CharterV3, Francis, Curation, bibRecord, 000458

The impact of structural reform on county government service provision

Identifieur interne : 000458 ( Francis/Curation ); précédent : 000457; suivant : 000459

The impact of structural reform on county government service provision

Auteurs : RBID : Francis:521-04-13862

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Réforme, Administration publique, Floride, Etats-Unis, Politique locale, Finance publique, Comportement, Modernisation, Changement structurel, Statistiques, Analyse comparative.
Wicri :
- topic : Administration publique, Analyse comparative.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Behaviour, Comparative analysis, Florida, Local Policy, Modernization, Public Finance, Public administration, Reform, Statistics, Structural change, United States Of America.

Abstract

Objective. This study examines the effect that county government structure has on county spending in an environment of rapid population growth. In particular, it looks at the consequence of changing from a traditional commission noncharter form to an appointed administrator/elected executive commission type with a home rule charter. Methods. This study uses a pooled time-series design to analyze the spending behavior of seven rapid-growth counties in Florida that adopted a modernized structure between 1980 and 1990. Results. The findings indicate that changing the form of county government leads to a statistically significant increase in total spending as well as for spending for traditional and regional services. Conclusions. In addition to the theoretical implications for studying government structural impacts, there are practical implications for county officials in rapidly growing areas who view the adoption of modernized structures as a means to facilitate the expansion of current services and/or the addition of new services.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0038-4941`
A03		`1`		`@0 Soc. sci. q.`
A05				`@2 84`
A06				`@2 4`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 The impact of structural reform on county government service provision`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 BENTON (J. Edwin)`
A14	`01`			`@1 University of South Florida @3 USA @Z 1 aut.`
A20				`@1 858-874`
A21				`@1 2003`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 24795 @5 354000118762410070`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2004 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 1 p.1/4`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 521-04-13862`
A60				`@1 P`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Social science quarterly`
A66	`01`			`@0 USA`
A68	`01`	`1`	`FRE`	`@1 L'impact de la réforme structurelle sur la provision du service du gouvernement de canton`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 Objective. This study examines the effect that county government structure has on county spending in an environment of rapid population growth. In particular, it looks at the consequence of changing from a traditional commission noncharter form to an appointed administrator/elected executive commission type with a home rule charter. Methods. This study uses a pooled time-series design to analyze the spending behavior of seven rapid-growth counties in Florida that adopted a modernized structure between 1980 and 1990. Results. The findings indicate that changing the form of county government leads to a statistically significant increase in total spending as well as for spending for traditional and regional services. Conclusions. In addition to the theoretical implications for studying government structural impacts, there are practical implications for county officials in rapidly growing areas who view the adoption of modernized structures as a means to facilitate the expansion of current services and/or the addition of new services.
C02	`01`	`S`		`@0 52155 @1 XIII`
C02	`02`	`S`		`@0 521`
C03	`01`	`S`	`FRE`	`@0 Réforme @5 01`
C03	`01`	`S`	`ENG`	`@0 Reform @5 01`
C03	`02`	`S`	`FRE`	`@0 Administration publique @5 02`
C03	`02`	`S`	`ENG`	`@0 Public administration @5 02`
C03	`03`	`S`	`FRE`	`@0 Floride @2 NG @5 03`
C03	`03`	`S`	`ENG`	`@0 Florida @2 NG @5 03`
C03	`04`	`S`	`FRE`	`@0 Etats-Unis @2 NG @5 04`
C03	`04`	`S`	`ENG`	`@0 United States Of America @2 NG @5 04`
C03	`05`	`S`	`FRE`	`@0 Politique locale @5 05`
C03	`05`	`S`	`ENG`	`@0 Local Policy @5 05`
C03	`06`	`S`	`FRE`	`@0 Finance publique @5 06`
C03	`06`	`S`	`ENG`	`@0 Public Finance @5 06`
C03	`07`	`S`	`FRE`	`@0 Comportement @5 07`
C03	`07`	`S`	`ENG`	`@0 Behaviour @5 07`
C03	`08`	`S`	`FRE`	`@0 Modernisation @5 08`
C03	`08`	`S`	`ENG`	`@0 Modernization @5 08`
C03	`09`	`S`	`FRE`	`@0 Changement structurel @5 09`
C03	`09`	`S`	`ENG`	`@0 Structural change @5 09`
C03	`10`	`N`	`FRE`	`@0 Statistiques @5 10`
C03	`10`	`N`	`ENG`	`@0 Statistics @5 10`
C03	`11`	`S`	`FRE`	`@0 Analyse comparative @5 11`
C03	`11`	`S`	`ENG`	`@0 Comparative analysis @5 11`
N21				`@1 257`
N44	`01`			`@1 PSI`
N82				`@1 PSI`

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

to stream Francis, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000458

Links to Exploration step

Francis:521-04-13862

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">The impact of structural reform on county government service provision</title>
<author><name sortKey="Benton, J Edwin" uniqKey="Benton J">J. Edwin Benton</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of South Florida</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="inist">521-04-13862</idno>
<date when="2003">2003</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">FRANCIS 521-04-13862 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Francis:521-04-13862</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Francis/Corpus">000458</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Francis/Curation">000458</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0038-4941</idno>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Soc. sci. q.</title>
<title level="j" type="main">Social science quarterly</title>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Behaviour</term>
<term>Comparative analysis</term>
<term>Florida</term>
<term>Local Policy</term>
<term>Modernization</term>
<term>Public Finance</term>
<term>Public administration</term>
<term>Reform</term>
<term>Statistics</term>
<term>Structural change</term>
<term>United States Of America</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Réforme</term>
<term>Administration publique</term>
<term>Floride</term>
<term>Etats-Unis</term>
<term>Politique locale</term>
<term>Finance publique</term>
<term>Comportement</term>
<term>Modernisation</term>
<term>Changement structurel</term>
<term>Statistiques</term>
<term>Analyse comparative</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Administration publique</term>
<term>Analyse comparative</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Objective. This study examines the effect that county government structure has on county spending in an environment of rapid population growth. In particular, it looks at the consequence of changing from a traditional commission noncharter form to an appointed administrator/elected executive commission type with a home rule charter. Methods. This study uses a pooled time-series design to analyze the spending behavior of seven rapid-growth counties in Florida that adopted a modernized structure between 1980 and 1990. Results. The findings indicate that changing the form of county government leads to a statistically significant increase in total spending as well as for spending for traditional and regional services. Conclusions. In addition to the theoretical implications for studying government structural impacts, there are practical implications for county officials in rapidly growing areas who view the adoption of modernized structures as a means to facilitate the expansion of current services and/or the addition of new services.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0038-4941</s0>
</fA01>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Soc. sci. q.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>84</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>4</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>The impact of structural reform on county government service provision</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>BENTON (J. Edwin)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of South Florida</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>858-874</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2003</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>24795</s2>
<s5>354000118762410070</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2004 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>1 p.1/4</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>521-04-13862</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Social science quarterly</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fA68 i1="01" i2="1" l="FRE"><s1>L'impact de la réforme structurelle sur la provision du service du gouvernement de canton</s1>
</fA68>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Objective. This study examines the effect that county government structure has on county spending in an environment of rapid population growth. In particular, it looks at the consequence of changing from a traditional commission noncharter form to an appointed administrator/elected executive commission type with a home rule charter. Methods. This study uses a pooled time-series design to analyze the spending behavior of seven rapid-growth counties in Florida that adopted a modernized structure between 1980 and 1990. Results. The findings indicate that changing the form of county government leads to a statistically significant increase in total spending as well as for spending for traditional and regional services. Conclusions. In addition to the theoretical implications for studying government structural impacts, there are practical implications for county officials in rapidly growing areas who view the adoption of modernized structures as a means to facilitate the expansion of current services and/or the addition of new services.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="S"><s0>52155</s0>
<s1>XIII</s1>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="S"><s0>521</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="S" l="FRE"><s0>Réforme</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="S" l="ENG"><s0>Reform</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="S" l="FRE"><s0>Administration publique</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="S" l="ENG"><s0>Public administration</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="S" l="FRE"><s0>Floride</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="S" l="ENG"><s0>Florida</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="S" l="FRE"><s0>Etats-Unis</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="S" l="ENG"><s0>United States Of America</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="S" l="FRE"><s0>Politique locale</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="S" l="ENG"><s0>Local Policy</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="S" l="FRE"><s0>Finance publique</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="S" l="ENG"><s0>Public Finance</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="S" l="FRE"><s0>Comportement</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="S" l="ENG"><s0>Behaviour</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="S" l="FRE"><s0>Modernisation</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="S" l="ENG"><s0>Modernization</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="S" l="FRE"><s0>Changement structurel</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="S" l="ENG"><s0>Structural change</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="N" l="FRE"><s0>Statistiques</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="N" l="ENG"><s0>Statistics</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="S" l="FRE"><s0>Analyse comparative</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="S" l="ENG"><s0>Comparative analysis</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21><s1>257</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>PSI</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>PSI</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Linguistique/explor/CharterV3/Data/Francis/Curation

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000458 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Francis/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000458 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Linguistique
   |area=    CharterV3
   |flux=    Francis
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Francis:521-04-13862
   |texte=   The impact of structural reform on county government service provision
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.07.
Data generation: Mon Jun 22 09:43:01 2015. Site generation: Mon Mar 11 16:19:56 2024

	Serveur d'exploration sur les chartes
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur les chartes

The impact of structural reform on county government service provision

The impact of structural reform on county government service provision

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri