Système d'information stratégique et agriculture (serveur d'exploration)

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Can forestry be a competitive land use option?

Identifieur interne : 001276 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 001275; suivant : 001277

Can forestry be a competitive land use option?

Auteurs : A. Nieuwenhuyse [Costa Rica] ; H. Hengsdijk [Costa Rica] ; B. A. M Bouman [Costa Rica] ; R. A Schipper [Pays-Bas] ; H. G P. Jansen [Costa Rica]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:EDB87F5DBD2C34A1111568B586BE2EC38AAAB585

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Model simulations are carried out to study options for managed natural forest and melina (Gmelina arborea) and teak (Tectona grandis) plantations on land suited for agriculture in the humid tropical Atlantic lowlands of Costa Rica. Tools used are a linear programming model that maximizes regional economic surplus, and the so-called technical coefficient generators that quantify input and outputs of forestry and competing crop and pasture-based beef cattle production systems. Model scenarios are carried out for varying prices of wood, beef and labor, under conditions of unlimited and restricted wood markets. Results indicate that teak and melina plantations are attractive land use options while managed natural forest is not. With unlimited wood demand, teak occupies 70% of the study area and total yearly teak production exceeds current Costa Rican wood consumption, indicating the need to include market mechanisms in the study. The area under teak is relatively insensitive to price changes between –40 and +60% of the base value of $95m−3 (1996 stumpage price). The area under melina changes considerably with price changes of ±20% of the base value of US$16m−3. Natural forest revenues must rise by 440% of the current $32m−3 to make it economically more attractive than other land use options, especially pasture for beef production and melina plantations. Increasing labor costs are likely to favor tree plantations. Increasing beef prices considerably reduce the competitiveness of melina, though not that of teak.

Url:
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00310-2


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Can forestry be a competitive land use option?</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Nieuwenhuyse, A" sort="Nieuwenhuyse, A" uniqKey="Nieuwenhuyse A" first="A" last="Nieuwenhuyse">A. Nieuwenhuyse</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Hengsdijk, H" sort="Hengsdijk, H" uniqKey="Hengsdijk H" first="H" last="Hengsdijk">H. Hengsdijk</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bouman, B A M" sort="Bouman, B A M" uniqKey="Bouman B" first="B. A. M" last="Bouman">B. A. M Bouman</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Schipper, R A" sort="Schipper, R A" uniqKey="Schipper R" first="R. A" last="Schipper">R. A Schipper</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Jansen, H G P" sort="Jansen, H G P" uniqKey="Jansen H" first="H. G P" last="Jansen">H. G P. Jansen</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:EDB87F5DBD2C34A1111568B586BE2EC38AAAB585</idno>
<date when="2000" year="2000">2000</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00310-2</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/EDB87F5DBD2C34A1111568B586BE2EC38AAAB585/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000C73</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000C73</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000C14</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000A85</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000A85</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0378-1127:2000:Nieuwenhuyse A:can:forestry:be</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">001288</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">001276</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">001276</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Can forestry be a competitive land use option?</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Nieuwenhuyse, A" sort="Nieuwenhuyse, A" uniqKey="Nieuwenhuyse A" first="A" last="Nieuwenhuyse">A. Nieuwenhuyse</name>
<affiliation></affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">Costa Rica</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Research Program on Sustainability in Agriculture (REPOSA — UAW/CATIE/MAG), Guápiles</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Guápiles</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Hengsdijk, H" sort="Hengsdijk, H" uniqKey="Hengsdijk H" first="H" last="Hengsdijk">H. Hengsdijk</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">Costa Rica</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Research Program on Sustainability in Agriculture (REPOSA — UAW/CATIE/MAG), Guápiles</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Guápiles</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bouman, B A M" sort="Bouman, B A M" uniqKey="Bouman B" first="B. A. M" last="Bouman">B. A. M Bouman</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">Costa Rica</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Research Program on Sustainability in Agriculture (REPOSA — UAW/CATIE/MAG), Guápiles</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Guápiles</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Schipper, R A" sort="Schipper, R A" uniqKey="Schipper R" first="R. A" last="Schipper">R. A Schipper</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="4">
<country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Economics and Management, Development Economics Group, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen</wicri:regionArea>
<orgName type="university">Université de Wageningue</orgName>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Wageningue</settlement>
<region nuts="2">Gueldre (province)</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Jansen, H G P" sort="Jansen, H G P" uniqKey="Jansen H" first="H. G P" last="Jansen">H. G P. Jansen</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">Costa Rica</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Research Program on Sustainability in Agriculture (REPOSA — UAW/CATIE/MAG), Guápiles</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Guápiles</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">Forest Ecology and Management</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">FORECO</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0378-1127</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher>
<date type="published" when="2000">2000</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">137</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">1–3</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="23">23</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="40">40</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0378-1127</idno>
</series>
<idno type="istex">EDB87F5DBD2C34A1111568B586BE2EC38AAAB585</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00310-2</idno>
<idno type="PII">S0378-1127(99)00310-2</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0378-1127</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Costa Rica</term>
<term>Linear programming</term>
<term>Managed natural forest</term>
<term>Teak and melina plantations</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="geographic" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Costa Rica</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Model simulations are carried out to study options for managed natural forest and melina (Gmelina arborea) and teak (Tectona grandis) plantations on land suited for agriculture in the humid tropical Atlantic lowlands of Costa Rica. Tools used are a linear programming model that maximizes regional economic surplus, and the so-called technical coefficient generators that quantify input and outputs of forestry and competing crop and pasture-based beef cattle production systems. Model scenarios are carried out for varying prices of wood, beef and labor, under conditions of unlimited and restricted wood markets. Results indicate that teak and melina plantations are attractive land use options while managed natural forest is not. With unlimited wood demand, teak occupies 70% of the study area and total yearly teak production exceeds current Costa Rican wood consumption, indicating the need to include market mechanisms in the study. The area under teak is relatively insensitive to price changes between –40 and +60% of the base value of $95m−3 (1996 stumpage price). The area under melina changes considerably with price changes of ±20% of the base value of US$16m−3. Natural forest revenues must rise by 440% of the current $32m−3 to make it economically more attractive than other land use options, especially pasture for beef production and melina plantations. Increasing labor costs are likely to favor tree plantations. Increasing beef prices considerably reduce the competitiveness of melina, though not that of teak.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>Costa Rica</li>
<li>Pays-Bas</li>
</country>
<region>
<li>Gueldre (province)</li>
</region>
<settlement>
<li>Wageningue</li>
</settlement>
<orgName>
<li>Université de Wageningue</li>
</orgName>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="Costa Rica">
<noRegion>
<name sortKey="Nieuwenhuyse, A" sort="Nieuwenhuyse, A" uniqKey="Nieuwenhuyse A" first="A" last="Nieuwenhuyse">A. Nieuwenhuyse</name>
</noRegion>
<name sortKey="Bouman, B A M" sort="Bouman, B A M" uniqKey="Bouman B" first="B. A. M" last="Bouman">B. A. M Bouman</name>
<name sortKey="Hengsdijk, H" sort="Hengsdijk, H" uniqKey="Hengsdijk H" first="H" last="Hengsdijk">H. Hengsdijk</name>
<name sortKey="Jansen, H G P" sort="Jansen, H G P" uniqKey="Jansen H" first="H. G P" last="Jansen">H. G P. Jansen</name>
</country>
<country name="Pays-Bas">
<region name="Gueldre (province)">
<name sortKey="Schipper, R A" sort="Schipper, R A" uniqKey="Schipper R" first="R. A" last="Schipper">R. A Schipper</name>
</region>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Agronomie/explor/SisAgriV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001276 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 001276 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Agronomie
   |area=    SisAgriV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:EDB87F5DBD2C34A1111568B586BE2EC38AAAB585
   |texte=   Can forestry be a competitive land use option?
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.28.
Data generation: Wed Mar 29 00:06:34 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 12 12:44:16 2024