Serveur d'exploration sur les chartes

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Four-Field Anthropology: Charter Myths and Time Warps from St. Louis to Oxford

Identifieur interne : 000025 ( Francis/Curation ); précédent : 000024; suivant : 000026

Four-Field Anthropology: Charter Myths and Time Warps from St. Louis to Oxford

Auteurs : RBID : Francis:14-0075182

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

The four-field model of anthropology is conventionally understood to have begun with a paper read by Franz Boas in St. Louis in 1904. Publishing for the first time a drawing made by Augustus Pitt-Rivers in England in 1882, this paper rethinks this proposition by making two arguments. First, the paper explores the role of the classificatory anthropology of the 1870s and 1880s on both sides of the Atlantic in the emergence of the idea of organizing anthropological knowledge. It suggests that this emergence was bound up with the problem of classifying anthropological knowledge in material form in European and North American museums. Second, the paper considers how our knowledge of the discipline's past can develop from the study of objects and documents (rather than only through rereading anthropologists' published texts), in a manner akin to documentary archaeology. In this respect, the anthropological problem of organizing knowledge in material form is still with us, but with a new challenge: How adequate are our current forms of disciplinary historiography for the use of material evidence? Rather than proposing a new set of "charter myths," the paper explores writing the history of four-field anthropology as a form of material culture studies or historical archaeology (in other words, as a subfield of anthropology), working with the "time warps" created by museums and archives in which disciplinary history is not always already written.
pA  
A01 01  1    @0 0011-3204
A03   1    @0 Curr. anthropol.
A05       @2 54
A06       @2 6
A08 01  1  ENG  @1 Four-Field Anthropology: Charter Myths and Time Warps from St. Louis to Oxford
A11 01  1    @1 HICKS (Dan)
A14 01      @1 School of Archaeology/Pitt Rivers Museum, University of Oxford, South Parks Road @2 Oxford OX1 3PP @3 GBR @Z 1 aut.
A20       @1 753-763
A21       @1 2013
A23 01      @0 ENG
A43 01      @1 INIST @2 1457 @5 354000505707210050
A44       @0 0000 @1 © 2014 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.
A45       @0 1 p.1/4
A47 01  1    @0 14-0075182
A60       @1 P
A61       @0 A
A64 01  1    @0 Current anthropology
A66 01      @0 USA
A68 01  1  FRE  @1 Les quatre sous-disciplines de l'anthropologie: "Charter Myths" et "Time Warps", de Saint-Louis à Oxford
C01 01    ENG  @0 The four-field model of anthropology is conventionally understood to have begun with a paper read by Franz Boas in St. Louis in 1904. Publishing for the first time a drawing made by Augustus Pitt-Rivers in England in 1882, this paper rethinks this proposition by making two arguments. First, the paper explores the role of the classificatory anthropology of the 1870s and 1880s on both sides of the Atlantic in the emergence of the idea of organizing anthropological knowledge. It suggests that this emergence was bound up with the problem of classifying anthropological knowledge in material form in European and North American museums. Second, the paper considers how our knowledge of the discipline's past can develop from the study of objects and documents (rather than only through rereading anthropologists' published texts), in a manner akin to documentary archaeology. In this respect, the anthropological problem of organizing knowledge in material form is still with us, but with a new challenge: How adequate are our current forms of disciplinary historiography for the use of material evidence? Rather than proposing a new set of "charter myths," the paper explores writing the history of four-field anthropology as a form of material culture studies or historical archaeology (in other words, as a subfield of anthropology), working with the "time warps" created by museums and archives in which disciplinary history is not always already written.
C02 01  H    @0 52530 @1 II
C02 02  H    @0 525
C03 01  A  FRE  @0 Siècle 19 apr. J.-C. @2 ND @5 01
C03 01  A  ENG  @0 Century 19 AD @2 ND @5 01
C03 02  A  FRE  @0 Siècle 20 apr. J.-C. @2 ND @5 02
C03 02  A  ENG  @0 Century 20 AD @2 ND @5 02
C03 03  H  FRE  @0 Amérique du Nord @2 NG @5 05
C03 03  H  ENG  @0 North America @2 NG @5 05
C03 04  H  FRE  @0 Europe @2 NG @5 07
C03 04  H  ENG  @0 Europe @2 NG @5 07
C03 05  H  FRE  @0 Historiographie @2 NI @5 14
C03 05  H  ENG  @0 Historiography @2 NI @5 14
C03 06  H  FRE  @0 Anthropologie @5 19
C03 06  H  ENG  @0 Anthropology @5 19
C03 07  H  FRE  @0 Modèle @5 20
C03 07  H  ENG  @0 Model @5 20
C03 08  A  FRE  @0 Classification @5 21
C03 08  A  ENG  @0 Classification @5 21
C03 09  A  FRE  @0 Archives @5 22
C03 09  A  ENG  @0 Archives @5 22
C03 10  H  FRE  @0 Histoire de l'anthropologie @4 INC @5 31
C03 11  H  FRE  @0 Mythe de fondation @4 INC @5 32
C07 01  H  FRE  @0 Amérique @2 NG
C07 01  H  ENG  @0 America @2 NG
N21       @1 097

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

Francis:14-0075182

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Four-Field Anthropology: Charter Myths and Time Warps from St. Louis to Oxford</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Hicks, Dan" uniqKey="Hicks D">Dan Hicks</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>School of Archaeology/Pitt Rivers Museum, University of Oxford, South Parks Road</s1>
<s2>Oxford OX1 3PP</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Royaume-Uni</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="inist">14-0075182</idno>
<date when="2013">2013</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">FRANCIS 14-0075182 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Francis:14-0075182</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Francis/Corpus">000025</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Francis/Curation">000025</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0011-3204</idno>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Curr. anthropol.</title>
<title level="j" type="main">Current anthropology</title>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Anthropology</term>
<term>Archives</term>
<term>Century 19 AD</term>
<term>Century 20 AD</term>
<term>Classification</term>
<term>Europe</term>
<term>Historiography</term>
<term>Model</term>
<term>North America</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Siècle 19 apr. J.-C.</term>
<term>Siècle 20 apr. J.-C.</term>
<term>Amérique du Nord</term>
<term>Europe</term>
<term>Historiographie</term>
<term>Anthropologie</term>
<term>Modèle</term>
<term>Classification</term>
<term>Archives</term>
<term>Histoire de l'anthropologie</term>
<term>Mythe de fondation</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Classification</term>
<term>Archives</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The four-field model of anthropology is conventionally understood to have begun with a paper read by Franz Boas in St. Louis in 1904. Publishing for the first time a drawing made by Augustus Pitt-Rivers in England in 1882, this paper rethinks this proposition by making two arguments. First, the paper explores the role of the classificatory anthropology of the 1870s and 1880s on both sides of the Atlantic in the emergence of the idea of organizing anthropological knowledge. It suggests that this emergence was bound up with the problem of classifying anthropological knowledge in material form in European and North American museums. Second, the paper considers how our knowledge of the discipline's past can develop from the study of objects and documents (rather than only through rereading anthropologists' published texts), in a manner akin to documentary archaeology. In this respect, the anthropological problem of organizing knowledge in material form is still with us, but with a new challenge: How adequate are our current forms of disciplinary historiography for the use of material evidence? Rather than proposing a new set of "charter myths," the paper explores writing the history of four-field anthropology as a form of material culture studies or historical archaeology (in other words, as a subfield of anthropology), working with the "time warps" created by museums and archives in which disciplinary history is not always already written.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>0011-3204</s0>
</fA01>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>Curr. anthropol.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05>
<s2>54</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06>
<s2>6</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Four-Field Anthropology: Charter Myths and Time Warps from St. Louis to Oxford</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>HICKS (Dan)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>School of Archaeology/Pitt Rivers Museum, University of Oxford, South Parks Road</s1>
<s2>Oxford OX1 3PP</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20>
<s1>753-763</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>2013</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>1457</s2>
<s5>354000505707210050</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2014 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45>
<s0>1 p.1/4</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>14-0075182</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>Current anthropology</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fA68 i1="01" i2="1" l="FRE">
<s1>Les quatre sous-disciplines de l'anthropologie: "Charter Myths" et "Time Warps", de Saint-Louis à Oxford</s1>
</fA68>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>The four-field model of anthropology is conventionally understood to have begun with a paper read by Franz Boas in St. Louis in 1904. Publishing for the first time a drawing made by Augustus Pitt-Rivers in England in 1882, this paper rethinks this proposition by making two arguments. First, the paper explores the role of the classificatory anthropology of the 1870s and 1880s on both sides of the Atlantic in the emergence of the idea of organizing anthropological knowledge. It suggests that this emergence was bound up with the problem of classifying anthropological knowledge in material form in European and North American museums. Second, the paper considers how our knowledge of the discipline's past can develop from the study of objects and documents (rather than only through rereading anthropologists' published texts), in a manner akin to documentary archaeology. In this respect, the anthropological problem of organizing knowledge in material form is still with us, but with a new challenge: How adequate are our current forms of disciplinary historiography for the use of material evidence? Rather than proposing a new set of "charter myths," the paper explores writing the history of four-field anthropology as a form of material culture studies or historical archaeology (in other words, as a subfield of anthropology), working with the "time warps" created by museums and archives in which disciplinary history is not always already written.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="H">
<s0>52530</s0>
<s1>II</s1>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="H">
<s0>525</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="A" l="FRE">
<s0>Siècle 19 apr. J.-C.</s0>
<s2>ND</s2>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="A" l="ENG">
<s0>Century 19 AD</s0>
<s2>ND</s2>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="A" l="FRE">
<s0>Siècle 20 apr. J.-C.</s0>
<s2>ND</s2>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="A" l="ENG">
<s0>Century 20 AD</s0>
<s2>ND</s2>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="H" l="FRE">
<s0>Amérique du Nord</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="H" l="ENG">
<s0>North America</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="H" l="FRE">
<s0>Europe</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="H" l="ENG">
<s0>Europe</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="H" l="FRE">
<s0>Historiographie</s0>
<s2>NI</s2>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="H" l="ENG">
<s0>Historiography</s0>
<s2>NI</s2>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="H" l="FRE">
<s0>Anthropologie</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="H" l="ENG">
<s0>Anthropology</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="H" l="FRE">
<s0>Modèle</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="H" l="ENG">
<s0>Model</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="A" l="FRE">
<s0>Classification</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="A" l="ENG">
<s0>Classification</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="A" l="FRE">
<s0>Archives</s0>
<s5>22</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="A" l="ENG">
<s0>Archives</s0>
<s5>22</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="H" l="FRE">
<s0>Histoire de l'anthropologie</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>31</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="H" l="FRE">
<s0>Mythe de fondation</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>32</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="H" l="FRE">
<s0>Amérique</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="H" l="ENG">
<s0>America</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
</fC07>
<fN21>
<s1>097</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Linguistique/explor/CharterV3/Data/Francis/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000025 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Francis/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000025 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Linguistique
   |area=    CharterV3
   |flux=    Francis
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Francis:14-0075182
   |texte=   Four-Field Anthropology: Charter Myths and Time Warps from St. Louis to Oxford
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.07.
Data generation: Mon Jun 22 09:43:01 2015. Site generation: Mon Mar 11 16:19:56 2024