Serveur d'exploration sur les chartes

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

A Usable Past: History and the Politics of National Identity in Late Victorian England

Identifieur interne : 001713 ( Main/Merge ); précédent : 001712; suivant : 001714

A Usable Past: History and the Politics of National Identity in Late Victorian England

Auteurs : RBID : ISTEX:19CC58625550DD38A58161C5BEF52F43F8CCD18F

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

For the past two decades, issues of English national identity have provided a fertile field for historical investigation. In the late Victorian era, the development of professional standards of scholarship within the academy gave a new dimension to historical debates. The bitter quarrels about appropriate research techniques from the 1860s to the 1890s, among James Anthony Froude, Edward Freeman and John Horace Round, acted as a proxy for the vision of national identity that each historian espoused. After 1870, the development of a national narrative focused on constitutional history as its primary vehicle. The battle over historical reconstruction represented a surrogate for divergent views about political values and national identity. What sometimes seemed frivolous scholarly skirmishes, therefore, had a much greater political importance. As a result, the long feud had greater importance than the eccentric personalities of the participants appeared to indicate. For Froude, the Tudor age of discovery and religious reformation represented the best of English character. For Freeman, a strong Gladstonian Liberal, consensus and continuity over many centuries defined English history best. John Horace Round, a Conservative stalwart, thought that Freeman had slanted his historical conclusions to validate his Liberal politics and reinterpreted the Norman conquest to express his own political beliefs. Thus the quibbles about shield walls and other issues provided a terrain for the real cause of antagonism: different views of national identity that history furnished. Each historian constructed a usable past in order to justify contemporary discussions of national identity.

Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-0206.2007.00008.x

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:19CC58625550DD38A58161C5BEF52F43F8CCD18F

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>A Usable Past: History and the Politics of National Identity in Late Victorian England</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Cosgrove, Richard A" uniqKey="Cosgrove R">RICHARD A. COSGROVE</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>University of Arizona</mods:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="no comma">University of Arizona</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:19CC58625550DD38A58161C5BEF52F43F8CCD18F</idno>
<date when="2008">2008</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1750-0206.2007.00008.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/19CC58625550DD38A58161C5BEF52F43F8CCD18F/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002796</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">002796</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">001517</idno>
<idno type="MainMerge">001517</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">001713</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0264-2824</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Anglo‐Saxonism</term>
<term>Archival history</term>
<term>Constitutional history</term>
<term>E.A. Freeman</term>
<term>J.A. Froude</term>
<term>J.H. Round</term>
<term>National identity</term>
<term>Norman conquest</term>
<term>Professional history</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Identité nationale</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="eng">For the past two decades, issues of English national identity have provided a fertile field for historical investigation. In the late Victorian era, the development of professional standards of scholarship within the academy gave a new dimension to historical debates. The bitter quarrels about appropriate research techniques from the 1860s to the 1890s, among James Anthony Froude, Edward Freeman and John Horace Round, acted as a proxy for the vision of national identity that each historian espoused. After 1870, the development of a national narrative focused on constitutional history as its primary vehicle. The battle over historical reconstruction represented a surrogate for divergent views about political values and national identity. What sometimes seemed frivolous scholarly skirmishes, therefore, had a much greater political importance. As a result, the long feud had greater importance than the eccentric personalities of the participants appeared to indicate. For Froude, the Tudor age of discovery and religious reformation represented the best of English character. For Freeman, a strong Gladstonian Liberal, consensus and continuity over many centuries defined English history best. John Horace Round, a Conservative stalwart, thought that Freeman had slanted his historical conclusions to validate his Liberal politics and reinterpreted the Norman conquest to express his own political beliefs. Thus the quibbles about shield walls and other issues provided a terrain for the real cause of antagonism: different views of national identity that history furnished. Each historian constructed a usable past in order to justify contemporary discussions of national identity.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Linguistique/explor/CharterV3/Data/Main/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001713 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 001713 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Linguistique
   |area=    CharterV3
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Merge
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:19CC58625550DD38A58161C5BEF52F43F8CCD18F
   |texte=   A Usable Past: History and the Politics of National Identity in Late Victorian England
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.07.
Data generation: Mon Jun 22 09:43:01 2015. Site generation: Mon Mar 11 16:19:56 2024