Agricultural Biotechnology: Legal Liability Regimes from Comparative and International Perspectives
Identifieur interne : 000C57 ( Main/Curation ); précédent : 000C56; suivant : 000C58Agricultural Biotechnology: Legal Liability Regimes from Comparative and International Perspectives
Auteurs : Stuart J. Smyth [Canada] ; Drew L. Kershen [États-Unis]Source :
- Global Jurist Advances [ 1535-1661 ] ; 2006-10-25.
Abstract
As agricultural biotechnology has become an agronomic alternative, discussion has emerged about what legal liabilities, if any, exists for those who create, distribute, and produce transgenic seeds and crops. Many governments have debated legal liability as related to agricultural biotechnology. In this article, the authors offer fresh insights on legal liability from comparative law and international law perspectives. The article begins by comparing Canadian and American legal liability regimes in agricultural biotechnology. Using this North American comparison as background, the article then discusses liability issues by contrasting the statutory regimes from Denmark and Germany. Once the comparisons and contrasts between Canadian, American, Danish, and German law have been presented, the article focuses on the on-going discussion of legal liability and agricultural biotechnology at the Meeting of the Parties (MOP) of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (BSP). The authors posit that understanding the comparisons and contrasts between Canada, the United States, Denmark, and Germany assists greatly in understanding the issues and debates about legal liability and agricultural biotechnology at the international level in the BSP negotiations.
Url:
DOI: 10.2202/1535-1661.1205
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :001357
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :001274
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000641
- to stream Main, to step Merge: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000C62
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:4674F37EF02C651C2EACBA83DD5F6B9FCCA77B33Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Agricultural Biotechnology: Legal Liability Regimes from Comparative and International Perspectives</title>
<author><name sortKey="Smyth, Stuart J" sort="Smyth, Stuart J" uniqKey="Smyth S" first="Stuart J." last="Smyth">Stuart J. Smyth</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Kershen, Drew L" sort="Kershen, Drew L" uniqKey="Kershen D" first="Drew L." last="Kershen">Drew L. Kershen</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:4674F37EF02C651C2EACBA83DD5F6B9FCCA77B33</idno>
<date when="2006" year="2006">2006</date>
<idno type="doi">10.2202/1535-1661.1205</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/4674F37EF02C651C2EACBA83DD5F6B9FCCA77B33/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001357</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001357</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001274</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000641</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000641</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000C62</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000C57</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Agricultural Biotechnology: Legal Liability Regimes from Comparative and International Perspectives</title>
<author><name sortKey="Smyth, Stuart J" sort="Smyth, Stuart J" uniqKey="Smyth S" first="Stuart J." last="Smyth">Stuart J. Smyth</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country wicri:rule="url">Canada</country>
<wicri:regionArea>University of Saskatchewan</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country wicri:rule="url">Canada</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Kershen, Drew L" sort="Kershen, Drew L" uniqKey="Kershen D" first="Drew L." last="Kershen">Drew L. Kershen</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country wicri:rule="url">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>University of Oklahoma College of Law</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country wicri:rule="url">États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j">Global Jurist Advances</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1535-1661</idno>
<imprint><publisher>De Gruyter</publisher>
<date type="published" when="2006-10-25">2006-10-25</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">6</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope>
</imprint>
</series>
<idno type="istex">4674F37EF02C651C2EACBA83DD5F6B9FCCA77B33</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.2202/1535-1661.1205</idno>
<idno type="ArticleID">1535-1661.1205</idno>
<idno type="pdf">gj.2006.6.2.1205.pdf</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass></textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">As agricultural biotechnology has become an agronomic alternative, discussion has emerged about what legal liabilities, if any, exists for those who create, distribute, and produce transgenic seeds and crops. Many governments have debated legal liability as related to agricultural biotechnology. In this article, the authors offer fresh insights on legal liability from comparative law and international law perspectives. The article begins by comparing Canadian and American legal liability regimes in agricultural biotechnology. Using this North American comparison as background, the article then discusses liability issues by contrasting the statutory regimes from Denmark and Germany. Once the comparisons and contrasts between Canadian, American, Danish, and German law have been presented, the article focuses on the on-going discussion of legal liability and agricultural biotechnology at the Meeting of the Parties (MOP) of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (BSP). The authors posit that understanding the comparisons and contrasts between Canada, the United States, Denmark, and Germany assists greatly in understanding the issues and debates about legal liability and agricultural biotechnology at the international level in the BSP negotiations.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Agronomie/explor/SisAgriV1/Data/Main/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000C57 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000C57 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Agronomie |area= SisAgriV1 |flux= Main |étape= Curation |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:4674F37EF02C651C2EACBA83DD5F6B9FCCA77B33 |texte= Agricultural Biotechnology: Legal Liability Regimes from Comparative and International Perspectives }}
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.28. | ![]() |