiliation>Faculty of Information and Media Studies, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5B7</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Proc. Am. Soc. Info. Sci. Tech.</title><idno type="pISSN">0044-7870</idno><idno type="eISSN">1550-8390</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1550-8390</idno><imprint><publisher>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><pubPlace>Hoboken</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2002-11"></date><biblScope unit="volume">39</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="171">171</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="180">180</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">70DA96E9A00A25129BB3B9C97EBFD5C777179B71</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/meet.1450390119</idno><idno type="ArticleID">MEET1450390119</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2002</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This paper describes a qualitative study, which investigated the attitudes of literary scholars towards the features of semantic markup for primary texts. The scholars were shown seven variations of the same text in XML format, each varying according to the two main features of semantic markup: the separation of structure from layout, and the ability to add interpretive markup to enhance searchability. The responses suggest that, contrary to many popular assumptions, layout is a vital part of the reading process, which implies that the standardization of DTDs begun with the Text Encoding Initiative should extend to styling as well. Second, interpretive markup achieves problematic results: while searchability is improved, the markup threatens to inhibit the reader's experience of the text.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="Journal Subject"><list><head>index-terms</head><item><term>semantic analysis</term></item><item><term>XML</term></item><item><term>literature</term></item><item><term>markup languages</term></item><item><term>encoding</term></item><item><term>metadata</term></item><item><term>usability</term></item></list></keywords></textClass><textClass><keywords scheme="Journal Subject"><list><head>article-category</head><item><term>Metadata</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2002-11">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><extension>txt</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/70DA96E9A00A25129BB3B9C97EBFD5C777179B71/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisherName><publisherLoc>Hoboken</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi registered="yes">10.1002/(ISSN)1550-8390</doi><issn type="print">0044-7870</issn><issn type="electronic">1550-8390</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="MEET"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" xml:lang="en" sort="PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY">Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology</title><title type="short">Proc. Am. Soc. Info. Sci. Tech.</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="10"><doi origin="wiley" registered="no">10.1002/meet.v39:1</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="39">39</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">1</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2002-11">November 2002</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="19" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley" registered="no">10.1002/meet.1450390119</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="MEET1450390119"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="10"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Metadata</title><title type="tocHeading1">Metadata</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="thirdParty">Copyright © 2002 American Society for Information Science and Technology</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2005-01-31"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2005-01-31"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:JWSART34_TO_WML3G version:2.3.4 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-30"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-02-02"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-11-03"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">171</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">180</numbering></numberingGroup><subjectInfo><subject href="psi.asis.org/digital/semantic+analysis">semantic analysis</subject><subject href="psi.asis.org/digital/XML">XML</subject><subject href="psi.asis.org/digital/literature">literature</subject><subject href="psi.asis.org/digital/markup+languages">markup languages</subject><subject href="psi.asis.org/digital/encoding">encoding</subject><subject href="psi.asis.org/digital/metadata">metadata</subject><subject href="psi.asis.org/digital/usability">usability</subject></subjectInfo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:MEET.MEET1450390119.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="6"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="17"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" xml:lang="en">Semantic markup for literary scholars: How descriptive markup affects the study and teaching of literature</title><title type="short" xml:lang="en">Semantic Markup for Literary Scholars</title></titleGroup><creators><creator xml:id="au1" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af1"><personName><givenNames>D. Grant</givenNames><familyName>Campbell</familyName></personName><contactDetails><email>gcampbel@uwo.ca</email></contactDetails></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="af1" countryCode="CA" type="organization"><unparsedAffiliation>Faculty of Information and Media Studies, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5B7</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p>This paper describes a qualitative study, which investigated the attitudes of literary scholars towards the features of semantic markup for primary texts. The scholars were shown seven variations of the same text in XML format, each varying according to the two main features of semantic markup: the separation of structure from layout, and the ability to add interpretive markup to enhance searchability. The responses suggest that, contrary to many popular assumptions, layout is a vital part of the reading process, which implies that the standardization of DTDs begun with the Text Encoding Initiative should extend to styling as well. Second, interpretive markup achieves problematic results: while searchability is improved, the markup threatens to inhibit the reader's experience of the text.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Semantic markup for literary scholars: How descriptive markup affects the study and teaching of literature</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Semantic Markup for Literary Scholars</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Semantic markup for literary scholars: How descriptive markup affects the study and teaching of literature</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">D. Grant</namePart><namePart type="family">Campbell</namePart><affiliation>Faculty of Information and Media Studies, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5B7</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: gcampbel@uwo.ca</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Hoboken</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2002-11</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2002</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="figures">6</extent><extent unit="references">17</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">This paper describes a qualitative study, which investigated the attitudes of literary scholars towards the features of semantic markup for primary texts. The scholars were shown seven variations of the same text in XML format, each varying according to the two main features of semantic markup: the separation of structure from layout, and the ability to add interpretive markup to enhance searchability. The responses suggest that, contrary to many popular assumptions, layout is a vital part of the reading process, which implies that the standardization of DTDs begun with the Text Encoding Initiative should extend to styling as well. Second, interpretive markup achieves problematic results: while searchability is improved, the markup threatens to inhibit the reader's experience of the text.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Proc. Am. Soc. Info. Sci. Tech.</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><subject><genre>index-terms</genre><topic authorityURI="psi.asis.org/digital/semantic+analysis">semantic analysis</topic><topic authorityURI="psi.asis.org/digital/XML">XML</topic><topic authorityURI="psi.asis.org/digital/literature">literature</topic><topic authorityURI="psi.asis.org/digital/markup+languages">markup languages</topic><topic authorityURI="psi.asis.org/digital/encoding">encoding</topic><topic authorityURI="psi.asis.org/digital/metadata">metadata</topic><topic authorityURI="psi.asis.org/digital/usability">usability</topic></subject><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Metadata</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0044-7870</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1550-8390</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1550-8390</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">MEET</identifier><part><date>2002</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>39</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>171</start><end>180</end><total>10</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">70DA96E9A00A25129BB3B9C97EBFD5C777179B71</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/meet.1450390119</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">MEET1450390119</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 2002 American Society for Information Science and Technology</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Ticri/explor/TeiVM2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000111 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000111 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Ticri
|area= TeiVM2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:70DA96E9A00A25129BB3B9C97EBFD5C777179B71
|texte= Semantic markup for literary scholars: How descriptive markup affects the study and teaching of literature
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |