Alternative organizational formations: a neo Weberian typology of polycratic administrative systems
Identifieur interne : 003391 ( Main/Merge ); précédent : 003390; suivant : 003392Alternative organizational formations: a neo Weberian typology of polycratic administrative systems
Auteurs : RBID : ISTEX:C0D94A93D2F742BA35F226B13722EDB87A894C1CAbstract
Much of the critical attention given to Weber's tripartite scheme of legitimate domination has focused on the issue of its supposed incapacity to accommodate forms of organization not based on instrumental rationality. In fact substantive rationality is a continuous point of reference in Weber's analysis and surfaces in his brief and fragmentary outlines of three polycratic organizational forms: collegiality, mass democracy, and direct democracy. This article locates polycratic organizations in relation to the three monocratic structures indicated by the typology of legitimate domination. Extant examples of polycratic organizations are compared substantively. The three forms are then typologized in terms first of characteristics of participation by personnel, and second of the processes by which decisions are made.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1993.tb02954.x
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 003C13
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 003C13
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 002896
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:C0D94A93D2F742BA35F226B13722EDB87A894C1CLe document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>Alternative organizational formations: a neo Weberian typology of polycratic administrative systems</title><author><name sortKey="Waters, Malcolm" uniqKey="Waters M">Malcolm Waters</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Tasmania</mods:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="no comma">University of Tasmania</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:C0D94A93D2F742BA35F226B13722EDB87A894C1C</idno><date when="1993">1993</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-954X.1993.tb02954.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/C0D94A93D2F742BA35F226B13722EDB87A894C1C/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">003C13</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">003C13</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">002896</idno><idno type="MainMerge">002896</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">003391</idno></publicationStmt><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0038-0261</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="eng">Much of the critical attention given to Weber's tripartite scheme of legitimate domination has focused on the issue of its supposed incapacity to accommodate forms of organization not based on instrumental rationality. In fact substantive rationality is a continuous point of reference in Weber's analysis and surfaces in his brief and fragmentary outlines of three polycratic organizational forms: collegiality, mass democracy, and direct democracy. This article locates polycratic organizations in relation to the three monocratic structures indicated by the typology of legitimate domination. Extant examples of polycratic organizations are compared substantively. The three forms are then typologized in terms first of characteristics of participation by personnel, and second of the processes by which decisions are made.</div></front></TEI></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Linguistique/explor/CharterV3/Data/Main/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003391 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 003391 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Linguistique
|area= CharterV3
|flux= Main
|étape= Merge
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:C0D94A93D2F742BA35F226B13722EDB87A894C1C
|texte= Alternative organizational formations: a neo Weberian typology of polycratic administrative systems
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.07. |  |