Residential proximity to agricultural pesticide use and incidence of breast cancer in California, 1988-1997.
Identifieur interne : 000401 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000400; suivant : 000402Residential proximity to agricultural pesticide use and incidence of breast cancer in California, 1988-1997.
Auteurs : Peggy Reynolds ; Susan E. Hurley ; Robert B. Gunier ; Sauda Yerabati ; Thu Quach ; Andrew HertzSource :
- Environmental health perspectives [ 0091-6765 ] ; 2005.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- chemical , toxicity : Agrochemicals, Pesticides.
- geographic : California.
- epidemiology : Breast Neoplasms.
- etiology : Breast Neoplasms.
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Environmental Exposure, Female, Geographic Information Systems, Housing, Humans, Incidence, Middle Aged.
Abstract
California is the largest agricultural state in the United States and home to some of the world's highest breast cancer rates. The objective of our study was to evaluate whether California breast cancer rates were elevated in areas with recent high agricultural pesticide use. We identified population-based invasive breast cancer cases from the California Cancer Registry for 1988-1997. We used California's pesticide use reporting data to select pesticides for analysis based on use volume, carcinogenic potential, and exposure potential. Using 1990 and 2000 U.S. Census data, we derived age- and race-specific population counts for the time period of interest. We used a geographic information system to aggregate cases, population counts, and pesticide use data for all block groups in the state. To evaluate whether breast cancer rates were related to recent agricultural pesticide use, we computed rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals using Poisson regression models, adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, and neighborhood socioeconomic status and urbanization. This ecologic (aggregative) analysis included 176,302 invasive breast cancer cases and 70,968,598 person-years of observation. The rate ratios did not significantly differ from 1 for any of the selected pesticide categories or individual agents. The results from this study provide no evidence that California women living in areas of recent, high agricultural pesticide use experience higher rates of breast cancer.
PubMed: 16079069
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:16079069Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Residential proximity to agricultural pesticide use and incidence of breast cancer in California, 1988-1997.</title><author><name sortKey="Reynolds, Peggy" sort="Reynolds, Peggy" uniqKey="Reynolds P" first="Peggy" last="Reynolds">Peggy Reynolds</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>California Department of Health Services, Environmental Health Investigations Branch, Oakland, California 94612, USA. preynold@dhs.ca.gov</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hurley, Susan E" sort="Hurley, Susan E" uniqKey="Hurley S" first="Susan E" last="Hurley">Susan E. Hurley</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gunier, Robert B" sort="Gunier, Robert B" uniqKey="Gunier R" first="Robert B" last="Gunier">Robert B. Gunier</name></author><author><name sortKey="Yerabati, Sauda" sort="Yerabati, Sauda" uniqKey="Yerabati S" first="Sauda" last="Yerabati">Sauda Yerabati</name></author><author><name sortKey="Quach, Thu" sort="Quach, Thu" uniqKey="Quach T" first="Thu" last="Quach">Thu Quach</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hertz, Andrew" sort="Hertz, Andrew" uniqKey="Hertz A" first="Andrew" last="Hertz">Andrew Hertz</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2005">2005</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:16079069</idno><idno type="pmid">16079069</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000401</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000401</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Residential proximity to agricultural pesticide use and incidence of breast cancer in California, 1988-1997.</title><author><name sortKey="Reynolds, Peggy" sort="Reynolds, Peggy" uniqKey="Reynolds P" first="Peggy" last="Reynolds">Peggy Reynolds</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>California Department of Health Services, Environmental Health Investigations Branch, Oakland, California 94612, USA. preynold@dhs.ca.gov</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hurley, Susan E" sort="Hurley, Susan E" uniqKey="Hurley S" first="Susan E" last="Hurley">Susan E. Hurley</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gunier, Robert B" sort="Gunier, Robert B" uniqKey="Gunier R" first="Robert B" last="Gunier">Robert B. Gunier</name></author><author><name sortKey="Yerabati, Sauda" sort="Yerabati, Sauda" uniqKey="Yerabati S" first="Sauda" last="Yerabati">Sauda Yerabati</name></author><author><name sortKey="Quach, Thu" sort="Quach, Thu" uniqKey="Quach T" first="Thu" last="Quach">Thu Quach</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hertz, Andrew" sort="Hertz, Andrew" uniqKey="Hertz A" first="Andrew" last="Hertz">Andrew Hertz</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Environmental health perspectives</title><idno type="ISSN">0091-6765</idno><imprint><date when="2005" type="published">2005</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Agrochemicals (toxicity)</term><term>Breast Neoplasms (epidemiology)</term><term>Breast Neoplasms (etiology)</term><term>California</term><term>Environmental Exposure</term><term>Female</term><term>Geographic Information Systems</term><term>Housing</term><term>Humans</term><term>Incidence</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Pesticides (toxicity)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="toxicity" xml:lang="en"><term>Agrochemicals</term><term>Pesticides</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" xml:lang="en"><term>California</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="epidemiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Breast Neoplasms</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="etiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Breast Neoplasms</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Environmental Exposure</term><term>Female</term><term>Geographic Information Systems</term><term>Housing</term><term>Humans</term><term>Incidence</term><term>Middle Aged</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">California is the largest agricultural state in the United States and home to some of the world's highest breast cancer rates. The objective of our study was to evaluate whether California breast cancer rates were elevated in areas with recent high agricultural pesticide use. We identified population-based invasive breast cancer cases from the California Cancer Registry for 1988-1997. We used California's pesticide use reporting data to select pesticides for analysis based on use volume, carcinogenic potential, and exposure potential. Using 1990 and 2000 U.S. Census data, we derived age- and race-specific population counts for the time period of interest. We used a geographic information system to aggregate cases, population counts, and pesticide use data for all block groups in the state. To evaluate whether breast cancer rates were related to recent agricultural pesticide use, we computed rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals using Poisson regression models, adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, and neighborhood socioeconomic status and urbanization. This ecologic (aggregative) analysis included 176,302 invasive breast cancer cases and 70,968,598 person-years of observation. The rate ratios did not significantly differ from 1 for any of the selected pesticide categories or individual agents. The results from this study provide no evidence that California women living in areas of recent, high agricultural pesticide use experience higher rates of breast cancer.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">16079069</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2005</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>04</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2006</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>17</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>19</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0091-6765</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>113</Volume><Issue>8</Issue><PubDate><Year>2005</Year><Month>Aug</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Environmental health perspectives</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Environ. Health Perspect.</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Residential proximity to agricultural pesticide use and incidence of breast cancer in California, 1988-1997.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>993-1000</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>California is the largest agricultural state in the United States and home to some of the world's highest breast cancer rates. The objective of our study was to evaluate whether California breast cancer rates were elevated in areas with recent high agricultural pesticide use. We identified population-based invasive breast cancer cases from the California Cancer Registry for 1988-1997. We used California's pesticide use reporting data to select pesticides for analysis based on use volume, carcinogenic potential, and exposure potential. Using 1990 and 2000 U.S. Census data, we derived age- and race-specific population counts for the time period of interest. We used a geographic information system to aggregate cases, population counts, and pesticide use data for all block groups in the state. To evaluate whether breast cancer rates were related to recent agricultural pesticide use, we computed rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals using Poisson regression models, adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, and neighborhood socioeconomic status and urbanization. This ecologic (aggregative) analysis included 176,302 invasive breast cancer cases and 70,968,598 person-years of observation. The rate ratios did not significantly differ from 1 for any of the selected pesticide categories or individual agents. The results from this study provide no evidence that California women living in areas of recent, high agricultural pesticide use experience higher rates of breast cancer.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Reynolds</LastName><ForeName>Peggy</ForeName><Initials>P</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>California Department of Health Services, Environmental Health Investigations Branch, Oakland, California 94612, USA. preynold@dhs.ca.gov</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Hurley</LastName><ForeName>Susan E</ForeName><Initials>SE</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Gunier</LastName><ForeName>Robert B</ForeName><Initials>RB</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Yerabati</LastName><ForeName>Sauda</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Quach</LastName><ForeName>Thu</ForeName><Initials>T</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Hertz</LastName><ForeName>Andrew</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><GrantList CompleteYN="Y"><Grant><GrantID>U01 CA081789</GrantID><Acronym>CA</Acronym><Agency>NCI NIH HHS</Agency><Country>United States</Country></Grant><Grant><GrantID>CA81789</GrantID><Acronym>CA</Acronym><Agency>NCI NIH HHS</Agency><Country>United States</Country></Grant></GrantList><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D052061">Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013487">Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Environ Health Perspect</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0330411</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0091-6765</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D016573">Agrochemicals</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D010575">Pesticides</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994 Feb 2;86(3):232-4</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8283497</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994 Apr 20;86(8):589-99</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8145274</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Toxicol Ind Health. 1994 May-Jun;10(3):163-79</RefSource><PMID Version="1">7855866</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Annu Rev Public Health. 1995;16:61-81</RefSource><PMID Version="1">7639884</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1997 Nov;33(4):453-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9419265</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cancer Causes Control. 1997 May;8(3):420-43</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9498903</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cad Saude Publica. 1998;14 Suppl 3:125-32</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9819471</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Lancet. 1998 Dec 5;352(9143):1816-20</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9851382</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Environ Health Perspect. 1999 Mar;107(3):205-11</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10064550</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Occup Environ Med. 1999 Jan;56(1):14-21</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10341741</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Am J Ind Med. 1999 Jul;36(1):48-53</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10361586</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Am J Ind Med. 1999 Jul;36(1):135-41</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10361598</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Am J Ind Med. 1999 Jul;36(1):142-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10361599</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Epidemiol. 1999 Jun;28(3):365-74</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10405835</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Environ Health Perspect. 1997 Nov;105(11):1222-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9370519</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cancer Causes Control. 1999 Dec;10(6):561-73</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10616825</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Jan;108(1):1-4</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10620518</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000 Jan;9(1):55-63</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10667464</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cancer Causes Control. 2000 Feb;11(2):177-84</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10710203</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Occup Environ Med. 2000 Mar;42(3):284-310</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10738708</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000 Mar;9(3):271-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10750665</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 May 3;92(9):750-3</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10793112</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Eur J Cancer Prev. 1998 Feb;7 Suppl 1:S13-5</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10866030</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Epidemiology. 2000 Sep;11(5):523-31</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10955404</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Am J Epidemiol. 2000 Aug 15;152(4):363-70</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10968381</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Sep;108(9):873-81</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11017893</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000 Nov;9(11):1233-40</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11097232</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Environ Health Perspect. 2001 Mar;109 Suppl 1:35-47</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11250804</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Cancer. 2001 Feb 15;91(4):568-74</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11251983</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Environ Health Perspect. 2001 May;109(5):471-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11401758</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Eur J Cancer. 2001 Aug;37(12):1531-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11506962</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cancer Causes Control. 2001 Oct;12(8):703-11</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11562110</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Environ Health Perspect. 2001 Oct;109(10):1071-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11689348</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2002 Jan;42(1):127-36</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11706377</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Eur J Cancer Prev. 2001 Oct;10(5):459-67</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11711761</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Am J Epidemiol. 1999 Sep 1;150(5):453-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10472944</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Cancer. 1999 Nov 26;83(5):596-600</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10521792</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Soc Sci Med. 2005 Apr;60(7):1547-55</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15652686</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cancer Causes Control. 2005 Mar;16(2):139-50</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15868455</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Cancer. 1996 Jan 3;65(1):39-50</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8543394</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cancer Causes Control. 1995 Nov;6(6):551-66</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8580305</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Epidemiol. 1996 Dec;25(6):1117-24</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9027514</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Am J Epidemiol. 1997 Feb 15;145(4):366-72</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9054241</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Am J Epidemiol. 1997 Jun 15;145(12):1061-75</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9199536</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>BMJ. 1997 Jul 12;315(7100):81-5</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9240045</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Environ Health Perspect. 1997 Jun;105 Suppl 4:891-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9255576</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cancer Res. 1997 Sep 1;57(17):3728-32</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9288780</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>N Engl J Med. 1997 Oct 30;337(18):1253-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9345073</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>N Engl J Med. 1997 Oct 30;337(18):1303-4</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9345081</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Sci Total Environ. 2002 Feb 4;284(1-3):75-84</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11846176</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2002 Jan-Feb;12(1):64-80</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11859434</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Lancet Oncol. 2001 Sep;2(9):533-43</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11905707</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Am J Ind Med. 2002 Oct;42(4):296-308</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12271477</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cancer Causes Control. 2002 Sep;13(7):625-35</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12296510</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Am J Public Health. 2002 Oct;92(10):1559; author reply 1560</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12356587</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>CA Cancer J Clin. 2002 Sep-Oct;52(5):301-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12363327</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Am J Ind Med. 2003 Feb;43(2):227-33</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12541279</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Arch Environ Health. 2002 Nov-Dec;57(6):561-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12696654</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Occup Environ Med. 2003 May;60(5):348-51</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12709520</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2003 Mar 28;66(6):501-17</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12712593</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Biomed Sci Instrum. 2003;39:397-401</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12724926</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Epidemiology. 2003 Jul;14(4):386-91</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12843760</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Oct;111(13):1582-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14527836</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Endocr Pract. 2003 Sep-Oct;9(5):370-5</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14583418</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003 Dec;12(12):1523-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14693747</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Environ Res. 2004 Feb;94(2):134-44</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14757376</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Jun;112(8):889-97</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15175178</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Environ Res. 2004 Oct;96(2):206-18</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15325881</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Epidemiology. 2004 Nov;15(6):746-54</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15475725</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1976 Apr;15(4):478-84</RefSource><PMID Version="1">816406</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Environ Res. 1984 Jun;34(1):24-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">6426947</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Scand J Work Environ Health. 1984 Dec;10(6 Spec No):361-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">6535240</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Epidemiol. 1989 Mar;18(1):269-74</RefSource><PMID Version="1">2656561</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Epidemiol. 1990 Sep;19(3):483-90</RefSource><PMID Version="1">2262237</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Cancer. 1991 Apr 1;47(6):803-10</RefSource><PMID Version="1">2010224</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Environ Health Perspect. 1991 Aug;94:61-5</RefSource><PMID Version="1">1954942</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Arch Environ Health. 1992 Mar-Apr;47(2):143-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">1567239</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Apr 21;85(8):648-52</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8468722</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000369" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged, 80 and over</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016573" MajorTopicYN="N">Agrochemicals</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000633" MajorTopicYN="Y">toxicity</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001943" MajorTopicYN="N">Breast Neoplasms</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000453" MajorTopicYN="N">epidemiology</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000209" MajorTopicYN="Y">etiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002140" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">California</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D004781" MajorTopicYN="Y">Environmental Exposure</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D040362" MajorTopicYN="N">Geographic Information Systems</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006798" MajorTopicYN="N">Housing</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015994" MajorTopicYN="N">Incidence</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010575" MajorTopicYN="N">Pesticides</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000633" MajorTopicYN="Y">toxicity</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><OtherID Source="NLM">PMC1280339</OtherID></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2005</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>5</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2006</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>18</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2005</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>5</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16079069</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC1280339</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Agronomie/explor/SisAgriV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000401 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000401 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Agronomie
|area= SisAgriV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:16079069
|texte= Residential proximity to agricultural pesticide use and incidence of breast cancer in California, 1988-1997.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:16079069" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a SisAgriV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.28. |  |