Moving from bureaucratic to market accountability: The problem of imperfect information
Identifieur interne : 000592 ( Francis/Corpus ); précédent : 000591; suivant : 000593Moving from bureaucratic to market accountability: The problem of imperfect information
Auteurs : RBID : Francis:520-02-11027Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
Abstract
Accountability is a complex idea frequently invoked as political rhetoric. Accordingly, a theoretical framework that includes bureaucratic, performance, market, and professional models of accountability is necessary to analyze the accountability system created for Arizona charter schools. Using a qualitative case study that relied on observations, interviews, and document analysis, this case indicated that valid and reliable performance data are not an intrinsic element of a school choice program. Accordingly, mechanisms that capture and distribute accurate, accessible, and wide-ranging information about schools of choice will assist consumers in making informed decisions when selecting among schools.
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
| pA |
|
|---|
Format Inist (serveur)
| NO : | FRANCIS 520-02-11027 INIST |
|---|---|
| FT : | (D'une responsabilité bureaucratique vers une responsabilité envers le marché de l'éducation : l'enjeu de l'information) |
| ET : | Moving from bureaucratic to market accountability: The problem of imperfect information |
| AU : | GARN (Gregg) |
| AF : | University of Oklahoma/Etats-Unis (1 aut.) |
| DT : | Publication en série; Niveau analytique |
| SO : | Educational administration quarterly; ISSN 0013-161X; Etats-Unis; Da. 2001; Vol. 37; No. 4; Pp. 571-599; Bibl. 1 p.3/4 |
| LA : | Anglais |
| EA : | Accountability is a complex idea frequently invoked as political rhetoric. Accordingly, a theoretical framework that includes bureaucratic, performance, market, and professional models of accountability is necessary to analyze the accountability system created for Arizona charter schools. Using a qualitative case study that relied on observations, interviews, and document analysis, this case indicated that valid and reliable performance data are not an intrinsic element of a school choice program. Accordingly, mechanisms that capture and distribute accurate, accessible, and wide-ranging information about schools of choice will assist consumers in making informed decisions when selecting among schools. |
| CC : | 52046; 520 |
| FD : | Etats-Unis; Administration de l'enseignement; Information; Choix; Bureaucratie; Marché de l'éducation |
| ED : | USA; Administration of education; Information; Choice; Bureaucracy; Educational market |
| LO : | INIST-27079.354000100103050050 |
| ID : | 520 |
Links to Exploration step
Francis:520-02-11027Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Moving from bureaucratic to market accountability: The problem of imperfect information</title><author><name sortKey="Garn, Gregg" uniqKey="Garn G">Gregg Garn</name><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Oklahoma</s1><s3>USA</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="inist">520-02-11027</idno><date when="2001">2001</date><idno type="stanalyst">FRANCIS 520-02-11027 INIST</idno><idno type="RBID">Francis:520-02-11027</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Francis/Corpus">000592</idno></publicationStmt><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0013-161X</idno><title level="j" type="abbreviated">Educ. admin. q.</title><title level="j" type="main">Educational administration quarterly</title></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Administration of education</term><term>Bureaucracy</term><term>Choice</term><term>Educational market</term><term>Information</term><term>USA</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Etats-Unis</term><term>Administration de l'enseignement</term><term>Information</term><term>Choix</term><term>Bureaucratie</term><term>Marché de l'éducation</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Accountability is a complex idea frequently invoked as political rhetoric. Accordingly, a theoretical framework that includes bureaucratic, performance, market, and professional models of accountability is necessary to analyze the accountability system created for Arizona charter schools. Using a qualitative case study that relied on observations, interviews, and document analysis, this case indicated that valid and reliable performance data are not an intrinsic element of a school choice program. Accordingly, mechanisms that capture and distribute accurate, accessible, and wide-ranging information about schools of choice will assist consumers in making informed decisions when selecting among schools.</div></front></TEI><inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0013-161X</s0></fA01><fA03 i2="1"><s0>Educ. admin. q.</s0></fA03><fA05><s2>37</s2></fA05><fA06><s2>4</s2></fA06><fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Moving from bureaucratic to market accountability: The problem of imperfect information</s1></fA08><fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>GARN (Gregg)</s1></fA11><fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Oklahoma</s1><s3>USA</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ></fA14><fA20><s1>571-599</s1></fA20><fA21><s1>2001</s1></fA21><fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0></fA23><fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1><s2>27079</s2><s5>354000100103050050</s5></fA43><fA44><s0>0000</s0><s1>© 2002 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1></fA44><fA45><s0>1 p.3/4</s0></fA45><fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>520-02-11027</s0></fA47><fA60><s1>P</s1></fA60><fA61><s0>A</s0></fA61><fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Educational administration quarterly</s0></fA64><fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0></fA66><fA68 i1="01" i2="1" l="FRE"><s1>D'une responsabilité bureaucratique vers une responsabilité envers le marché de l'éducation : l'enjeu de l'information</s1></fA68><fA99><s0>18 notes</s0></fA99><fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Accountability is a complex idea frequently invoked as political rhetoric. Accordingly, a theoretical framework that includes bureaucratic, performance, market, and professional models of accountability is necessary to analyze the accountability system created for Arizona charter schools. Using a qualitative case study that relied on observations, interviews, and document analysis, this case indicated that valid and reliable performance data are not an intrinsic element of a school choice program. Accordingly, mechanisms that capture and distribute accurate, accessible, and wide-ranging information about schools of choice will assist consumers in making informed decisions when selecting among schools.</s0></fC01><fC02 i1="01" i2="C"><s0>52046</s0><s1>II</s1></fC02><fC02 i1="02" i2="C"><s0>520</s0></fC02><fC03 i1="01" i2="C" l="FRE"><s0>Etats-Unis</s0><s2>NG</s2><s5>01</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="01" i2="C" l="ENG"><s0>USA</s0><s2>NG</s2><s5>01</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="C" l="FRE"><s0>Administration de l'enseignement</s0><s5>02</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="C" l="ENG"><s0>Administration of education</s0><s5>02</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="C" l="FRE"><s0>Information</s0><s5>03</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="C" l="ENG"><s0>Information</s0><s5>03</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="C" l="FRE"><s0>Choix</s0><s5>04</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="C" l="ENG"><s0>Choice</s0><s5>04</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="C" l="FRE"><s0>Bureaucratie</s0><s5>05</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="C" l="ENG"><s0>Bureaucracy</s0><s5>05</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="C" l="FRE"><s0>Marché de l'éducation</s0><s5>06</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="C" l="ENG"><s0>Educational market</s0><s5>06</s5></fC03><fN21><s1>098</s1></fN21><fN82><s1>PSI</s1></fN82></pA></standard><server><NO>FRANCIS 520-02-11027 INIST</NO><FT>(D'une responsabilité bureaucratique vers une responsabilité envers le marché de l'éducation : l'enjeu de l'information)</FT><ET>Moving from bureaucratic to market accountability: The problem of imperfect information</ET><AU>GARN (Gregg)</AU><AF>University of Oklahoma/Etats-Unis (1 aut.)</AF><DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT><SO>Educational administration quarterly; ISSN 0013-161X; Etats-Unis; Da. 2001; Vol. 37; No. 4; Pp. 571-599; Bibl. 1 p.3/4</SO><LA>Anglais</LA><EA>Accountability is a complex idea frequently invoked as political rhetoric. Accordingly, a theoretical framework that includes bureaucratic, performance, market, and professional models of accountability is necessary to analyze the accountability system created for Arizona charter schools. Using a qualitative case study that relied on observations, interviews, and document analysis, this case indicated that valid and reliable performance data are not an intrinsic element of a school choice program. Accordingly, mechanisms that capture and distribute accurate, accessible, and wide-ranging information about schools of choice will assist consumers in making informed decisions when selecting among schools.</EA><CC>52046; 520</CC><FD>Etats-Unis; Administration de l'enseignement; Information; Choix; Bureaucratie; Marché de l'éducation</FD><ED>USA; Administration of education; Information; Choice; Bureaucracy; Educational market</ED><LO>INIST-27079.354000100103050050</LO><ID>520</ID></server></inist></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Linguistique/explor/CharterV3/Data/Francis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000592 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Francis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000592 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Linguistique
|area= CharterV3
|flux= Francis
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= Francis:520-02-11027
|texte= Moving from bureaucratic to market accountability: The problem of imperfect information
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.07. |  |