Who owns the child in hospital? A preliminary discussion
Identifieur interne : 000E70 ( Istex/Curation ); précédent : 000E69; suivant : 000E71Who owns the child in hospital? A preliminary discussion
Auteurs : RBID : ISTEX:08C396C1FAA32FD2CDF5A584515B4D397DA9FF4ADescripteurs français
- Wicri :
- topic : éthique, Soins de santé, Droits de l'homme, Propriété des biens.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Aim. To ‘own’ a person is considered an infringement of human rights, but we suggest that concepts of ownership influence interactions between parents and staff when a child is admitted to hospital. This paper aims to stimulate debate and contains an explanation of the exploration of the literature for research and discussion of ownership of the child. Method. A wide variety of library indexes, databases and populist media were examined although it was impossible to examine all literature which may have contained references to this topic, and, apart from databases which contained abstracts in English, we could not include literature written in any language other than English, Swedish, and Icelandic. Findings. We found no research that examines how concepts of ownership of a child affects communication between health professionals and parents and, ultimately, the delivery of health care. This paper begins discussion on the issues. Discussion. Historical literature shows that ownership of humans has been a part of many cultures, and parents were once considered to own their children. Ownership of another has legal connotations, for instance in guardianship struggles of children during marriage breakup and in ethical debates over surrogacy and products of assisted conception. Within health care, it becomes a contentious issue in transplantation of body parts, in discourse on autonomy and informed consent, and for religious groups who refuse blood transfusions. In health care, models such as family centred care and partnership in care depend on positive communication between parents and staff. If a hospital staff member feels that he/she owns a child for whom he/she is caring, then conflict between the staff member and the parents over who has the ‘best interests of the child’ at heart is possible. Conclusion. We encourage debate about concepts of who owns the hospitalized child – the parents or the staff? Should it be argued at all? Is the whole concept of ownership of another, be it adult or child, the ethical antithesis to modern beliefs about human rights? Comment on this issue is invited.
Url:
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02521.x
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000E70
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:08C396C1FAA32FD2CDF5A584515B4D397DA9FF4ALe document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>Who owns the child in hospital? A preliminary discussion</title><author><name sortKey="Shields, Linda" uniqKey="Shields L">Linda Shields</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>NH & MRC Public Health Research Fellow, Mater Children's Hospital, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Adjunct Senior Lecturer, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia, Visiting Fellow, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia; and Visiting Fellow, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden and University of Northumbria, Newcastle‐upon‐Tyne, UK</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>NH & MRC Public Health Research Fellow, Mater Children's Hospital, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Adjunct Senior Lecturer, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia, Visiting Fellow, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia; and Visiting Fellow, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden and University of Northumbria, Newcastle‐upon‐Tyne</wicri:regionArea></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Correspondence:
Linda Shields,
NH & MRC Public Health Research Fellow,
Mater Children's Hospital,
South Brisbane,
Queensland 4101,
Australia.
E‐mail: 1cm5ch@mater.org.au</mods:affiliation><country wicri:rule="url">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>Correspondence:
Linda Shields,
NH & MRC Public Health Research Fellow,
Mater Children's Hospital,
South Brisbane,
Queensland 4101</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kristensson Allstr M, Inger" uniqKey="Kristensson Allstr M I">Inger Kristensson‐Hallström</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Associate Professor, Department of Nursing, Children's Hospital, University Hospital, and The Vardal Institute, Lund University, Lund, Sweden</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Suède</country><wicri:regionArea>Associate Professor, Department of Nursing, Children's Hospital, University Hospital, and The Vardal Institute, Lund University, Lund</wicri:regionArea></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Correspondence:
Linda Shields,
NH & MRC Public Health Research Fellow,
Mater Children's Hospital,
South Brisbane,
Queensland 4101,
Australia.
E‐mail: 1cm5ch@mater.org.au</mods:affiliation><country wicri:rule="url">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>Correspondence:
Linda Shields,
NH & MRC Public Health Research Fellow,
Mater Children's Hospital,
South Brisbane,
Queensland 4101</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kristj Nsd Ttir, Gudrun" uniqKey="Kristj Nsd Ttir G">Gudrun Kristjánsdóttir</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Professor of Paediatric Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Islande</country><wicri:regionArea>Professor of Paediatric Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, University of Iceland, Reykjavik</wicri:regionArea></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Correspondence:
Linda Shields,
NH & MRC Public Health Research Fellow,
Mater Children's Hospital,
South Brisbane,
Queensland 4101,
Australia.
E‐mail: 1cm5ch@mater.org.au</mods:affiliation><country wicri:rule="url">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>Correspondence:
Linda Shields,
NH & MRC Public Health Research Fellow,
Mater Children's Hospital,
South Brisbane,
Queensland 4101</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hunter, Judith" uniqKey="Hunter J">Judith Hunter</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Clinical Director, Trauma/Orthopaedics and A & E, City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Trust, Sunderland, UK</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Clinical Director, Trauma/Orthopaedics and A & E, City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Trust, Sunderland</wicri:regionArea></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Correspondence:
Linda Shields,
NH & MRC Public Health Research Fellow,
Mater Children's Hospital,
South Brisbane,
Queensland 4101,
Australia.
E‐mail: 1cm5ch@mater.org.au</mods:affiliation><country wicri:rule="url">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>Correspondence:
Linda Shields,
NH & MRC Public Health Research Fellow,
Mater Children's Hospital,
South Brisbane,
Queensland 4101</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:08C396C1FAA32FD2CDF5A584515B4D397DA9FF4A</idno><date when="2003">2003</date><idno type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02521.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/08C396C1FAA32FD2CDF5A584515B4D397DA9FF4A/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000E70</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000E70</idno></publicationStmt><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0309-2402</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Children</term><term>Ethics</term><term>Health care</term><term>Hospital</term><term>Human rights</term><term>Law</term><term>Ownership</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>éthique</term><term>Soins de santé</term><term>Droits de l'homme</term><term>Propriété des biens</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="eng">Aim. To ‘own’ a person is considered an infringement of human rights, but we suggest that concepts of ownership influence interactions between parents and staff when a child is admitted to hospital. This paper aims to stimulate debate and contains an explanation of the exploration of the literature for research and discussion of ownership of the child. Method. A wide variety of library indexes, databases and populist media were examined although it was impossible to examine all literature which may have contained references to this topic, and, apart from databases which contained abstracts in English, we could not include literature written in any language other than English, Swedish, and Icelandic. Findings. We found no research that examines how concepts of ownership of a child affects communication between health professionals and parents and, ultimately, the delivery of health care. This paper begins discussion on the issues. Discussion. Historical literature shows that ownership of humans has been a part of many cultures, and parents were once considered to own their children. Ownership of another has legal connotations, for instance in guardianship struggles of children during marriage breakup and in ethical debates over surrogacy and products of assisted conception. Within health care, it becomes a contentious issue in transplantation of body parts, in discourse on autonomy and informed consent, and for religious groups who refuse blood transfusions. In health care, models such as family centred care and partnership in care depend on positive communication between parents and staff. If a hospital staff member feels that he/she owns a child for whom he/she is caring, then conflict between the staff member and the parents over who has the ‘best interests of the child’ at heart is possible. Conclusion. We encourage debate about concepts of who owns the hospitalized child – the parents or the staff? Should it be argued at all? Is the whole concept of ownership of another, be it adult or child, the ethical antithesis to modern beliefs about human rights? Comment on this issue is invited.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><copyrightdate>2003</copyrightdate><author><json:item><name>Linda Shields PhD FRCNA</name><affiliations><json:string>NH & MRC Public Health Research Fellow, Mater Children's Hospital, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Adjunct Senior Lecturer, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia, Visiting Fellow, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia; and Visiting Fellow, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden and University of Northumbria, Newcastle‐upon‐Tyne, UK</json:string><json:string>Correspondence:
Linda Shields,
NH & MRC Public Health Research Fellow,
Mater Children's Hospital,
South Brisbane,
Queensland 4101,
Australia.
E‐mail: 1cm5ch@mater.org.au</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Inger Kristensson‐Hallström DrMedSci</name><affiliations><json:string>Associate Professor, Department of Nursing, Children's Hospital, University Hospital, and The Vardal Institute, Lund University, Lund, Sweden</json:string><json:string>Correspondence:
Linda Shields,
NH & MRC Public Health Research Fellow,
Mater Children's Hospital,
South Brisbane,
Queensland 4101,
Australia.
E‐mail: 1cm5ch@mater.org.au</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Gudrun Kristjánsdóttir DrPH RN</name><affiliations><json:string>Professor of Paediatric Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland</json:string><json:string>Correspondence:
Linda Shields,
NH & MRC Public Health Research Fellow,
Mater Children's Hospital,
South Brisbane,
Queensland 4101,
Australia.
E‐mail: 1cm5ch@mater.org.au</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Judith Hunter BSc MA RN MBE</name><affiliations><json:string>Clinical Director, Trauma/Orthopaedics and A & E, City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Trust, Sunderland, UK</json:string><json:string>Correspondence:
Linda Shields,
NH & MRC Public Health Research Fellow,
Mater Children's Hospital,
South Brisbane,
Queensland 4101,
Australia.
E‐mail: 1cm5ch@mater.org.au</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang>eng</lang><value>ethics</value></json:item><json:item><lang>eng</lang><value>children</value></json:item><json:item><lang>eng</lang><value>law</value></json:item><json:item><lang>eng</lang><value>health care</value></json:item><json:item><lang>eng</lang><value>hospital</value></json:item><json:item><lang>eng</lang><value>human rights</value></json:item><json:item><lang>eng</lang><value>ownership</value></json:item></subject><genre><json:string>Serial article</json:string></genre><host><genre></genre><language></language><issn><json:string>0309-2402</json:string></issn><title>Journal of Advanced Nursing</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2648</json:string></doi></host><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><abstract>Aim. To ‘own’ a person is considered an infringement of human rights, but we suggest that concepts of ownership influence interactions between parents and staff when a child is admitted to hospital. This paper aims to stimulate debate and contains an explanation of the exploration of the literature for research and discussion of ownership of the child. Method. A wide variety of library indexes, databases and populist media were examined although it was impossible to examine all literature which may have contained references to this topic, and, apart from databases which contained abstracts in English, we could not include literature written in any language other than English, Swedish, and Icelandic. Findings. We found no research that examines how concepts of ownership of a child affects communication between health professionals and parents and, ultimately, the delivery of health care. This paper begins discussion on the issues. Discussion. Historical literature shows that ownership of humans has been a part of many cultures, and parents were once considered to own their children. Ownership of another has legal connotations, for instance in guardianship struggles of children during marriage breakup and in ethical debates over surrogacy and products of assisted conception. Within health care, it becomes a contentious issue in transplantation of body parts, in discourse on autonomy and informed consent, and for religious groups who refuse blood transfusions. In health care, models such as family centred care and partnership in care depend on positive communication between parents and staff. If a hospital staff member feels that he/she owns a child for whom he/she is caring, then conflict between the staff member and the parents over who has the ‘best interests of the child’ at heart is possible. Conclusion. We encourage debate about concepts of who owns the hospitalized child – the parents or the staff? Should it be argued at all? Is the whole concept of ownership of another, be it adult or child, the ethical antithesis to modern beliefs about human rights? Comment on this issue is invited.</abstract><title>Who owns the child in hospital? A preliminary discussion</title><pubdate>2003-02</pubdate><doi><json:string>10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02521.x</json:string></doi><id>08C396C1FAA32FD2CDF5A584515B4D397DA9FF4A</id><fulltext><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/08C396C1FAA32FD2CDF5A584515B4D397DA9FF4A/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><extension>zip</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/08C396C1FAA32FD2CDF5A584515B4D397DA9FF4A/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><extension>txt</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/08C396C1FAA32FD2CDF5A584515B4D397DA9FF4A/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/08C396C1FAA32FD2CDF5A584515B4D397DA9FF4A/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader type="text"><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="alt" xml:lang="">Who owns the child in hospital? A preliminary discussion</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>Blackwell Science Ltd</p></availability><date>2003-02-04</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="">Who owns the child in hospital? A preliminary discussion</title><author><persName><forename type="first">Linda</forename><surname>Shields</surname><roleName type="degree">PhD FRCNA</roleName></persName><affiliation>NH & MRC Public Health Research Fellow, Mater Children's Hospital, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Adjunct Senior Lecturer, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia, Visiting Fellow, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia; and Visiting Fellow, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden and University of Northumbria, Newcastle‐upon‐Tyne, UK</affiliation><note type="correspondence"><p>Correspondence:
Linda Shields,
NH & MRC Public Health Research Fellow,
Mater Children's Hospital,
South Brisbane,
Queensland 4101,
Australia.
E‐mail: 1cm5ch@mater.org.au</p></note></author><author><persName><forename type="first">Inger</forename><surname>Kristensson‐Hallström</surname><roleName type="degree">DrMedSci</roleName></persName><affiliation>Associate Professor, Department of Nursing, Children's Hospital, University Hospital, and The Vardal Institute, Lund University, Lund, Sweden</affiliation><note type="correspondence"><p>Correspondence:
Linda Shields,
NH & MRC Public Health Research Fellow,
Mater Children's Hospital,
South Brisbane,
Queensland 4101,
Australia.
E‐mail: 1cm5ch@mater.org.au</p></note></author><author><persName><forename type="first">Gudrun</forename><surname>Kristjánsdóttir</surname><roleName type="degree">DrPH RN</roleName></persName><affiliation>Professor of Paediatric Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland</affiliation><note type="correspondence"><p>Correspondence:
Linda Shields,
NH & MRC Public Health Research Fellow,
Mater Children's Hospital,
South Brisbane,
Queensland 4101,
Australia.
E‐mail: 1cm5ch@mater.org.au</p></note></author><author><persName><forename type="first">Judith</forename><surname>Hunter</surname><roleName type="degree">BSc MA RN MBE</roleName></persName><affiliation>Clinical Director, Trauma/Orthopaedics and A & E, City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Trust, Sunderland, UK</affiliation><note type="correspondence"><p>Correspondence:
Linda Shields,
NH & MRC Public Health Research Fellow,
Mater Children's Hospital,
South Brisbane,
Queensland 4101,
Australia.
E‐mail: 1cm5ch@mater.org.au</p></note></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Journal of Advanced Nursing</title><idno type="pISSN">0309-2402</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2648</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2648</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2003-02"></date><biblScope unit="vol">41</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="213">213</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="222">222</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">08C396C1FAA32FD2CDF5A584515B4D397DA9FF4A</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02521.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">JAN2521</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2003-02-04</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Aim. To ‘own’ a person is considered an infringement of human rights, but we suggest that concepts of ownership influence interactions between parents and staff when a child is admitted to hospital. This paper aims to stimulate debate and contains an explanation of the exploration of the literature for research and discussion of ownership of the child. Method. A wide variety of library indexes, databases and populist media were examined although it was impossible to examine all literature which may have contained references to this topic, and, apart from databases which contained abstracts in English, we could not include literature written in any language other than English, Swedish, and Icelandic. Findings. We found no research that examines how concepts of ownership of a child affects communication between health professionals and parents and, ultimately, the delivery of health care. This paper begins discussion on the issues. Discussion. Historical literature shows that ownership of humans has been a part of many cultures, and parents were once considered to own their children. Ownership of another has legal connotations, for instance in guardianship struggles of children during marriage breakup and in ethical debates over surrogacy and products of assisted conception. Within health care, it becomes a contentious issue in transplantation of body parts, in discourse on autonomy and informed consent, and for religious groups who refuse blood transfusions. In health care, models such as family centred care and partnership in care depend on positive communication between parents and staff. If a hospital staff member feels that he/she owns a child for whom he/she is caring, then conflict between the staff member and the parents over who has the ‘best interests of the child’ at heart is possible. Conclusion. We encourage debate about concepts of who owns the hospitalized child – the parents or the staff? Should it be argued at all? Is the whole concept of ownership of another, be it adult or child, the ethical antithesis to modern beliefs about human rights? Comment on this issue is invited.</p></abstract><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>Keywords</head><item><term>ethics</term></item><item><term>children</term></item><item><term>law</term></item><item><term>health care</term></item><item><term>hospital</term></item><item><term>human rights</term></item><item><term>ownership</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2003-02-04">Created</change><change when="2003-02">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley component found"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2648</doi><issn type="print">0309-2402</issn><issn type="electronic">1365-2648</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JAN"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING">Journal of Advanced Nursing</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="02003"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/jan.2003.41.issue-3</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="41">41</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="3">3</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2003-02">February 2003</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0021300" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02521.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JAN2521"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="10"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Philosophical and ethical issues</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2003-02-04"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2003-02-04"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-06"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-28"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-24"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="213">213</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="222">222</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>
<i>Linda Shields,
NH & MRC Public Health Research Fellow,
Mater Children's Hospital,
South Brisbane,
Queensland 4101,
Australia.
E‐mail: </i><email>1cm5ch@mater.org.au</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JAN.JAN2521.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><unparsedEditorialHistory>Submitted for publication 14 March 2002 Accepted for publication 18 October 2002</unparsedEditorialHistory><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="109"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="7199"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Who owns the child in hospital? A preliminary discussion</title><title type="shortAuthors"><i>L. Shields</i> et al.</title><title type="short"><i>Who owns the child in hospital?</i></title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Linda</givenNames><familyName>Shields</familyName><degrees>PhD FRCNA</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Inger</givenNames><familyName>Kristensson‐Hallström</familyName><degrees>DrMedSci</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Gudrun</givenNames><familyName>Kristjánsdóttir</familyName><degrees>DrPH RN</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a4"><personName><givenNames>Judith</givenNames><familyName>Hunter</familyName><degrees>BSc MA RN MBE</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="GB"><unparsedAffiliation>NH & MRC Public Health Research Fellow, Mater Children's Hospital, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Adjunct Senior Lecturer, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia, Visiting Fellow, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia; and Visiting Fellow, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden and University of Northumbria, Newcastle‐upon‐Tyne, UK</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>Associate Professor, Department of Nursing, Children's Hospital, University Hospital, and The Vardal Institute, Lund University, Lund, Sweden</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="IS"><unparsedAffiliation>Professor of Paediatric Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a4" countryCode="GB"><unparsedAffiliation>Clinical Director, Trauma/Orthopaedics and A & E, City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Trust, Sunderland, UK</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">ethics</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">children</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">law</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">health care</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">hospital</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">human rights</keyword><keyword xml:id="k7">ownership</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><!-- shields l ., kristensson -hallström i ., kristjánsdóttir g ., hunter j . (2003)  Journal of Advanced Nursing41(3), 213–222
Who owns the child in hospital? A preliminary discussion<p> <b>Aim.</b> To ‘own’ a person is considered an infringement of human rights, but we suggest that concepts of ownership influence interactions between parents and staff when a child is admitted to hospital. This paper aims to stimulate debate and contains an explanation of the exploration of the literature for research and discussion of ownership of the child.</p><p> <b>Method.</b> A wide variety of library indexes, databases and populist media were examined although it was impossible to examine all literature which may have contained references to this topic, and, apart from databases which contained abstracts in English, we could not include literature written in any language other than English, Swedish, and Icelandic.</p><p> <b>Findings.</b> We found no research that examines how concepts of ownership of a child affects communication between health professionals and parents and, ultimately, the delivery of health care. This paper begins discussion on the issues.</p><p> <b>Discussion.</b> Historical literature shows that ownership of humans has been a part of many cultures, and parents were once considered to own their children. Ownership of another has legal connotations, for instance in guardianship struggles of children during marriage breakup and in ethical debates over surrogacy and products of assisted conception. Within health care, it becomes a contentious issue in transplantation of body parts, in discourse on autonomy and informed consent, and for religious groups who refuse blood transfusions. In health care, models such as family centred care and partnership in care depend on positive communication between parents and staff. If a hospital staff member feels that he/she owns a child for whom he/she is caring, then conflict between the staff member and the parents over who has the ‘best interests of the child’ at heart is possible.</p><p> <b>Conclusion.</b> We encourage debate about concepts of who owns the hospitalized child – the parents or the staff? Should it be argued at all? Is the whole concept of ownership of another, be it adult or child, the ethical antithesis to modern beliefs about human rights? Comment on this issue is invited.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.5"><titleInfo><title>Who owns the child in hospital? A preliminary discussion</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Who owns the child in hospital?</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative"><title>Who owns the child in hospital? A preliminary discussion</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Linda</namePart><namePart type="family">Shields</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">PhD FRCNA</namePart><affiliation>NH & MRC Public Health Research Fellow, Mater Children's Hospital, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Adjunct Senior Lecturer, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia, Visiting Fellow, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia; and Visiting Fellow, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden and University of Northumbria, Newcastle‐upon‐Tyne, UK</affiliation><affiliation>Correspondence:
Linda Shields,
NH & MRC Public Health Research Fellow,
Mater Children's Hospital,
South Brisbane,
Queensland 4101,
Australia.
E‐mail: 1cm5ch@mater.org.au</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Inger</namePart><namePart type="family">Kristensson‐Hallström</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DrMedSci</namePart><affiliation>Associate Professor, Department of Nursing, Children's Hospital, University Hospital, and The Vardal Institute, Lund University, Lund, Sweden</affiliation><affiliation>Correspondence:
Linda Shields,
NH & MRC Public Health Research Fellow,
Mater Children's Hospital,
South Brisbane,
Queensland 4101,
Australia.
E‐mail: 1cm5ch@mater.org.au</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Gudrun</namePart><namePart type="family">Kristjánsdóttir</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">DrPH RN</namePart><affiliation>Professor of Paediatric Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland</affiliation><affiliation>Correspondence:
Linda Shields,
NH & MRC Public Health Research Fellow,
Mater Children's Hospital,
South Brisbane,
Queensland 4101,
Australia.
E‐mail: 1cm5ch@mater.org.au</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Judith</namePart><namePart type="family">Hunter</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">BSc MA RN MBE</namePart><affiliation>Clinical Director, Trauma/Orthopaedics and A & E, City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Trust, Sunderland, UK</affiliation><affiliation>Correspondence:
Linda Shields,
NH & MRC Public Health Research Fellow,
Mater Children's Hospital,
South Brisbane,
Queensland 4101,
Australia.
E‐mail: 1cm5ch@mater.org.au</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre>Serial article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2003-02-04</dateCreated><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2003-02</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2003</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract lang="eng">Aim. To ‘own’ a person is considered an infringement of human rights, but we suggest that concepts of ownership influence interactions between parents and staff when a child is admitted to hospital. This paper aims to stimulate debate and contains an explanation of the exploration of the literature for research and discussion of ownership of the child. Method. A wide variety of library indexes, databases and populist media were examined although it was impossible to examine all literature which may have contained references to this topic, and, apart from databases which contained abstracts in English, we could not include literature written in any language other than English, Swedish, and Icelandic. Findings. We found no research that examines how concepts of ownership of a child affects communication between health professionals and parents and, ultimately, the delivery of health care. This paper begins discussion on the issues. Discussion. Historical literature shows that ownership of humans has been a part of many cultures, and parents were once considered to own their children. Ownership of another has legal connotations, for instance in guardianship struggles of children during marriage breakup and in ethical debates over surrogacy and products of assisted conception. Within health care, it becomes a contentious issue in transplantation of body parts, in discourse on autonomy and informed consent, and for religious groups who refuse blood transfusions. In health care, models such as family centred care and partnership in care depend on positive communication between parents and staff. If a hospital staff member feels that he/she owns a child for whom he/she is caring, then conflict between the staff member and the parents over who has the ‘best interests of the child’ at heart is possible. Conclusion. We encourage debate about concepts of who owns the hospitalized child – the parents or the staff? Should it be argued at all? Is the whole concept of ownership of another, be it adult or child, the ethical antithesis to modern beliefs about human rights? Comment on this issue is invited.</abstract><subject lang="eng"><genre>Keywords</genre><topic>ethics</topic><topic>children</topic><topic>law</topic><topic>health care</topic><topic>hospital</topic><topic>human rights</topic><topic>ownership</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Advanced Nursing</title></titleInfo><identifier type="ISSN">0309-2402</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1365-2648</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2648</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JAN</identifier><part><date>2003</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>41</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>3</number></detail></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">08C396C1FAA32FD2CDF5A584515B4D397DA9FF4A</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02521.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JAN2521</identifier><part><extent unit="pages"><start>213</start><end>222</end><total>10</total></extent><extent unit="references"><total>109</total></extent><extent unit="words"><total>7199</total></extent></part><recordInfo><recordOrigin>WILEY</recordOrigin><recordContentSource>Blackwell Science Ltd</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Linguistique/explor/CharterV3/Data/Istex/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000E70 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000E70 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Linguistique
|area= CharterV3
|flux= Istex
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:08C396C1FAA32FD2CDF5A584515B4D397DA9FF4A
|texte= Who owns the child in hospital? A preliminary discussion
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.07. |  |