Different Roads to Unfamiliar Places: UK Experience in Comparative Perspective
Identifieur interne : 002229 ( Istex/Checkpoint ); précédent : 002228; suivant : 002230Different Roads to Unfamiliar Places: UK Experience in Comparative Perspective
Auteurs : RBID : ISTEX:17E59B558639356CEEEFB330450CF486D015261AAbstract
This article views the new public management (NPM) as a prime example of the sour laws of unintended consequences in action. Section 1 places the UK in international context by arguing there is no such thing as NPM and suggesting recent public sector reforms vary along six dimensions: privatisation, marketisation, corporate management, regulation, decentralisation and political control. Section 2 updates the UK story by describing developments under New Labour. Section 3 identifies the unintended consequences of reform: fragmentation, steering, accountability, co‐ordination, and public service ethics. Section 4 argues the conventional story of public sector reform as marketization and corporate management omits significant changes. British government differentiated its service delivery systems and now employs at least three governing structures: bureaucracy, markets and networks. The final section discusses whether British experience is different. I argue a satisfactory explanation of the differences must include an analysis of governmental traditions that make public sector reform distinctive everywhere.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8500.1998.tb01558.x
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:17E59B558639356CEEEFB330450CF486D015261ALe document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>Different Roads to Unfamiliar Places: UK Experience in Comparative Perspective</title><author><name sortKey="Rhodes, R A W" uniqKey="Rhodes R">R.A.W. Rhodes</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Professor of Politics University of Newcastle, Newcastle‐upon‐Tyne</mods:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">Newcastle‐upon‐Tyne</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:17E59B558639356CEEEFB330450CF486D015261A</idno><date when="1998">1998</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-8500.1998.tb01558.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/17E59B558639356CEEEFB330450CF486D015261A/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002E10</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">002E10</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">002229</idno></publicationStmt><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0313-6647</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="eng">This article views the new public management (NPM) as a prime example of the sour laws of unintended consequences in action. Section 1 places the UK in international context by arguing there is no such thing as NPM and suggesting recent public sector reforms vary along six dimensions: privatisation, marketisation, corporate management, regulation, decentralisation and political control. Section 2 updates the UK story by describing developments under New Labour. Section 3 identifies the unintended consequences of reform: fragmentation, steering, accountability, co‐ordination, and public service ethics. Section 4 argues the conventional story of public sector reform as marketization and corporate management omits significant changes. British government differentiated its service delivery systems and now employs at least three governing structures: bureaucracy, markets and networks. The final section discusses whether British experience is different. I argue a satisfactory explanation of the differences must include an analysis of governmental traditions that make public sector reform distinctive everywhere.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><copyrightdate>1998</copyrightdate><author><json:item><name>R.A.W. Rhodes</name><affiliations><json:string>Professor of Politics University of Newcastle, Newcastle‐upon‐Tyne</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><genre><json:string>Serial article</json:string></genre><host><genre></genre><language></language><issn><json:string>0313-6647</json:string></issn><title>Australian Journal of Public Administration</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1467-8500</json:string></doi></host><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><abstract>This article views the new public management (NPM) as a prime example of the sour laws of unintended consequences in action. Section 1 places the UK in international context by arguing there is no such thing as NPM and suggesting recent public sector reforms vary along six dimensions: privatisation, marketisation, corporate management, regulation, decentralisation and political control. Section 2 updates the UK story by describing developments under New Labour. Section 3 identifies the unintended consequences of reform: fragmentation, steering, accountability, co‐ordination, and public service ethics. Section 4 argues the conventional story of public sector reform as marketization and corporate management omits significant changes. British government differentiated its service delivery systems and now employs at least three governing structures: bureaucracy, markets and networks. The final section discusses whether British experience is different. I argue a satisfactory explanation of the differences must include an analysis of governmental traditions that make public sector reform distinctive everywhere.</abstract><title>Different Roads to Unfamiliar Places: UK Experience in Comparative Perspective</title><pubdate>1998-12</pubdate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1467-8500.1998.tb01558.x</json:string></doi><id>17E59B558639356CEEEFB330450CF486D015261A</id><fulltext><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/17E59B558639356CEEEFB330450CF486D015261A/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><extension>zip</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/17E59B558639356CEEEFB330450CF486D015261A/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><extension>txt</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/17E59B558639356CEEEFB330450CF486D015261A/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/17E59B558639356CEEEFB330450CF486D015261A/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader type="text"><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="alt" xml:lang="">Different Roads to Unfamiliar Places: UK Experience in Comparative Perspective</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</p></availability><date>2008-06-28</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="">Different Roads to Unfamiliar Places: UK Experience in Comparative Perspective</title><author><persName><forename type="first">R.A.W.</forename><surname>Rhodes</surname></persName><affiliation>Professor of Politics University of Newcastle, Newcastle‐upon‐Tyne</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Australian Journal of Public Administration</title><idno type="pISSN">0313-6647</idno><idno type="eISSN">1467-8500</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-8500</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1998-12"></date><biblScope unit="vol">57</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="19">19</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="31">31</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">17E59B558639356CEEEFB330450CF486D015261A</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1467-8500.1998.tb01558.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">AUPA19</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2008-06-28</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This article views the new public management (NPM) as a prime example of the sour laws of unintended consequences in action. Section 1 places the UK in international context by arguing there is no such thing as NPM and suggesting recent public sector reforms vary along six dimensions: privatisation, marketisation, corporate management, regulation, decentralisation and political control. Section 2 updates the UK story by describing developments under New Labour. Section 3 identifies the unintended consequences of reform: fragmentation, steering, accountability, co‐ordination, and public service ethics. Section 4 argues the conventional story of public sector reform as marketization and corporate management omits significant changes. British government differentiated its service delivery systems and now employs at least three governing structures: bureaucracy, markets and networks. The final section discusses whether British experience is different. I argue a satisfactory explanation of the differences must include an analysis of governmental traditions that make public sector reform distinctive everywhere.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2008-06-28">Created</change><change when="1998-12">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley component found"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-8500</doi><issn type="print">0313-6647</issn><issn type="electronic">1467-8500</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="AUPA"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION">Australian Journal of Public Administration</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="12004"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/ajpa.1998.57.issue-4</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="57">57</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="4">4</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="1998-12">December 1998</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="miscellaneous" position="0001900" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1467-8500.1998.tb01558.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="AUPA19"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="13"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Public Policy and Private Management Symposium</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2008-06-28"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2008-06-28"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-03-09"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-06"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-15"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="19">19</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="31">31</numbering></numberingGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:AUPA.AUPA19.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="referenceTotal" number="69"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="1"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Different Roads to Unfamiliar Places: UK Experience in Comparative Perspective</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>R.A.W.</givenNames><familyName>Rhodes</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation>Professor of Politics University of Newcastle, Newcastle‐upon‐Tyne</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>This article views the new public management (NPM) as a prime example of the sour laws of unintended consequences in action. Section 1 places the UK in international context by arguing there is no such thing as NPM and suggesting recent public sector reforms vary along six dimensions: privatisation, marketisation, corporate management, regulation, decentralisation and political control. Section 2 updates the UK story by describing developments under New Labour. Section 3 identifies the unintended consequences of reform: fragmentation, steering, accountability, co‐ordination, and public service ethics. Section 4 argues the conventional story of public sector reform as marketization and corporate management omits significant changes. British government differentiated its service delivery systems and now employs at least three governing structures: bureaucracy, markets and networks. The final section discusses whether British experience is different. I argue a satisfactory explanation of the differences must include an analysis of governmental traditions that make public sector reform distinctive everywhere.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.5"><titleInfo><title>Different Roads to Unfamiliar Places: UK Experience in Comparative Perspective</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative"><title></title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">R.A.W.</namePart><namePart type="family">Rhodes</namePart><affiliation>Professor of Politics University of Newcastle, Newcastle‐upon‐Tyne</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre>Serial article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2008-06-28</dateCreated><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1998-12</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1998</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract lang="eng">This article views the new public management (NPM) as a prime example of the sour laws of unintended consequences in action. Section 1 places the UK in international context by arguing there is no such thing as NPM and suggesting recent public sector reforms vary along six dimensions: privatisation, marketisation, corporate management, regulation, decentralisation and political control. Section 2 updates the UK story by describing developments under New Labour. Section 3 identifies the unintended consequences of reform: fragmentation, steering, accountability, co‐ordination, and public service ethics. Section 4 argues the conventional story of public sector reform as marketization and corporate management omits significant changes. British government differentiated its service delivery systems and now employs at least three governing structures: bureaucracy, markets and networks. The final section discusses whether British experience is different. I argue a satisfactory explanation of the differences must include an analysis of governmental traditions that make public sector reform distinctive everywhere.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Australian Journal of Public Administration</title></titleInfo><identifier type="ISSN">0313-6647</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1467-8500</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-8500</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">AUPA</identifier><part><date>1998</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>57</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>4</number></detail></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">17E59B558639356CEEEFB330450CF486D015261A</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1467-8500.1998.tb01558.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">AUPA19</identifier><part><extent unit="pages"><start>19</start><end>31</end><total>13</total></extent><extent unit="references"><total>69</total></extent></part><recordInfo><recordOrigin>WILEY</recordOrigin><recordContentSource>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Linguistique/explor/CharterV3/Data/Istex/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002229 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 002229 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Linguistique
|area= CharterV3
|flux= Istex
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:17E59B558639356CEEEFB330450CF486D015261A
|texte= Different Roads to Unfamiliar Places: UK Experience in Comparative Perspective
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.07. |  |