Quantitative portfolio evaluation of US federal research and development programs
Identifieur interne : 001244 ( Istex/Curation ); précédent : 001243; suivant : 001245Quantitative portfolio evaluation of US federal research and development programs
Auteurs : Rosalie T. Ruegg [États-Unis]Source :
- Science and Public Policy [ 0302-3427 ] ; 2007-12.
Abstract
Portfolio evaluation of R&D programs, that is, assessment of the value or performance across a broad set of projects, programs, or activities, is receiving increasing attention in the federal evaluation community. Now quantitative portfolio evaluation of federal R&D programs is emerging. This paper provides a brief overview of the emerging practice, touching on efforts of the Department of Commerce's Advanced Technology Program, the Department of Agriculture's Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service, the National Institutes of Health, and the US Department of Energy (DOE). Then the focus shifts to a recent Congressionally driven quantitative portfolio evaluation to inform funding decisions of a large group of applied energy R&D programs of the DOE. These efforts represent the beginnings of systematic quantitative evaluation of entire portfolios of federal R&D projects and programs in place of the prevalent piecemeal approach.
Url:
DOI: 10.3152/030234207X259021
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :001323
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:3C8D83E5E27085DBE996AD32EC9AFCDF61D97FE0Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>Quantitative portfolio evaluation of US federal research and development programs</title>
<author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Ruegg, Rosalie T" sort="Ruegg, Rosalie T" uniqKey="Ruegg R" first="Rosalie T" last="Ruegg">Rosalie T. Ruegg</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>TIA Consulting, Inc, 111 Pinewood Place, Emerald Isle, NC 8594, USA</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>TIA Consulting, Inc, 111 Pinewood Place, Emerald Isle, NC 8594</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: ruegg@ec.rr.com</mods:affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="no comma">E-mail: ruegg@ec.rr.com</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:3C8D83E5E27085DBE996AD32EC9AFCDF61D97FE0</idno>
<date when="2007" year="2007">2007</date>
<idno type="doi">10.3152/030234207X259021</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/3C8D83E5E27085DBE996AD32EC9AFCDF61D97FE0/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001323</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001323</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001244</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">Quantitative portfolio evaluation of US federal research and development programs</title>
<author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Ruegg, Rosalie T" sort="Ruegg, Rosalie T" uniqKey="Ruegg R" first="Rosalie T" last="Ruegg">Rosalie T. Ruegg</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>TIA Consulting, Inc, 111 Pinewood Place, Emerald Isle, NC 8594, USA</mods:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>TIA Consulting, Inc, 111 Pinewood Place, Emerald Isle, NC 8594</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: ruegg@ec.rr.com</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j">Science and Public Policy</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">sci public policy</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0302-3427</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1471-5430</idno>
<imprint><publisher>Beech Tree Publishing</publisher>
<date type="published" when="2007-12">2007-12</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">34</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">10</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="723">723</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="730">730</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0302-3427</idno>
</series>
<idno type="istex">3C8D83E5E27085DBE996AD32EC9AFCDF61D97FE0</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.3152/030234207X259021</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0302-3427</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract">Portfolio evaluation of R&D programs, that is, assessment of the value or performance across a broad set of projects, programs, or activities, is receiving increasing attention in the federal evaluation community. Now quantitative portfolio evaluation of federal R&D programs is emerging. This paper provides a brief overview of the emerging practice, touching on efforts of the Department of Commerce's Advanced Technology Program, the Department of Agriculture's Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service, the National Institutes of Health, and the US Department of Energy (DOE). Then the focus shifts to a recent Congressionally driven quantitative portfolio evaluation to inform funding decisions of a large group of applied energy R&D programs of the DOE. These efforts represent the beginnings of systematic quantitative evaluation of entire portfolios of federal R&D projects and programs in place of the prevalent piecemeal approach.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Agronomie/explor/SisAgriV1/Data/Istex/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001244 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 001244 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Agronomie |area= SisAgriV1 |flux= Istex |étape= Curation |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:3C8D83E5E27085DBE996AD32EC9AFCDF61D97FE0 |texte= Quantitative portfolio evaluation of US federal research and development programs }}
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.28. | ![]() |