Petitioning as popular politics in early sixteenth–century England
Identifieur interne : 000E27 ( Istex/Curation ); précédent : 000E26; suivant : 000E28Petitioning as popular politics in early sixteenth–century England
Auteurs : RBID : ISTEX:29B8999CA1A25B28C55C3372C58512FA871B5ADAAbstract
This article offers the thesis that petitioning by collective groups, whether occupational, regionally constituted, or simply the body of people called the commons, was an important form of political communication in the early sixteenth century which, although poorly documented and consequently overlooked by historians, allows us an entry into the world of popular politics. The article offers illustrations of the way in which petitions were employed within the city of York, by groups such as weavers or by the commons of East Anglia in 1549 and 1553. The right to petition could not be denied, but mass petitioning was viewed with apprehension by government. Nonetheless, petitioning may be seen as a conservative form of behaviour when compared to calls for insurrection.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/1468-2281.00156
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000E27
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:29B8999CA1A25B28C55C3372C58512FA871B5ADALe document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>Petitioning as popular politics in early sixteenth–century England</title><author><name sortKey="Hoyle, R W" uniqKey="Hoyle R">R. W. Hoyle</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Reading</mods:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="no comma">University of Reading</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:29B8999CA1A25B28C55C3372C58512FA871B5ADA</idno><date when="2002">2002</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/1468-2281.00156</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/29B8999CA1A25B28C55C3372C58512FA871B5ADA/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000E27</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000E27</idno></publicationStmt><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0950-3471</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="eng">This article offers the thesis that petitioning by collective groups, whether occupational, regionally constituted, or simply the body of people called the commons, was an important form of political communication in the early sixteenth century which, although poorly documented and consequently overlooked by historians, allows us an entry into the world of popular politics. The article offers illustrations of the way in which petitions were employed within the city of York, by groups such as weavers or by the commons of East Anglia in 1549 and 1553. The right to petition could not be denied, but mass petitioning was viewed with apprehension by government. Nonetheless, petitioning may be seen as a conservative form of behaviour when compared to calls for insurrection.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><copyrightdate>2002</copyrightdate><author><json:item><name>R. W. Hoyle</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Reading</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><genre><json:string>Serial article</json:string></genre><host><genre></genre><language></language><issn><json:string>0950-3471</json:string></issn><title>Historical Research</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1468-2281</json:string></doi></host><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><abstract>This article offers the thesis that petitioning by collective groups, whether occupational, regionally constituted, or simply the body of people called the commons, was an important form of political communication in the early sixteenth century which, although poorly documented and consequently overlooked by historians, allows us an entry into the world of popular politics. The article offers illustrations of the way in which petitions were employed within the city of York, by groups such as weavers or by the commons of East Anglia in 1549 and 1553. The right to petition could not be denied, but mass petitioning was viewed with apprehension by government. Nonetheless, petitioning may be seen as a conservative form of behaviour when compared to calls for insurrection.</abstract><title>Petitioning as popular politics in early sixteenth–century England</title><pubdate>2002-11</pubdate><doi><json:string>10.1111/1468-2281.00156</json:string></doi><id>29B8999CA1A25B28C55C3372C58512FA871B5ADA</id><fulltext><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/29B8999CA1A25B28C55C3372C58512FA871B5ADA/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><extension>zip</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/29B8999CA1A25B28C55C3372C58512FA871B5ADA/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><extension>txt</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/29B8999CA1A25B28C55C3372C58512FA871B5ADA/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/29B8999CA1A25B28C55C3372C58512FA871B5ADA/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader type="text"><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="alt" xml:lang="">Petitioning as popular politics in early sixteenth–century England</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</pubPlace><availability><p>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</p></availability><date>2002-12-16</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="">Petitioning as popular politics in early sixteenth–century England</title><author><persName><forename type="first">R. W.</forename><surname>Hoyle</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Reading</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Historical Research</title><idno type="pISSN">0950-3471</idno><idno type="eISSN">1468-2281</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1468-2281</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2002-11"></date><biblScope unit="vol">75</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">190</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="365">365</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="389">389</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">29B8999CA1A25B28C55C3372C58512FA871B5ADA</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/1468-2281.00156</idno><idno type="ArticleID">HISR156</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2002-12-16</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This article offers the thesis that petitioning by collective groups, whether occupational, regionally constituted, or simply the body of people called the commons, was an important form of political communication in the early sixteenth century which, although poorly documented and consequently overlooked by historians, allows us an entry into the world of popular politics. The article offers illustrations of the way in which petitions were employed within the city of York, by groups such as weavers or by the commons of East Anglia in 1549 and 1553. The right to petition could not be denied, but mass petitioning was viewed with apprehension by government. Nonetheless, petitioning may be seen as a conservative form of behaviour when compared to calls for insurrection.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2002-12-16">Created</change><change when="2002-11">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley component found"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1468-2281</doi><issn type="print">0950-3471</issn><issn type="electronic">1468-2281</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="HISR"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="HISTORICAL RESEARCH">Historical Research</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="11190"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/hisr.2002.75.issue-190</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="75">75</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="190">190</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2002-11">November 2002</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0036500" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/1468-2281.00156</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="HISR156"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="25"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><copyright>Institute of Historical Research, 2002</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2002-12-16"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2002-12-16"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:Header result:Header" date="2010-03-04"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-27"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-23"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="365">365</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="389">389</numbering></numberingGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:HISR.HISR156.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count><count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Petitioning as popular politics in early sixteenth–century England</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>R. W.</givenNames><familyName>Hoyle</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation>University of Reading</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>This article offers the thesis that petitioning by collective groups, whether occupational, regionally constituted, or simply the body of people called the commons, was an important form of political communication in the early sixteenth century which, although poorly documented and consequently overlooked by historians, allows us an entry into the world of popular politics. The article offers illustrations of the way in which petitions were employed within the city of York, by groups such as weavers or by the commons of East Anglia in 1549 and 1553. The right to petition could not be denied, but mass petitioning was viewed with apprehension by government. Nonetheless, petitioning may be seen as a conservative form of behaviour when compared to calls for insurrection.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.5"><titleInfo><title>Petitioning as popular politics in early sixteenth–century England</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative"><title>Petitioning as popular politics in early sixteenth–century England</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">R. W.</namePart><namePart type="family">Hoyle</namePart><affiliation>University of Reading</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre>Serial article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</placeTerm></place><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2002-12-16</dateCreated><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2002-11</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2002</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract lang="eng">This article offers the thesis that petitioning by collective groups, whether occupational, regionally constituted, or simply the body of people called the commons, was an important form of political communication in the early sixteenth century which, although poorly documented and consequently overlooked by historians, allows us an entry into the world of popular politics. The article offers illustrations of the way in which petitions were employed within the city of York, by groups such as weavers or by the commons of East Anglia in 1549 and 1553. The right to petition could not be denied, but mass petitioning was viewed with apprehension by government. Nonetheless, petitioning may be seen as a conservative form of behaviour when compared to calls for insurrection.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Historical Research</title></titleInfo><identifier type="ISSN">0950-3471</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1468-2281</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1468-2281</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">HISR</identifier><part><date>2002</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>75</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>190</number></detail></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">29B8999CA1A25B28C55C3372C58512FA871B5ADA</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/1468-2281.00156</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">HISR156</identifier><part><extent unit="pages"><start>365</start><end>389</end><total>25</total></extent></part><recordInfo><recordOrigin>WILEY</recordOrigin><recordContentSource>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Linguistique/explor/CharterV3/Data/Istex/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000E27 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000E27 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Linguistique
|area= CharterV3
|flux= Istex
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:29B8999CA1A25B28C55C3372C58512FA871B5ADA
|texte= Petitioning as popular politics in early sixteenth–century England
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.07. |  |