Livestock Mandatory Price Reporting: A Literature Review and Synthesis of Related Market Information Research
Identifieur interne : 001363 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001362; suivant : 001364Livestock Mandatory Price Reporting: A Literature Review and Synthesis of Related Market Information Research
Auteurs : Stephen R. Koontz ; Clement E. WardSource :
- Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization [ 1542-0485 ] ; 2011-07-20.
Abstract
Congress passed into law the Livestock Mandatory Reporting Act in 1999 and a mandatory pricing reporting system for livestock and meat began in 2001. The implementation was problematic. It is also difficult to find any research prior to the legislation that demonstrated inadequacies in the voluntary price reporting system that had been in existence since the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946. Thus, there is little evidence upon which to evaluate the new system. Available research suggests mandatory price reporting increased transparency and information at the national level and across cash and non-cash market choices, reduced price information in regional markets, and increased spatial and vertical market integration. Research shows diverse opinions on the success of the new system. Research also shows the potential for retail meat scanner data to significantly improve the accuracy of reported retail meat prices. Related research suggests clear benefits of the new system will be hard to measure. A primary conclusion from the literature is that benefits were unforeseen and unintended consequences were large. And that continued cost/benefit oriented research of the policy and legislation would be useful.
Url:
DOI: 10.2202/1542-0485.1254
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:3C71D82762F8458C01E6B51C96AC0BC8A033A246Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Livestock Mandatory Price Reporting: A Literature Review and Synthesis of Related Market Information Research</title><author><name sortKey="Koontz, Stephen R" sort="Koontz, Stephen R" uniqKey="Koontz S" first="Stephen R" last="Koontz">Stephen R. Koontz</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Colorado State University</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ward, Clement E" sort="Ward, Clement E" uniqKey="Ward C" first="Clement E" last="Ward">Clement E. Ward</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Oklahoma State University</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:3C71D82762F8458C01E6B51C96AC0BC8A033A246</idno><date when="2011" year="2011">2011</date><idno type="doi">10.2202/1542-0485.1254</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/3C71D82762F8458C01E6B51C96AC0BC8A033A246/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001363</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001363</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Livestock Mandatory Price Reporting: A Literature Review and Synthesis of Related Market Information Research</title><author><name sortKey="Koontz, Stephen R" sort="Koontz, Stephen R" uniqKey="Koontz S" first="Stephen R" last="Koontz">Stephen R. Koontz</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Colorado State University</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ward, Clement E" sort="Ward, Clement E" uniqKey="Ward C" first="Clement E" last="Ward">Clement E. Ward</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Oklahoma State University</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization</title><idno type="eISSN">1542-0485</idno><imprint><publisher>De Gruyter</publisher><date type="published" when="2011-07-20">2011-07-20</date><biblScope unit="volume">9</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope></imprint></series><idno type="istex">3C71D82762F8458C01E6B51C96AC0BC8A033A246</idno><idno type="DOI">10.2202/1542-0485.1254</idno><idno type="ArticleID">1542-0485.1254</idno><idno type="pdf">jafio.2011.9.1.1254.pdf</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Congress passed into law the Livestock Mandatory Reporting Act in 1999 and a mandatory pricing reporting system for livestock and meat began in 2001. The implementation was problematic. It is also difficult to find any research prior to the legislation that demonstrated inadequacies in the voluntary price reporting system that had been in existence since the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946. Thus, there is little evidence upon which to evaluate the new system. Available research suggests mandatory price reporting increased transparency and information at the national level and across cash and non-cash market choices, reduced price information in regional markets, and increased spatial and vertical market integration. Research shows diverse opinions on the success of the new system. Research also shows the potential for retail meat scanner data to significantly improve the accuracy of reported retail meat prices. Related research suggests clear benefits of the new system will be hard to measure. A primary conclusion from the literature is that benefits were unforeseen and unintended consequences were large. And that continued cost/benefit oriented research of the policy and legislation would be useful.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>degruyter-journals</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Stephen R Koontz</name><affiliations><json:string>Colorado State University</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Clement E Ward</name><affiliations><json:string>Oklahoma State University</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>mandatory price reporting</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>livestock</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>meat</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>market information</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>voluntary price reporting</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>literature review</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>1542-0485.1254</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>research-article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Congress passed into law the Livestock Mandatory Reporting Act in 1999 and a mandatory pricing reporting system for livestock and meat began in 2001. The implementation was problematic. It is also difficult to find any research prior to the legislation that demonstrated inadequacies in the voluntary price reporting system that had been in existence since the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946. Thus, there is little evidence upon which to evaluate the new system. Available research suggests mandatory price reporting increased transparency and information at the national level and across cash and non-cash market choices, reduced price information in regional markets, and increased spatial and vertical market integration. Research shows diverse opinions on the success of the new system. Research also shows the potential for retail meat scanner data to significantly improve the accuracy of reported retail meat prices. Related research suggests clear benefits of the new system will be hard to measure. A primary conclusion from the literature is that benefits were unforeseen and unintended consequences were large. And that continued cost/benefit oriented research of the policy and legislation would be useful.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>9.184</score><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>612 x 792 pts (letter)</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><keywordCount>6</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>1222</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>12353</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>78640</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>33</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>182</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Livestock Mandatory Price Reporting: A Literature Review and Synthesis of Related Market Information Research</title><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><volume>9</volume><publisherId><json:string>jafio</json:string></publisherId><issue>1</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1542-0485</json:string></eissn><title>Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization</title></host><publicationDate>2011</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2011</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.2202/1542-0485.1254</json:string></doi><id>3C71D82762F8458C01E6B51C96AC0BC8A033A246</id><score>0.063333936</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/3C71D82762F8458C01E6B51C96AC0BC8A033A246/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/3C71D82762F8458C01E6B51C96AC0BC8A033A246/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/3C71D82762F8458C01E6B51C96AC0BC8A033A246/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Livestock Mandatory Price Reporting: A Literature Review and Synthesis of Related Market Information Research</title><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>De Gruyter</publisher><availability><p>©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston</p></availability><date>2011-07-20</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Livestock Mandatory Price Reporting: A Literature Review and Synthesis of Related Market Information Research</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Stephen R</forename><surname>Koontz</surname></persName><affiliation>Colorado State University</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">Clement E</forename><surname>Ward</surname></persName><affiliation>Oklahoma State University</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization</title><idno type="eISSN">1542-0485</idno><imprint><publisher>De Gruyter</publisher><date type="published" when="2011-07-20"></date><biblScope unit="volume">9</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">3C71D82762F8458C01E6B51C96AC0BC8A033A246</idno><idno type="DOI">10.2202/1542-0485.1254</idno><idno type="ArticleID">1542-0485.1254</idno><idno type="pdf">jafio.2011.9.1.1254.pdf</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2011-07-20</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Congress passed into law the Livestock Mandatory Reporting Act in 1999 and a mandatory pricing reporting system for livestock and meat began in 2001. The implementation was problematic. It is also difficult to find any research prior to the legislation that demonstrated inadequacies in the voluntary price reporting system that had been in existence since the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946. Thus, there is little evidence upon which to evaluate the new system. Available research suggests mandatory price reporting increased transparency and information at the national level and across cash and non-cash market choices, reduced price information in regional markets, and increased spatial and vertical market integration. Research shows diverse opinions on the success of the new system. Research also shows the potential for retail meat scanner data to significantly improve the accuracy of reported retail meat prices. Related research suggests clear benefits of the new system will be hard to measure. A primary conclusion from the literature is that benefits were unforeseen and unintended consequences were large. And that continued cost/benefit oriented research of the policy and legislation would be useful.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>Keywords</head><item><term>mandatory price reporting</term></item><item><term>livestock</term></item><item><term>meat</term></item><item><term>market information</term></item><item><term>voluntary price reporting</term></item><item><term>literature review</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2011-07-20">Created</change><change when="2011-07-20">Published</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2017-01-17">References added</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/3C71D82762F8458C01E6B51C96AC0BC8A033A246/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="corpus degruyter-journals" wicri:toSee="no header"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//Atypon//DTD Atypon Systems Journal Archiving and Interchange NLM DTD v3.0.2 20101108//EN" URI="atypon_archive-interchange-dtd-3.0.2/atypon-archivearticle3.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="EN"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">jafio</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1542-0485</issn><publisher><publisher-name>De Gruyter</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1542-0485.1254</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2202/1542-0485.1254</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Livestock Mandatory Price Reporting: A Literature Review and Synthesis of Related Market Information Research</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Koontz</surname><given-names>Stephen R</given-names></name><aff id="a1"><italic>Colorado State University</italic></aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Ward</surname><given-names>Clement E</given-names></name><aff id="a2"><italic>Oklahoma State University</italic></aff></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>7</month><year>2011</year></pub-date><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><permissions><copyright-statement>©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2011</copyright-year></permissions><related-article related-article-type="pdf" xlink:href="jafio.2011.9.1.1254.pdf"></related-article><abstract><p>Congress passed into law the Livestock Mandatory Reporting Act in 1999 and a mandatory pricing reporting system for livestock and meat began in 2001. The implementation was problematic. It is also difficult to find any research prior to the legislation that demonstrated inadequacies in the voluntary price reporting system that had been in existence since the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946. Thus, there is little evidence upon which to evaluate the new system. Available research suggests mandatory price reporting increased transparency and information at the national level and across cash and non-cash market choices, reduced price information in regional markets, and increased spatial and vertical market integration. Research shows diverse opinions on the success of the new system. Research also shows the potential for retail meat scanner data to significantly improve the accuracy of reported retail meat prices. Related research suggests clear benefits of the new system will be hard to measure. A primary conclusion from the literature is that benefits were unforeseen and unintended consequences were large. And that continued cost/benefit oriented research of the policy and legislation would be useful.</p></abstract><kwd-group><title>Keywords</title><kwd>mandatory price reporting</kwd><x>, </x><kwd>livestock</kwd><x>, </x><kwd>meat</kwd><x>, </x><kwd>market information</kwd><x>, </x><kwd>voluntary price reporting</kwd><x>, </x><kwd>literature review</kwd></kwd-group><counts><page-count count="33"></page-count></counts></article-meta></front></article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Livestock Mandatory Price Reporting: A Literature Review and Synthesis of Related Market Information Research</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" lang="en" contentType="CDATA"><title>Livestock Mandatory Price Reporting: A Literature Review and Synthesis of Related Market Information Research</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Stephen R</namePart><namePart type="family">Koontz</namePart><affiliation>Colorado State University</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Clement E</namePart><namePart type="family">Ward</namePart><affiliation>Oklahoma State University</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="research-article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>De Gruyter</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2011-07-20</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2011-07-20</dateCreated><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Congress passed into law the Livestock Mandatory Reporting Act in 1999 and a mandatory pricing reporting system for livestock and meat began in 2001. The implementation was problematic. It is also difficult to find any research prior to the legislation that demonstrated inadequacies in the voluntary price reporting system that had been in existence since the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946. Thus, there is little evidence upon which to evaluate the new system. Available research suggests mandatory price reporting increased transparency and information at the national level and across cash and non-cash market choices, reduced price information in regional markets, and increased spatial and vertical market integration. Research shows diverse opinions on the success of the new system. Research also shows the potential for retail meat scanner data to significantly improve the accuracy of reported retail meat prices. Related research suggests clear benefits of the new system will be hard to measure. A primary conclusion from the literature is that benefits were unforeseen and unintended consequences were large. And that continued cost/benefit oriented research of the policy and legislation would be useful.</abstract><subject><genre>Keywords</genre><topic>mandatory price reporting</topic><topic>livestock</topic><topic>meat</topic><topic>market information</topic><topic>voluntary price reporting</topic><topic>literature review</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="eISSN">1542-0485</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">jafio</identifier><part><date>2011</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>9</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><total>33</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">3C71D82762F8458C01E6B51C96AC0BC8A033A246</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.2202/1542-0485.1254</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">1542-0485.1254</identifier><identifier type="pdf">jafio.2011.9.1.1254.pdf</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>De Gruyter</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Agronomie/explor/SisAgriV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001363 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001363 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Agronomie
|area= SisAgriV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:3C71D82762F8458C01E6B51C96AC0BC8A033A246
|texte= Livestock Mandatory Price Reporting: A Literature Review and Synthesis of Related Market Information Research
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.28. |  |